Efficacy in patients who received biologic and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in combination with rituximab. aLast-observation carried-forward.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

2013 Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative An.

Advertisements

The effects of the spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor fostamatinib on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of.

Algorithm based on the 2016 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Algorithm based on the.

Figure 3 Simplified EULAR and GRAPPA

Figure 2 Simplified EULAR and GRAPPA

Mean change from baseline in disease and disability outcomes at 6 months for abatacept initiators by anti-CCP status. Mean change from baseline in disease.

Mean change from baseline in (A) DAS28-4(ESR), (B) CDAI and (C) HAQ-DI

Change in secondary endpoints over time: (A) LS mean change from baseline in DAS28-CRP through Week 32, (B) mean change from baseline in CRP through Week.

Mean change in patient-reported outcomes from baseline to Week 25 with biweekly or monthly pegloticase compared with placebo. Mean change in patient-reported.

Disease activity over time in autoantibody-positive patients treated with belimumab. Disease activity over time in autoantibody-positive patients treated.

(A) EULAR response based on DAS28 (ESR, otherwise CRP) and (B) Boolean remission, at 6 months in patients treated with abatacept as a first-line biologic.

Percentage of patients achieving minimal disease activity (MDA): A

ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates during the 12-week study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with baricitinib or placebo. ACR20,

Patients included in linear extrapolation and observed/last observation carried forward analyses at week 48. Patients who were rescued or discontinued.

Percentage of patients achieving DAS28 (CRP) < 3

Association between anti-CCP antibody status and response to remission, LDA and mACR by anti-CCP status and TNFi initiators (multivariable models). Association.

Figure 1 Simplified EULAR and GRAPPA

Percentages of (A) ACR 20, 50, and 70 responders, and (B) patients with DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2 or < 2.6 during 5 years. Percentages of (A) ACR 20, 50, and 70.

Example choice set: DAS28, 28 joint disease activity score; EUR, Euro; QALY, quality-adjusted life year. * In the choice sets, changes of the individual.

Percentage of patients achieving EULAR response

Efficacy end points: the percentage of patients achieving an improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) of (A) 20% (ACR20), (B) 50% (ACR50)

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes following up to 3 years of open-label adalimumab as monotherapy after 2 years of adalimumab+methotrexate.

Improvement in PROs, TJC, SJC and PGA at month 6 in patients achieving (A) ACR50, (B) CDAI LDA and (C) HAQ-DI

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients randomised to CZP 200 mg Q2W and CZP 400 mg Q4W to week 96. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Changes in clinical disease activity over 24 months on a continuous scale in SWEFOT trial participants randomised to triple therapy or anti-TNF with available.

Disease activities evaluated as a comparison between abatacept plus MTX and placebo plus MTX groups. Disease activities evaluated as a comparison between.

Mean change from baseline in disease and disability outcomes at 6 months for TNFi initiators by anti-CCP status. Mean change from baseline in disease and.

HAQ-DI change from baseline and proportion of patients achieving MCID after 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or in combination.

ACR response rates at 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or in combination with cDMARDs or MTX. The proportions of patients.

ACR responder rates in patients receiving CZP from Week 0, stratified by prior anti-TNF exposure (A−C) and the proportion of patients receiving CZP from.

The severity of fatigue over 8 years of disease in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. The severity of fatigue over 8 years of disease in early rheumatoid.

Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65 years versus younger patients: ACR outcomes at (A) week 12 and (B) week 24. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65.

Response rates for patients achieving 50% (A), 70% (B), and 90% (C) improvement in ACR criteria, and normal physical function (D) over the course of 10.

Additional efficacy outcomes for the 12-week study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with baricitinib or placebo. Additional efficacy.

Patient-reported outcomes: proportion of patients with clinically meaningful improvements in (A) SF-36 PCS and MCS at Week 52 and Week 104*†‡ and (B) HAQ-DI.

Column bar graphs showing Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores and pain score on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (scale 0–10) that were collected at.

DAS28-CRP cut-off values corresponding to the DAS28-ESR cut-off values for remission, LDA and HDA, average of three statistical approaches. DAS28-CRP cut-off.

A. A. Change from baseline in Genant-modified Sharp total score. B. Erosion score. C. Joint-space narrowing score in patients originally randomized to.

Treatment strategy. Treatment strategy. For every patient, changes of treatment were analysed per change, for up to five subsequent therapeutic changes.

Algorithm based on the ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis. Algorithm based on the ASAS-EULAR recommendations for.

Clinical response in patients with early and established RA at month 24. *p

Adjusted estimates of DAS28 (95% CI) and RAPID3 (95% CI) scores over time based on multivariate models a priori adjusted for possible confounders: age,

Step-down efficacy through week 48: categorical CDAI state DMARD-IR (RA-BEAM, RA-BUILD, RA-BEACON) analysis set. Step-down efficacy through week 48: categorical.

Improvement in FACIT-F fatigue score according to ACR20 response status (ACR, American College of Rheumatology; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic.

A. A. Percentages of patients with active dactylitis in ≥ 4 digits (fingers or toes) at baseline and Week 12. *p < versus baseline. Data are observed.

ACR20 response rates. ACR20 response rates. ACR20 response rates based on non-responder imputation (NRI) for the 120/Q4W, 90/Q2W and placebo groups over.

Relative treatment effects concerning efficacy endpoints in patients with inadequate response to methotrexate for triple therapy versus TNFi–methotrexate.

Rates of ACR50 response and prespecified MTX-related adverse events in patients in the (A) CONCERTO study over 26 weeks and (B) MUSICA study over 24 weeks. ACR50, American.

ACR20/50/70 response rates at week 24 (TP1 per-protocol set).

Percentage of patients achieving 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria at week 12 by patient demographic and disease characteristics.

ACR responses: (A) responses at Week 52 and Week 104

Percentage of responders at month 6 by (A) ACR50, SDAI/CDAI LDA, and HAQ-DI

Multivariable analysis of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) over time modelled with a cubic effect of time and adjusted for age, gender, disease duration,

Efficacy as first, second and third bDMARD in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. ASAS, Assessment of Spondylo Arthritis international Society; BASDAI,

The proportions (and 95% CIs) of anti-CCP+/RF+, anti-CCP+/RF- anti-CCP-/RF+ and anti-CCP-/RF- patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times a day.

The proportions (and 95% CIs) of anti-CCP+/RF+, anti-CCP+/RF-, anti-CCP-/RF+ and anti-CCP-/RF- patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times a day.

(A) Mean (95% CI) change and (B) mean percentage (SE) change in enthesitis scores (Leeds Enthesitis Index, SPARCC Enthesitis Index, and MASES) from baseline.

DAPSA LSM change from baseline (A), patients achieving DAPSA ≤28 (MDA) (B), DAPSA ≤14 (LDA) (C) or DAPSA ≤4 (REM) (D) after 24 weeks in patients treated.

(A) JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 response rates by visit in part 1.

Associations between the ‘% of patients that ever used a bDMARD’ and the ‘composite score clinical criteria’, ‘composite score access to medication’ and.

Changes over time in DAS 28 (A), SLEDAI (B), glucocorticoid dose (C) and EULAR response (D) in patients with rhupus treated by anti-TNF-α. Box plot (median,

Effect sizes (95% CI) of clinical variables per treatment group of studies directly comparing different dosages/routes. Effect sizes (95% CI) of clinical.

Mean disease activity score based on a 28-joint count (DAS28 (ESR)) (A), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score (B) and Simplified Disease Activity.

Multivariable model of adjusted

Percent of patients with ASDAS inactive disease grouped by normal or elevated CRP at baseline through week 156. §p

The mTSS individual-patient change from baseline to Week 52 cumulative probability plot (observed data). The mTSS individual-patient change from baseline.

The percentage of patients with baseline BSA ≥ 3% in the ITT population who achieved (a) PASI 75, (c) PASI 90, and (e) PASI 100 during the 24-week double-blind.

Algorithm based on the 2016 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Algorithm based on the.

Average annual price for csDMARDs (A) and bDMARDs (B) per country in international dollars (light blue) and in euros (dark blue), prices first quarter.

ACR20 (A), ACR50 (B) and MDA (C) response rates at 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or when added to background cDMARDs or.

Presentation transcript:

Efficacy in patients who received biologic and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in combination with rituximab. aLast-observation carried-forward method was used to impute post-baseline missing ACR components. Efficacy in patients who received biologic and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in combination with rituximab. aLast-observation carried-forward method was used to impute post-baseline missing ACR components. Subjects with insufficient data to calculate ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 responses or who withdrew from the study prior to assessment were classified as nonresponders. bDAS-ESR ≤ 3.2. cDAS-ESR < 2.6. dEULAR moderate and good responses were achieved by 34.1% and 9.1% of patients at Week 24, and 43.8% and 18.2% of patients at Week 48, respectively. ACR: American College of Rheumatology; DAS: Disease Activity Score; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; EULAR: European League Against Rheumatism; LDA: low disease activity. William F.C. Rigby et al. J Rheumatol 2013;40:599-604 ©2013 by The Journal of Rheumatology