Cross Examination Strategies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debate V: Cross-examination Doris L. W. Chang. Outline (Johnston 92-98; )  Refutation Review Refutation Review  The Purpose of Cross-examination.
Advertisements

Parts of a Debate. Opening Statements Organization It must have an intro, body, and conclusion Try to think of a slogan to tie everything together Argument.
Speaking Persuasively. AV Aids & Props Guidelines for the Ethical Use of Evidence.
Meta Level Case Writing Jeffrey Miller Marist School 2015 Georgia Debate Institutes.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Writing to persuade and convince others to agree with facts, share our values, and/or accept our conclusions. ENG 101: Professor Bailey-Kirby.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
CROSS EXAMINATION YOU tell the story. YOU are the star.
Persuasive Writing  Writing that attempts convince or persuade.  Introductory Paragraph  Body Paragraphs (usually 3+)  Concluding Paragraph.
Sample Exam Questions for Kahane These are just like the scantron questions for the midterm and the final exam. In fact, some of these may be on the midterm.
Persuasive Text convincing a reader to do something, buy something, believe in something.
Parts of a Debate. Opening Statements Organization It must have an intro, body, and conclusion Try to think of a slogan to tie everything together Argument.
Fallacies To error in reason is human; to analyze divine!
ARGUMENTS. WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? An argument consist of two or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement that supports the conclusion.
Argumentative Terms Complete your foldable with the following.
Persuasive  To convince someone to believe in something or do something.  Writers may use language that appeals to the reader’s senses.
1 1 Fallacies UNCLASSIFIED The overall classification of this briefing is UNCLASSIFIED /FOUO.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
By Nat Murphy.  Involves drawing conclusions about something based on a physical sign  Mystery Novels  Conclusions based on such reasoning are based.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers The Master Reader Updated Edition by D. J. Henry Advanced Argument: Persuasive.
RHETORICAL STRATEGIES:
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
How to Write a Slammin’ Essay. Introduction  Begin with a hook to get your reader interested  Provide general background information to put your essay.
1. Persuasive Methods The ways we persuade matter as much as the content we convey. Why??? The reader’s interest hangs in the balance.
Parts of a Debate. Opening Statements Organization It must have an intro, body, and conclusion Try to think of a slogan to tie everything together Argument.
Basic Structure of a Round. a) Before the Round Pre-flowed arguments.
A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.
CIVICS AND GOVERNMENTPAGE 240 Distinguishing fact from Opinion. An important skill is being able to determine fact from opinion. Fact is information about.
Chapter 25 Cross-Examination Techniques. Purposes of Cross-Examination Clarify arguments Clarify arguments Point out misinterpretations Point out misinterpretations.
The Argumentative Essay
SELECTING DEBATE PATTERNS, ATTACKING FALLACIES, & REFUTATION
Chapter 10 notes Logic and Reasoning.
Argument Analysis and Criticism chapter 8
What is a logical fallacy?
Debate Chapter 13 Pages
Week 1 Review.
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies.
How to win friends and influence people by being a jerk.
Argument Fallacies *Adapted from FactCheckEd.org
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
4 The Art of Critical Reading Reading Critically Mather ▪ McCarthy
The Day Has Come….. Tomorrow, you will enter the north commons at 7:30. Tomorrow, you will show the world your fabulous writing skills, your mature thinking.
Fallacy practice.
Parent/Student Writing Resource
Logical Fallacies Part 3.
Chapter 3 Speech Ethics.
Beginning to 3:27. Beginning to 3:27 What is a logical fallacy?
Expository Essay Writing
Let’s talk cross-ex!.
Using Principles of Logic to Strengthen Argument Writing
SPEECH110 C.ShoreFall 2015 East San Gabriel Valley, ROP
Revolutionary/ Age of Reason/ The Art of the Argument
Logical Fallacies.
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Argumentation PPT: Persuasive Techniques
Ways to Attack an Argument
Introduction Hook choices Integrated Quote.
A. Background Information
Lesson context Students have spent eight lessons examining major turning points of the last thousand years in British political history. This is the first.
Give ‘Em What They Want & Show ‘Em Where You Got It
Logical Fallacies Part 3 “Non-logic”.
Give ‘Em What They Want & Show ‘Em Where You Got It
The Argumentative Essay
Researching a Topic First read for understanding and background information Mark ideas that would help develop values or case ideas Highlight specific.
Information, data, maps & photos explanation & analysis
Debate April 12/13.
Propaganda.
Looking at what a text says and how it says it. Norton 38-58
Presentation transcript:

Cross Examination Strategies Clarify Could you repeat that contention? What evidence do you have to support it? Do you mean? Commit to a Position Get your opponent to take a stance So then what you mean is…? Expose Fallacies Demonstrate faulty reasoning Uncover illogical conclusions Expose quotes taken out of context to fit “reasoning” Expose Inadequate Evidence If your opponent makes a statement/contention, challenge them to back it up with vetted statistics!

Cross-Ex General Strategies Cross-ex is a time for questions, NOT for statements Be polite, yet firm and direct Questions should be closed-ended and factual Cross-ex is not the time for arguments or ad hominem attacks Questions should be clear When you are being questioned, be honest…and succinct. Don’t ramble, stay to the point of the question. Do not give your questioner any more than is asked.