COURT PERFORMANCE Why and what to follow

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managers and Management
Advertisements

European Judicial Systems 2002 Facts and figures on the basis of a survey conducted in 40 Council of Europe Member States.
School Leadership that Works
Supervision in Organizations
COURT PERFORMANCE Why and what to follow. Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes - Different Measures Robert D. Behn Harvard University Public Administration.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice.
1 Bulgaria Delegation. 2 Societary evaluation context Globalization Increasing complexity of governance Better governance Global competition Budget deficits.
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools. CEPEJ Guidelines.
1 The Great Challenges For Top Public Executives The Forum for Executive Public Management Copenhagen, Denmark September 1, 2003 Robert D. Behn Kennedy.
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
11 Management Functions and Principles. 22 Overview The Managerial Environment Management Processes (Functions) Managerial Roles Universality of the Manager’s.
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe.
Performance Management Measuring Performance Using Information to Improve Performance.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Organizational Control
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Item 8: Revised project plan: Encouraging Quality in ECEC Miho Taguma Education and Training Policy Division Directorate for Education, OECD 7-8 December.
Chapter no:6 Training and development of sales force.
1 Performance Measures Rebecca Stark, Court Administrator Austin Municipal Court.
Tasks:  analyse the judicial systems in member states  identify the difficulties they meet  define concrete ways to improve the functioning of these.
Strategic Planning Session David Rudder, Ph.D. Rudder Consultants, LLC. May 17, 2006.
CEPEJ Activities on Court Performance. Activities of CEPEJ in the field of… Evaluation of Judicial Systems Evaluation of Judicial Systems Judicial time.
Managers & Management MGT Principles of Management and Business
Management Functions & Principles
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning and programming Planning and prioritizing Part 1 Strengthening Statistics Produced.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
European judicial systems: 2008 findings and regional analysis Commission Européenne pour l’efficacité de la Justice European Commission for the Efficiency.
Performance Measurement Theoretical Perspectives. The Regional Hub participating countries’ experience. 26 of July, 2015 Issyk-Kul, Kyrgyz Republic.
The state of performance management Visa Paajanen/NAOF
1 Report on European judicial systems Presentation of the main results Edition 2012 (data 2010)
The Formation of Public Policy Promoting Civil Society in the 21st Century.
2015 edition of the Crystal Scales of Justice Prize awarding ceremony Cérémonie de remise du Prix Balance de cristal 2015 Explanations by Fabio Bartolomeo,
Jump to first page 1 The Supervisor's Job ORGANIZATIONS A systematic grouping of people brought together to accomplish a specific purpose. Common Characteristics.
From Monitoring Through Evaluation To Impact Assessment The case of NHDRs and vulnerable groups Andrey Ivanov Human Development Adviser, Bratislava RSC.
Chp. 1 - Managers & Management
Pete Williams Governor’s Office for Innovation in Government.
Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015.
1 Quality of justice and courts Checklist Checklist for promoting the quality of justice and the courts.
Study session: evaluating activities of courts and judges Moderator: Frans van der Doelen Plenary meeting CEPEJ 7 December 2011.
1 Report on European judicial systems Presentation of the main results Edition 2010 (data 2008)
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
CAN EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ALONE HELPS IMPROVE SERVICE DELIVERY? Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions Cherèl.
Kenya Evidence Forum - June 14, 2016 Using Evidence to Improve Policy and Program Designs.
1 1 Supervision Fundamentals Explain the difference among supervisors, middle managers, and top management Define supervisor Identify.
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
Introduction to Core Concepts
Performance Management System
Appraisal Management The Human Side.
Chapter 3: The Meaning of Public Administration
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
COMPONENTS OF A LANGUAGE ACCESS PLAN
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
CEPEJ IN TURKEY Ismail Aksel CEPEJ Member of Turkey
Foundations of Control
Effect combined IMPACT on achieving outcomes Organizational OUTPUTS
Click here to advance to the next slide.
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe Dear Excellencies, Dear Colleagues and guests!
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools
Barry Anderson OECD 1st MENA SBO Meeting Cairo November 24-25, 2008
Assessment of Service Outcomes
Performance Assessment in Finland
Performance and Quality Improvement
European Institute of Public Administration (NL)
Study session: evaluating activities of courts and judges Moderator: Frans van der Doelen Plenary meeting CEPEJ 7 December 2011.
The EU Model of PIC Raymond Hill Team Leader, PIC Task Force
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
HWC - Brussels meeting Session 1
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

COURT PERFORMANCE Why and what to follow

Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes - Different Measures Robert D. Behn Harvard University Public Administration Review • September/October 2003, Vol. 63, No. 5

Purposes I Evaluate Control Budget Motivate How well is my public agency performing? Control How can I ensure that my subordinates are doing the right thing? Budget On what programs, people, or projects should my agency spend the public's money? Motivate How can I motivate line staff, middle managers, nonprofit and for-profit collaborators, stakeholders, and citizens to do the things necessary to improve performance?

Purposes II Promote Celebrate Learn Improve How can I convince political superiors, legislators, stakeholders, journalists, and citizens that my agency is doing a good job? Celebrate What accomplishments are worthy of the important organizational ritual of celebrating success? Learn Why is what working or not working? Improve What exactly should who do differently to improve performance?

Characteristics of Performance Measures – Needs I Evaluate Outcomes, combined with inputs and with the effects of exogenous factors Control Inputs that can be regulated Budget Efficiency measures (specifically outcomes or outputs divided by inputs) Motivate Almost-real-time outputs compared with production targets

Characteristics of Performance Measures – Needs II Promote Easily understood aspects of performance about which citizens really care Celebrate Periodic and significant performance targets that, when achieved, provide people with a real sense of personal and collective accomplishment Learn Disaggregated data that can reveal deviancies from the expected Improve Inside-the-black-box relationships that connect changes in operations to changes in outputs and outcomes

Conclusion "What gets measured gets done“ If you measure it, people will do it.

CEPEJ Activities on Court Performance

Activities of CEPEJ in the field of… Evaluation of Judicial Systems Judicial time management Quality of justice Enforcement Mediation Targeted co-operation

CEPEJ – recommends especially Evaluation of Judicial Systems – Report “Time Management Checklist“ SATURN – European Uniform Guidelines for Monitoring of Judicial Timeframes (EUGMONT) GOJUST – Guidelines on Judicial Statistics

CEPEJ – recommended indicators Type of case Cases pending on 1.1.2008 New cases initiated in 2008 Resolved cases Cases pending on 31.12.2008 1 Civil cases 1a Litigious divorces 1b Dismissals

CEPEJ – recommended indicators Efficiency rate, Total backlog, Backlog resolution, Case per judge, Standard departure …

CEPEJ indicators – applied to TK I

CEPEJ indicators – applied to TK II

Comprehensive court quality models The Netherlands: measurement system court quality and RechtspraaQ Finland: Quality Benchmarks Rovaniemi Courts Ongoing work of CEPEJ-GT-QUAL 15