SCU Phase Shifter Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of Detector Solenoid Effect to the Beam Effect on Beam Orbit Effect on Beam Size S.Kuroda(KEK)
Advertisements

SCUs for the LCLS-II HXR FEL SCUs for the LCLS-II HXR FEL P. Emma, et. al. July 9, 2014 Hard X-Ray (HXR) FEL for LCLS-II must cover 1-5 keV (4-GeV) SASE.
SCU Measurements at LBNL
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
 LCLS beam energy is 200-times lower at sec-21 than SLC beam (2-times lower in FFTB)  LCLS emittance is 5-50 times smaller than SLC  Need weaker corrector.
Overview of Proposed Parameter Changes Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Number of Blocks per Pole Diego Arbelaez. Option – Number of Blocks per Pole Required magnetic field tolerance of ~10 -4 For a single gap this can be.
SuperConducting Undulator (SCU) R&D Motivation and Status P. Emma For the SCU R&D collaboration: ANL, LBNL, SLAC June 27, 2014.
End Design Discussion D. Arbelaez (LBNL) Oct. 7,
Bernhard Holzer * IP5 IP1 IP2 IP8 IR 7 ”Beam Dynamics for Nb3Sn dipoles... latest news"
Options for Final Focusing Quadrupoles Michele Modena CERN TE-MSC Many thanks for the contributions of: J. Garcia Perez, H. Gerwig, C. Lopez, C. Petrone,
Option – 5m Undulators What is the optimum length for an LCLS undulator?  XFEL is using 5m undulator segments.  Is this optimum?  What are the advantages.
Magnetic Design S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers, R. Oort, M. Morsch, E. Rochepault, H. Pan, T. Ki, R. Schlueter (LBNL) Superconducting Undulator Integrated.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Proposal to use electromagnetic correction coils for RT trajectory correction.
Low Energy RHIC e - Cooling Meeting Minutes – 11/5/14 1.J. Tuozzolo will schedule a visit to NSLS next week to evaluate available magnets, power supplies,
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
XFEL X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Bernward Krause MEA WP-12: Warm Magnets WPL: B. Krause.
Harmonic lasing in the LCLS-II (a work in progress…) G. Marcus, et al. 03/11/2014.
MBA Magnets MultiBend Achromat Magnets 8/14/2015 Review By Mark Jaski.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
FEL Simulations: Undulator Modeling Sven Reiche Start-end Workshop DESY-Zeuthen 08/20/03.
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
Harmonic lasing in the LCLSII SXR beamline G. Marcus, Y. Ding, Z. Huang 11/21/2013.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
Baseline Injection/Extraction Configuration Aimin Xiao and Louis Emery, September 12th 2006.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
Magnet design and field calculations
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
Frequency Sensitivity to Dimensions
Feng Zhou LCLS-II AP meeting 02/23/2017
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
Alexander Kalimov, State Polytechnic University, St.-Petersburg
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
Optics Development for HE-LHC
Undulator Tolerances for LCLS-II using SCUs
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
MDL0L02 Dipole and Environmental Fields
MDL0L02 Dipole Field July 6, 2016.
MDL0L02 Dipole Field Offset
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
BDS civil construction Single IR upgrade scenarios discussion
A Cold SCU Phase-Shifter
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Undulator Line Design Liz Moog, Advanced Photon Source April 24, 2002
Linear beam dynamics simulations for XFEL beam distribution system
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
IR Beam Transport Status
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Undulator Physics Issues Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS July 11, 2007
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

SCU Phase Shifter Meeting 04/19/2016

Phase Integral Requirements From Heinz-Dieter’s analysis the minimum phase integral required is ~ 350 T2mm3 Need to add excess strength for continuous scans Photon energy scans are to be performed over a range of ±2.5% but not smaller than ±25 eV. Will perform analysis to determine the excess strength that is needed Will have to consider hysteresis in the phase shifter (may be advantageous to avoid operating near zero field)

Heinz-Dieter’s phase shifter analysis

Field Strength Estimates Second Field Integral k 2k First Field Integral k -k From Heinz-Dieter’s analysis the minimum phase integral required is ~ 350 T2mm3 Assume PS length is 100 mm and pole length is 10 mm Then k = 1900 µTm Central pole required strength is 3800 µTm -> .38 T for a 1 cm pole Required strength will be somewhat higher to account for excess capacity and non-ideal effects

Possible layouts 1: * y-direction is along undulator field orientation ECy/PS PS ECx 1: * y-direction is along undulator field orientation EC – end corrector pole PS – phase shifter pole 2: PS Ecx/PS ECy 3: PS Ecx/PS ECy Scenario 1 y-direction correction is closest to the undulator end Phase shifter and end corrections are closely coupled Higher strength might be required for ECy/PS poles Scenario 2 y-direction correction is further from the undulator end (may lead to larger beam displacement at the ends) Phase shifter and main undulator end corrections are decoupled (phase shifter can be controlled with one power supply + small trim coil on a separate power supply for x correction) Scenario 3 Phase shifter and main undulator end corrections are decoupled Higher field is needed in PS poles to compensate for the shorter drift length