Preamble Design Harmonization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0534r1 Submission Duration in L-SIG Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: May 2010.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0643 Submission Autodetection with Signature Symbol May 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
Follow-up on Doppler Design in ax
AID Selection Date: Authors: September 2010 Month Year
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
Consideration on WUR Frame Structure
Consideration on WUR Frame Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Consideration on WUR packet Design
Spec Text Motion Date: Authors: July 2018 Month Year
Terminology for AP Coordination
TGz Beijing May 2010 Closing Report
Terminology for AP Coordination
May 2015 Bandwidth and Packet Type Detection Schemes for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: Frank Hsu, et. al. (MediaTek)
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
Usage of Doppler Bit in 11ax
Terminology for AP Coordination
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
WUR FDMA Padding Content
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Changes From D6.00 to D6.10 Date: Authors: July 2007
Changes From D6.00 to D7.00 Date: Authors: July 2007
11be Peak Data Rate Analysis
Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2010 May 2010
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Preamble Design Harmonization
TGr Closing Report for May 2008
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
320MHz Channelization and Tone Plan
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Multi-link Operation Framework
False L-STF Detection Issue
Consideration on HARQ Unit
2840 Junction Ave, San Jose, CA 95134, USA
Discussion on the preamble for 11be
Multi-link Operation Framework
Joint Transmissions: Backhaul and Gain State Issues
Multi-link Operation Framework
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
PHY designs for NGV Date: Authors:
20 MHz transmission in NGV
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2012 May 2012
Control Trailer Clarifications
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Motion on Manchester Coding
Channel coding issue in HARQ
20 MHz transmission in NGV
Performance aspects of Multi-link operations with constraints
Evaluation of PAPR in WUR FDMA transmission
Further discussion for 11be preamble
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Preamble Autodetection for 11be
Consideration on HARQ feedback
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Revisiting the 20/40/80 MHz Tone Plan
Revisiting the 20/40/80 MHz Tone Plan
Forward Compatibility for WiFi Preamble Design
11be Preamble Structure Date: 09/15/19 Authors: Sep Name
Multi-link Operation Framework
Preamble design and auto-detection for 11bd
Further discussion for 11be preamble
Presentation transcript:

Preamble Design Harmonization July 2013 September 2012 doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0866r0 June 2019 Preamble Design Harmonization Date: 2019-06-27 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Email Sameer Vermani Qualcomm Alice Chen Bin Tian Menzo Wentink Youhan Kim Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm) Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)

Preamble for EHT: Desirable Traits June 2019 Preamble for EHT: Desirable Traits High level design goals for EHT preamble Minimal design burden and easy implementation Good classification performance Enough bits to accommodate new EHT features Desire to solve the auto-detection issue for multiple standards starting with EHT, together Necessitates a paradigm shift Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Traditional 802.11 auto-detection June 2019 Traditional 802.11 auto-detection Every new standard after 11a has been introducing new auto-detection markers 11n Q-BPSK rotation on symbol after L-SIG 11ac Q-BPSK rotation on the second symbol after L-SIG L-SIG length to be a multiple of 3 11ax RL-SIG Non-multiple of 3 length in L-SIG Problem with this approach The auto-detection scheme takes up spec development time in every 802.11 generation The classification engine keeps getting more and more complicated Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Preamble Design Harmonization across Generations June 2019 Preamble Design Harmonization across Generations Starting with EHT, fix the preamble auto-detection marker across multiple 802.11 generations Maintain a common auto-detection signature  Need to maintain a common structure for a few symbols after L-SIG, for multiple 802.11 generations Classification of future generations based on a PHY version identifier field (e.g., 3-4 bits) in the PHY header Value of the version identifier field differentiates between EHT and future standards Same auto-detection method can be used for all standards starting with EHT Benefit: The auto-detection problem is solved for multiple 802.11 generations together Common structure for EHT and beyond New SIG contains a PHY Version Identifier whose value identifies this as 11be 802.11be preamble Legacy preamble (may include RL-SIG) New PHY header Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)

Summary We proposed a paradigm shift in the preamble design June 2019 Harmonization of auto-detection for multiple standards, starting with EHT Introduce a PHY version identifier field in the PHY header Sameer Vermani (Qualcomm)