Epigenetic Silencing Mediates Mitochondria Stress-Induced Longevity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 14, Pages (July 2013)
Zilong Qiu, Anirvan Ghosh  Neuron 
Stress Signaling Etches Heritable Marks on Chromatin
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
JNK1 Phosphorylation of Cdt1 Inhibits Recruitment of HBO1 Histone Acetylase and Blocks Replication Licensing in Response to Stress  Benoit Miotto, Kevin.
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
MEC1-Dependent Redistribution of the Sir3 Silencing Protein from Telomeres to DNA Double-Strand Breaks  Kevin D Mills, David A Sinclair, Leonard Guarente 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
A Metabolic Function for Phospholipid and Histone Methylation
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Virginie Faure, Stéphane Coulon, Julien Hardy, Vincent Géli 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Epigenetic Silencing of the p16INK4a Tumor Suppressor Is Associated with Loss of CTCF Binding and a Chromatin Boundary  Michael Witcher, Beverly M. Emerson 
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
The DNA Damage Machinery and Homologous Recombination Pathway Act Consecutively to Protect Human Telomeres  Ramiro E. Verdun, Jan Karlseder  Cell  Volume.
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
A Major Role for Capsule-Independent Phagocytosis-Inhibitory Mechanisms in Mammalian Infection by Cryptococcus neoformans  Cheryl D. Chun, Jessica C.S.
Farah D. Lubin, J. David Sweatt  Neuron 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β Modulates Melanocyte Viability
Silencing of the DNA Mismatch Repair Gene MLH1 Induced by Hypoxic Stress in a Pathway Dependent on the Histone Demethylase LSD1  Yuhong Lu, Narendra Wajapeyee,
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Barrier Function at HMR
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Functional Modulation of IGF-Binding Protein-3 Expression in Melanoma
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (September 2006)
Junko Kanoh, Mahito Sadaie, Takeshi Urano, Fuyuki Ishikawa 
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

Epigenetic Silencing Mediates Mitochondria Stress-Induced Longevity Elizabeth A. Schroeder, Nuno Raimundo, Gerald S. Shadel  Cell Metabolism  Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 954-964 (June 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Metabolism 2013 17, 954-964DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Histone Demethylase Rph1p Mediates Hormetic mtROS Longevity Signaling (A) Strategy to identify factors that regulate the global transcriptional response to hormetic mtROS signaling. (i) Identification of genes induced under conditions of elevated mtROS. (ii) Promoter sequences of induced genes were analyzed to identify enriched motifs. (iii) Known transcription factor binding sequences were scanned for the presence of motifs similar to those enriched in mtROS-induced gene promoters. (B) Results of promoter analysis. The AG5 motif is significantly enriched in promoters of genes induced by mtROS and is similar to the DNA sequences recognized by the proteins listed. The percentages of mtROS-induced genes containing the exact motifs recognized by the candidate proteins are indicated to the right of the motif. See also Table S1. (C) CLS of wild-type (DBY2006) and rph1Δ strains treated with 50 μM menadione (MD) or vehicle (not treated, nt) during logarithmic growth. In all CLS curves, data points represent the mean of three biological replicates inoculated from single colonies ± SEM. (D) ROS levels in wild-type and rph1Δ strains treated with menadione (MD+) or vehicle (−) during exponential growth. Samples were analyzed at day 1 of CLS. In all graphs, data points represent the mean of three biological replicates ± SEM unless otherwise indicated. “ns” designates p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, and **p ≤ 0.01. (E) RT-PCR of transcripts induced by mtROS. Wild-type and rph1Δ were treated with 50 μM menadione (MD) or vehicle (nt) for 2 hr in exponential phase, and the expression of three genes selected from the list of 45 mtROS-responsive transcripts (Figure 1A) was analyzed. See also Figure S1. Cell Metabolism 2013 17, 954-964DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A Mitochondrial Superoxide Signal Extends CLS (A) Western blot analysis of Sod2p (MnSOD) in PTDH::SOD2 and wild-type (DBY2006). Samples were collected at an OD600 of 1.0. MnSOD band intensity was normalized to actin, and the DBY2006 protein level was set to 1. Values under the blot represent the mean ± SEM for three biological replicates. (B) CLS in wild-type and PTDH::SOD2 strains following exponential phase treatment with menadione (MD) or ethanol (nt). (C) CLS in wild-type and sod2Δ strains as in (B). (D) CLS in wild-type and rho° as in (B). Cell Metabolism 2013 17, 954-964DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Hormetic mtROS Longevity Signaling Requires the Tel1p and Rad53p DNA Damage Response Kinases (A) Schematic of DNA damage signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (B) CLS of sml1Δ and rad53Δ/sml1Δ strains treated with 50 μM menadione (MD) or vehicle (nt) during exponential growth. (C) ROS levels in sml1Δ and rad53Δ/sml1Δ strains treated with menadione (+) or vehicle (−) during exponential growth as in Figure 1D. Samples were collected at day 1 of CLS. (D) CLS of wild-type (DBY2006) and tel1Δ strains as in (B). See also Figure S2. Cell Metabolism 2013 17, 954-964DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 mtROS Activate a Noncanonical, Tel1p-Dependent DNA Damage Response (A) Left: western blot analysis of Rad53p phosphorylation in the wild-type treated with 50 μM menadione (MD+), 0.01% methylmethane sulfate (MMS+), or ethanol (−) for 30 min. Right: wild-type and tel1Δ strains treated with menadione, MMS, ethanol, and/or calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP). (B) Protein phosphorylation at (S/T)Q sites in response to 30 min treatment with 50 μM menadione or 0.01% MMS. Molecular weights (kDa) are indicated on the left. Starred bands indicate proteins that are phosphorylated in response to MMS, but not menadione, treatment. (C) RT-PCR of transcripts induced by DNA damage. Wild-type and rph1Δ were treated with 50 μM menadione (MD), 0.01% MMS, or vehicle (nt) for 30 min in exponential phase. See also Table S2. (D) Quantification of 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-oxoG) formation in wild-type and ogg1Δ. Cells were treated for 30 min prior to DNA extraction. Values were normalized to untreated wild-type, which was set to 1. Data points represent the mean of three biological replicates inoculated from single colonies ± SEM. “ns” designates p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01. See also Figure S3. Cell Metabolism 2013 17, 954-964DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 mtROS Regulate Rph1p to Modify Subtelomeric Heterochromatin (A) Schematic of Rad53p-dependent regulation of Rph1p chromatin binding and histone demethylase activity. (B) Western blot analysis of Rph1-HA phosphorylation in wild-type, tel1Δ, and sml1Δ/rad53Δ strains treated with 50 μM menadione or 0.01% MMS. Samples for western blots were collected after 30 min of treatment during exponential growth. (C) ChIP of Rph1-HA at a control region (ACT1) and two subtelomeric genes (YPS6 and YEL077C) in a wild-type or sml1Δ/rad53Δ background at day 1 of CLS. Data points represent the mean of two independent ChIP experiments; error bars represent the range. Values were normalized to the wild-type untreated ACT1 sample, which was set to 1. (D) ChIP using antibodies against trimethyl H3K36 or total H3 in wild-type or rph1Δ as in (C). See also Figure S4. Cell Metabolism 2013 17, 954-964DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Hormetic mtROS Signaling to Rph1p Promotes Subtelomeric Silencing (A) Gene expression changes induced by exponential phase menadione treatment in a wild-type strain (mtROS dependent, sector A), rph1Δ strain (Rph1p dependent, sector B), or mtROS-dependent inactivation of Rph1p (sector C) at day 1 of CLS. Gray font indicates the number of induced genes, and black font indicates the number of repressed genes. See Table S3 for full gene lists. (B) Repressed genes located the indicated distance (kb) from telomeres. Subtelomeric genes are within 25 kb (gray region) of telomeres and are listed in Table S4. The significance of enrichment of repressed subtelomeric genes was determined using hypergeometric probability distribution. See also Figure S5. Cell Metabolism 2013 17, 954-964DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 mtROS Signaling via Rph1p Promotes Sir3p Binding at Subtelomeres to Repress Gene Expression and Extend CLS (A) ChIP of Sir3p in wild-type (DBY2006) and rph1Δ at a control region (ACT1) and two subtelomeric genes (YPS6 and YEL077C). Cells were analyzed at day 1 of CLS following treatment with 50 μM menadione or vehicle during exponential growth. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR of subtelomeric transcripts relative to ACT1 at day 1 of CLS in wild-type or sir3Δ yeast following 50 μM menadione or vehicle during exponential growth. (C) CLS of wild-type and sir3Δ treated with 50 μM menadione (MD) or vehicle (nt) during logarithmic growth. (D) Model for mtROS signaling via DNA damage response kinases and Rph1p to regulate subtelomeric heterochromatin formation and CLS. Cell Metabolism 2013 17, 954-964DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions