Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

(your state) Master Farmer Program
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Upper Blackfoot Mining Complex
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
Update on Wyoming Draft 303(d) List and Changes to Watershed Planning.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Innovative Data Management and Planning Strategies for TMDL Compliance
Mulberry River Watershed
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Fish and Watershed Restoration Efforts in the Ninemile Drainage: Potential, Progress, and Opportunity Clark Fork R.
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
MACo Winter Conference
Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development
Watershed Restoration on the Lolo NF Benefits for the Clark Fork Watershed Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist, Lolo National Forest Jennifer Mickelson,
Water Quality Credit Trading
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Environmental Management Commission Information Item January 8, 2015
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
John Babcock, Bruce Anderson, and Gary Ingman,
Clark Fork Voluntary Nutrient Reduction Program (VNRP):
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Presentation transcript:

Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs

Montana’s Watershed Restoration are based on TMDL Requirements Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are science-based water quality restoration specifications to meet state water quality standards (prepared by Montana DEQ using 7 specific items required for EPA approval in accordance with the year 2001 Montana Court Settlement Agreement) Identify Water Quality Standards (including water quality targets) Water Quality Impairment Status (identification of impaired waters) Source Assessment (sources/amounts of non-point or point source pollutants) Allocations of Allowable Loads to Each Source (reductions using reasonable land, soil and water conservation practices, i.e. Best Management Practices (BMPs)) Includes Margin of Safety and Seasonality (times of the year) Monitoring Strategy (to measure progress toward water quality standards) Public Participation (Conservation Districts, Watershed Groups, and publics)

Under Montana Law, TMDLs…. Can not divest, diminish or imperil water rights The implementation of a non-point source TMDL restoration BMPs are normally voluntary The implementation of point source TMDL restoration BMPs are necessary (usually through permits or remediation activities).

Montana’s TMDL Activity Map

Upper Clark Fork TMDL Status TMDLs completed: Elk Creek –Sediment (June 1997) Clark Fork Voluntary Nutrient Reduction Program –mainstem VNRP (Aug. 1997) Upper Lolo Creek –Sediment (April 2003) Blackfoot Headwaters - Metals (June 2003) and Sediment (April 2004) Ninemile - Sediment and Metals (January 2005) Bitterroot Headwaters – Sediment (October 2005) Prospect Creek – Metals (October 2006) Sediment & Temperature (January 2009) Middle Blackfoot/Nevada Creek –Sediment and Metals (September 2008) St. Regis - Sediment and Temperature (September 2008) Lower Blackfoot – Sediment and Temperature (December 2009) Upper Clark Fork Tributaries – Metals, Sediment & Temperature (Dec. 2009) TMDLs nearing completion: Bitterroot Mainstem – Sediment and Temperature (2010) Little Blackfoot – Sediment and Metals (2010) Flint Creek – Sediment and Metals (2010?) TMDLs in planning: Lower Clark Fork Tributaries - Sediment Middle Clark Fork and Drummond Tributaries – Nutrients, Metals, Sediment and Temperature Rock Creek- Nutrients, Sediment and Metals Clark Fork River (mainstem) and Silver Bow Creek – Metals and Nutrients

TMDL Water Quality Targets (to meet Standards) typically include: Sediment Channel dimension, stream sediment size measures, stream side vegetation, BMPs for significant human sources Nutrients Summer total phosphorus, total nitrogen and benthic algal chlorophyll a targets, BMPs for significant human sources Temperature Daily water temperature, stream shade, channel width, discharge, BMPs for human sources Metals Metal concentrations, BMPs for human sources

TMDLs are followed up by a local Watershed Restoration Plan (WRP) WRP identifies the tools and priorities for achieving priority TMDL targets: For example: Agricultural BMPs and application areas Mine drainage BMPs and application areas Waste Water Treatment Plant efficiency study and subsequent engineering/building of facility Local conservation districts and watershed groups will implement WRP actions or coordinate/partner with other groups to implement their WRP.

Watershed Actions after a TMDL: Federal/state/local nonpoint source restoration coordination may occur voluntarily TMDL can be used to guide/leverage other state and federal grant funds Implement point source reductions via permits Upcoming TMDL implementation reviews (i.e. five year reviews)