Discussion document on Mode Construction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worldwide Harmonised Test Procedure for Light Duty Vehicles WLTP EVE 2nd Session 13 of September Per Öhlund Co-chair Subgroup EV.
Advertisements

Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
Status report and Discussion paper for Number of tests WLTP IWG at Geneva in June JAPAN WLTP-11-20e.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
Informal document No. GRPE (62nd GRPE, 9-10 June 2011, agenda item 3(a)) 1 Summary of 8 th WLTP-DHC Meeting 9 June 2011 Palais des Nations, Geneva.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-066 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by Japan the 16 th DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 15 th Jan Palais.
WLTP - 5h DTP Meeting Zuerich DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 LabProcICE issues on DTP level Zuerich, April 2011.
1 WLTP-DTP- E-LabProc-005 Test Procedure for Electrified Vehicles presented by Japan 24&25 November 2010.
WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I Results and Recommendations by India
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by DHC Secretary the 18 th DHC meeting under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 th Jun.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
under GRPE/WLTP informal group
1 Discussion paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2 Prepared by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group November 2011 WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-108.
Worldwide Harmonized Heavy Duty Emissions Certification Procedure UNITED NATIONS 22nd WHDC, Geneva, 16 January 2008 GRPE/WHDC/FE08 Informal document No.
Worldwide Harmonized Heavy Duty Emissions Certification Procedure UNITED NATIONS 57th GRPE, Geneva, 15 January 2009 Informal document No. GRPE (57th.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Progress report from VTF Validation Phase 2 and Next Steps DTP-12, 16th January 2013, Geneva
WLTP Vehicle range and energy consumption EVE October 2014.
Status report and Discussion paper for Number of tests at WLTP Tokyo IWG in 2015 JAPAN WLTP-12-15e.
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP-DHC Development of World-wide Light- duty Test Cycle -- Proposal for the threshold vehicle speed of Low/Middle/High(/extra-High) phase --
12 April th DTP Meeting WLTP-DHC Secretary WLTP-DTP DHC Progress Report 12 April 2011 EMPA, Duebendorf, Switzerland WLTP-DHC Secretary N.
Summary of 3 rd Informal Group on WLTP 11 June 2009 Palais des Nations, Geneva Informal document No. GRPE (58th GRPE, 9-12 June 2009, agenda item.
Submitted by the expert from Japan the secretariat
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
VIAQ (Vehicle Interior Air Quality) Informal Working Group
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
SiCo ACEA position RESULT slides proposal.
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012
RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-077
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
Open issues 3 bis12, 20, 25, 26 bis, 30, 31 and 33 O.I. 12 (EV) :
Current status of WLTP-DHC
ATCT - Family Validation
Annex8  ( ) CD-CS break-off criteria Proposal from Japan with ACEA Comments ( )
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
WLTP DTP Lab Process EV sub group
ACEA Comments from ACEA still does not understand the reasoning for this proposal. This proposal increases the test burden disproportionally.
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
WLTP Informal Working Group
Proposal EV/PHEV/HEV/FCV Lab Process Sub-Group
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
ACEA Comments from ACEA welcomes the idea to develop a shortened range test procedure based on MCT However, ACEA does not support JP proposal.
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
Mode Construction during Validation2
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Comparative study on the threshold speed
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Analysis for WLTP UF development
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
Palais des Nations, Geneva
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Proposal for optional procedure of All Electric Range test (BEV)
Presentation transcript:

Discussion document on Mode Construction Prepared by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 6-7 July 2011 Stockholm, Sweden

1. Background During the 7th DHC meeting held on 16 May 2011, the possible six(6) options (refer page 3) of mode construction were proposed (refer next slide). Japan prepared different approach for mode construction from the view points of what mode construction should be. (1) Emission Limits (2) Air pollutant modeling (3) Customer information (4) Regional weighting factor (5) Testing efficiency (6) Testing repeatability (7) Testing accuracy (8) Represent vehicle condition (9) Unique technologies (10)Unique vehicle configuration

Mode construction 1 2 3 4 5 6 2. Possible mode constructions ** ** ** option Mode construction Brief description Series test independent 1 2 MIDDLE&HIGH1 sampling 3 similar to US procedure 4 1 HIGH phase 5 LOW&MIDDLE 1 sampling 6 All phases test as a series ** Prep.-> SOAK Prep. -> LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s HIGH * 441s LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s Ex-HIGH * 338s Intermediate soak 1 sampling ** Prep.-> SOAK LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s HIGH * 441s Ex-HIGH * 338s LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s Intermediate soak ** Prep.-> SOAK Prep. -> LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s HIGH * 441s Ex-HIGH * 338s Intermediate soak ** Prep.-> SOAK LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s HIGH * 441s LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s Intermediate soak Prep.-> SOAK 1 sampling ** LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s HIGH * 441s Ex-HIGH * 338s MIDDLE * 439s Intermediate soak LOW * 582s 1 sampling ** Prep.-> SOAK LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s HIGH * 441s Ex-HIGH * 338s LOW * 582s MIDDLE * 439s Intermediate soak *) phase duration subject to change after obtaining the statistical information from China **) middle phase test after intermediate soak is required for HEV vehicles

Testing repeatability 3. Requirement on test cycle mode -1 Customer information (i.e. CO2, FC, Range) Emission limits Air pollutant modeling Regional weighting factor Unique technologies (i.e. regeneration, EV, PHEV, etc) Testing efficiency LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s Unique vehicle configuration (i.e. city commuter) Testing repeatability Represent vehicle condition Testing accuracy (low concentration)

Testing repeatability 3. Requirement on test cycle mode -2 Customer information (i.e. CO2, FC, Range) Emission limits Air pollutant modeling Regional weighting factor Require each phase measurement Unique technologies (i.e. regeneration, EV, PHEV, etc) Testing efficiency LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s Unique vehicle configuration (i.e. city commuter) Testing repeatability Cold Hot intermediate or completely hot condition Represent vehicle condition Testing accuracy (low concentration) Necessity of middle phase under cold condition will be evaluated during validation1

Testing repeatability 3. Requirement on test cycle mode -3 Customer information (i.e. CO2, FC, Range) Emission limits Require each phase measurement Air pollutant modeling Regional weighting factor urban Urban/rural rural motorway Unique technologies (i.e. regeneration, EV, PHEV, etc) contradiction Testing efficiency LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s Unique vehicle configuration (i.e. city commuter) Testing repeatability Better to measure all phases as one set Represent vehicle condition Testing accuracy (low concentration)

Testing repeatability 3. Requirement on test cycle mode -4 Customer information Emission limits Air pollutant modeling Regional weighting factor Avoid long-term testing contradiction Require continuous cycle driving contradiction Unique technologies (i.e. regeneration, EV, PHEV, etc) Testing efficiency LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s Require pre-conditioning under same driving cycle Better to measure all phases as one set Unique vehicle configuration (i.e. city commuter) Testing repeatability contradiction Require both cold/hot conditions Represent vehicle condition Testing accuracy (low concentration)

Testing repeatability 3. Requirement on test cycle mode -5 Customer information (i.e. CO2, FC, Range) Emission limits Air pollutant modeling Regional weighting factor Unique technologies (i.e. regeneration, EV, PHEV, etc) Testing efficiency LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s Unique vehicle configuration (i.e. city commuter) LOW phase is first driving cycle taking into account of unique vehicle configuration Testing repeatability Represent vehicle condition Testing accuracy (low concentration)

4. Summary Acceptance of harmonized weighting for pollutants options Emission Limits Air pollutant modeling Separate measurement of each phase Acceptance of harmonized weighting for pollutants Customer information Separate measurement depend on customer requirement L, M, H (& Ex-H) L&M, H (& Ex-H) Regional weighting factor Testing efficiency Separate L/M phases and H/Ex-H phases Testing repeatability Conduct preconditioning of same driving cycle Testing accuracy Acceptance of separate measurement in each phase (validation 2 or confirmation) Represent vehicle condition Cold & Hot conditions Necessity of M phase under cold Hot condition : intermediate or completely hot Unique technologies EV/PHEV : Separate continuous driving of L/M and H/Ex-H Regeneration : L/M/H/Ex-H EV/PHEV : depend on customer requirement Unique vehicle configuration First phase : LOW

5. Tentative Proposal L/M test H/Ex-H test Range test Range L/M Range preconditioning L/M test LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s overnight soak Intermediate or complete hot sample1 sample2 sample3 sample4 HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s No soak preconditioning (option) sample A (option) sample B H/Ex-H test sample1 sample2 (option) sample A Range test Range L/M LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s Range H/Ex-H HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s Ki determination (regeneration system) L/M test L/M test LOW 589s MIDDLE 433s HIGH 455s Ex-HIGH 323s H/Ex-H test H/Ex-H test Loading cycle