Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: A comparative study Darius Sorbi, Christopher J. Gostout, Jessica Henry, Keith D. Lindor Gastroenterology Volume 117, Issue 6, Pages 1301-1307 (December 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70280-5 Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Small-caliber upper endoscope. (A) The distal tips of the small-caliber and the conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopes are shown for comparison, along with (B) the handle of the small-caliber endoscope. Gastroenterology 1999 117, 1301-1307DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70280-5) Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Small-caliber upper endoscope. (A) The distal tips of the small-caliber and the conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopes are shown for comparison, along with (B) the handle of the small-caliber endoscope. Gastroenterology 1999 117, 1301-1307DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70280-5) Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Image quality. Endoscopic image of an esophageal stricture as viewed by the (A) small-caliber and (B) conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopes. Gastroenterology 1999 117, 1301-1307DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70280-5) Copyright © 1999 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions