Suzanne Paradis, Sean T Sweeney, Graeme W Davis  Neuron 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christian Rosenmund, Charles F Stevens  Neuron 
Advertisements

Steven H. DeVries, Wei Li, Shannon Saszik  Neuron 
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Gain Change Is Related to Postsynaptic Spike Firing at a Cerebellar Inhibitory Synapse  Carlos D Aizenman, Paul B Manis,
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Recruitment of New Sites of Synaptic Transmission During the cAMP-Dependent Late Phase of LTP at CA3–CA1 Synapses in the Hippocampus  Vadim Y. Bolshakov,
Variance-Mean Analysis in the Presence of a Rapid Antagonist Indicates Vesicle Depletion Underlies Depression at the Climbing Fiber Synapse  Kelly A.
The Generation of Direction Selectivity in the Auditory System
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
The Number of Postsynaptic Currents Necessary to Produce Locomotor-Related Cyclic Information in Neurons in the Neonatal Rat Spinal Cord  Morten Raastad,
Coincident Pre- and Postsynaptic Activity Modifies GABAergic Synapses by Postsynaptic Changes in Cl− Transporter Activity  Melanie A Woodin, Karunesh.
Bidirectional Modification of Presynaptic Neuronal Excitability Accompanying Spike Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity  Cheng-yu Li, Jiang-teng Lu, Chien-ping.
Postsynaptic PKA Controls Quantal Size and Reveals a Retrograde Signal that Regulates Presynaptic Transmitter Release in Drosophila  Graeme W Davis, Aaron.
Active Currents Regulate Sensitivity and Dynamic Range in C
Transsynaptic Control of Presynaptic Ca2+ Influx Achieves Homeostatic Potentiation of Neurotransmitter Release  Martin Müller, Graeme W. Davis  Current.
Felix Felmy, Erwin Neher, Ralf Schneggenburger  Neuron 
Pair Recordings Reveal All-Silent Synaptic Connections and the Postsynaptic Expression of Long-Term Potentiation  Johanna M Montgomery, Paul Pavlidis,
The Reduced Release Probability of Releasable Vesicles during Recovery from Short- Term Synaptic Depression  Ling-Gang Wu, J.Gerard G Borst  Neuron  Volume.
Yongling Zhu, Jian Xu, Stephen F. Heinemann  Neuron 
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Efficacy of Thalamocortical and Intracortical Synaptic Connections
Spike Timing-Dependent LTP/LTD Mediates Visual Experience-Dependent Plasticity in a Developing Retinotectal System  Yangling Mu, Mu-ming Poo  Neuron 
Anatol C Kreitzer, Adam G Carter, Wade G Regehr  Neuron 
A Presynaptic Glutamate Receptor Subunit Confers Robustness to Neurotransmission and Homeostatic Potentiation  Beril Kiragasi, Joyce Wondolowski, Yan.
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Heather Heerssen, Richard D. Fetter, Graeme W. Davis  Current Biology 
Einat S. Peled, Zachary L. Newman, Ehud Y. Isacoff  Current Biology 
Unrestricted Synaptic Growth in spinster—a Late Endosomal Protein Implicated in TGF- β-Mediated Synaptic Growth Regulation  Sean T Sweeney, Graeme W Davis 
Disparate Postsynaptic Induction Mechanisms Ultimately Converge to Drive the Retrograde Enhancement of Presynaptic Efficacy  Pragya Goel, Xiling Li, Dion.
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Long-Term Depression Properties in a Simple System
A Genetic Analysis of Synaptic Development
Functional Differentiation of Multiple Climbing Fiber Inputs during Synapse Elimination in the Developing Cerebellum  Kouichi Hashimoto, Masanobu Kano 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
CAPS-1 and CAPS-2 Are Essential Synaptic Vesicle Priming Proteins
Xin-hao Wang, Mu-ming Poo  Neuron 
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Enhancement of Synaptic Efficacy by Presynaptic GABAB Receptors
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Bo Li, Ran-Sook Woo, Lin Mei, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Tiago Branco, Kevin Staras, Kevin J. Darcy, Yukiko Goda  Neuron 
A Hierarchy of Cell Intrinsic and Target-Derived Homeostatic Signaling
Transsynaptic Control of Presynaptic Ca2+ Influx Achieves Homeostatic Potentiation of Neurotransmitter Release  Martin Müller, Graeme W. Davis  Current.
Serotonergic Modulation of Sensory Representation in a Central Multisensory Circuit Is Pathway Specific  Zheng-Quan Tang, Laurence O. Trussell  Cell Reports 
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
Martin Müller, Edward C.G. Pym, Amy Tong, Graeme W. Davis  Neuron 
Encoding of Oscillations by Axonal Bursts in Inferior Olive Neurons
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Deactivation of L-type Ca Current by Inhibition Controls LTP at Excitatory Synapses in the Cerebellar Nuclei  Abigail L. Person, Indira M. Raman  Neuron 
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Xiling Li, Pragya Goel, Joyce Wondolowski, Jeremy Paluch, Dion Dickman 
Bhupesh Mehta, Josefin Snellman, Shan Chen, Wei Li, David Zenisek 
Christian Rosenmund, Charles F Stevens  Neuron 
Genetic Dissection of Structural and Functional Components of Synaptic Plasticity. III. CREB Is Necessary for Presynaptic Functional Plasticity  Graeme.
Sydney Cash, Yang Dan, Mu-ming Poo, Robert Zucker  Neuron 
Kinetics of Synaptic Vesicle Refilling with Neurotransmitter Glutamate
Taro Ishikawa, Yoshinori Sahara, Tomoyuki Takahashi  Neuron 
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2003)
Rab3 Dynamically Controls Protein Composition at Active Zones
BACHD mice demonstrate decreases in synaptic activity of medium-sized spiny neurons at 6 months. BACHD mice demonstrate decreases in synaptic activity.
α2δ-3 Is Required for Rapid Transsynaptic Homeostatic Signaling
Extrasynaptic Glutamate Spillover in the Hippocampus: Dependence on Temperature and the Role of Active Glutamate Uptake  Fredrik Asztely, Gül Erdemli,
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Homeostatic Control of Presynaptic Release Is Triggered by Postsynaptic Membrane Depolarization  Suzanne Paradis, Sean T Sweeney, Graeme W Davis  Neuron  Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 737-749 (May 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00326-9

Figure 1 Morphology and Synaptic Localization of the Kir2.1 Channel (A, E, and H) The GFP tagged Kir2.1 channel localizes to the postsynaptic membranes of synaptic boutons in Kir2.1-expressing third instar larvae (yw/+; UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4). Clear definition of the postysnaptic subsynaptic reticulum underneath a single bouton can be seen with Kir2.1-GFP (E and H insets). (B) Visualization of both Kir2.1-GFP (green) and anti-synapsin (red) staining for the same synapse as in (A). (C) The synaptic terminal at muscles 6 and 7 of a control animal, yw/+; MHC-GAL4/+, is visualized using anti-synapsin and anti-FasII antibodies. (D) The synaptic terminal at muscles 6 and 7 of a Kir2.1-expressing animal, yw/+; UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4, is visualized using anti-synapsin and anti-FasII antibodies. (F and I) Substitution of the consensus PDZ interacting motif in the Kir2.1 protein (yw/+; UAS-Kir2.1AAE-GFP/MHC-GAL4) disrupts channel localization. The UAS-Kir2.1AAE-GFP channel appears diffuse at the postsynaptic subsynaptic reticulum underneath a single bouton (F and I insets). (G and J) Quantification of the ratio of fluorescence intensity of the difference between the synaptic and the muscle membrane (ΔF) relative to the fluorescence intensity of the muscle membrane for muscle 6 (G) and muscle 4 (J). There is a significant difference in relative fluorescence intensity between the Kir2.1- and Kir2.1AAE-expressing animals (asterisk, p < 0.001, Student's t test) indicating that the Kir2.1AAE channel is mislocalized to the muscle membrane surface. The numbers above the bars indicate the number of boutons assayed for fluorescence intensity. Dashed lines in (E) and (F) indicate the edge of muscle 6. Arrows indicate boutons selected for insets in (E, F, H, and I). Scale bar in (A) is 5 μm; in (C) and (D) scale bar is 15 μm Neuron 2001 30, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00326-9)

Figure 2 The Kir2.1 Channel Passes a Persistent Outward Current in Drosophila Larval Muscle (A) I-V plot of the currents in Drosophila muscle with and without expression of the Kir2.1 channel. The muscle in the UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4 animals (Kir Muscle, filled boxes [n = 9]) has a large inward current hyperpolarized relative to −85 mV and a persistent outward current depolarized relative to −85 mV that is not present in the control animals (MHC-GAL4/+, open diamonds [n = 6] and UAS-Kir/+, open circles [n = 9]). The novel outward current in the Kir2.1-expressing muscle gradually decreases as the muscle becomes more depolarized and is absent by −15 mV. (B) I-V plot of the currents in Kir2.1-expressing muscle with and without Ba2+ treatment. Both the large inward and outward currents in the Kir2.1-expressing muscle (Kir Muscle, black filled boxes [n = 9]) are dramatically decreased by Ba2+ treatment (Kir Muscle + Ba2+, red filled circles [n = 8]). Currents frommuscle in control animals without Ba2+ treatment are also plotted for comparison (MHC-GAL4/+, open diamonds [n = 6]). (C) I-V plot of the currents in the muscles of the MHC-GAL4/+ control animals with Ba2+ treatment (Control + Ba2+, red open squares [n = 7]) and without Ba2+ treatment (Control, black open diamonds [n = 6]). Ba2+ treatment slightly reduces the outward current in control animals starting at approximately −15 mV. (D) Representative current traces used to generate the I-V curves in (A)–(C). Control is MHC-GAL4/+, Kir Muscle is UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4. The muscles were clamped at −85 mV and stepped from −115 mV to +5 mV in 10 mV increments. To generate the I-V curves, the magnitude of the currents was measured 15 ms after stepping to the new membrane potential. Error bars are S.E.M. All recordings were performed in 0.5 mM Ca2+ HL3 saline ± Ba2+ as indicated. Complete genotypes are as follows and are the same for all figures: UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4 is yw/+; UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4, MHC-GAL4/+ is yw/+; MHC-GAL4/+, UAS-Kir/+ is yw; UAS-Kir/+. Neuron 2001 30, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00326-9)

Figure 3 Muscle Excitability is Impaired in Kir2.1-Expressing Animals (A) Representative traces of spontaneous transmitter release events (mEPSPs) recorded in 0.3 mM Ca2+ HL3 saline from control animals (UAS-Kir/+) without Ba2+ treatment and Kir2.1 Muscle-Expressing animals (UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) with and without 0.3 mM Ba2+ treatment. The traces show the reduction in muscle excitability in the Kir2.1-expressing animals which is alleviated by Ba2+ treatment. The Ba2+ has no effect on mEPSPs of control animals (traces not shown). (B) Quantification of the average amplitude of the spontaneous mEPSPs in the control and Kir2.1-expressing animals in HL3 saline containing 0.3 mM Ca2+ with or without 0.3 mM Ba2+ treatment. The average amplitude of the mEPSP without Ba2+ treatment is significantly reduced in the Kir2.1-expressing animals, UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4, compared to the control animals, MHC-GAL4/+ and UAS-Kir/+ (p < 0.0001, Student's t test). Upon Ba2+ treatment, the average amplitude of the mEPSPs in the Kir2.1-expressing animals, UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4, is the same as the UAS-Kir/+ control animals (p = 0.139, Student's t test) but is different from the MHC-GAL4/+ control animal (p < 0.02, Student's t test). The average mEPSP amplitudes are significantly different between the two control genotypes in both Ba2+ conditions (p < 0.03, Student's t test). The number of recordings for each genotype and condition is shown above the bars Neuron 2001 30, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00326-9)

Figure 4 Synaptic Depolarizations Reach Wild-Type Membrane Potentials in the Kir2.1-Expressing Muscle (A) An average EPSP for a control animal (yw; UAS-Kir/+) and a Kir2.1-expressing animal (yw/+; UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) is pictured in 0.5 mM Ca2+; these recordings were performed without Ba2+ treatment. The EPSP in the Kir2.1-expressing animal depolarizes the muscle to approximately the same overall level as in the control animal (dotted line). The numbers above the traces refer to the overall muscle membrane voltage that is achieved by the peak amplitude of the EPSP in n ≥ 19 recordings (as calculated by Vm + EPSP amplitude for each recording). Membrane voltages reached by the EPSPs are not different (p = 0.163, Student's t test). The pictured EPSP traces are the average of 4–5 suprathreshold EPSPs from a single animal of the indicated genotype and is representative of the average amplitude of EPSPs from n ≥ 19 recordings. “EPSP” refers to the average EPSP amplitude from n ≥ 19 recordings for each genotype. Average EPSP amplitudes are significantly different comparing the control to Kir2.1-expressing animals (p < 0.003, Student's t test). (B) Graph of the overall muscle membrane voltage that is achieved by the peak amplitude of the EPSP at various calcium concentrations. Muscle is depolarized to approximately the same overall level in the UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4 animals (Kir Muscle, filled boxes [n ≥ 9]) as in the control animals (MHC-GAL4/+, open diamonds (n ≥ 6) and UAS-Kir/+, open circles [n ≥ 8]) in 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, and 1.5 mM Ca2+ (p ≥ 0.112, Student's t test). Inset: graph of the overall muscle membrane voltage that is achieved by the peak amplitude of the EPSP at 0.5 mM and 1.5 mM Ca2+ and includes data for the Kir2.1AAE-expressing animals (KirAAE Muscle, filled circles [n ≥ 9]) and the UAS-KirAAE/+ control (open triangles [n ≥ 6]). Muscle is depolarized to approximately the same overall level in UAS-KirAAE/MHC-GAL4 compared to Kir2.1-expressing animals and controls (p ≥ 0.182, Student's t test) at both Ca2+ concentrations. Error bars are S.E.M. Complete genotypes are: yw/+; UAS-KirAAE/MHC and yw; UAS-KirAAE/+. Neuron 2001 30, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00326-9)

Figure 5 GluR Function Is Normal while Evoked Responses Are Increased in Kir2.1-Expressing Animals (A) Left, quantification of average mEPSC amplitudes for the control animals (MHC-GAL4/+ and UAS-Kir/+) and the Kir2.1-expressing animals (UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) in HL3 saline containing 0.3 mM Ca2+ and 0.3 mM Ba2+. There is no difference in average mEPSC amplitude between these three genotypes (p ≥ 0.3, Student's t test). Right, there is no change in distribution of spontaneous miniature release events when Kir2.1 is expressed in muscle. The number of events analyzed (n), the average amplitude of the mEPSCs (q), and the standard error of the mean (±) are indicated for each histogram. Inset: sample traces showing spontaneous mEPSCs from the indicated genotypes. Scale bars are 400 pA on the vertical axis and 400 ms on the horizontal axis. (B) Quantification of average evoked EPSC amplitudes for the control animals (MHC-GAL4/+ and UAS-Kir/+) and the Kir2.1-expressing animals (UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) in HL3 saline containing 0.3 mM Ca2+ and 0.3 mM Ba2+. The average EPSC amplitude is 34% larger in the Kir2.1-expressing animals than in the control animals (p < 0.002, Student's t test). Control genotypes are not different from one another (p = 0.373, Student's t test). Representative traces of evoked transmitter release from a control animal (UAS-Kir/+) and a Kir2.1-expressing animal (UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) are shown at the right. In this and all subsequent figures, the number of recordings for each genotype is shown above the bars and the asterisk indicates a significant difference between control and experimental genotype values Neuron 2001 30, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00326-9)

Figure 6 Evidence for a Homeostatic Increase in Presynaptic Transmitter Release (A) Quantification of quantal content in the Kir2.1-expressing and control animals, as estimated by dividing the average EPSC amplitude by the average mEPSC amplitude from recordings in HL3 saline containing 0.3 mM Ca2+ and 0.3 mM Ba2+. Quantal content in the Kir2.1-expressing animals (UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) is increased 22% compared to the MHC-GAL4/+ animals (p < 0.03, Student's t test) and 56% compared to the UAS-Kir/+ control animals (p < 0.001, Student's t test). Control genotypes are not different from one another (p = 0.07, Student's t test). (B) Quantification of quantal content normalized to muscle surface area for the Kir2.1-expressing and control animals. Quantal content per muscle surface area was calculated by dividing the quantal content from individual recordings in HL3 saline containing 0.3 mM Ca2+ and 0.3 mM Ba2+ by the mean muscle surface area for a given genotype (see Experimental Procedures). When normalized to muscle surface area, the quantal content in the Kir2.1-expressing animal (UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) is increased 43% compared to the MHC-GAL4/+ animals (p < 0.0001, Student's t test) and 73% compared to the UAS-Kir/+ control animals (p < 0.0001, Student's t test). Control genotypes are not different from one another (p = 0.159, Student's t test). (C) Quantification of mEPSC frequency as determined by counting mEPSC events over a 49 s interval for multiple recordings in HL3 saline containing 0.3 mM Ca2+ and 0.3 mM Ba2+. An increase in mEPSC frequency of approximately 50% is observed in the Kir2.1-expressing animals (UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) compared to the two control genotypes (MHC-GAL4/+ and UAS-Kir/+) (p < 0.008, Student's t test). Control genotypes are not different from one another (p = 0.282, Student's t test) Neuron 2001 30, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00326-9)

Figure 7 The Probability of Observing a Release Event at Single Boutons Is Increased in the Kir2.1-Expressing Animals (A) Quantification of the probability of observing a release event at the single bouton level in the Kir2.1-expressing and control animals in HL3 saline containing 0.25 mM Ca2+. There is a greater than 80% increase in the probability of observing a release event in the Kir2.1-expressing animals (UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4) compared to control animals (MHC-GAL4/+ and UAS-Kir/+) (p < 0.003, Student's t test). Control genotypes are not different from one another (p = 0.249, Student's t test). (B) Sample amplitude histograms from boutons contacting UAS-Kir/+ muscle (left) or UAS-Kir/MHC-GAL4 muscle (right). Insets are sample traces from each genotype (25 traces superimposed). The number of events analyzed (N) and the average probability of observing a release event (Pevent) are indicated for each histogram. Scale bars are 100 μV on the vertical axis and 12 ms on the horizontal axis Neuron 2001 30, 737-749DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00326-9)