Pamela M. England, Yinong Zhang, Dennis A. Dougherty, Henry A. Lester 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (October 2007)
Activity-Dependent Regulation of HCN Pacemaker Channels by Cyclic AMP
Molecular Determinants of U-Type Inactivation in Kv2.1 Channels
Binding Site in Eag Voltage Sensor Accommodates a Variety of Ions and is Accessible in Closed Channel  William R. Silverman, John P.A. Bannister, Diane.
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Interaction between Extracellular Hanatoxin and the Resting Conformation of the Voltage-Sensor Paddle in Kv Channels  Hwa C Lee, Julia M Wang, Kenton.
Rundown of the Hyperpolarization-Activated KAT1 Channel Involves Slowing of the Opening Transitions Regulated by Phosphorylation  Xiang D. Tang, Toshinori.
Transmembrane Movement of the Shaker K+ Channel S4
Functional Interactions at the Interface between Voltage-Sensing and Pore Domains in the Shaker Kv Channel  Gilberto J. Soler-Llavina, Tsg-Hui Chang,
Voltage Sensor–Trapping
B.Alexander Yi, Yu-Fung Lin, Yuh Nung Jan, Lily Yeh Jan  Neuron 
Differential Modulation of Cardiac Ca2+ Channel Gating by β-Subunits
Altered Subthreshold Sodium Currents and Disrupted Firing Patterns in Purkinje Neurons of Scn8a Mutant Mice  Indira M Raman, Leslie K Sprunger, Miriam.
Iman M Shammat, Sharona E Gordon  Neuron 
Helen C. Lai, Michael Grabe, Yuh Nung Jan, Lily Yeh Jan  Neuron 
James Kim, Smita Ghosh, Deborah A Nunziato, Geoffrey S Pitt  Neuron 
Kimberly Matulef, Galen E Flynn, William N Zagotta  Neuron 
Coupling Gβγ-Dependent Activation to Channel Opening via Pore Elements in Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels  Rona Sadja, Karine Smadja, Noga Alagem,
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Unitary Conductance Variation in Kir2
An Unaltered Orthosteric Site and a Network of Long-Range Allosteric Interactions for PNU in α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors  Christopher B.
David C. Immke, Edwin W. McCleskey  Neuron 
Functional Interactions at the Interface between Voltage-Sensing and Pore Domains in the Shaker Kv Channel  Gilberto J. Soler-Llavina, Tsg-Hui Chang,
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2004)
Modulation of the Gating of Unitary Cardiac L-Type Ca2+ Channels by Conditioning Voltage and Divalent Ions  Ira R. Josephson, Antonio Guia, Edward G.
Narae Shin, Heun Soh, Sunghoe Chang, Do Han Kim, Chul-Seung Park 
Alvaro Villarroel, M.Paz Regalado, Juan Lerma  Neuron 
Yael Stern-Bach, Sebastian Russo, Menahem Neuman, Christian Rosenmund 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
A Genetically Encoded Optical Probe of Membrane Voltage
Dorine M. Starace, Enrico Stefani, Francisco Bezanilla  Neuron 
H.Peter Larsson, Fredrik Elinder  Neuron 
Carlos A. Obejero-Paz, Stephen W. Jones, Antonio Scarpa 
Immunity to K1 Killer Toxin
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Sharona E Gordon, Michael D Varnum, William N Zagotta  Neuron 
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages (November 2012)
Alexander I. Sobolevsky, Christine Beck, Lonnie P. Wollmuth  Neuron 
KCNKØ: Single, Cloned Potassium Leak Channels Are Multi-Ion Pores
Samuel J. Goodchild, Logan C. Macdonald, David Fedida 
The I182 Region of Kir6.2 Is Closely Associated with Ligand Binding in KATP Channel Inhibition by ATP  Lehong Li, Jing Wang, Peter Drain  Biophysical.
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Asymmetrical Contributions of Subunit Pore Regions to Ion Selectivity in an Inward Rectifier K+ Channel  Scott K. Silverman, Henry A. Lester, Dennis A.
KCNE1 Binds to the KCNQ1 Pore to Regulate Potassium Channel Activity
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Localization of Divalent Cation-Binding Site in the Pore of a Small Conductance Ca2+- Activated K+ Channel and Its Role in Determining Current-Voltage.
Inhibition of αβ Epithelial Sodium Channels by External Protons Indicates That the Second Hydrophobic Domain Contains Structural Elements for Closing.
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Vladimir Avdonin, Toshinori Hoshi  Biophysical Journal 
Strong G-Protein-Mediated Inhibition of Sodium Channels
Distinct Functional and Pharmacological Properties of Triheteromeric GluN1/GluN2A/GluN2B NMDA Receptors  Kasper B. Hansen, Kevin K. Ogden, Hongjie Yuan,
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Jeffrey S Diamond, Dwight E Bergles, Craig E Jahr  Neuron 
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e3 (August 2017)
Kinetics of P2X7 Receptor-Operated Single Channels Currents
Regulating the Conducting States of a Mammalian Serotonin Transporter
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Interaction between Extracellular Hanatoxin and the Resting Conformation of the Voltage-Sensor Paddle in Kv Channels  Hwa C Lee, Julia M Wang, Kenton.
Kenton J Swartz, Roderick MacKinnon  Neuron 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
A Distinct Contribution of the δ Subunit to Acetylcholine Receptor Channel Activation Revealed by Mutations of the M2 Segment  Jian Chen, Anthony Auerbach 
Galen E Flynn, William N Zagotta  Neuron 
David Naranjo, Hua Wen, Paul Brehm  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Backbone Mutations in Transmembrane Domains of a Ligand-Gated Ion Channel  Pamela M. England, Yinong Zhang, Dennis A. Dougherty, Henry A. Lester  Cell  Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 89-98 (January 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80962-9

Figure 1 The Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor (nAChR) Studied by Backbone Mutagenesis (A) The probable transmembrane topology of an nAChR subunit and location of the two regions studied. The extracellular agonist-binding site comprises ∼200 residues at the N terminus. The Pro-221 residue is thought to lie in the middle of the M1 transmembrane domain. The M2 transmembrane domain extends approximately from positions 243 (abbreviated 1′) to 264 (abbreviated 22′). The five subunits (α2βγδ) are arranged pseudosymmetrically to form the channel pore. The pore is lined primarily by the M2 domains from each of the five subunits. (B) Structures of six residues (amino acids and α-hydroxy acids) incorporated into the nAChR in this study. (C) Schematic of the backbone peptide bond versus the backbone ester bond. Structures of a protein chain containing leucine, leucic acid, or proline residues are shown. The drawing emphasizes differences in hydrogen-bonding patterns. Neither the proline residue nor the ester residue formed from leucic acid can serve as a hydrogen bond donor. Cell 1999 96, 89-98DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80962-9)

Figure 2 Base-Catalyzed Hydrolysis Shows Site-Specific Formation of an Ester Backbone in the α Subunit of the Nicotinic Receptor Expressed in Oocytes Hydrolysis of esters formed by incorporation of Lah, an α-hydroxy acid, was studied at two positions. Oocytes were injected with mRNA encoding the wild-type α subunits containing the hemagglutinin epitope and either no additional mutation (lanes 1, 2) or a UAG codon at position 253 (lanes 3, 4) or position 146 (lanes 5, 6), with mRNA encoding wild-type βγ, and δ subunits, and with THG73 tRNA acylated with Lah. Membranes were isolated and, in lanes marked with (+), also exposed to base. Membranes were then analyzed by gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting for the hemagglutinin epitope. Although the wild-type α subunit receptor is not hydrolyzed, the two ester backbone mutant subunits produce lower-MW bands corresponding to the expected MW of the C-terminal hydrolysis fragment. Cell 1999 96, 89-98DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80962-9)

Figure 3 Characteristics of nAChR with Side Chain and Backbone Mutations at α 221 and at the Aligning Positions in Other Subunits (A) α-bungarotoxin binding for the wild-type (WT) and the α Pro221Leu receptor types. Note that the α Pro221Leu receptor displays carbachol-blocked α-bungarotoxin binding, showing that there are surface receptors, even though no functional responses were measured. (B) Dose–response relations are shown for the wild-type nAChR (EC50, 47 μ M; Hill coefficient, 1.65) as well as for the three ester backbone mutations: α Pro221Lah (88 μ M; 1.48)α Pro221Vah (193 μ M; 1.36), and α Pro221Aah (19 μ M; 2.47). The lines are least square fits to the dose–response parameters. (C) Dose–response relations for ACh receptors containing the α Pro221Leu mutation and the aligning mutations at other subunits. The α Pro221Leu-α Leu9′Ser receptor has an EC50 of 14 μ M and a Hill coefficient of ∼2. The β Pro223Leu γ Pro229Leu, and δ Pro235Ala receptors have EC50 values of 34, 59, and 70 μ M and Hill coefficients of 1.46, 1.42, and 1.26, respectively. Cell 1999 96, 89-98DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80962-9)

Figure 4 Single-Channel Analysis of the α Pro221Lah Mutant (A) Examples of single-channel openings at several ACh concentrations. Bursts of approximately equal duration are displayed. Calibrations: 25 ms, 5 pA. (B) Open-channel duration histograms for the wild-type (WT) and α Pro221Lah mutant, measured at 5 μ M ACh. The time constant for the predominant fraction of open interval distribution was 3.07 ms for the mutant, compared with 3.15 ms for the wild type. (C) Dose–response analysis. The EC50 is 49 μ M and the Hill coefficient is 1.47 for the α Pro221Lah mutant (open squares), compared with wild-type values of 30 μ M and 1.6 (solid squares). The discrepancies in the EC50 values between the single-channel and whole-cell recordings may arise from the impact on the amplitudes of macroscopic currents of channel block and desensitization introduced by ACh. Cell 1999 96, 89-98DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80962-9)

Figure 5 Analysis of Gating for Amide-to-Ester Mutations in the M2 Region (A) Changes in macroscopic EC50 produced by the amide-to-ester mutation at each position. The symbols are based on the data in Table 2. The closed symbols represent mutations from wild-type (WT) Leu or Val residues to Lah or Vah residues. The open squares represent positions where the wild-type residue is neither Leu nor Val; the ratio is (EC50 for the Lah mutant)/(EC50 for the Leu mutant). The open circles represent positions where the wild-type residue is neither Leu nor Val but the Leu mutation did not express; the ratio is (EC50 for the Lah mutant)/(EC50 for wild type). (B) Hill coefficients for the ester backbone mutants. The wild-type value is given at left. (C) Voltage dependence for responses at five ester backbone mutants. The parameter a, defined in the text, is plotted. The wild-type value is given at left. (D) Voltage-jump relaxation time constants at −120 mV for the five ester backbone mutants studied in (C). The wild-type value is given at left. Cell 1999 96, 89-98DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80962-9)

Figure 6 Single-Channel Recordings with an M2 Backbone Mutation: The α Leu9′Lah Receptor The upper and lower traces show recordings at 100 and 5 μ M ACh, respectively. The open-time histogram for 5 μ M ACh is shown in the bottom panel. The smooth line represents a fit of open intervals to two components, with time constants of 1.1 ms (63%) and 5.9 ms (37%). Cell 1999 96, 89-98DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80962-9)

Figure 7 Voltage-Jump Relaxations for the α Leu19′Lah Mutant (A) The top panel shows voltage-clamp currents in the absence of ACh. The membrane potential was held at −80 mV, stepped to +40 mV for 20 ms, then stepped to test potentials at 20 mV increments between +40 mV and −140 mV. As a result, the ACh-induced conductance relaxed to a new steady-state value over a period of several tens of ms. The middle panel shows the same voltage protocol applied in the presence of 2.5 μ M ACh. The subtracted traces, shown in the bottom panel, isolate the voltage-jump relaxation of the ACh-induced current. A single exponential time course was fitted to each of the subtracted traces between −20 mV and −140 mV and superimposes exactly on the traces. Vertical calibrations: 1 μ A for the top two panels, 0.5 μ A for the bottom panel. (B) Time constants for the fits as a function of membrane potential. (C) Steady-state amplitudes of the ACh-induced currents near the end of the test pulses. (D) Voltage dependence of the steady-state currents. The ACh-induced currents were converted to conductance by dividing by (V − Vrev), where the reversal potential Vrev is +10 mV for this cell. The conductance was plotted on a logarithmic axis and fitted to an exponential function of membrane potential. Cell 1999 96, 89-98DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80962-9)