EURODELTA 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emissions in GEMS Data on emissions are needed for the 4 sub-systems GHG, GRG, AER and RAQ GEMS Project has dedicated tasks for emissions and surface fluxes.
Advertisements

Science questions How will source-receptor relations change due to expected changes in emissions? How should future emission scenarios be constructed?
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
INERIS ongoing works for CITIZEN (2009) 1 Bessagnet, B ; 1 Meleux, F. ; 1,2 Péré, J.-C. ; 1 Colette,A; 1,3 Siour,G, 4 Menut,L; 1 Rouïl, L. 1) INERIS, France.
15 / 05 / 2008 Model ensembles for the simulation of air quality over Europe Robert Vautard Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement And.
Improving regional air quality model results at the city scale : results from the EC4MACS project INERIS : Bertrand Bessagnet, Etienne Terrenoire, Augustin.
The robustness of the source receptor relationships used in GAINS Hilde Fagerli, EMEP/MSC-W EMEP/MSC-W.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Title Progress in the development and results of the UNIFIED EMEP model Presented by Leonor Tarrason EMEP/MSC-W 29 th TFIAM meeting, Amiens, France,
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
GEM-MACH Global The Canadian Global Air Quality Modeling/Forecasting System Dr. Sunling Gong Science and Technology Branch January 16-17, 2012.
Recent developments in CHIMERE. Accuracy and Realism for research and operational applications Accuracy Realism/Complexity Time.
The Euro- and City-Delta model intercomparison exercises P. Thunis, K. Cuvelier Joint Research Centre, Ispra.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Contribution from MSC-W to the review of the Gothenburg protocol – Reports 2006 TFIAM, Rome, 16-18th May, 2006.
Modelling perspective: Key limitations of current country projection data in transboundary modelling activities. What improvements are needed? Jan Eiof.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Air Quality Forecasting in China using a regional model Bas Mijling Ronald van der A Henk Eskes Hennie Kelder.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
GlobEmission (ITT 6721) new ESA contract starting on Oct. 11 KNMI/BIRA/FMI/TNO/VITO.
2018 Emission Reductions from the Base 18b Emission Inventory Lee Gribovicz Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, California February 22-23, 2007.
PAGE 1 An adaptation of SMOKE for Europe Johannes Bieser Armin Aulinger, Volker Matthias, Markus Quante GKSS Research Center Geesthacht, Germany.
13 / 10 / 2006 Uncertainty and regional air quality model diversity: what do we learn from model ensembles? Robert Vautard Laboratoire des Sciences du.
GlobEmission (ITT 6721) new ESA contract starting on Oct. 11 KNMI/BIRA/FMI/TNO/VITO.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 Date & Time 09: :30Status review and improvements  BaseCase (1) problem review and actions taken (20’)
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service
The CAMS Policy products
Model Future: Nesting with Regional Models
Xuguo ZHANG, Jimmy FUNG, Alexis LAU and Wayne Wei HUANG
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
A. Aulinger, V. Matthias, M. Quante, Institute for Coastal Research
Model overview.
EURODELTA III RCG-Model
16th Task Force on Measurement and Modelling Meeting:
Multi-model and Observed PM Trends
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
EURODELTA 3 – Trend Analysis
Jan Eiof Jonson, Peter Wind EMEP/MSC-W
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Visualization of first (Model - to – Observations/Emissions)
9th TFMM, Bordeaux, France, April 2008
CITY-DELTA Objectives, Methodology, and Results
EURODELTA Preliminary results
Modelling atmospheric transport of Benzo(a)Pyrene with CMAQ
Trends in sulphur and nitrogen components
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
M. Schaap + TNO and RIVM teams
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
The EuroDelta inter-comparison, Phase I Variability of model responses
19th TFMM Meeting, Geneva May 3rd 2018
C. Carnevale1, G. Finzi1, E. Pisoni1, P. Thunis2, M. Volta1
PGM Boundary conditions
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Report on the EEA workshop dedicated to the use of GMES data for emission inventories John Van Aardenne (EEA), Justin Goodwin (Aether), Peter de Smet.
TFMM – Trends Emissions of air pollutants for
Title Recent developments of the EMEP/MSC-W model aiming at PM improvement Work by MSC-W modelling group presented by Svetlana Tsyro TFMM.
Experience with the new 0.1°x0.1° EMEP emissions
A Visualization/Analysis Tool for Model - to – Observations/Emissions
EMEP/MSC-W How can EMEP Intensive measurement periods help to improve modelling of acidification, eutrophication, O3 and PM? Views from MSC-W H. Fagerli.
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Assessment of LRT contribution to cities in Europe using uEMEP?
Presentation transcript:

EURODELTA 3

Overall objectives & background EURODELTA was initiated by the TFMM Historically : EMEP, RCG (DE), LOTOS (NL), CHIMERE (FR), MATCH (SE) and TM5 (EC-JRC) Model inter-comparison for improving and understanding processes Improvement & challenging of the EMEP model Uncertainty assessment (multi model approach) Previous steps Evaluation & intercomparison (met. year :1999, 2001) Intercomparison of country reductions responses Intercomparison of sectoral reductions

EURODELTA3 participants Met.No – UNECE (EMEP) SMHI – SE (MATCH) TNO – NL (LOTOS) INERIS – FR (CHIMERE) FUB – DE (RCG) PSI / RSE – CH/IT (CAMx) Univ. Brescia - IT (TCAM )? ENEA/Arianet - IT (FARM) HZG - DE (CMAQ )

The new Exercise Meeting INERIS on April, 4th 2012 Evaluation on the EMEP field campaigns (« Scientific & politic issue ») 2006: 01/06 - 30/06 2007: 08/01 - 04/02 2008: 17/09 - 15/10 2009: 25/02 – 26/03 Retrospective analysis (« Policy issue ») Capacity of current models to reproduce monitored changed in air quality Retro. analysis 2008  1999 1990 Response of models to real sharp emission reduction (1990- 1999 – 2008) Common set of input data , domain Opportunity to build a more consistent inventory ( Martijn exercise) Baseline yr GP. Pre-crisis yr. Current period Signature of the GP.

Field campaign analysis Context : Performances of model has changed (processes, met. drivers) Objectives Validation with usual stations (AIRBASE, EMEP) and on the campaigns Validation on hourly data of PM/Gas components (HNO3/NO3, NH4/NH3) Focus on PM, SOA (biog., anth.), BBOA? EMEP versus other CTMs performances The campaigns (1 month campaigns) 2006: 01/06 - 30/06 2007: 08/01 - 04/02 2008: 17/09 - 15/10 2009: 25/02 – 26/03 Models will run on one month with 15 days for spin-up The domain is prescribed, anthropogenic emissions, fire emissions, meteorology, boundary conditions are provided by INERIS

Retrospective analysis Three yearly simulations will be performed by each participant on entire European domain (1990 – 1999 – 2008) Emission inventories might be scaled to be consistent with EMEP national sectoral totals Consistency of the meteorology (WRF / ERAinterim) At least one model (CHIMERE) will run the same meteorological year with the emission years (1990-1999-2008) Validation against monitoring data restricted to species covered by the Protocol: O3, SO2, NOx, SO4, NO3, PM?… for which measurement data are available Multi-model analysis of responses to emissions reductions Locate the EMEP model in the spread of model responses

General settings expected for the simulations Common domain COORD_ED25 for the Modelling Teams Common emission dataset for anthropogenic species and wildfires EC/POM/OPPM for the field campaigns (BBOA?) Total PPM (TPPM) instead of POM/EC/OPPM for the retrospective analysis Biogenic emissions (free), NO & VOC Landuse : free Common boundary conditions for the Modelling Teams (MACC) Common meteorology for the Modelling Teams (still in discussion for some groups) Other emissions : Road dust resuspension, wind blown dust (free) Define an output species to track these species POA chemistry (free) Minimum aerosol species required in the outputs (EC, BBOA?, POM, Other PPM, BSOA, ASOA, NO3, SO4, NH4) Sea Salt & Dust are recommended Requested output data : 1st model layer (+ground level conc.)

Definition of the domain (0.25°x0.25°)  MACC2 domain

Emission update Framework : EC4MACS project (EU LIFE) Objective : create the best (less bad!) inventory for 2009 on the MACC-TNO grid Mix of TNO/MACC 2007 & EMEP 2009 with INERIS expertise SNAP 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 : EMEP 0.5x0.5° + INERIS regridding with EPER + Landuse SNAP 2 : INERIS regridding (population + ratio for wood burning from country totals) SNAP 7,8, 9,10 : TNO-MACC regridding For missing countries in TNO/MACC, EMEP 0.5x0.5 is used and downscaled with adequate proxies Use of russian emissions from EMEP All SNAP are rescaled with national totals

EMEP 0.5x0.5° downscaled with proxies PM2.5 – SNAP2 Log(E)

New INERIS emissions – PM2.5 – SNAP2 Log(E) + scaling with 2009 EMEP emissions

Raw MACC/TNO emissions 2007 – PM2.5 – SNAP2 Log(E)

PM2.5 emissions – SNAP2 for EURODELTA

NOx emissions – SNAP7 for EURODELTA

NOx emissions – SNAP8 for EURODELTA

NOx emissions - SNAP1 for EURODELTA

NH3 emissions – SNAP10 for EURODELTA

Field campaign analysis Retro. runs 4/4/2012 -MT works on pre-processing -INERIS provide the 2009 input data -INERIS/JRC defines the common netcdf format INERIS works emissions & BC 31/05/2012 Production phase for 2009 MT run 2009 field campaign 30/06/2012 MT send the data to JRC/INERIS 20/08/2012 -INERIS provides the 2006, 2007 and 2008 input data 30/09/2012 Next meeting? Production phase for 2006, 2007 & 2008 MT deliver the outputs 30/11/2012 MT start their runs MT : Modelling Teams

Meteorology Part A : field campaign analysis IFS data (ECMWF) : most accurate (grib files) 0.25° resolution Same grid encompassing the ED25 domain One directory / day INERIS can share its pre-processor Part B: retrospective analysis Consistency for the three years : 1990, 1999, 2008 ERAinterim/WRF (0.25°) One file / day (netcdf)

Boundary conditions At least, O3, CO, CH4, Dust, OM, EC, SO4, NO3, NH4 Which frequency : 3hr/6hr , Daily? Part A : Field campaign analysis  Use of MACC reanalysis INERIS will provide netcdf format (end of May) Part B : Retrospective analysis  Input from global models Wait for PEGASOS inputs (C. Granier) : CAM-chem September/October : last 3 decades available INERIS will provide netcdf format to the MT

Emissions Field campaign analysis PM2.5 , PMcoarse, NOx, SOx, NH3, CO  Temporal profile : ED  PM2.5 split EC/OC/Other PPM  Shall I deliver OC/EC emissions (could be better)? PMcoarse split EC/OC/Other PPM  VOC split update? NO/NO2 ratio at least for SNAP7  Regridding : new emission inventory with EMEP compliance  Emission injection profile : revised version  SNAP2 put in the very first layer SNAP1 and 3 a bit different

Emissions Retrospective analysis Gas emissions  Temporal profile : ED  Regridding of 1999 sources  Regridding of 1990 industrial sources? East/West Germany  Is it a problem? INERIS can do its own reggridding if LPS available in 1990 and even 1999 PM emissions in 1990 : GAINS, ratio PM/SOx or PM/NOx by sector and country?  NO/NO2 ratio, GAINS? Fire emissions , 1990 ?

PM2.5 emissions as a function of pop. density (french data)

Model outputs to be delivered FIELD CAMPAIGN ANALYSIS RETROSPECTIVE RUNS Hourly concentrations and met. NO3, NH4, SO4, Na, DUST, EC, POM, OPPM, ASOA, BSOA, PM10, PM25 Size : add _25, _10, _1 for PM2.5, PM10, PM1 fractions for PM components: Ex: NO3_25 or NO3_10 O3, NH3, SO2, NO, NO2, APINEN, ISOP, HNO3, H2O2, HCHO, PAN, VOC (T2M, W10), Kz(1st level), PBL, u* Daily deposition Dry dep. : DSOx, DNOx, DNHx Wet dep : WSOx, WNOx, WNHx Daily concentrations NO3, NH4, SO4, Na, DUST, TPPM, BSOA, ASOA, PM10, PM25 Size : add _25, _10, _1 for PM2.5, PM10, PM1 fractions for PM components: Ex: NO3_25 or NO3_10 O3, NH3, SO2, NO, NO2, APINEN, ISOP, HNO3, H2O2, HCHO, PAN, VOC Hourly concentrations and met. O3, NO2, NO, PM10, PM25 (T2M, W10), Kz(1st level), PBL, u* Monthly deposition Dry dep. : DSOx, DNOx, DNHx Wet dep : WSOx, WNOx, WNHx

Expected outputs Model Part A : field campaign analysis Only 4 months to store All species in 3D (is it possible?) The format of outputs can be decided later Pairs M/O at stations (to JRC in delta tool) Common netcdf files (to INERIS/JRC) Part B : retrospective analysis 3 years to store Two options : Store 3D data for a small subset of species All species in 2D OUTPUTS 1 Interface  Common netcdf OUTPUTS 2 JRC, INERIS

Fire emissions (Field campaigns, relevant for 2006 & 2008) MACC dataset Daily emissions at 0.5° res. (reggridding by the teams) Carbon Monoxide Methane Nitrogen Oxides Particulate Matter PM2.5 Total Particulate Matter Organic Carbon Black Carbon Sulfur Dioxide Injection height for fires : max (1000m,PBL) Fire VOC skipped, too uncertain! NO/NO2 ratio for fires? OPM2.5 = PM2.5 - 1.4*OC - BC OPMcoa=TSP-PM2.5

Anthropogenic emissions Initially MACC/TNO was expected to be the EURODELTA inventory MACC/TNO : NOx, CH4, CO, SO2, VOC, NH3, PM25, PMcoarse Some troubles : 1999, 2006 & 2007 are only available The SNAP2 reggriding displays strange patterns (too spotty!) As all emission datasets NO in SNAP10 refers to « soil NO » and would doublecount if you have a biogenic module for NO (MEGAN) Some countries are missing (Iceland and ED25 asian countries) Identification of troubles in EMEP 0.5x0.5 Strange patterns for the SNAP2 regridding (NL emissions over the North sea) NO from SNAP10 is partly reported (same problem of double counting) SNAP2 emissions very low over some cities (Berlin, Madrid) Low reported emissions in Eastern countries

Observations for the field campaigns 4 one-month campaigns Many hourly data (evaluation of diurnal cycles) SO4, NH4/NH3, NO3/HNO3, Ca, Cl, Na, OM, BC on PM2.5 and PM10 fractions POM SOA PM2.5/PM10, gas species

EMEP emissions (1990 → 1999) SOX – SNAP1 - 1990 SOX – SNAP1 – 1999

EMEP emissions (1990 → 2008) – Zoom on DE SOX – SNAP1 1990 1999 2008