Developmental Compartments and Planar Polarity in Drosophila

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MCDB 4650 Developmental Genetics in Drosophila
Advertisements

Kálmán Somogyi, Pernille Rørth  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Localized Requirements for windbeutel and pipe Reveal a Dorsoventral Prepattern within the Follicular Epithelium of the Drosophila Ovary  Laura A Nilson,
Creation of a Sog Morphogen Gradient in the Drosophila Embryo
The DHHC Palmitoyltransferase Approximated Regulates Fat Signaling and Dachs Localization and Activity  Hitoshi Matakatsu, Seth S. Blair  Current Biology 
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Persistent Expression of Genes of the Enhancer of Split Complex Suppresses Neural Development in Drosophila  Keiko Nakao, José A. Campos-Ortega  Neuron 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Regulation of Frizzled by Fat-like Cadherins during Planar Polarity Signaling in the Drosophila Compound Eye  Chung-hui Yang, Jeffrey D. Axelrod, Michael.
Eye development: Notch lends a handedness
Direct and Long-Range Action of a DPP Morphogen Gradient
A Hedgehog-Insensitive Form of Patched Provides Evidence for Direct Long-Range Morphogen Activity of Sonic Hedgehog in the Neural Tube  James Briscoe,
Opposing Transcriptional Outputs of Hedgehog Signaling and Engrailed Control Compartmental Cell Sorting at the Drosophila A/P Boundary  Christian Dahmann,
Persistent Expression of Genes of the Enhancer of Split Complex Suppresses Neural Development in Drosophila  Keiko Nakao, José A. Campos-Ortega  Neuron 
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Insect segmentation: Genes, stripes and segments in ‘Hoppers’
Precision of Hunchback Expression in the Drosophila Embryo
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Eric J. Rulifson, Chi-Hwa Wu, Roel Nusse  Molecular Cell 
Organ Size Control: Lessons from Drosophila
Muscles in the Drosophila second thoracic segment are patterned independently of autonomous homeotic gene function  Sudipto Roy, L.S. Shashidhara, K VijayRaghavan 
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Ruth Grosskortenhaus, Frank Sprenger  Developmental Cell 
Luis Alberto Baena-López, Antonio Baonza, Antonio García-Bellido 
J.P. Couso, E. Knust, A. Martinez Arias  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Petra Haas, Darren Gilmour  Developmental Cell 
Todd Nystul, Allan Spradling  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
Rongwen Xi, Jennifer R. McGregor, Douglas A. Harrison 
Cytonemes Cell Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Dendrites of Distinct Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons Show Different Capacities for Homotypic Repulsion  Wesley B. Grueber, Bing Ye, Adrian W. Moore,
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Creation of a Sog Morphogen Gradient in the Drosophila Embryo
Pattern formation: Wingless on the move
Lethal Giant Larvae Acts Together with Numb in Notch Inhibition and Cell Fate Specification in the Drosophila Adult Sensory Organ Precursor Lineage  Nicholas.
The EGF and FGF Receptors Mediate Neuroglian Function to Control Growth Cone Decisions during Sensory Axon Guidance in Drosophila  Luis García-Alonso,
Short-Range Cell Interactions and Cell Survival in the Drosophila Wing
Evolution of yellow Gene Regulation and Pigmentation in Drosophila
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Thomas J. Klein, Andreas Jenny, Alexandre Djiane, Marek Mlodzik 
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (May 2002)
Amy Brittle, Chloe Thomas, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Zhenyu Zhang, Leslie M. Stevens, David Stein  Current Biology 
Mechanotransduction: Getting Morphogenesis Down Pat
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Producing Cells Retain and Recycle Wingless in Drosophila Embryos
Joseph M. Bateman, Helen McNeill  Cell 
Planar Cell Polarity: A Bridge Too Far?
Epithelial morphogenesis: Filopodia at work
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Transducing the Dpp Morphogen Gradient in the Wing of Drosophila
Novel Functions for Integrins in Epithelial Morphogenesis
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 21, Pages (October 2003)
Replacement of Fab-7 by the gypsy or scs Insulator Disrupts Long-Distance Regulatory Interactions in the Abd-B Gene of the Bithorax Complex  Ilham Hogga,
Volume 10, Issue 17, Pages (September 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Developmental Compartments and Planar Polarity in Drosophila José Casal, Gary Struhl, Peter A Lawrence  Current Biology  Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages 1189-1198 (July 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00974-0

Figure 1 The Pattern of ds and fj Expression, as Indicated by Enhancer Traps (A) A diagram of the anatomy of a segment of the dorsal epidermis showing the disposition of types of cuticle. The P compartment is shown in blue [17]. In all figures, anterior is toward the top of the page, the outlines of the clones are indicated, and red arrows indicate the zones of reversed polarity. (B) ds.lacZ. One segment of the tergites. There is strong expression in a single band that includes most of the P compartment and the back of the A compartment; it is weaker elsewhere. (C) ds.lacZ. Ventral view. We see strong bands centered at the back of each A compartment and grading away forward and backward. The approximate boundaries of the P compartments are indicated by red dots. (D) fj.lacZ. Ventral view. In the pleura, we see strong bands centered near the front of the A compartments. Current Biology 2002 12, 1189-1198DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00974-0)

Figure 2 Clones Lacking and Overexpressing fj (A) A fj− clone situated far anterior in the A compartment (it is marked with pawn, which makes finer hairs and depauperate bristles). It reverses the polarity of cells behind it. (B) A fj− clone, as in (A), but situated posterior within the A compartment. It makes cuticle of normal polarity. (C–E) Clones overexpressing fj. (C) A clone in the anterior part of A: it reverses hairs in front. The clone is marked with tricornered (trc), which makes multiple hairs and scraggy bristles. Note that the trc pattern of hairs indicates cell shapes, and, in the clone, these appear to form a concentric pattern. (D) A large clone marked with pawn at the extreme front of A that has no phenotype, and posterior to it, a small clone that reverses in front. (E) A clone in the P compartment, marked with pawn, that reverses polarity behind it. (F) A summary of the polarity effects of fj clones. Clones in the P compartment are edged in blue. fj is expressed at the front of A and may also be expressed at the back of P. Current Biology 2002 12, 1189-1198DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00974-0)

Figure 3 Gradients and Polarity This figure models the gradients and illustrates how different directions of slope, as shown for Fj and Ds, can give the observed results. For simplicity, we do not show the activity gradient of Ft or the consequences of removing Ft activity, but both should be similar to that of Fj. We imagine that the clones either remove Fj, Ds, or Ft activity (mutant clones) or augment Fj (UAS.fj). Spreading or diffusion of either the protein itself, or some consequence of it, will set up new slopes as indicated. If the vector of each slope or some derivative of it is read to give the polarity, then the reversals of polarity (in front or behind the clone) should be as we observe. Red arrows mark the places where the gradient vector is reversed. Current Biology 2002 12, 1189-1198DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00974-0)

Figure 4 Clones Overexpressing fj that Are near the A/P Border (A) This clone belongs to the A compartment and is marked with trc; it abuts the A/P border. Behind it, the cells in P are reversed, as are the cells in A in front and the cells of the clone itself. (B) A clone located at the front of the P compartment. Note that it reverses behind but has no effect on polarity of the A cells in front. The nuclei of P cells are marked with hh.lacZ. (C) Another A compartment clone, but this one is narrow and runs along the compartment boundary. Note that the polarity of the P cells (marked with hh.lacZ) behind is extensively reversed, but there is only slight reversal anteriorly — at a point where the clone is a little broader (compare with 5A). The a6 region (see Figure 1A) is unusually thin in this segment, both near and far from the clone. (D) A summary of the polarity effects of clones near the A/P border. On the left, a clone in A resembles 4A. On the right, the clone in P resembles 4B. Current Biology 2002 12, 1189-1198DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00974-0)

Figure 5 dachsous and Polarity (A) A segment of a fly strongly hypomorphic for ds; note that, apart from the most anterior regions of the A compartment, the hairs show disturbed and whorly polarity. At the back of the P compartment, the hairs are reversed. (B) A clone of ds− cells, marked with yellow and near some yellow bristles (arrowheads). The zone of whorly hair orientation indicates the epidermal extent of the clone. (C) A ds− clone in the A compartment, marked with crinkled (ck) (making numerous hairs per cell and damaging the bristles). Note that anterior, but not posterior, to the clone, there are hairs with disturbed orientation. (D) A ds− clone in the P compartment. Posterior to the clone, the orientation of hairs is reversed. We could not determine polarity within this clone because of the ck phenotype. Current Biology 2002 12, 1189-1198DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00974-0)

Figure 6 ft− Clones and Polarity (A) The clones are marked with stubby chaete (stc), a mutation with a similar phenotype to trc and ck. Two clones in the A compartment; the lower one has reversed hairs behind it. Variation in the amount of reversal is typical with ft− clones; the likelihood of reversal does not appear to depend on the position of the clone. (B) A clone in the P compartment; anterior to the clone there are disturbed hairs, and some are reversed. Current Biology 2002 12, 1189-1198DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00974-0)