The Changing Nature of Technology- Based Industry in Washington State: Perspectives from 7 Technology Alliance Sponsored Studies William B. Beyers Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
1
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0: Trends in the Overall Health Care Market Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2005 Chart 1.2: Percent Change.
Performance of Hedges & Long Futures Positions in CBOT Corn Goodland, Kansas March 2, 2009 Daniel OBrien, Extension Ag Economist K-State Research and Extension.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
Create an Application Title 1D - Dislocated Worker Chapter 9.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
ZMQS ZMQS
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
ABC Technology Project
Lecture 4. GDP at Constant Price 1. What are the ways to value GDP? GDP at current price - the value of production of goods and services using prices.
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
© S Haughton more than 3?
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
VOORBLAD.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Research Department 1 Global Economic Crisis and the Israeli Economy Herzliya conference Dr. Karnit Flug Research Director, Bank of Israel February 2009.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1..
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Adding Up In Chunks.
© 2013 E 3 Alliance 2013 CENTRAL TEXAS EDUCATION PROFILE Made possible through the investment of the.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
1 Tracking Innovation in NC Patterns and Implications for NC's Eastern Region John Hardin, Executive Director NC Board of Science & Technology
Addition 1’s to 20.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Annual Industry Accounts Overview George Smith & Nicole Mayerhauser Current Industry Analysis Division Bureau of Economic Analysis Industry Accounts Users’
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Essential Cell Biology
Clock will move after 1 minute
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Select a time to count down from the clock above
The Changing Nature of Technology- Based Industry in Washington State: Perspectives from 8 Technology Alliance Sponsored Studies William B. Beyers Department.
Structural Change in the Washington State Economy: Evidence from Seven Input-Output Models William B. Beyers Department of Geography University of Washington.
The Economic Impact of Technology-Based Industries in Washington State 2000 William B. Beyers & David P. Lindahl Department of Geography University of.
Export History From Washington State Input-Output Models
The Economic Impact of Technology-Based Industries in Washington State
Presentation transcript:

The Changing Nature of Technology- Based Industry in Washington State: Perspectives from 7 Technology Alliance Sponsored Studies William B. Beyers Department of Geography University of Washington Seattle, WA Seattle Economists Club June 13, 2012

Outline Defining Technology-Based Industry The Changing Nature of R&D – WA vs. Other States Current Employment Trends in Employment The Changing Geography of Tech-Based Industry Changes in Economic Impacts

The Technology Alliance Technology- Based Industry Economic Impact Studies Studies have been benchmarked against the years 2005, 2007, 2000, 2003, 2007, 2009, and 2011 They have tried to use a consistent methodology Changes in underlying data sources have made this difficult We are unaware of any similar legacy of studies of this type

Defining Technology-Based Industry Many definitions of high tech Some are based on % of sales related to R&D, some based on arbitrary definitions of industries included, some based on % of R&D related occupations Early Technology Alliance economic impact studies defined technology-based industries as those with at least 10% of their workforce in R&D related occupations Starting in 2008, we defined tech-based industry as those with double the state average in R&D employment for all industries. In the current study, that threshold is 16.2% (up from 15.6 in 2010). This definition leads to some changes in industries included in the study, but other factors also lead to changes to industry inclusion (shift to NAICS, occupational structural change) After careful inspection of occupational structure, we included two industries with less than 16.2% R&D related occupations (electronic shopping & waste treatment/disposal)

R&D Related Jobs are very important in technology-based industry Source: Calculated From Washington State Employment Security Department 2010 industry-x-occupation matrix

Technology-Based Industries in 2011 Study

Examples of R&D Intensive Occupations in SOC 15, 17, and 19

Washington R&D by Users of Funds Source: NSF 2012 D – data not disclosed NA – data not available for this year Indexed ranks are against Gross State Product, which controls size of state economies

1995 Study Employment Mix

1997 Study Employment Mix

2000 Study Employment Mix

Employment Mix 2003 – After the shift from SIC to NAICS

Employment Mix 2007

Employment Mix 2009

Employment Mix Manufacturing 28% Services 72% Total 434,343 Data for 2011 Includes Self-Employed for the first time

Changing Mix of Technology-Based Industry Employment

History of Technology-Based Employment in Washington State

Boeing Employment Fluctuations

Boeings Long-Run Trend towards Outsourcing Regional Purchases are about 7% of total, mostly services Source: Washington State Input-Output Tables

Concentration of Technology-Based Employment in Washington State Nonemployer = 9.4% of County Business Patterns Employment

Location Quotients

Washington Ranks 2 nd. - Peer States Black/White Numbers Other High Location Quotients - Red Location Quotients – All Hi Tech 2009

1993 Location Quotients – Less Aerospace

Washington Ranks 3 rd - Peer States Black/White Numbers Other High Location Quotients - Red Location Quotients – Less Aerospace

1993 Location Quotients- Tech Intensive

Washington Ranks 3 rd - Peer States Black/White Numbers Other High Location Quotients – Red 1.27 Location Quotients – Tech-Intensive

Location Quotient Trend – Washington State

Washington County Employment 1997

233,475 52,918 15,048 18,739 11,929 Direct County Tech-Based Employment , ,475 15,048 18,739 11,929

Economic Impact Analysis

Employment Impacts 1997

434,343 1,007,378 1,441,721 Hi Tech Trade Services Direct Mfg. Other Industries Indirect Total Direct and Indirect Employment Impacts Report: 381, ,644 1,208,189

Direct & Total Impacts B&O tax only B&O and Sales Tax

Multiplier History

Historic Trend in Technology-Based Industry Employment and Impacts

Concluding Comments Washington has strong technology-based industry, but it has changed over time The occupational foundation for defining technology-based industry continues to rise Our R&D position relative to other states has also risen Service industry components of technology-based industry have continued to expand While these industries are strongly concentrated in the Puget Sound region, there has been geographical spread to other parts of the state Growth of technology-based industry has been faster than the state average, leading to growth in economic impacts that have also gradually risen. Thanks to the Technology Alliance for supporting this unique set of portraits of technology-based industry in Washington State