Zhiqiang Hou, Lijing Su, Jimin Pei, Nick V. Grishin, Hong Zhang 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Crystal Structure of a Human Cleavage Factor CFIm25/CFIm68/RNA Complex Provides an Insight into Poly(A) Site Recognition and RNA Looping  Qin Yang, Molly.
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Smads “Freeze” When They Ski
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Structural and Functional Studies of the 252 kDa Nucleoporin ELYS Reveal Distinct Roles for Its Three Tethered Domains  Silvija Bilokapic, Thomas U. Schwartz 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Thomas R. Lane, Elaine Fuchs, Kevin C. Slep  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Rab35/ACAP2 and Rab35/RUSC2 Complex Structures Reveal Molecular Basis for Effector Recognition by Rab35 GTPase  Lin Lin, Yingdong Shi, Mengli Wang, Chao.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Zhiqiang Hou, Lijing Su, Jimin Pei, Nick V. Grishin, Hong Zhang 
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Phosphorylated Histone H3 by the Survivin Subunit of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  A. Arockia Jeyaprakash,
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Iwr1 Directs RNA Polymerase II Nuclear Import
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
A YidC-like Protein in the Archaeal Plasma Membrane
Recognition of AT-Rich DNA Binding Sites by the MogR Repressor
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Missense Mutations in the N-Terminal Domain of Human Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Interfere with Binding of Regulatory Phenylalanine  Torben Gjetting, Marie.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Crystal Structure of the CLOCK Transactivation Domain Exon19 in Complex with a Repressor  Zhiqiang Hou, Lijing Su, Jimin Pei, Nick V. Grishin, Hong Zhang  Structure  Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 1187-1194.e3 (August 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.05.023 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2017 25, 1187-1194.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.05.023) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A Simplified Model of Mammalian Circadian Clock Feedback Loop The transcriptional activating positive arm and its components (CLOCK:BMAL1 and coactivators) are colored green, whereas the negative arms are colored red. Two distinct negative transcriptional regulatory mechanisms are known: PER:CRY-mediated recruitment of corepressors and CIPC- or CHRONO-mediated blocking of coactivator interactions. Structure 2017 25, 1187-1194.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.05.023) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of CLOCK Exon19:CIPC Complex (A) Domain organizations of mouse CLOCK and CIPC. a.a., amino acids. (B) The coiled-coil three-helical bundle structure of Exon19:CIPC with 2:1 stoichiometry. (C) Sedimentation-velocity ultracentrifugation analyses of Exon19:CIPC complexes. The experimentally deduced molecular weights (MW) closely match those calculated for the complexes with two Exon19 and one CIPC stoichiometry. For the untagged 2:1 complex, the calculated MW is 19.1 kDa. The tagged 2:1 complex has a calculated MW of 113 kDa. (D) The dimerization of two 2:1 Exon19:CIPC three-helical bundle in the crystal. Structure 2017 25, 1187-1194.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.05.023) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Interface between CLOCK Exon19 and CIPC (A) Details of Exon19 and CIPC interface at the interior of the coiled-coil three-helical bundle with side chains of relevant residues, shown in stick representation. The bundle is broken up into two parts with different viewing angles for clarity. The three distinct segments are marked I, II, and III. (B) A Per2 promoter-driven Luciferase reporter assay was used to evaluate the effects of CIPC mutants on its repression activities. Cells were transfected with wide-type CLOCK and BMAL1 and with either wild-type or mutant CIPC as indicated. (C) Effects of selected CLOCK Exon19 mutants on the CLOCK:BMAL1-mediated transactivation in the reporter assays. (D) Effects of Exon19 mutants on the CIPC-mediated repression of CLOCK:BMAL1 activity. Data in (B) to (D) are presented as mean ± SD of three replicates in a single assay. The results shown are representative of at least three independent experiments. Structure 2017 25, 1187-1194.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.05.023) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Multiple Sequence Alignments of the CLOCK Exon19 Domains and CIPC Homologs from Representative Species The accession number and species abbreviation are listed at the beginning of each sequence. mm, Mus musculus; hs, Homo sapiens; gg, Gallus gallus; xt, Xenopus tropicalis; dr, Danio rerio; bf, Branchiostoma floridae; ac, Aplysia californica; cg, Crassostrea gigas; tc, Tribolium castaneum; dm, Drosophila melanogaster; dp, Daphnia pulex; nv, Nematostella vectensis; sp, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus; ct, Capitella teleta; ap, Apis mellifera. Conserved hydrophobic residues are highlighted in yellow; conserved polar residues are bold on gray. The mammalian NPAS2 proteins are CLOCK paralogs enriched in brain. PASD1 is a cancer/testis antigen protein containing an Exon19 homologous domain (shown here) and was recently reported to repress clock-mediated transcription (Liggins et al., 2004; Michael et al., 2015). Structure 2017 25, 1187-1194.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.05.023) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Interaction between CLOCK Exon19 and CIPC Is Conserved in Drosophila (A) The Exon19 domain of dCLK (dExon19) and the C-terminal domain of dCIPC were coexpressed in Escherichia coli and copurified by Ni-NTA affinity and size-exclusion chromatography. (B) Drosophila CIPC represses CLK:CYC-mediated transcription activation in S2 cells. CLK and CYC are Drosophila homologs of mammalian CLOCK and BMAL1, respectively. (C) Pairwise alignment of mouse and Drosophila Exon19 and CIPC sequences in the helical bundle region. The mutated residue numbers are marked above for mouse residues and below for Drosophila residues. Structure 2017 25, 1187-1194.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.05.023) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Proposed Mechanism of Exon19 Domain Action and CIPC-Mediated Repression of CLOCK:BMAL1 In the absence of CIPC, binding to the tandem E boxes on DNA would bring two or more CLOCK:BMAL1 activators in proximity and enable a more effective recruitment of general coactivators by CLOCK Exon19 domains. Interaction with CIPC induces the formation of the 2:1 Exon19:CIPC complex and would interfere with the coactivator recruitment thus repress CLOCK:BMAL1-mediated transactivation. Structure 2017 25, 1187-1194.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.05.023) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions