"Experience with the peer reviews, successes and things to change for next reviews" Delina Ibrahimaj, Albania.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation arrangements in Lithuania Neringa Jarmalavičiūtė, Evaluation Division, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania.
Advertisements

Implementation of Capacity Development for CDM Project in Viet Nam Nguyen Khac Hieu Climate Change Coordinator Vietnam National Office for Climate Change.
1 Lal Shanker Ghimire Joint Secretary FACD, Ministry of Finance Joint Evaluation in Nepal: Experience Sharing from the Paris Declaration Evaluation.
Audit of Public Procurement
NEXT Lessons Learned from Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014, Brussels Fernando Franco, Spanish Nuclear.
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
EU Code of Practice Peer Review 2006 – 8 :A Peer’s Perspective Frank Nolan Office for National Statistics UK.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Proposed Framework for Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Negussie Gorfe.
Preparatory Stakeholder Workshop - Laos 26 May 2010.
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR CDM IN VIET NAM Presented by Nguyen Mong Cuong Project CD4CDM - Viet Nam Outline  Overview of project  Project activities and.
MGSC/2009/06 Eurostat Strategy for Developing Light Peer Reviews (LPR) for Candidate Countries and Adapted Global Assessments (AGA) for Potential Candidates.
Overview on the peer reviews in the Member States PGSC October 2015 Point 6 of the Agenda Claudia Junker Eurostat.
23 March 2012 Adapted global assessments and light peer reviews.
Eurostat New round of peer reviews in the enlargement countries 1 Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2015, Herceg Novi, Montenegro.
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia Point 9 - The coordination of the National Statistical System in Serbia PGSC 2015 Kotor, Montenegro,
1 Project Coordinators’ meeting March 2010 NATIONAL TEMPUS OFFICES (NTOs) & HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial Control Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
21 June 2011 High level seminar for EECCA on “Quality matters in statistics” High level seminar for EECCA on “Quality matters in statistics” The Code of.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
United Nations Statistics Division
Ministry of Industry and Commerce
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING.
National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic
Capacity Building Project for Argentina’s Voluntary Peer Review
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
The experiences of Turkish Statistical Institute in the
TurkStat's experience with the preparation for the peer review in 2015
The experiences of Turkey in the
Statistical capacity building in the ENP South countries
Peer review experience in the CSB of Latvia
New round of assessments in the enlargement and EECCA countries
years of existence.
Peer review on compliance with the Code of Practice and the coordination role of the National Statistical Institute Kosovo experience Meetings of.
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2015
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2014, Antalya
Updated Inventory of national practices
Introduction to the training
Sectoral Review on Labour Force Statistics
ESS Security and Secure exchange of information Expert Group (E4SEG) DIME/ITDG SG ESS IT Security Framework Pascal Jacques ESTAT B2 Local Security Officer.
Strategy for statistical cooperation with the enlargement countries 2014 – 2020 MGSC March 2014 Point 3.1 of the Agenda Ferenc Gálik.
9. Quality and Experimental data
The Amended ESS Statistical Law - Regulation (EC) 223/2009
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Peer review in the Republic of Macedonia
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2013, Skopje
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2014, Luxembourg
Cost accounting in the ESS
United Nations Statistics Division
Peer reviews DIME/ITDG Steering Group 15 February 2019 Claudia Junker
Mr. Alper GÜCÜMENGİL Head of Projects Group, TURKSTAT
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Statistics in the Enlargement context
PRESENTATION OF EXISTING EVALUATION
Overview of lessons learnt from the Peer Reviews workshop in March
The role of the international department of TurkStat
Item 8 Revision of the European Statistics Code of Practice
Current state & Prospects of implementation
United Nations Statistics Division
Institutional framework for quality management in official statistics
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2013, Skopje
‘QUALITY’ ROADMAP: Implementation
United Nations Statistics Division
United Nations Statistics Division
Coordination of the National Statistical System of the Republic of Macedonia Kruševo, 2018.
Task Force Peer reviews and quality Eurostat
21st meeting of the Management Group on Statistical Cooperation
Presentation transcript:

"Experience with the peer reviews, successes and things to change for next reviews" Delina Ibrahimaj, Albania

Content Experience with Assessments Reviews Preparation phase Peer Review focus Organization of PR self assessment process Self assessment benefits Importance of self assessment Coordination and content PR Recommendations PR Benefits Measures to meet the recommendations Lesson learned

Assessments carried out AGA - 2010 Light Peer review - 2013 Limited Peer Review - 2015 Sector reviews - Business Statistics 2015 and LFS 2016 Planned - Sector Reviews - Agriculture statistics 2018

First Draft of SAQ: February 2018 Second Draft of SAQ: March 2018 SAQ Preparation phase Creation of the working groups for each principle and Steering Body: January 2018 First Draft of SAQ: February 2018 Second Draft of SAQ: March 2018 Completed SAQ: May 2018 Country visit: June 2018

Preparation of Peer Review process First Phase Establishing Steering Group and Technical Groups for each principle; Preparing the first draft-SAQ and discussing twice a month; Organizing preparatory meetings with ONA-s Second Phase Discussing the draft-SAQ prepared by INSTAT; Establishing responsible persons for providing the appropriate logistic, translation and other facilities; Organizing preparatory meetings with representatives of users, data providers, media and academic world Final Phase Discussing the final SAQ, approval and send to PR Team; Collect and list the supporting documents (laws, regulations, guidelines, MoU’s etc.) Agenda finalization; Ensure the appropriate work environment for interviews. A specific office is needed as well, equipped with Wi-Fi, PC, printer etc.

Peer review focus Self assessment Review visit Focus of the PR NSI: Self-assessment questionnaire. implementation of Code of Practice + questionnaires on coordination in national statistical system ONAs: “Light-self-evaluation” based on Code of Practice Documentation needed for all answers Review visit The Peer Review Team : 2 international experts 1 representative from Eurostat 2 observer form neighbouring country (Montenegro) 5 days country visit Focus of the PR Compliance with all 15 principles of the Code of Practice NSIs and Other National Statistics producers Coordination within the national statistical system Involvement of users (media, researchers, ministries etc.) and data providers Resources allocated for statistical activities

Self Assessment benefits Self-assessment an opportunity for all the NSS for a better picture of: Full legal framework on which INSTAT activity and other producers of official statistics is based; Activities covered by the actors involved in the system, development phases and the problems faced Better communication on institutional and inter-institutional level; The level of the available resources to cover statistical activities; Perception of the level of application of the statistical principles.

Importance of Self Assessment Opportunity to: identify weaknesses initiate improvement activities raise awareness at the whole NSS about the CoP Better cooperation with the counterparts from other institutions covering statistics; Information on the level of user perception on the NSS performance; Information on the level of media perception for the NSS and their future expectations for official statistics;

Coordination and content Coordination by INSTAT 46 Documents 3 Questionnaires 85 Representatives The Assessment Team conducted interviews with stakeholders, representatives from key users of official statistics, administrative data holders, the academic world, media and international organizations. The documentation needed for the experts was prepared by working groups established by INSTAT, the Bank of Albania and the Ministry of Finances and Economy, while the whole process was coordinated by INSTAT.

Peer Review Recommendations Institutional strengthening - 9 recommendations Developing quality management and improving cost-effectiveness - 10 recommendations Improve communication with users and other stakeholders - 5 recommendations

Peer Review benefits Will help INSTAT in the processes of drafting strategies and implementation plans; Will assist in monitoring of the implementation of activities as expected by Eurostat; Will serve as a supporting document for proposing other legal and sub-legal acts for the strengthening of INSTAT and NSS; Will affect the increase of public confidence of the NSS through the publication of the reports; Will strengthen cooperation with the media and the academic world; Will affect the allocation of resources needed to cover for production of official statistics.

Measures to meet PR recommendations Improvement actions for each of the recommendations has been prepared and sent to Eurostat for comments/approval Peer Review report is published in Eurostat and INSTAT website Improvement actions will be included in the operational plan of INSTAT and followed on regular basis.

Lesson learned A high level team of NSI should evaluate the SAQ and give opinions Stable working groups members Periodic meetings within INSTAT and inter-institutional level during preparatory phases Draft-agenda as early as possible Legal expertise on specific issues Media to be met in morning sessions

Thank you for your kind attention !