Facility Options June 20, 2019 Presented by: Dr

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USG Housing P3 Initiative
Advertisements

Lakewood School District REFERENDUM SEPTEMBER 30, 2014.
I.The Building/Remodeling/ Renovating Project NSSED North Shore Academy (NSA) and Administration Office Building/Remodeling/Renovating Project.
Board Update November 21, What is Tower Pinkster's Charge? 1.To assess the existing conditions of the Portage Public School Buildings and Sites.
PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATION POLICY FORUM PROPOSED SCHOOL PROPERTY TAX RELIEF AND REFERENDUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX INCREASES May 13, 2004 William.
Budget Development Update March 23, 2015.
Fremont City Schools - Visioning Fremont City Schools August 21, 2008.
BOARD OF EDUCATION Finance Presentation Thursday, February 9, 2012.
2009 Payable 2010 Levy Certification Independent School District 196 Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schools December 14, 2009 Educating our students.
 ACC Public Community College District created in  Nine member elected Board of Trustees.  36,000 Students in Fall  Seven Campuses & Two.
Long Range Facility Planning assisted by Silver Falls School District.
DECEMBER 2014 Hastings School District # 200 Truth In Taxation.
Budget Update RYAN KAHLDEN JUNE 8, 2015.
NORTH MAC SCHOOL DISTRICT #34 Community Forum December 8, 2010.
SCHOOL BUILDING AID PROGRAM CHANGES 2014 AND BEYOND.
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues October 2012.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT JUNE 30, 2014 ISD #413 Marshall Public Schools HOFFMAN & BROBST, PLLP.
Lincoln Consolidated Schools Citizens Steering Committee Bond Issue Final Recommendation Board of Education Meeting October 18, :00 p.m.
Levy Components? EAV—Equalized Assessed Valuation Funds Fund Rate Overall Levy Rate.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT JUNE 30, 2015 ISD #413 Marshall Public Schools HOFFMAN & BROBST, PLLP.
Fund Balance Policy Actions/Procedures Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent Mr. Brantley Thomas, Chief Financial Officer September 23, 2014 Berkeley County.
Tax Anticipation Notes Presented to the Finance Committee June 5, 2015.
SAN JACINTO COLLEGE DISTRICT BUDGET HEARING AUGUST 3, 2009 PROPOSED BUDGET
1 Attachment A Austin Community College District Debt Status and Financial Options January 14, 2002.
CITY OF DEKALB CITY OF DEKALB 2015 Property Tax Levy Presented to Finance Advisory Committee October 27, 2015.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
SMITHVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT Tradition of Excellence The Power of One … One Community … One Future! November 4, 2014 SMITHVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Berkeley County School District Debt Service & Referendum Millage Ms. Brenda Blackburn, Superintendent Brantley Thomas, CFO March 8, 2016.
State of the School Presentation Monday, March 21, 2011 Monday, March 21, 2011.
PRESENTED BY: REBECCA ALLARD INTERIM ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FINANCE, FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS MARCH 17, 2016 Illinois School Finance.
Sugar-Salem School District #322 September Feb 2017 – Interest Payment $11,150 Sept 2017 – Principal Payment $1,115,000 Feb 2018 – Interest Payment.
MASON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Bond Committee Meeting #1 August 9, 2016.
Presented to the Board of Education April 20, 2017
Budget Overview State Budget Overview M & O Levy Review
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
Lebanon Borough Board of Education
FY17 Proposed Budget Fiscal Year
Capital Construction Bond Program
Woodbridge Township School District Referendum 2017
Update on 440 Oakland Avenue Note Sale
VCSD Capital Project Community Forum
Budget and finance Ryan Kahlden June 12, 2017.
Rotary Foundation District 6540 District Grants
ISD #413 Marshall Public Schools
FY Proposed Budget and Rates
San Jacinto College District Budget Hearing August 3, 2009
Board Meeting August 21, 2017.
Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL)
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues
William “Bill” McGinnis
Wauwatosa School District
Rotary Foundation District 6880 District Grants
Proposed Budget Public Hearing
Woodbridge Township School District Referendum 2017
1300+ High School Seats School Board Work Session May 15, 2017
Rotary Foundation District 6540 District Grants
Budget February 3, 2015.
Local Funding for Capital Improvements
Financing the Future Five-Year Financial Forecast
Independent School District No. 318 December 3, 2018
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Presented to the School Board -- July 21, 2011
Hammondsport Central School
Measure – V Facilities Update April 8th, 2019
Paynesville Area Schools
budgets Changed date to 4th Monday in June
East Troy Community School District Community Survey Results
Portville Central School District
Warsaw Community Schools November 2018
Presentation transcript:

Facility Options June 20, 2019 Presented by: Dr Facility Options June 20, 2019 Presented by: Dr. Johnnie Thomas Superintendent of Schools, Rich Township High School District 227 Alicia Evans, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent of Business and Operations

Information Sharing Timeline Demographic Report Facility Report Budget Forecast Thought Exchange Options Decision Actions Focused on Students and Student Success

ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS SHOW DECLINES WHICH WILL LEAD TO REDUCED STATE AID Focused on Students and Student Success Source: May 2018 Kasarda Study

Replacement Cost = $40,220,000 When Forecasted Repairs = $39,704,922

Replacement Cost = $42,710,000 When Projected Repair Cost = $59,958,656

  Replacement Cost = $42,595,000 When Projected Repair Cost = $32,625,153

Net Income/(Deficit) Forecast Shows Unbalanced Budgets In Future Because Of Reduced Enrollment Sound Stewardship of District Finances

Information Sharing Timeline December 11 – January 11 Student Discussion/Forums December 11, 2018 Staff Discussion/Forums December 12, 2018 Community/Parent Forums December 13, 2018 December 19, 2018 January 3, 2019 January 10, 2019 Parent Email January 12th and January 13th

A Summary of the Results Close one school Consolidate campuses Consider the enrollment trend data Board transparency in decision making

Options Repairs to Facilities - No Upgrades Upgrade All Facilities and Address Facility Needs Upgrade and Consolidate to Two Schools in District Build One New Facility (Full student body) Build One New Facility / Partially Upgrade One Existing Site Purchase Facility and Partial Renovation of Existing Site

Option Concepts Cost Estimates Timeline Financing Legislation Referendum Percentage Increase in Overall Property Tax Bill Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Portion Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Bond Amount All options retain the same bond payments for the first two years

Option 1 Repairs to Facilities - No Upgrades Cost Estimates/Financing Timeline

Costs For Repairs by School (Only) Note: *Other includes 10% contingency, 6% escalation, 2% abatement and 10% soft cost.

Option 1 – Financing Requires a change in legislation Requires referendum Percentage Increase in Overall Property Tax Bill = 3% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Portion = 9% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Bond Amount = 109%

Option 2 Upgrade All Facilities and Address Facility Needs Cost Estimates/Financing Timeline

Upgrade All Facilities and Address Facility Needs Includes new Field House, Pool and Secure Entrance Additions Note: *Other includes 10% contingency, 6% escalation, 2% abatement and 10% soft cost.

Option 2 – Financing Requires a change in legislation Requires referendum Percentage Increase in Overall Property Tax Bill = 15% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Portion = 41% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Bond Amount = 516%

Option 3 Upgrade and Consolidate to Two Schools in District Cost Estimates/Financing Timeline

Upgrade and Consolidate to Two Schools in District Upgrade Rich Central and Rich East (Demolish Rich South) Note: *Other includes 10% contingency, 6% escalation, 2% abatement and 10% soft cost.

Upgrade and Consolidate to Two Schools in District Upgrade Rich Central and Rich South (Demolish Rich East) Note: *Other includes 10% contingency, 6% escalation, 2% abatement and 10% soft cost.

Upgrade and Consolidate to Two Schools in District Upgrade Rich East and Rich South (Demolish Rich Central) Note: *Other includes 10% contingency, 6% escalation, 2% abatement and 10% soft cost.

Option 3 – Financing Requires a change in legislation Requires referendum Percentage Increase in Overall Property Tax Bill = 7% - 9% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Portion = 19% - 25% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Bond Amount = 237%, 314%, 308%

Option 4 Build One New Facility Using an Existing Site (Full student body) Cost Estimates/Financing Timeline

Build One New Facility Using an Existing Site To Accommodate the Entire Student Body Note: The building costs is based on $90,470 per student Note: *Other includes 10% contingency, 6% escalation, 2% abatement and 10% soft cost.

Option 4 – Financing Requires a change in legislation Requires referendum Percentage Increase in Overall Property Tax Bill = 14% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Portion = 37% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Bond Amount =458%

Option 5 Build One New Facility / Partially Upgrade One Existing Building Cost Estimates/Financing Timeline

Build One New Facility and Partially Upgrade One Existing Building Note: *Other includes 10% contingency, 6% escalation, 2% abatement and 10% soft cost.

Option 5 – Financing Requires a change in legislation Requires referendum Percentage Increase in Overall Property Tax Bill = 10% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Portion = 25% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Bond Amount = 318%

Option 6 Purchase Facility and Partial Renovation of an Existing Site Cost Estimates/Financing Timeline

Purchase Facility and Partial Renovation of an Existing Site Note: *Other includes 10% contingency, 6% escalation, 2% abatement and 10% soft cost.

Financing Source Use of DSEB, Lease, Working Cash Funding Lease Purchase Funding Bond Working Cash Retain the same bond payments for the first two years

Option 6 – Financing Requires no change in legislation Requires no front door referendum Percentage Increase in Overall Property Tax Bill = 1% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Portion = 3% Percentage Increase in Property Tax Rich Bond Amount = 32%

% Property Tax Bill Increase Option/Costs % Property Tax Bill Increase Financing Options Referendum Timeline Option 1 $169,677,893 3% Legislation and Referendum Needed Yes Summer 2021- Summer 2027 Option 2 $399,535,954 15% Option 3A-3B-3C $285,059,159 $241,697,053 $282,035,695 9% 7% Option 4 $367,947,360 14% Summer 2025 Option 5 $288,243,200 10% Option 6 $105,640,000 1% Working Cash/DSEB/Lease No Summer 2021 Partial Renovation 2023 Summary Information

Thought Exchange

Question: Of the options presented, which do you find most favorable and why? Please be sure to indicate the number assigned to the option you are discussing.

Reminder Show curiosity! If there’s a thought that really made you pause and consider, be sincere and open. Keep the conversation going, even after the exchange! Come back into the exchange to do more starring Encourage other people to come back into the exchange to do more starring

Thought Exchange Dates and Participation Exchange Dates: Thursday, June 20, 2019 – Thursday, July 11, 2019 Enter the exchange using the following link: https://my.thoughtexchange.com/#584255789 

% Property Tax Bill Increase Option/Costs % Property Tax Bill Increase Financing Options Referendum Timeline Option 1 $169,677,893 3% Legislation and Referendum Needed Yes Summer 2021- Summer 2027 Option 2 $399,535,954 15% Option 3A-3B-3C $285,059,159 $241,697,053 $282,035,695 9% 7% Option 4 $367,947,360 14% Summer 2025 Option 5 $288,243,200 10% Option 6 $105,640,000 1% Working Cash/DSEB/Lease No Summer 2021 Partial Renovation 2023 Summary Information