Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Conservation of Structure and Mechanism between Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I and Site-Specific Recombinases  Chonghui Cheng, Paul Kussie, Nikola Pavletich,
A Detailed View of a Ribosomal Active Site
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Mechanisms of TGF-β Signaling from Cell Membrane to the Nucleus
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Modular Recognition of RNA by a Human Pumilio-Homology Domain
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Scot A Wolfe, Elizabeth I Ramm, Carl O Pabo  Structure 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Recognition of Polyadenylate RNA by the Poly(A)-Binding Protein
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Structural Elements of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor–DNA Complex
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Structural Basis of Caspase-7 Inhibition by XIAP
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Structure of the BRCT Repeats of BRCA1 Bound to a BACH1 Phosphopeptide
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA Yigong Shi, Yan-Fei Wang, Lata Jayaraman, Haijuan Yang, Joan Massagué, Nikola P. Pavletich  Cell  Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 585-594 (September 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81600-1

Figure 1 Two Molecules of Smad3 MH1 Bind to SBE with No Cooperativity (A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) of Smad3 MH1 binding to two different DNA sites. The SB sequence, 5′-AGTATGTCTCAGATGA-3′, contains a single copy of Smad box (GTCT), whereas SBE carries two copies. In these experiments, Smad3 MH1 domain was prepared in a 3-fold serial dilution, starting with a concentration of 15 μM. (B) Sequence of SBE, the DNA duplex used in the cocrystallization as well as in the EMSA experiments. The 16 bp oligonucleotide exhibits a pseudo 2-fold symmetry axis through the center of the two inverted repeats of Smad box. In the text, bases of the upper strand in the figure are referred to by their base pair numbers, and bases of the lower strand are referred to by base pair number followed by the prime symbol (′). Cell 1998 94, 585-594DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81600-1)

Figure 2 Overall Structure of Smad3 MH1 Bound to SBE The structure is viewed either along the pseudo 2-fold symmetry axis (A) or along the DNA major axis (B). The MH1 domain and DNA are colored in cyan and purple, respectively. The β hairpin, which mediates base-specific recognition in the major groove of DNA, is highlighted in yellow. The N and C termini of the MH1 domain are labeled. Also indicated in this figure are two surface loops, L2 and L4, and an α helix, H2. Figure was prepared with the programs MOLSCRIPT (Klaulis 1991) and RASTER3D (Merrit and Murphy 1994). Cell 1998 94, 585-594DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81600-1)

Figure 3 Smad3 MH1 Employs a β Hairpin for Base-Specific DNA Recognition The protein–DNA interface is visualized either perpendicular to (A) or along (B) the DNA major groove. The protein backbone and DNA are colored cyan and purple, respectively. The side chains of the DNA-binding residues—Arg-74, Gln-76, and Lys-81—are highlighted in yellow. Asp-72, which makes two stabilizing hydrogen bonds to Arg-74 and the protein backbone, is also shown in yellow. The four bases of the Smad box are labeled. Hydrogen bonds are indicated with red dashed lines. (C) Schematic representation of hydrogen bonds between MH1 domain and DNA. The four base pairs of a Smad box are colored in purple. The three base-contacting residues are highlighted in yellow. Cell 1998 94, 585-594DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81600-1)

Figure 4 Sequence Alignment of the MH1 Domains of Six Human Smad Proteins, with the Secondary Structure Elements and Solvent Accessibility Indicated below and above the Sequences, Respectively Due to high degree of sequence similarity, only invariant residues are colored in yellow. The four tumorigenic mutations in Smad4 and Smad2 are shown in cyan above the sequences. The residues at which these mutations occur are in boldface and underlined. Cell 1998 94, 585-594DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81600-1)

Figure 5 Identification of Functional Regions by Sequence Conservation, Solvent Accessibility, and Tumorigenic Mutations (A) Mapping of the tumorigenic mutations, the invariant and solvent-exposed residues, identifies the β hairpin, the L2/L4 double loop, and the H2 basic helix as regions likely to be important for Smad functions. Color coding is the same as in Figure 2. Residues at which tumor-derived mutations occur are labeled, with corresponding mutations indicated in parentheses. (B) Close-up view showing the region with four tumorigenic mutations. Surrounding residues, which the tumorigenic residues pack against, are shown in purple. Cell 1998 94, 585-594DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81600-1)

Figure 6 Comparison of DNA Recognition by β Hairpin to Known Protein–DNA Interactions that Involve β Sheets The β hairpin of MH1 domain bound to Smad box, together with the MetJ (Somers and Philips 1992) and Arc (Raumann et al. 1994) repressor–operator complexes, are schematically represented with DNA sequences and the DNA-binding motifs. Hydrogen bonds between β strand side chains and DNA bases are indicated by arrows. Cell 1998 94, 585-594DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81600-1)

Figure 7 Model of Transcription Complexes Involving Smad MH1 (A) Two molecules of Smad MH1 are modeled to bind a tandem repeat of two copies of Smad boxes. The DNA sequence is derived from the PAI-1 promoter that has been shown to form a complex with Smad3/Smad4 (Dennler et al. 1998). (B) For the AP-1 transcription factor to coexist on the p3TP promoter with a Smad MH1 molecule, two helical turns in the N-terminal end of Fos would have to become disordered or adopt a different conformation. The DNA in this model contains a Smad box and an AP-1 consensus site, which overlap with each other by one base pair (Yingling et al. 1997). Cell 1998 94, 585-594DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81600-1)