OGC Document Number Document Name Volume 1,OGC CDB Core Standard: Model and Physical Data Store Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Coast Survey IHO S-100 and S st Century Framework Data Structure for Hydrographic and Related Data.
Advertisements

National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark GIS Guidance update.
® Hosted and Sponsored by ESA/ESRIN Progress towards a standard WMO Hydrologic Metadata Model 86th OGC Technical Committee Frascati, Italy Irina Dornblut,
® OGC Web Services Initiative, Phase 9 (OWS-9): Innovations Thread - OPeNDAP James Gallagher and Nathan Potter, OPeNDAP © 2012 Open Geospatial Consortium.
1 TECO-WIS, 6-8 November 2006 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON THE WMO INFORMATION SYSTEM Seoul, Republic of Korea, 6-8 November 2006 ISO 191xx series of geographic.
Martin Doerr, Gerald Hiebel, Institute of Computer Science
Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.
© Rheinmetall Defence 2013 The Geospatial Catalogue and Database Repository (GCDR) and the Knowledge Management System (KMS) Shane Reschke – Technical.
 Definition  Components  Advantages  Limitations Contents  DBMS DBMS  Functions Functions  Architecture Architecture.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
® ® OGC Web Services Initiative, Phase 9 (OWS-9) Initial Ideas Nadine Alameh OWS-9 Initiative Director Copyright © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium.
Standards and the US National Spatial Data Infrastructure Improving access to geospatial information.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
Intro to GIS and ESRI Trainers: Randy Jones, GIS Technician, Douglas County Jon Fiskness, GISP GIS Coordinator, City of Superior.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Joint Research Centre The Inspire Geoportal Validator.
What is Information Modelling (and why do we need it in NEII…)? Dominic Lowe, Bureau of Meteorology, 29 October 2013.
® SOS 2.0 Profile For Hydrology 91 st OGC Technical Committee Geneva, Switzerland Simon Jirka (52°North) 11 June 2014 Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial.
Copyright © 2009, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Time issue : Meteo Domain needs and WMS present means Meteorology DWG Frédéric Guillaud, Marie-Françoise.
® GRDC Hydrologic Metadata - core concepts - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of WMO at BfG Copyright.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Data Resource Management.
GeoMAPP: Using Metadata to Help Preserve Geospatial Content Matt Peters, Utah’s Automated Geographic Reference Center Glen McAninch, Kentucky Department.
Exploring Spatial Data Infrastructure in an Open Source World Jacqueline Lowe UNC-Asheville National Environmental Modeling and Analysis Center Jacqueline.
Rupa Tiwari, CSci5980 Fall  Course Material Classification  GIS Encyclopedia Articles  Classification Diagram  Course – Encyclopedia Mapping.
Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation ADQ, INSPIRE and Metadata AIXM 5.1 Seminar.
Geography Markup Language (GML). What is GML? – Scope  The Geography Markup Language is  a modeling language for geographic information  an encoding.
® Sponsored by G eo S ci ML : v4 Modularization OGC TC Crystal City March 24, 2014.
Develop Use Cases Evaluate Existing Models Develop/Extend Model Test ModelDocument 1. Commercial This use-case involves identifying the location and properties.
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
NATURE-SDIplus Metadata Specification Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO
Tutorial on XML Tag and Schema Registration in an ISO/IEC Metadata Registry Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries Tuesday, January 21, 2003; 4:45-5:30.
Proposal of Developing Standards for Public Transport From ISO/TC204/WG8 Pacific Rim Economies At 29th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Taipei,
Geography Markup Language (GML). GML What is GML? – Scope  The Geography Markup Language is  a modeling language for geographic information  an encoding.
Application Profiles Application profiles -- are schemas which consist of data elements drawn from one or more namespaces, combined together by implementers,
ISO 191** Overview A “Family” of Standards. Resources ISO Standards Web Page – Technical.
® Using (testing?) the HY_Features model, 95th OGC Technical Committee Boulder, Colorado USA Rob Atkinson 3 June 2015 Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial.
A look to the past for the future- The North American Profile Sharon Shin Metadata Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee.
GeoSciML meeting April 24th-28th 2006 INSPIRE Drafting teams.
® Sponsored by Hosted by HY_Features Part 3 - OWL encoding: rhyme and reason 96th OGC Technical Committee Nottingham, UK Rob Atkinson 17 September 2015.
1 XFDU Issues and Status Report Louis Reich IPR WG Chair Sergey Nikhinsen NASA/CSC CCSDS/MOIMS IPR/DAI Workshop 05-December-2005.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
® Hosted and Sponsored by W3C Provenance Working Group Update 80th OGC Technical Committee Austin, Texas (USA) Carl Reed March 20, 2012 Copyright © 2012.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey WaterML Presentation to FGDC SWG Nate Booth January 30, 2013.
FGDC  ISO MTX (Metadata Transformation XSLT) Bruce Westcott – Geospatial Metadata Consultant.
1 © 2007 Humboldt Consortium Fraunhoferstraße Darmstadt HUMBOLDT Surveys: The Handbook of Standards and the User Classification.
Architecture DWG Closing Plenary Report
Spatial and Attribute Data Management
Program / Interoperability Update CDB
Chris Little Marie-Francoise Voidrot
Common DataBase (CDB) Best Practice Document(s)
S-121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries
CEOP/IGWCO Joint Meeting, Feb.28  March 4, University of Tokyo, Japan
S-121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
S-121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries
AIXM CCB meeting EUROCONTROL HQ, Brussels
Status Update for Extended/Multiple Feature Data Dictionary CRP WP
What does the Joint Staff J7 need from the OGC moving forward?
Point Cloud ad hoc 95th OGC Technical Committee Boulder, Colorado USA
Proposal for a procedure for adoption of INSPIRE good practices
Meeting of Working Group Data & Information Sharing (DIS)
Developing a Metadata Element Set and/or an Application Profile
Met Ocean DWG Progress report Met Ocean WMS 1.3 Best Practices
Club d’innovation – Forage-Puits et Monitoring
Joni Kaitaranta HELCOM Secretariat
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2014.
WG standards for data access/exchange
SDI from a technological perspective: Standards
Final Version (after MS revision)
Presentation transcript:

OGC Document Number Document Name 15-113 15-112 16-007 15-120 16-005 Volume 1,OGC CDB Core Standard: Model and Physical Data Store Structure  15-112 Volume 3 OGC CDB Terms and Definitions   Volume 9, metadata / schemas 16-007 Volume 11 OGC CDB Core Standard Conceptual Model  15-120 Volume 0, OGC CDB Core Primer (Best Practice) 16-005 Volume 2 OGC CDB Core Model and Physical Structure Annexes (Best Practice)  16-070 Volume 4, OGC CDB Use of Shapefiles for Vector Data Storage (Best Practice)  16-004 Volume 5, OGC CDB Radar Cross Section (RCS) Models (Best Practice)  16-009 Volume 6, OGC CDB Rules for Encoding Data using OpenFlight (Best Practice)  16-010 Volume 7, OGC CDB Data Model Guidance (Best Practice)  16-011 Volume 8, OGC CDB Spatial Reference System Guidance (Best Practice)  16-006 Volume 10, OGC CDB Implementation Guidance (Best Practice)  16-003 Volume 12 OGC CDB Navaids Attribution and Navaids Attribution Enumeration Values (Best Practice)

Simulated Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

These guys need CDB 1.0, with traceability to the 10 years of successful implementations of the ad-hoc specification…putting content into these VR theatres

This guy needs a core standard and schema, and lots of innovation in the CDB 2.0 standard to put the content in this VR theatre