Links and more … D. Breton

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First developments of DAQ\Trigger for RPC 30 October, 2002 General layout of OPERA DAQ\Trigger Naples activity Conclusions Adele Di Cicco Naples RPC Groups:
Advertisements

Data Acquisition Software for CMS HCAL Testbeams Jeremiah Mans Princeton University CHEP2003 San Diego, CA.
Designing a HEP Experiment Control System, Lessons to be Learned From 10 Years Evolution and Operation of the DELPHI Experiment. André Augustinus 8 February.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
SL1Calo Input Signal-Handling Requirements Joint Calorimeter – L1 Trigger Workshop November 2008 Norman Gee.
12GeV Trigger Workshop Christopher Newport University 8 July 2009 R. Chris Cuevas Welcome! Workshop goals: 1.Review  Trigger requirements  Present hardware.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
Guido Haefeli CHIPP Workshop on Detector R&D Geneva, June 2008 R&D at LPHE/EPFL: SiPM and DAQ electronics.
SoLID DAQ A.Camsonne SoLID collaboration meeting November 8 th 2013.
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
The trigger-less TBit/s readout for the Mu3e experiment Dirk Wiedner On behalf of the Mu3e collaboration 24 Sep 20131Dirk Wiedner TWEPP2013.
ATLAS DCS ELMB PRR, March 4th 2002, H.J.Burckhart1 Embedded Local Monitor Board ELMB  Context  Aim  Requirements  Add-ons  Our aims of PRR.
CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting, Saclay, 3 Dec MVT Read-Out Architecture & MVT / SVT Integration Issues Irakli MANDJAVIDZE.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
SuperB DAQ U. Marconi Padova 23/01/09. Bunch crossing: 450 MHz L1 Output rate: 150 kHz L1 Triggering Detectors: EC, DC The Level 1 trigger has the task.
The trigger-less readout for the Mu3e experiment Dirk Wiedner On behalf of the Mu3e collaboration 31 March 20161Dirk Wiedner.
November 16th 2011 Christophe Beigbeder 1 ETD meeting PID Integration.
D.Breton, U.Marconi, Perugia SuperB Workshop – June 16th 2009 Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB: proposal for the system architecture. Dominique.
HCAL Fall meeting, Nov 11-13,`04 HCAL digital optic link and trigger mapping Ianos Schmidt The university of Iowa.
ETD/Online Summary D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz Frascati Workshop 04/2011.
Status of ETD D. Breton, U.Marconi, S.Luitz WS summary plenary session October 1 st 2010 D. Breton - SuperB Frascati Workshop – September 2010.
Some thoughs about trigger/DAQ … Dominique Breton (C.Beigbeder, G.Dubois-Felsmann, S.Luitz) SuperB meeting – La Biodola – June 2008.
Giovanna Lehmann Miotto CERN EP/DT-DI On behalf of the DAQ team
Work on Muon System TDR - in progress Word -> Latex ?
Trigger, DAQ, & Online Planning and R&D needs
ETD meeting Architecture and costing On behalf of PID group
ETD PID meeting We had many presentations dedicated to the PM test .
ETD meeting First estimation of the number of links
Electronics Trigger and DAQ CERN meeting summary.
ETD summary D. Breton, S.Luitz, U.Marconi
ETD/Online Report D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz
CERN meeting report, and more … D. Breton
Status of ETD/Online D. Breton, U.Marconi, S.Luitz
Modelisation of SuperB Front-End Electronics
Summary of the parallel session. Design and organisation
ETD/Online Report D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz
A few ideas about detector grounding and shielding D. Breton
Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB
RT2003, Montreal Niko Neufeld, CERN-EP & Univ. de Lausanne
Discussion after electronics parallel session
PADME L0 Trigger Processor
Workshop Goals for the Detector Groups
Trigger, DAQ, & Online: Perspectives on Electronics
Status of the Merlin Readout System
SuperB EMC Computing Foreseen activities and software/computing needs
DCH Electronics Upgrade: Overview and Status
Modelisation of control of SuperB Common Front-End Electronics
EMC Electronics and Trigger Review and Trigger Plan
TTC system and test synchronization
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
Dominique Breton, Jihane Maalmi
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
SVT detector electronics
ETD/Online Summary D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz
PID electronics for FDIRC (Focusing Detector of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light) and FTOF (Forward Time of Flight) Christophe Beigbeder and Dominique.
John Harvey CERN EP/LBC July 24, 2001
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
Francesco Forti SuperB Workshop LNF, March, 2006
LHCb Trigger, Online and related Electronics
Long term projections summary
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
ETD parallel session March 18th 2010
Electronics for the PID
Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB: summary of the workshop.
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
U. Marconi, D. Breton, S. Luitz
Computing production Need for detector studies
LNF PID session 1 December 1st 2009
Zhiwen Zhao,UVa for EC group
Presentation transcript:

Links and more … D. Breton ETD/online session - Frascati Meeting December 3rd 2009

Number of links We held the front-end dedicated session yesterday: Each sub-detector was able to present an estimation of its number of links It was mostly targetting the readout links The numbers are very reasonable for the triggered systems: SVT : 58 DCH : 30 (35 for the trigger primitives) PID : 12 IFR : 40 They are less reasonable for an untriggered calorimeter: Barrel : 160 (200 ?) Forward : 450 (560 ?) => shouldn’t we find another solution ? (see talk about L1 trigger) We commonly estimated that for all the triggered sytems, the numbers of ECS and FCTS links could be the same as that of the readout links For the calorimeter, we agreed to have 80 links for the barrel and 80 for the forward. We would like to get the safety factors for each subsystem and to understand what they are based on.

ROMs and event size These numbers allowed us to produce the first estimation of the ETD cost. We had to make a guess about the number of ROMs. We assumed that: 1 crate per sub-detector would be necessary This would allow to ensure an easy partitionning of the system 8 links per ROM would be very conservative This number mainly depends on the smaller data compression ratio This leads us to the following request, in junction with the event size estimation: We would like all subdetector to estimate: The event size at the input of the ROM What type of event processing (zero suppression, data compression, digital filtering, feature extraction, …) you feel like performing inside the ROM The event size after said processing These numbers are necessary in order to scale the load on the network and the PC farm

Option 1: untriggered EMC

Option 2: triggered EMC