Plasma Focus- The Machine and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia Institute for Plasma Focus Studies, 32 Oakpark Drive, Chadstone, VIC 3148, Australia.
Advertisements

From Electric Birth through Micro-nova to
Seminar on Plasma Focus Experiments 2012,(SPFE2012), 12 th July 2012 S H Saw Ion Beams and Plasma Streams- some results from numerical experiments- Ion.
Latest Trends in Plasma Focus Fusion Studies S Lee & S H Saw Institute for Plasma Focus Studies INTI University College, Malaysia Turkish Atomic Energy.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
Seminar on Plasma Focus Experiments SPFE2010 Use of current measurements to interpret plasma focus properties and mechanisms S Lee, S H Saw INTI International.
International Workshop on Plasma Science and Applications
Laser Doppler Vibrometer tests Goran Skoro UKNF Meeting 7-8 January 2010 Imperial College London UKNF Target Studies Web Page:
Runaway Electron Mitigation Collaboration on J-TEXT David Q. Hwang UC Davis Sixth US-PRC Magnetic Fusion Collaboration Workshop Collaborating Institutions:
Moist Processes ENVI1400: Lecture 7. ENVI 1400 : Meteorology and Forecasting2 Water in the Atmosphere Almost all the water in the atmosphere is contained.
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion Warsaw, Poland Status and Prospect of MJ Plasma Focus Experiment by Marek Scholz Institute of Plasma.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 11: Diagnostics / heating.
Study of D-D Reaction at the Plasma Focus Device P. Kubes, J. Kravarik, D. Klir, K. Rezac, E. Litseva, M. Scholz, M. Paduch, K. Tomaszewski, I. Ivanova-Stanik,
A Look at Density and How to Calculate It
5 th International Conference on the Frontiers of Plasma Physics and Technology April 2011, Singapore MULTI-RADIATION MODELLING OF THE PLASMA FOCUS.
2 nd INTERNATIONAL Conference on Nuclear and Renewable Energy Resources 4-7 July 2010, 4-7 July 2010, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey The Plasma Focus-
International Conference on Plasma Science & Applications ICPSA2013 Singapore 3-6 December 2013 Developing a Plasma Focus Research Training System for.
TRIGGERING EXCIMER LASERS BY PHOTOIONIZATION FROM A CORONA DISCHARGE* Zhongmin Xiong and Mark J. Kushner University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory.
TIME-RESOLVED OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY OF HIGH-TEMPERATURE PLASMAS M.J. Sadowski  , K. Malinowski , E. Skladnik-Sadowska , M. Scholtz , A. Tsarenko ¤
Plasma Focus Ion Beam Scaling Laws S H Saw INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia Institute for Plasma Focus Studies, Chadstone, VIC 3148,
Seminar on Plasma Focus Experiments SPFE2010 Use of current measurements to interpret plasma focus properties and mechanisms S Lee, S H Saw INTI International.
International Workshop on Plasma Science and Applications (IWPSA2012) 4 – 5 October 2012 University of Chulalongkorn INTI International University, Nilai,
Scaling Trends for Deuteron Beam Properties at Plasma Focus Pinch Exit S H Saw 1,2 and S Lee 1,2,3 INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Dynamic Electron Injection for Improved.
Numerical Experiments on Ion Beams from Plasma Focus S H Saw 1,2 & S Lee 1,2,3 1 INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia 2 Institute for Plasma.
Seminar on Plasma Focus Experiments SPFE2010 In-situ measurement of Capacitor Bank Parameters Using Lee model code S H Saw 1,2 & S Lee 1,2,3 1 INTI International.
Fusion Energy and the Plasma Focus
Global View of the Lee Model code S H Saw INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia.
HIGH ENERGY DENSITY PHYSICS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS WITH Z PINCHES N. Rostoker, P. Ney, H. U. Rahman, and F. J. Wessel Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
Experimental investigation and nanosecond imaging of streamers T.M.P. Briels, E.M. van Veldhuizen, U. Ebert Workshop Leiden, 9-13 May 2005.
1 AN EFFICIENT SNOW PLOW MODEL TO DEDUCE PLASMA FOCUS MACROSCALE PARAMETERS Brian L. Bures and Mahadevan Krishnan Alameda Applied Sciences Corporation.
The Periodic Table.
A guide for A level students
Atomic Structure Notes
Specific Heats Chapter 4
Plasma Focus Fusion Devices
Latest Trends in Plasma Focus Fusion Studies
& Figures Descriptions
Atomic Structure Notes
THE STRUCTURE OF ATOMS Atoms consist of a number of fundamental particles, the most important are ... Mass / kg Charge / C Relative mass Relative charge.
MULTI-RADIATION MODELLING OF THE PLASMA FOCUS
N2 Vibrational Temperature, Gas Temperature,
Resident Physics Lectures
4.6 Anharmonic Effects Any real crystal resists compression to a smaller volume than its equilibrium value more strongly than expansion due to a larger.
Overview of High Pulsed Power domain and their applications
CHAPTER 4 – ATOMIC STRUCTURE:
Fermi Gas Distinguishable Indistinguishable Classical degenerate depend on density. If the wavelength.
International Workshop on Plasma Science and Applications
Neutron Stars Aree Witoelar.
OH KINETICS IN A SHIELDED ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE PLASMA JET
Numerical Experiments on Plasma Focus S H Saw & S Lee
2nd INTERNATIONAL Conference on Nuclear and Renewable Energy Resources
Scaling of Ion Beams from Plasma Focus in Various Gases
EDEXCEL Topic 14 PARTICLE MODEL
Review of Plasma Focus Numerical Experiments
Keynote address: IWPDA, Singapore 2 July 2009
Numerical Experiments for the Plasma Focus
5th International Conference on the Frontiers of Plasma Physics and Technology April 2011, Singapore The Plasma Focus- Numerical Experiments Leading.
Knowing the Dense Plasma Focus – The Coming of Age (of the PF) with Broad-ranging Scaling Laws S H Saw1,2 & S Lee1,2,3 1Nilai University, 1 Persiaran Universiti,
From Beam-target to Thermonuclear Fusion in the Dense Plasma Focus Pinch: Energy throughput scaling 1,2,3,4S Lee, 2,3S H Saw 1Physics Department, University.
S H Saw & S Lee Nilai University, Malaysia IPFS, Melbourne, Australia
Nuclear Fusion Energy- The role of the Plasma Focus
Energy Gain from Thermonuclear Fusion
Review of Plasma Focus Numerical Experiments
Atomic Structure Notes
Basic Principles for Design of Ignition Systems
Exploring the Plasma Focus-From Electrodynamics to Radiative Collapse
Dual Plasma Focus- 160 kJ DuPF – Concept, Design & Installation
Presentation transcript:

Plasma Focus- The Machine and International School on Magnetohydrodynamics and Fusion Applications (ISMFA 2011) 9-17 September 2011, ITAP, Turunc, Marmaris, Turkey Plasma Focus- The Machine and Scaling Properties S H Saw and S Lee INTI International University, 71800 Nilai, Malaysia Institute for Plasma Focus Studies, Chadstone VIC 3148 Australia e-mail: leesing@optusnet.com.au sorheoh.saw@newinti.edu.my

Plasma Focus- The Machine and Scaling Properties Outline Energy Storage in Plasma Focus spans 7 orders of magnitudes How do properties scale? 1. Machine properties - Ipeak, anode radius, storage energy 2. Axial phase scaling properties - axial speed, speed factor, energy density 3. Radial phase scaling properties -same speeds, temperatures, densities hence same radiation intensities and 4. Radiation/particle yields depend only on -pinched plasma dimensions, lifetimes

The Plasma Focus 2/2 Axial Phase Radial Phases

Scaling Properties 3 kJ machine Small Plasma Focus 1000 kJ machine Big Plasma Focus

Comparison (Scaling) Important machine properties: UNU ICTP PFF PF1000 E0 3kJ at 15 kV 600kJ at 30kV I0 170 kA 2MA ‘a’ 1 cm 11.6 cm

Comparison (Scaling) Important Compressed Plasma Properties Density of plasma Temperature of plasma These two properties determine radiation intensity energy radiated per unit volume per unit lifetime of plasma) Size of plasma Lifetime of plasma These two properties together with the above two determine total yield.

Experimental Observations of Temperatures and Densities PF1000 Anode length=56cm

PF1000: 60cm/7.7 us= 7.8 cm/us average speed End axial speed~ 12 cm/us

For PF1000; c~1.4 and speed ratio less than 2; our calculations show that radial speed~2x axial speed

Compare Temperatures UNU ICTP PFF PF1000 (from LS lecture) (this estimate) Axial speed 10 12 cm/us Radial speed 25 20 cm/us Temperature 1.5x106 1x106 K Reflected S 3x106 2x106 K After RS comes pinch phase which may increase T a little more in each case Comparative T: about same; several million K

Compare Number Density During shock propagation phase, density is controlled by the initial density and by the shock-’jump’ density Shock density ratio=4 (for high T deuterium) RS density ratio=3 times On-axis density ratio=12 Initial at 3 torr n=2x1023 atoms m-3 RS density ni=2.4x1024 m-3 or 2.4x1018 per cc Further compression at pinch; raises no. density higher typically to just under 1019 per cc.

Compare Number Density Big or small PF initial density small range of several torr. Similar shock processes Similar final density

Big PF and small PF Same density, same temperature Over a range of PFs smallest 0.1J to largest 1 MJ; over the remarkable range of 7 orders of magnitude- same initial pressure, same speeds This leads to conclusion that all PF’s: Same T, hence same energy (density) per unit mass same n, hence same energy (density) per unit volume Hence same radiation intensity

Next question: How does yield vary? Yield is intensity x volume x lifetime Dimensions and lifetime of the focus will determine radiation and particle yields. How do dimensions and lifetime of compressed plasma vary from PF to PF? Look at experimental observations

UNU ICTP PFF Radial inward shock phase & pinch Phase- ns shadowgraphy

PF1000: Nanosecond Imaging-laser shadowgraphs and high speed ns photography

Another set of PF1000 high speed imaging- framing and streak photography

Comparing large and small PF’s- Dimensions and lifetimes- putting shadowgraphs side-by-side, same scale Lifetime ~10ns order of ~100 ns

Scaling properties-mainly axial phase 1/3 Comparing small (sub kJ) and large (thousand kJ) Plasma Focus Scaling Properties: size (energy) , current, speed and yield Scaling properties-mainly axial phase 1/3

Scaling of anode radius ‘a’ with current (I) and storage energy (E0) Scaling properties-machine properties Peak current Ipeak increases with E0. Anode radius ‘a’ increases with E0. Current per cm of anode radius (ID) Ipeak /a : narrow range 160 to 210 kA/cm for all machines

Speeds, Speed Factor SF and Yn Observed Peak axial speed va : 9 to 11 cm/us. SF (speed factor) (Ipeak /a)/r0.5 : narrow range 82 to 100 (kA/cm) per Torr 0.5 D Fusion neutron yield Yn : 106 for PF400-J to 1011 for PF1000 (Yn 5 orders of magnitude for storage energy of 3 orders of magnitude)

Scaling properties-mainly radial phase 1/2 Comparing small (sub kJ) & large (thousand kJ) Plasma Focus Scaling Properties: size (‘a’) , T, pinch dimensions & duration Scaling properties-mainly radial phase 1/2

Moreover number densities are also the same for big and small focus, in the pinsh compressed plasma around 1019/cc

Focus Pinch T, dimensions & lifetime with anode radius ‘a’ Scaling properties-mainly radial phase 2/2 Dimensions and lifetime scales as the anode radius ‘a’. rmin/a (almost constant at 0.14-0.17) zmax/a (almost constant at 1.5) Pinch duration narrow range 8-14 ns/cm of ‘a’ Tpinch is measure of energy per unit mass. Quite remarkable that this energy density varies so little (factor of 5) over such a large range of device energy (factor of 1000).

Scaling Properties: Pinch Dimensions & Duration: Compare D & Ne (Lee, Kudowa 1998, Cairo 2003)

Rule-of-thumb scaling properties, (subject to minor variations caused primarily by the variation in c=b/a) over whole range of device Axial phase energy density (per unit mass) constant Radial phase energy density (per unit mass) constant Pinch radius ratio constant Pinch length ratio constant Pinch duration per unit anode radius constant

Further equivalent Scaling Properties Constant axial phase energy density (Speed Factor (I/a)/r0.5, speed) equivalent to constant dynamic resistance I/a approx constant since r has only a relatively small range for each gas Also strong relationship requirement between plasma transit time and capacitor time t0= (L0C0)0.5 E.g. strong interaction between t0 and ‘a’ and I for a given bank.

Energy Storage in Plasma Focus spans 7 orders of magnitudes Conclusion Energy Storage in Plasma Focus spans 7 orders of magnitudes We discussed the scaling of properties 1. Machine properties - Ipeak, anode radius ‘a’, storage energy; (Ipeak/a)=constant 2. Axial phase scaling properties - axial speed, speed factor, energy density; constant 3. Radial phase scaling properties -same speeds, temperatures, densities; constant hence same radiation intensities and 4. Radiation/particle yields depend only on -pinched plasma dimensions, lifetimes: depend on ‘a’, on I The current dominates Plasma Focus Yields

Plasma Focus- The Machine and International School on Magnetohydrodynamics and Fusion Applications (ISMFA 2011) 9-17 September 2011, ITAP, Turunc, Marmaris, Turkey Plasma Focus- The Machine and Scaling Properties S H Saw and S Lee INTI International University, 71800 Nilai, Malaysia Institute for Plasma Focus Studies, Chadstone VIC 3148 Australia e-mail: leesing@optusnet.com.au sorheoh.saw@newinti.edu.my