School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Fostering A Positive School Culture Through Collaborative Administrative Practices A Framework for Excellence: The Role of Administration.
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
PORTFOLIO.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
EstándAres Claves para Líderes Educativos publicados por The Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortion Standards (ISLLC) desarrollados por The Council.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys ™ Module 8: Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Spring 2010 Teacher and.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 School Counseling Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams,
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY11-12
Roles and Responsibilities of School Principals
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
What should be the basis of
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
How many balls can you juggle at one time?. Identify 7 balls extension middle managers juggle every day in leading the extension program Identify strategies.
Technology Leadership
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
School Social Workers’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 School Social Workers Office, SSS Paulette Herbert, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office,
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
SAS CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY Professional SAS Strand Rubrics December 14, 2009 DRAFT 1.0 Curriculum Design PAGE 0.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Colorado Department of Education
Competency Reflections
Strategic Human Resources Management Providing Accountability for Your Agency’s Mission in Indian Country SAIGE 2019.
Presentation transcript:

School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO

Evaluation System for Leaders The Cobb Keys Leader’s performance evaluation system consists of three documents: Performance Rubric Annual Report Guidelines and Instructions

Performance Rubric The Cobb Keys Leader’s Performance Standard Rubric establishes the 8 Standards which are the framework for the evaluation instrument used to assess a Leader’s annual performance. Standards-based Instruction Data Analysis and Assessment Organizational Culture Professional Learning and Development Performance Management and Process Improvement Managing Operations Leading Change Relationships Development

Performance Rubric cont… Each Element identifies specific behavior/performance that will be evaluated and assigned an annual performance rating of Not Evident, Emerging, or Proficient. a. Proficient – 4 “Proficient” Standards ratings and a “Satisfactory” Summary Rating on Professional Duties and Responsibilities b. Emerging – Fewer than 4 “Proficient” Standards ratings (no more than 1 “Not Evident”) and “Satisfactory” or “Needs Improvement” Summary Rating on Duties/Responsibilities. c. Unsatisfactory – 2 or more “Not Evident” Standards ratings OR “Unsatisfactory” Summary Rating on Duties/Responsibilities.

Annual Performance Report The Leader’s Performance Evaluation Annual Report assesses performance on sixteen Standard Elements and twelve Leader Duties and Responsibilities, resulting in an annual overall performance rating. A. Standards-Based Instruction (SBI): To ensure that all students achieve proficiency relative to the Georgia Performance Standards (GPS/QCC). SBI-1: Engages instructional staff in collaborative work to design, monitor, and revise instruction to ensure that students achieve proficiency on required curriculum standards and District expectations for learning. SBI-2: Leads others in a collaborative process to set high expectations for all learners in a standards-based classroom.

Annual Performance Report B. Data Analysis and Assessment (DAA): The process of collecting, organizing, and analyzing data with the purpose of extracting useful information, facilitating conclusions, identifying patterns of achievement and underachievement, and planning. DAA-1: Monitors and evaluates the use of a variety of assessment data to maximize student learning and achievement. DAA-2: Engages school instructional staff in the collaborative analysis of assessment data to plan for continuous improvement for each student.

Annual Performance Report C. Organizational Culture (OC): The norms, values, attitudes, beliefs, and practices associated within the school to ensure organizational productivity. OC-1: Develops or leads others to develop plans of action that address the analysis of a school culture. OC-2: Leads processes and structures that support a pervasively academic climate within a culture of high expectations for all students and adults. OC-3: Develops and implements distributed leadership as part of the process of shared leadership D. Professional Learning and Development (PL&D): The means by which staff acquire, enhance, and refine the knowledge, skills, and commitment necessary to create and support high levels of learning for all students. PL&D-1: Leads job-embedded professional learning that aligns with school and District improvement goals and supports student achievement.

Annual Performance Report PL&D-2: Evaluates the implementation and impact of professional learning on teacher practices, continuous school improvement, and student learning. E. Performance Management and Process Improvement (PM&PI): The process of developing strategies, aligning resources, monitoring progress, and overcoming barriers to District and school goals. PM&PI-1: Engages all stakeholders in developing, implementing, and monitoring a strategic plan that has a positive impact on student achievement using an accountability system. PM&PI-2: Identifies and addresses gaps in leader and/or staff performance.

Annual Performance Report F. Managing Operations (MO): The functions that leaders perform to support staff and facilitate the core work of the schools. MO-1: Monitors school to ensure safe, orderly, and engaging learning environments, including facilities that reflect state, system, and local school rules, policies, and procedures. MO-2: Works collaboratively to implement fiscal policies that equitably and adequately distribute all available resources to support the success of all students.

Annual Performance Report G. Leading Change (LC): The leader’s ability to develop and implement an organizational vision and strategies that motivate others to take actions to improve processes, staff performance, and student learning. LC-1: Drives and sustains change in a collegial environment focused on a continuous improvement model that supports all students meeting high standards. H. Relationships Development (RD): The process of developing and enhancing internal and external relationships which advance the goals of the District, school, staff, and students. RD-1: Supports the engagement of parents, community and other stakeholders in the decision-making and problem solving processes to have a positive effect on student learning and to achieve the school’s vision. RD-2: Models impartiality, sensitivity to student diversity and to community norms and values, and ethical considerations in interactions with others.

Evaluation System for Leaders Next, your evaluator will assign a rating to each of 12 Leader Duties and Responsibilities Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Satisfactory

Evaluation System for Leaders Leader Duties & Responsibilities Interacts in a professional manner with parents, staff, and stakeholders. Is accessible to parents, staff, and stakeholders. Facilitates effective two-way communication between the school/district and home. Works cooperatively with district administrators, local school staff, special support personnel, colleagues, parents, and other stakeholders

Evaluation System for Leaders Leader Duties & Responsibilities Demonstrates prompt and regular attendance. Maintains accuracy and confidentiality of information and records. Attends and participates in faculty meetings, district level meetings, and other assigned meetings and activities according to school and district policies. Models correct use of oral and written language

Evaluation System for Leaders 12 Leader Duties and Responsibilities Manages operations within the structure of Georgia public education rules, regulations, and laws. Makes leadership decisions based on legal and ethical principles to promote equity Organizes a safe, orderly, and engaging learning environment, including facilities, which reflect state, district, and local rules, policies, and procedures Demonstrates responsible fiscal management of funds in compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.