Analysis of the 19 August 2017 (C032) Case and Plan for Simulations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Advertisements

1 CIRA/NOAA/ESRL, Boulder, CO
Impacts of Large-scale Controls and Internal Processes on Low Clouds
Vertical Structure of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer in Trade Winds Yumin Moon MPO 551 September 26, 2005.
1/26/10MET 61 topic 01 1 MET 61 Topic 1 Precipitation Processes.
Page 1© Crown copyright The Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) BAe-146 Steve Abel First VOCALS Regional Experiment (REx) Preparatory.
ENVI3410 : Lecture 8 Ken Carslaw
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Effect of Turbulence on Cloud Microstructure,
Remote sensing of Stratocumulus using radar/lidar synergy Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth & Robin Hogan University of Reading.
Lecture 11: Growth of Cloud Droplet in Warm Clouds
RF02 How does it look in the real world? Margreet van Zanten Thanks to Bjorn Stevens and Gabor Vali.
Mesoscale Convective Systems Robert Houze Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Nebraska Kansas Oklahoma Arkansas.
Cloud Microphysics SOEE3410 : Lecture 4 Ken Carslaw Lecture 2 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds Cloud microphysics.
Aerosol effects on rain and hail formation and their representation using polarimetric radar signatures Eyal Ilotovich, Nir Benmoshe and Alexander Khain.
Page 1© Crown copyright ICEPIC Sortie Brief P:\OBR\Exeter\2006 Spring Sortie Briefs\ICEPIC sortie brief.doc Steve Abel: 20 th April 2006.
Precipitation.
Simulation of Below-cloud and In-cloud Aerosol Scavenging in ECHAM5-HAM Betty Croft, Ulrike Lohmann, Philip Stier, Sabine Wurzler, Sylvaine Ferrachat,
Sensitivity of Methane Lifetime to Sulfate Geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Giovanni Pitari V. Aquila,
Clouds, Aerosols and Precipitation GRP Meeting August 2011 Susan C van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins,
Cloud Resolving Model Studies of Tropical Deep Convection Observed During HIBISCUS By Daniel Grosvenor, Thomas W. Choularton, & Hugh Coe - The University.
Xin Xi Aspects of the early morning atmospheric thermodynamic structure which affect the surface fluxes and BL growth through convection:
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
Lesson 01 Atmospheric Structure n Composition, Extent & Vertical Division.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise 9-24 October 2001 Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University of Washington) Chris Fairall, Taneil.
Lecture 15, Slide 1 Physical processes affecting stratocumulus Siems et al
For more information about this poster please contact Gerard Devine, School of Earth and Environment, Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT.
Evaluating forecasts of the evolution of the cloudy boundary layer using radar and lidar observations Andrew Barrett, Robin Hogan and Ewan O’Connor Submitted.
Page 1© Crown copyright A comparison of CRM simulations of trade wind cumulus with aircraft observations taken during RICO Steve Abel and Ben Shipway 21.
RICO Modeling Studies Group interests RICO data in support of studies.
Possible Aerosol Effects on Lightning Activity and Structure of Hurricanes Khain, A., N. Cohen, B. Lynn, and A. Pokrovsky, 2008: Possible aerosol effects.
1. Introduction Boundary-layer clouds are parameterized in general circulation model (GCM), but simulated in Multi-scale Modeling Framework (MMF) and.
Boundary Layer Clouds.
Cloud Physics Summary SOURCE:
Water Droplet Growth by Condensation & Collision
Modeling of warm-rain microphysics and dynamics-microphysics interactions with EULAG-based Large Eddy Simulation model W. W. Grabowski 1, A. A. Wyszogrodzki.
Modelling and observations of droplet growth in clouds A Coals 1, A M Blyth 1, J-L Brenguier 2, A M Gadian 1 and W W Grabowski 3 Understanding the detailed.
NATS 101 Section 13: Lecture 13 Precipitation. Precipitation: Any form of water particles—liquid or solid—that falls from the atmosphere and reaches the.
In this presentation you will: The Water Cycle explore the stages of the water cycle Next >
A Non-POC HYPOTHESIS (A. Clarke): The persistence of the adjacent Scu clouds that define a POC region is sustained as a result of entrainment of aged aerosol.
Warm Rain Formation by Ultragiant Particles & Cumulus Entrainment Sonia Lasher-Trapp Purdue University In collaboration with Alan Blyth, Univ. of Leeds.
The Arctic boundary layer: Characteristics and properties Steven Cavallo June 1, 2006 Boundary layer meteorology.
Condensational growth of cloud droplets, COST 722 Condensational growth of cloud droplets, with reference to warm cumulus clouds and the impact on formation.
Chien Wang Massachusetts Institute of Technology A Close Look at the Aerosol-Cloud Interaction in Tropical Deep Convection.
The EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise: Implications for Cloudsat as a stratocumulus drizzle meter Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University.
The Third Indirect Aerosol-Cloud Effect: Global Model Sensitivity and Restrictions Hans-F. Graf and Frank J. Nober EGS-AGU-ESF meeting Nice, April 2003.
SIMULATION OF AEROSOL EFFECTS ON CONVECTIVE CLOUDS UNDER CONTINENTAL AND MARITIME CONDITIONS Alexander Khain, Andrei Pokrovsky and Daniel Rosenfeld Institute.
Background – Building their Case “continental” – polluted, aerosol laden “maritime” – clean, pristine Polluted concentrations are 1-2 orders of magnitude.
Cloud Formation. Review LCL & Dew Point The Sun’s radiation heats Earth’s surface, the surrounding air is heated due to conduction and rises because of.
Large Eddy Simulations of Entrainment and Inversion Structure Alison Fowler (MRes Physics of Earth and Atmosphere) Supervisor: Ian Brooks Entrainment Zone.
CLARIFY-2016 Cloud characterisation and aerosol-cloud-interaction flight planning Steven Abel, 29 th February 2016, Birmingham.
Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes.
© Crown copyright Met Office Cloud observations at Cardington Simon Osborne (OBR, Cardington) OBR Conference, 11 th -13 th December 2012.
Observations Suggestive of Ice Production through Secondary Processes in Convective Clouds in Southwest England Jeffrey French, David Leon, Robert Jackson,
Clouds (Condensed PPT)
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
Stratocumulus cloud thickening beneath layers of absorbing smoke aerosol – Wilcox, 2010 The semi-direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols.
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
Giant Raindrops in mid-latitude Cumuli
Impact of the vertical resolution on Climate Simulation using CESM
Eddy correlation – basic principles
Concept of Stability Stable Rock always returns to starting point
Jennifer C. DeHart, Robert A. Houze, Jr. and Deanna A. Hence
Assessment of NASA GISS CMIP5 and post-CMIP5 Simulated Clouds and Radiation fluxes Using Satellite Observations 1/15/2019 Ryan Stanfield(1), Xiquan Dong(1),
EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise 9-24 October 2001 Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University of Washington) Chris Fairall, Taneil.
EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise 9-24 October 2001 Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University of Washington) Chris Fairall, Taneil.
VOCALS Open Ocean: Science and Logistics
EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise 9-24 October 2001 Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University of Washington) Chris Fairall, Taneil.
The EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise: Implications for Cloudsat as a stratocumulus drizzle meter Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter.
D. C. Stolz, S. A. Rutledge, J. R. Pierce, S. C. van den Heever 2017
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of the 19 August 2017 (C032) Case and Plan for Simulations Zhiqiang Cui1 and Alan Blyth1,2 1University of Leeds 2NCAS

Cluster Analysis Based on max. and mean Npcasp above BL, the height of max. Npcasp, and mean Npcasp within BL Two clusters: A and B B  B1 and B2 max(N) above BL mean(N) above BL A B2 Z(Nmax) above BL B1 Mean(N)in BL

A B2 B1 B1 A B2 PCASP concentration C032(19-08-2017) end of the first scenario (A) A clean Polluted B2 B1 B1 A Polluted clean B2 More Polluted and higher clean

Cloud penetrations Courtesy of S. Abel Below-cloud aerosol run

P1 P4 PCASP Aerosol conc. within the BL ~ 200-700 cm-3 Aerosol layer above the BL < 200 cm-3

Aerosol in Run 6 just below cloud PCASP CDP Run 6 Mean concentration in Run 6 ~ 480 cm-3 Repeated patterns in PCASP concentration Wavelet analysis: the period of the patterns ~ 16 s No correlation between PCASP and w’,w’t’, TKE

Cloud Penetrations CDP concentration (cm-3) Convection in Run 11 Sc in Runs 8 – 10

In-cloud w Distribution Longer tails at higher level: strong w at higher levels Fat tails at lower ends: more downdraught

More drizzle drops at higher levels. More raindrops at lower levels. Size Dis. Functions Peaks shift towards large values with increasing height, i.e., Run 7 => Run 11 Growth through collision-coalescence. CDP 2DS Concentration of 200 µm-sized drizzle drops increases with height, but Concentration of 1000 µm-sized raindrops decreases with height. More drizzle drops at higher levels. More raindrops at lower levels. CIP

CDP Drop Number Flux (w-wterminal)*N(bin) Upward transport of large drops

CIP Drop Number Flux (w-wterminal)*N(bin) Magaritz and Pinsky, 2009 Profile run 11

Profiles Altitude Time Profile run SLR SLR Altitude SLR SLR Time Slopes of profile runs (Height/Distance): 3.2 – 4.1 % Gentle slantwise ascending

Similar CDP size distribution functions in P11, P12, and P13 (upper part of the clouds) CIP

Summary Two aerosol layers Five cloud penetrations Vertical velocities Below ~2000 m: 200 – 700 cm-3 ~2500 – 4000 m, < 200 cm-3 Five cloud penetrations Sc and shallow convection Warm rain process Upward transport of drizzle drops, and downward of raindrops Vertical velocities Very strong for such shallow clouds, close to 10 ms-1

Plan for Simulations Use the Met Office’s MONC model Can the model capture the general feature of the clouds, such as the stratocumulus and the cellular convection? Investigate the structure and evolution of the clouds Aerosol impact on the clouds The role of aerosol above the BL through entrainment to act as CCN or the effect of radiation

Supplementary slides

Cloud Types in Run 11 In broad downdraught circulation In broad updraught Dip by downdraught

Wavelet Analysis of PCASP in Run 6 Repeated patterns Period of ~ 16 sec Other variables do not have such periodicity w’ (next slide) w’w’ w’t’ sqrt(u’u’+v’v’+w’w’) Might be caused by gravity waves P6 After Run 6 P5 before Run 6

Wavelet Analysis of Vertical Velocity

CDP drop size distribution in updraught (solid) and downdraught (dashed) Both upward and downward exist More upward flux of large drops in Runs 9-10

Correlation between w and CDP concentration Correlations are not great except between 10 – 20 µm in Run 8