TFMM – Trends Emissions of air pollutants for

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TFEIP/EIONET meeting, May 2009, Vienna stage 3 centralised review, Country feedback, France perspective Chang Jean-Pierre, Gueguen Céline.
Advertisements

TNO MACC-II European emissions Model-ready emission set for Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Antoon Visschedijk TNO, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Finnish BC emission inventory, and national characteristics and user practice influence on domestic wood combustion emissions Kaarle J. Kupiainen 1,2,
Science questions How will source-receptor relations change due to expected changes in emissions? How should future emission scenarios be constructed?
18 participants Zig’s presentation : Regional and global GAINS projections for air pollution and climate modelling; Problems and solutions Agreed GP reduction.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
From experience of emission inventory preparation in Belarus JOINT ACCENT/GEIA Workshop on Anthropogenic emissions for non-OECD countries in global inventories.
Improving regional air quality model results at the city scale : results from the EC4MACS project INERIS : Bertrand Bessagnet, Etienne Terrenoire, Augustin.
Fairmode meeting ETC/ACM task manager: Ulrike Döring, Öko- Institut ETC/ACM deputy manager: Christian Nagl, Umweltbundesamt Vienna Compilation.
Harmonization process between inventory and Model projections of Air Pollution Emissions in Italy October, TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Stage 3 Review: TFEIP/ETC-ACC Karin Kindbom, Martin Adams & Justin Goodwin.
Investigating the Links Between GMES & Emission Inventories - An Update Justin Goodwin: ETC-ACC Supported by EEA TFEIP Meeting Stockholm 3th May 2011.
1 JRC – Ispra DG JRC and EC4MACS IPTS Institute for Prospective Technology Studies - Peter Russ - Antonio Soria - Szabolc Szekeres IES Institute for Environment.
Air Quality Forecasting Bas Mijling Ronald van der A AMFIC Annual Meeting ● Beijing ● October 2008.
Bulgarian National Emission Inventory System Assoc. Prof. N.Miloshev – Geophysical Institute BAS St. Tzonev – National Statistical Institute E. Nikolova.
Reported emissions for models Perspectives from MACC & MACC-II projects, and the use of the LOTOS-EUROS AQ model Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon,
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no 7 th Joint UNECE Task Force & EIONET WS on Emission Inventories and Projections, Thessaloniki 31 Oct – 2 Nov.
8th meeting of the TFEIP’s projections expert panel, 15th May 2012 Bern, Switzerland. Emissions projections reported under the LRTAP convention and EEA.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Modelling perspective: Key limitations of current country projection data in transboundary modelling activities. What improvements are needed? Jan Eiof.
IPCC WG1 AR5: Key Findings Relevant to Future Air Quality Fiona M. O’Connor, Atmospheric Composition & Climate Team, Met Office Hadley Centre.
UN ECE WORKSHOP ON INTERACTION BETWEEN AIR-QUALITY MONITORING AND AIR-PROTECTION STRATEGIES IN EECCA Geneva, 11 June th Pan-European Environment.
GAINS emission projections for the EU Clean Air Policy Package Work in Zbigniew Klimont Task Force on.
Air Quality Forecasting in China using a regional model Bas Mijling Ronald van der A Henk Eskes Hennie Kelder.
The links to global problems Presentation at the 25 th anniversary special event of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution “Past successes.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Quality of current PM emission inventories Kristin Rypdal, Chair of Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections With input from Zbigniew Klimont.
Rianne Dröge EMEP/EEA Guidebook and the Netherlands Emission Register.
European Union emission inventory report 1990–2011 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) EU LRTAP inventory team.
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
Review process 2008 Katarina Mareckova, CEIP - Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections TFEIP Tallinn, 27 May 2008.
GlobEmission (ITT 6721) new ESA contract starting on Oct. 11 KNMI/BIRA/FMI/TNO/VITO.
UNECE Reporting Guidelines Approval – impact on future reporting Katarina Mareckova, 11 May 2009, Vienna TFEIP/EIONET meeting.
PAGE 1 An adaptation of SMOKE for Europe Johannes Bieser Armin Aulinger, Volker Matthias, Markus Quante GKSS Research Center Geesthacht, Germany.
1 Emission data needs for assessments and international reporting Joint UNECE and EIONET workshop on emission inventories and projections 9-11 May 2001,
Hemispheric transport – Why is EMEP interested? Peringe Grennfelt, Jurgen Schneider.
Data BaseCompareVerifyDrivers EDGARv4 UNFCCC EMEP GAINS REAS MICS-Asia PKU VULCAN TNO-MACC EPRTR HTAP_V2 Econo- metrics Decom- position Inverse modeling.
Gap-filling of the EU-27 CLRTAP inventory Sabine Göttlicher, Katarina Mareckova and Michael Gager ETC/ACC (Umweltbundesamt, Austria) Martin Adams European.
Variability in emission parameters of ozone precursors’ emissions in the GAINS model TFIEP/TFMM Workshop on Uncertainties in emission inventories and atmospheric.
Gap filling process for the EC CLRTAP inventory B.Gugele, K.Mareckova, ETC-ACC TFEIP EIONET workshop, Vienna, 11 May 2009.
GlobEmission (ITT 6721) new ESA contract starting on Oct. 11 KNMI/BIRA/FMI/TNO/VITO.
How official national inventory data is used as input data for EMEP models Katarina Mareckova, Robert Wankmueller CEIP - Centre on Emission Inventories.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 Date & Time 09: :30Status review and improvements  BaseCase (1) problem review and actions taken (20’)
Claire Granier LATMOS/IPSL, Paris, France Currently on-leave at the Max Planck Insitute for Meteorology, Hamburg Also at the NOAA Earth System Research.
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
Emissions of Pollutants into the Atmospheric Air
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
Air pollution, transport and noise
Gap-filling of the EU-27 CLRTAP inventory Sabine Göttlicher, Katarina Mareckova and Michael Gager ETC/ACC (Umweltbundesamt, Austria) Martin Adams.
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
Emission inventory: characteristics and status
Janusz Cofala and Zbigniew Klimont
EURODELTA 3 – Trend Analysis
9th TFMM, Bordeaux, France, April 2008
Z.Klimont, J.Cofala EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) Variability in emission parameters of ozone precursors’ emissions in the GAINS.
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
The EuroDelta inter-comparison, Phase I Variability of model responses
Title Why do we underestimate Elemental Carbon in PM?
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Report on the EEA workshop dedicated to the use of GMES data for emission inventories John Van Aardenne (EEA), Justin Goodwin (Aether), Peter de Smet.
Projections expert panel agenda
The European Commission’s science
Presentation transcript:

TFMM – Trends Emissions of air pollutants for 1990-2010 Augustin Colette [augustin.colette@ineris.fr] Elsa Real, Bertrand Bessagnet Institut National de L’Environnement Industriel et des Risques

Emissions of air pollutants for 1990-2010 Overview of available sources of information Will ultimately be used for the modelling Criteria for selection Completeness 1990-2010 Available by activity sector, spatially gridded Key pollutants: NOx, NMVOC, SOx, NH3, PM or BC&OC

Emissions of air pollutants for 1990-2010 Regional datasets preferred to global inventories (EMEP or GAINS preferred to EDGAR, ACCMIP…) EMEP emissions used in modelling lacks PM before 1999 GAINS has been revised in 2014 for 1990-2010 (ECLIPSE-V5) Provided by Zig Klimont & Chris Heyes => ECLIPSE-V5 is a good candidate Need to benchmark wrt other sources to assess uncertainties Also an issue since other sources are used in global models (used for Boun. Cond.)

Emission details EDGAR / ACCMIP / MACCCity EMEP: ECLIPSE-V5 Primarily designed for chemistry-climate MACCCity: monthly, ACCMIP before 2000, RCP85 after EMEP: « as used in models » ECLIPSE-V5 GAINS national totals (updated after TSAP2013) provided for all RCP sectors (energy, industry, solvent use, transport, agriculture, open burning of agricultural waste, residential combustion, and waste treatment) Spatially at 0.5 resolution based on RCP-consistent proxies.

1965-2008 EDGAR v4.2

Available species

Quantitative Comparisons over Europe Domain used for comparison : Longitude: min= -15; max= +35 Latidude: min=37.5; max=65

EMEP/ECLIPSE quite different for recent years PM25 EMEP/ECLIPSE quite different for recent years

PM25: by sector EMEP/ECLIPSE difference moslty due to Residential, Industry, Agriculture

Despite differences in totals, trends by sector are broadly similar PM25: trends by sector Despite differences in totals, trends by sector are broadly similar

NOx GAINS Granier CC, 2011 ECLIPSE still higher than other sources but not as much as in Granier et al. 2011

NOx: transport The overestimation in ECLIPSE is due to land transport, the difference is constant over 20yrs

ECLIPSE > EMEP > MACCCity NOx: Energy Decreasing trend: ECLIPSE > EMEP > MACCCity

All the sources are quite consistent (except EDGAR)

SO2: by sector Slight discrepancies at sectoral level: Might have an impact on spatialisation

NMVOC Large uncertainties, especially for EDGAR The discrepancy EMEP/ECLIPSE in the 1990s is a concern

Discrepancy EMEP/ECLIPSE due to « other transports » NMVOC: by sector Discrepancy EMEP/ECLIPSE due to « other transports »

NH3 ECLIPSE & EMEP quite consistent MACCCity & GEA: less focus on NH3

Conclusions & Questions for Discussion On the paper, ECLIPSE-V5 is a good source for AQ hindcast over Europe Benchmarking with other sources show: PM: not much comparison possible NOx slighlty high compared to other sources, but constant in time SO2 very consistent VOC: large spread NH3: good consistency EMEP/ECLIPSE

Open issues Are there gaps at national level that do not appear on these Europe-wide comparisons? Esp. for PM: not reported before 1999 How to deal with NO/NO2 changes ? To be discussed by Bertrand tomorrow: Using Country-totals ? Spatial distribution: ECLIPSE or in-house ? Temporal profiles ?

PM25 gap filling in EEA dataviewer “Linear extrapolation was performed if one or several years at the beginning or at the end of a time series were missing, and if at least 5 consecutive years showing a clear trend (r2 ≥ 0.6) were available. Extrapolation 'backwards' was never allowed to result in negative values. “ extract from the EEA Technical report No 12/2014 ( European Union emission inventory report 1990–2012 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP)