Key Issues and Today’s Goals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Advertisements

Introducing the Durban Climate Change Partnership January 2012.
INSPECTING DESIGN & TECHNOLOGY: NOW AND IN THE FUTURE Peter Toft HMI – Ofsted Specialist Subject Adviser For D&T.
MA-PAL TASK 1 LEADERSHIP THROUGH A VISION FOR HIGH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
Local Points of Contact Webinar
Highlighting key definitions, suggested SAC roles, and challenges
Building evaluation in the Department of Immigration and Citizenship
Purpose of this discussion
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Performance Management and Employee Development
Draft thoughts on selecting LSST DDFs
Orientation Overview April 14, 2017
Selection & Deployment - Principals
Community Science Updates
Planning for Information System
SOAR Observatory Strategic Planning Initial Concept Presentation
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
Addressing Curricular Barriers to Completion
Creating and Using Community Report Cards
IESBA CAG Meeting Madrid September 13, 2017
LSST Commissioning: FY18 Planning
Simulations, Metrics and Merit Functions for Mini-surveys and Deep Drilling 1.
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
What is a Learning Collaborative?
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
ISCOM 424Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ISCOM 424 Education for Service- -snaptutorial.com
Drafting a Climate Change Response Plan
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
IESBA Meeting New York March 14, 2017
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Have your say!.
Critical Element: Faculty Commitment
Priority Research Direction (use one slide for each)
Board of Trustees Update
Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.
Overview of Science Verification Plan Keith Bechtol and Zeljko Ivezic LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.
Competency Modeler Designing the Project
So you’ve been inspected…. communicators driving improvement
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
An Update of COSO’s Internal Control–Integrated Framework
Medical Students Documenting in the EMR
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Key Value Indicators (KVIs)
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Development of energy balance statistics
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Medical Students Documenting in the EMR
ETS WG role and working methods
Extreme Programming.
Future Strategy and Work Plan
Legal issues in WFD implementation WD meeting 16 June 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Priority Research Direction (use one slide for each)
Creating and Using Community Report Cards
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Building an Informatics-Savvy Health Department
Workforce Planning Project support overview Presenter's Name
Coastal Bend College’s Quality Enhancement Plan
Question 1: Contingency for “extra” year
Commissioning Data – Who and Why?
Bridging the ITSM Information Gap
Meeting Water Directors
APMP Professional Certification
Presentation transcript:

Key Issues and Today’s Goals March 2017 SAC Meeting Key Issues and Today’s Goals

Key Issues raised by the SAC in August 2016 Timeline for final decision on observing strategy The observing strategy is never final; Andy Connolly and Zeljko Ivezic will discuss a target timeline for deciding on an initial baseline cadence. At five and a half years before the ten year survey begins, we are working on a balance between giving community information needed for community planning (e.g. early declaration of some DDFs), and resisting making statements that we cannot deliver. We are planning a flexible approach so LSST’s Observing Strategy can adapt to our evolving knowledge of both the system and of science opportunities.

Key Issues raised by the SAC in August 2016 Timeline for developing the Operations Simulator is unclear The Project holds detailed schedules for Schedule and OpSim development, but have not exposed those to the community before now. Andy Connolly will discuss a best-case scenario timeline (see discussion on staffing shuffle).   Metrics may not represent the breadth of the science community’s interests Beth will discuss the suggested role of the SAC itself in addressing this question How will decisions about survey strategy be made Zeljko Ivezic and Andy Connolly will discuss this

Key Issues raised by the SAC in August 2016 Deficiency of existing metrics to measure the impact of specific cadences on DDF science Lack of simulations of 2011 DDF proposals Working on the efficiency and science impact of the wide-fast-deep footprint is the Project’s priority. Over the coming year, the Project will assess DDFs on a best-effort basis. Timing and Process for Selecting DDF Cadences and/or Additional DDFs Andy Connolly will discuss this after lunch Plans for Commissioning Data Release Provided a summary document. Will discuss in the afternoon.

Goals from the Project for this SAC meeting Observing Strategy React to discussion of DDFs, mini-surveys, Director’s Discretionary time Advise on prioritization of limited resources to devote to software development, generating simulations, and synthesizing results – with focus on the wide-fast-deep survey footprint Advise on - What are the most important things about the observing strategy the community must know to prepare for LSST, and exactly when (ideally) should these things be known? Discuss suggested roles of the SAC in reading the Community White Paper, and in reacting to the breadth of science representation

Goals from the Project for this SAC meeting Commissioning Data React to commissioning plans Endorse the commissioning data policy React to the commissioning review feedback, that relates to the SAC and community