Introduction of Member States and Candidate Countries

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Central and Eastern European EA (Planning and Management)related higher education, a SWOT analysis Ingrid Belčáková, Faculty of Architecture, STU, EIA.
Advertisements

Info Day - Promoting FP7 – Theme 1 HealthFeb. 14th, 2007, Bucharest Building on the success of SMEs go Life Sciences SMEs go Health.
The CEE Bankwatch Network's mission is to prevent the environmentally and socially harmful impacts of international development finance, and to promote.
Goran Šoster PREPARE Coordinator Ohrid, 31. August 2010.
IST Call 5 Information Day, Luxembourg, 16 June 05 TEL-ME-MOR The European Library: Modular Extensions for Mediating Online Resources
Presentation WG 2 Managing EU Funds on the Regional Level Republic of Albania Ministry of European Integration (MEI) Regional Conference EU Perspectives.
Forum for Sustainable Mobility and Metropolitan Development Oradea, November 2013 JASPERS Teo Falato, Transport Sector Specialist.
Strengthening global awareness in the local communities - Kolping 2020 Strategy.
1 The Project Circle, January 27, 2005 How can the NCP support you? Mária Búciová, IST NCP Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovakia.
Eu2008.si May th DG Meeting IPSG – Innovative Public Services Group Dr Gordana Žurga.
Science, research and development European Commission DG RTD A-2/Peter Härtwich 09/2001 Associated candidate countries in the 5th Framework Programme Associated.
Cracow Seminar, 2006Dragon – fly Project Presentation of the Dragon-fly Project – its aims and concept Patrycja Wojtaszczyk & Krzysztof Puchalski National.
TÜBİTAK SOCRATES II European Community action programme in the field of education Duration: 1 January December 2006 Budget: 1,850 mEuro over.
TÜBİTAK Youth Programme Participating countries  15 EU Member States  3 EFTA countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway  10 associated countries:
Horizon 2020 Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation TWINNING.
Elisabetta Piselli Senior Counsel, LEGIA Procurement and Consultant Services.
ROUND TABLE Possibilities for Cooperation on Consular and Visa Issues in the Danube Region ROUND TABLE Possibilities for Cooperation on Consular and Visa.
Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions Erasmus+
The European Union 1 THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 2 Where in the world is the European Union?
Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions Erasmus+
E u r o g u i d a n c e A Network of National Resource and Information Centres for Guidance Established in 1992.
E u r o g u i d a n c e A Network of National Resource and Information Centres for Guidance Established in 1992.
Ministry Of Education and Higher Education National Tempus Office Palestine TEMPUS PROGRAM PREPARED BY National Tempus Office – Palestine 2009 European.
Identification of a problem Limited participation of social partners from New Member States and Candidate Countries in European sectoral social dialogue.
2013 China-CEEC Business Council – proposed role and structure Michal Polański, Ph.D. Polish Agency for Enterprise Development Katowice, April 20th 2015.
Information Society Technologies (IST) Programme
Role of CEN and CENELEC in support to SMEs
The big enlargement: healing the division of Europe
PRAG PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR CONTRACT PROCEDURES
Lifelong Learning Programme 2007 – 2013
Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions
Support to National Helpdesks
ESF Regulation Dominique Bé 07/12/2011, Brussels
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
Support to National Helpdesks
Patrick Staes and Ann Stoffels
Bipartite workshop Connecting to EU level sectoral social dialogue: lessons learned and perspectives for the social partners Evelin Toth Turin, 9 December.
European Social Partners Integrated Programmes What opportunities for your social dialogue? ITC Turin Brussels 6 May 2010.
CAF Activities.
Household Budget Surveys Working Group May 2003
Discussion on engaging with other partners
Open public consultation on the FEAD
Activities of the Human Resources Working Group
Enterprise and Industry Directorate General
the European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
EUPAN DG-Meeting Innovative Public Services Group (IPSG)
IPSG Work Programme January – June 2004.
Knowledge Economy team,JASPERS
French Presidency of the EU 2008
4QC – Status of the Conference
DG Troika – 26 October – Portugal
Sweden Presidency of the EU 2009 IPSG September 2009.
Comparative Analysis of Quality Management in Public Administrations in the EU Member States The DG’s acknowledged the importance of the e-Gov and encourage.
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Lifelong Learning Programme
Customer Satisfaction Management
The Sigma Experience of Public Internal Financial Control Peer Reviews
Meeting of the Secretariat Friday 4th of July 2003
The big enlargement: uniting east and west
DGs Meeting IPSG Report Monday,10 December 2007 Lisboa  Portugal
IPSG – Innovative Public Services Group
NATIONAL STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE
Where in the world is the European Union?
E-GOVERNMENT WG MEETING
IPSG Meeting Croke Park Dublin
Evaluation of Public Administrations‘ Added Value to the Lisbon Strategy Goals Dr Gordana Žurga.
Programme Dutch Presidency
IPSG Work Programme.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction of Member States and Candidate Countries Cyprus Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Latvia Lithuania Malta Poland Slovak Republic Slovenia Bulgaria Romania Turkey

Cyprus IPSG Representative Name: Andreas Mylonas What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG: Techniques how to disseminate the CAF and/or other quality management tools Networking with experts with a view to promoting formal business cooperation Gain knowledge and experience of how to organise/deliver a high level conference. What we hope to contribute to IPSG group: Organisation and delivery of a conference /training programme relating to the activities of IPSG. Participation in working sub-groups Knowledge Management, Benchmarking, and especially CAF. Participation in learning labs and Quality Conferences

The Czech Republic IPSG Representative Name: Jiri Marek What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG to gain know-how of good quality public administration to participate in joint programmes to improve the quality of our public administration to earn experience of good management of public administration What we hope to contribute to IPSG group to solve problems of good European public administration jointly with other Member States by active participation to assist in problem solving to be a good partner to all members

Estonia IPSG Representative Name: Juhani Lemmik, Estonian Ministry of Finance What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG CAF and its application, links with other models Benchmarking – what is it and how to use it Expert meetings (e.g process management) What we hope to contribute to IPSG group CAF experience, participation in expert meetings, contribution to EIPA website Quality Conferences Expert meetings and other new initiatives

Hungary IPSG Representative Name: Ákos Kovács What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG Approval of new CAF Action Plan Data, information and practical tools Benchmarking possibilities New, integrated and easy-to-use EPAN website What we hope to contribute to IPSG group To support CAF activities (top priority) CAF Action Plan – active paticipation e.g. Vienna Taking part in the work of LLs Use of the results of benchmarking, KM, etc

Latvia IPSG Representative Name: Reinis Upenieks What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG Ideas for national government Public service quality improvement strategy Support to the ongoing activities in the field Networking What we hope to contribute to IPSG group Challenges as new member Place for piloting new ideas

Lithuania IPSG Representative Name: Jurgita Domeikiene What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG to get knowledge and to learn from experience and achievements of the EU countries seeking to improve the quality of services delivered to citizens and businesses; to be involved in current process of developing of a new approaches and methods for improving the quality of public services. What we hope to contribute to IPSG group to participate actively in the work of IPSG; to ensure implementation of proposals and recommendations of IPSG and subgroups in order to meet objectives set in MTP; to spread results and achievements of IPSG in our country.

Malta IPSG Representative Name: Christine Madiona (standing in for Charles Polidano) What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG To learn about initiatives taken by other countries in the fields of quality assurance and service quality improvement. More specifically, to find out what measures other countries are taking to bring about tangible improvements in service delivery. What we hope to contribute to IPSG group To contribute our own experiences in these areas.

Poland IPSG Representative Name: Adam Misiuwianiec What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG Support in 1: Promotion of modern management solutions in public administration, Exchange of experiences in implementing CAF and benchmarking, Adaptation of CAF for Polish public administration conditions, Dissemination of CAF throughout Polish public administration, Training of Polish CAF trainers. 2. CAF participation effects: Improved contact between citizens and local authorities by CAF people surveys Improved quality of services delivered to citizens and businesses, Membership in CAF Network

Poland Engagement in works of IPSG. What we hope to contribute to IPSG group: Engagement in works of IPSG. Experience of Polish public administration

Slovakia IPSG Representative Name: František Kajánek What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG exchange of experiences new ideas as regards public administration useful personal contacts What we hope to contribute to IPSG group strong support to activities of common interest to the IPSG active role in the field Quality Management experiences in the field State Administration staff reform

Slovenia IPSG Representative Name: Gordana Žurga What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG: Knowledge Management 3QC What we hope to contribute to IPSG group: Participation in Knowledge Management Assisting with some of the background preparatory work for 3QC

Bulgaria IPSG Representative Name: Roumyana Rousseva

Romania IPSG Representative Name: Monica Dimitriu What we hope to get out of participating in IPSG learning and implementing CAF concept and Knowledge Management finding more about best practices from Member States being involved in joint programmes to improve the quality of the Romanian public administration finding more about the possible benchmarking partners What we hope to contribute to IPSG group become involved in benchmarking activities’ subgroup contribute to EIPA’s work, documents and materials participate within the Knowledge Management subgroup share our experiences with other countries which are in similar situations, by using EIPA’s site

Turkey IPSG Representative Name: Mr. Cevdet Yilmaz