Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
The Evolution of Venom by Co-option of Single-Copy Genes
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e5 (December 2017)
A Feedback Mechanism Controlling SCRAMBLED Receptor Accumulation and Cell- Type Pattern in Arabidopsis  Su-Hwan Kwak, John Schiefelbein  Current Biology 
A Coordinated Global Control over Cellular Transcription
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Transcriptional Activation of Arabidopsis Axis Patterning Genes WOX8/9 Links Zygote Polarity to Embryo Development  Minako Ueda, Zhongjuan Zhang, Thomas.
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Andres Laan, Tamar Gutnick, Michael J. Kuba, Gilles Laurent 
Nicholas Treen, Tyler Heist, Wei Wang, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages (October 2013)
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Margarita V. Chibalina, Dmitry A. Filatov  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 19, Pages (October 2009)
Michael J.L. Magrath, Oscar Vedder, Marco van der Velde, Jan Komdeur 
Roberta L. Hannibal, Julie C. Baker  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages R265-R266 (April 2013)
Kensaku Nomoto, Susana Q. Lima  Current Biology 
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Anterior-Posterior Gradient in Neural Stem and Daughter Cell Proliferation Governed by Spatial and Temporal Hox Control  Ignacio Monedero Cobeta, Behzad.
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
X-Chromosome Inactivation Patterns Are Unbalanced and Affect the Phenotypic Outcome in a Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome  Juan I. Young, Huda Y. Zoghbi 
Volume 27, Issue 24, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Doris Bachtrog, Nicholas R.T. Toda, Steven Lockton  Current Biology 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1  Stephanie A. Miller, Michael L. Johnson, P. Todd.
Restorative Justice in Children
Kristoffer Palma, Yuelin Zhang, Xin Li  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Histone Modifications Associated with Somatic Hypermutation
Peng Zhang, Min Bao, Miyoung Kwon, Sheng He, Stephen A. Engel 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Biallelic transcription of Igf2 and H19 in individual cells suggests a post-transcriptional contribution to genomic imprinting  Y Jouvenot, F Poirier,
Transcriptional Pulsing of a Developmental Gene
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Maternally Inherited Stable Intronic Sequence RNA Triggers a Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop during Development  Mandy Li-Ian Tay, Jun Wei Pek  Current.
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 17, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 20, Pages (October 2006)
Small RNAs: How Seeds Remember To Obey Their Mother
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Expression Partitioning between Genes Duplicated by Polyploidy under Abiotic Stress and during Organ Development  Zhenlan Liu, Keith L. Adams  Current.
Christoph Kayser, Nikos K. Logothetis, Stefano Panzeri  Current Biology 
Transcriptional Pulsing of a Developmental Gene
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (April 2013)
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
Endosperm Imprinting: A Child Custody Battle?
Caroline Josefsson, Brian Dilkes, Luca Comai  Current Biology 
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (April 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development Stephanie Meyer, Stefan Scholten  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 19, Pages 1686-1691 (October 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.046 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Enhanced Growth Rate of maize F1 Hybrids (A) Midplane confocal images of cell wall stained UH005 inbred and 005×301 hybrid embryos, 6 days after pollination (dap). Scale bars represent 100 μm. (B) Correlation between cell number and length of hybrid and inbred embryos 6 dap. The mean embryo length of inbred line UH005 and UH301 and reciprocal hybrids plotted against mean cell numbers of the same genotypes is shown. The standard deviation is given by error bars. A strong correlation of both features was found by PEARSON analysis. Current Biology 2007 17, 1686-1691DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.046) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Parental-Genome Activities in Early Embryo Development Relative allelic expression levels of 25 genes in the reciprocal F1-hybrid embryos 005×301 and 301×005 (the maternal line is denoted first) at 1, 3, and 6 dap. Transcript or genomic DNA amounts of both alleles were measured and displayed as a percentage of the total expression level. Black and white bar fractions indicate transcript abundance of the 005 and the 301 allele, respectively. The y axis scale refers to the portion of the 005 allele. Mixes of gDNA [1:20, 1:4, 4:1, 20:1] of the inbred lines [005:301] were used so that the assay performance concerning allelic ratio reproduction could be controlled. Inbred line gDNA 005 [1:0] and 301 [0:1] was used for the definition of the thresholds of each assay for both alleles. The detection limits are indicated by dashed lines. Hybrid gDNA [1:1 allelic ratio] was used for the normalization of the data for each assay. Continuous lines indicate 50% allelic proportion. For EH038213, cDNA of inbred lines served to define the allelic thresholds, and expression data were not normalized. For gDNA mixes [1:20, 1:4, 4:1, 20:1] of inbred lines one, for cDNA samples, hybrid gDNA [1:1] and both inbred gDNAs [1:0, 0:1] three independent replicates were analyzed by four mass spectrometry runs for analyte detection, and the mean values are displayed. Current Biology 2007 17, 1686-1691DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.046) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Equivalent Parental-Genome Activities in Early Embryo Development Relative allelic expression ratio from hybrids of crosses of maize inbred line UH301 females and inbred line UH005 males (005/301, y axis) plotted against ratio of hybrids from the reciprocal crosses (005/301, x axis). Expression ratios are plotted on a logarithmic scale, with error bars indicating 95% confidence intervals. 005/301 = 1 demonstrate equal expression of both alleles; the y = x line highlights the relationships without parental effects. Maternal or paternal effects lead to opposed deviation from the line (marked by arrows). The deflection of y = x = 1 along the y = x line specifies UH005 or UH301 allelic preference, also indicated by arrows. Points are grayscale coded according to significance of a two-sided Student's t test, where H0: allele 005 (301×005) = allele 005 (005×301). No parental influence (white boxes), paternal influence (p < 0.01) (gray boxes), and maternal influence (p < 0.01) (black boxes) are indicated. EH038212, EH038217, EH038207, AW066927, DT649185, AB073081; and EH038206 are not displayed because of monoallelic or absent expression, at least at one time point. Current Biology 2007 17, 1686-1691DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.046) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions