SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Advertisements

Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Generation and Interconversion of Multiple Distinct Nucleosomal States as a Mechanism for Catalyzing Chromatin Fluidity  Geeta J. Narlikar, Michael L.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Reconstitution of a Functional Core Polycomb Repressive Complex
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (September 1996)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Commitment to Splice Site Pairing Coincides with A Complex Formation
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Stabilization of Chromatin Structure by PRC1, a Polycomb Complex
DNA Demethylation In Vitro: Involvement of RNA
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular Cell 
The Rpd3 Core Complex Is a Chromatin Stabilization Module
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Mu Transpososome Architecture Ensures that Unfolding by ClpX or Proteolysis by ClpXP Remodels but Does Not Destroy the Complex  Briana M. Burton, Tania.
Transcriptional Fidelity and Proofreading by RNA Polymerase II
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Scott Gradia, Samir Acharya, Richard Fishel  Cell 
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
NAD+-Dependent Modulation of Chromatin Structure and Transcription by Nucleosome Binding Properties of PARP-1  Mi Young Kim, Steven Mauro, Nicolas Gévry,
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (November 2004)
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
DNA Topology and Global Architecture of Point Centromeres
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Barbara S Nikolajczyk, J.Aquiles Sanchez, Ranjan Sen  Immunity 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Functional Link between the Mammalian Exosome and mRNA Decapping
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Xuetong Shen, Ryan Ranallo, Eugene Choi, Carl Wu  Molecular Cell 
Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
Nucleosomes Unfold Completely at a Transcriptionally Active Promoter
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
RSC Unravels the Nucleosome
Chul-Hwan Lee, Jun Wu, Bing Li  Molecular Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Ali Hamiche, Raphael Sandaltzopoulos, David A Gdula, Carl Wu  Cell 
Jachen A. Solinger, Konstantin Kiianitsa, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
ISWI Is an ATP-Dependent Nucleosome Remodeling Factor
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
A SWI/SNF–Related Chromatin Remodeling Complex, E-RC1, Is Required for Tissue- Specific Transcriptional Regulation by EKLF In Vitro  Jennifer A Armstrong,
Presentation transcript:

SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology Igor Gavin, Peter J Horn, Craig L Peterson  Molecular Cell  Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 97-104 (January 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00158-7

Figure 1 ySWI/SNF-Dependent Remodeling Requires DNA Folding into a Nucleosome (A) ySWI/SNF-dependent remodeling of nucleosomal arrays and nonspecific DNA–histone complexes. HincII (500 U/ml) and ySWI/SNF (2 nM) were added to remodeling reactions that contained either a 11-mer nucleosomal array (1 nM) or a nonspecific histone–DNA substrate (1 nM). Reactions were incubated at 37°C for 20 min followed by addition of ATP to half of the reaction mixture. Aliquots were taken at the indicated times, and the reaction was stopped by addition of 5× stop solution (0.5% SDS, 25 mM EDTA, 1 mg/ml proteinase K). Purified DNA was loaded on a 1% agarose gel to separate digestion products from uncut DNA fragments. The amount of radioactivity in each band was quantified, and the percentage of uncut arrays was calculated. The average from at least three experiments is plotted as a function of time. The standard deviation did not exceed 10%. (B) ySWI/SNF ATPase activity is equally stimulated by DNA, nonspecific histone–DNA complexes, and nucleosomal arrays. ySWI/SNF ATPase reactions were performed at an ATP concentration of 100 μM (Logie and Peterson 1999). Reactions were stopped by spotting onto thin layer chromatography (TLC) paper. Inorganic phosphate was separated from ATP, quantified, and the percentage of hydrolyzed ATP was calculated. The average from at least three experiments was plotted as a function of time. The standard deviation did not exceed 10%. (C) Competition of ySWI/SNF remodeling activity by nonspecific histone–DNA complexes and nucleosomal arrays. Remodeling reactions contained HincII (500 U/ml), 1.5 nM ySWI/SNF, and 1 nM 32P-labeled 11-mer nucleosomal arrays. Reactions either lacked an unlabelled competitor DNA (closed circles) or contained 5 nM nonspecific histone–DNA complexes (squares) or nucleosomal (open circles) competitor DNAs. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 97-104DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00158-7)

Figure 2 Changes in DNA Topology Are Required for SWI/SNF Remodeling (A) A schematic representation of linear and circular trinucleosomal array substrates. Predicted nucleosome positions are shown as ellipses relative to restriction sites. The hatch mark between each nucleosome indicates the position of EcoRI sites. (B) ySWI/SNF (2 nM) and MspI (2500 U/ml) were incubated in remodeling reactions that contained either the linear or circular trinucleosomal array (1 nM). The fraction of uncut array was quantified with time as described in the legend to Figure 1. (C) Linear arrays, circular arrays, and DNA equally stimulate ySWI/SNF ATPase activity at similar concentrations. Reactions were carried out at an ATP concentration of 50 μM for 10 min. (D) Addition of eukaryotic topoisomerases rescue ySWI/SNF remodeling of small chromatin circles. Topoisomerase I (Amersham; 0.3 U/μl) or topoisomerase II (USB; 1 U/μl) were added to remodeling reactions that contained linear or circular trinucleosomal array, ATP, and MspI. Remodeling was initiated by addition of ySWI/SNF at t = 12 min. The fraction of uncut array was quantified with time as described in the legend to Figure 1. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 97-104DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00158-7)

Figure 4 ySWI/SNF Enhances the Accessibility of Small Circular Arrays in the Absence of Dramatic Histone Octamer Movements (A) MNase digestion analysis of nucleosome positions within linear trinucleosomal arrays. End-labeled nucleosomal arrays or free DNA were digested with increasing concentrations of MNase (triangles above lanes). DNA was purified and electrophoresed on a 4% acrylamide gel. Derived nucleosome positions are shown by ellipses. Note that in the presence of ySWI/SNF and ATP, the MNase digestion pattern of the linear arrays is similar to but clearly distinct from that of the free, linear DNA. S, linear array substrate; M, 100 bp DNA ladder. (B) MNase digestion of circular trinucleosomal arrays. Arrays were reconstituted onto DNA circles that contained a 32P label at the point of ligation. Circular arrays were incubated with increasing concentrations of MNase (triangles above lanes), and the purified DNA was cut with AlwI prior to loading on the gel. Cleavage with AlwI generates the unique, end-labeled DNA fragments (see Figure 2A for schematic). Reactions contained ySWI/SNF, topoisomerase II, and ATP where indicated. C, circular; L, linear; N, nicked DNA probe. Asterisks indicate hypersensitive sites on the naked, circular DNA probe. Note that the MNase digestion pattern of the circular arrays is similar both in the presence or absence of ATP. S, circular array substrate; M, 100 bp DNA ladder. (C) Restriction enzyme accessibility of circular trinucleosomal arrays. Circular arrays were incubated with topoisomerase II, ySWI/SNF, and either MspI (500 U/ml) or EcoRI (500 U/ml). ATP was added where indicated. For reactions that contained apyrase, circular arrays were first incubated with topoisomerase II, ySWI/SNF, and ATP for 5 min, then apyrase (10 U/ml) was added to remove ATP, and this treatment was followed by addition of either MspI or EcoRI. The amount of radioactivity in all topoisomers was quantified, and the percentage of uncut array was calculated. Data shown is representative of three independent experiments. Note that the bulk of the minichromosomes contain an accessible EcoRI site and that ySWI/SNF action does not lead to a significant decrease in EcoRI accessibility. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 97-104DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00158-7)

Figure 5 ySWI/SNF-Dependent Loss of Supercoiling of Small Circular Arrays Does Not Result from Eviction of Histone Octamers Analysis of the MspI accessibility of minichromosome topoisomers. Circular trinucleosomal arrays were incubated with topoisomerase II in the absence (lanes 1–3) or presence (lanes 4–7) of MspI and in the presence (lane 1 and lanes 3–7) or absence (lane 2) of ySWI/SNF. All reactions were incubated in the absence of MspI for 5 min at 37°C, and then, where indicated, MspI was added to half of the mixture, and all reactions were incubated for an additional 20 min. For reactions shown in lanes 6 and 7, apyrase (10 U/ml) was added after the initial 5 min incubation prior to MspI addition. DNA was purified and electrophoresed on a 4% acrylamide gel (30:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide ratio). The migration of topoisomers and linear DNA is shown on the left. Identity of the topoismers was determined by electrophoresis of topoisomer standards isolated by ligating circles in the presence of different concentrations of ethidium bromide. M, 32P-labeled 100 bp DNA molecular weight standard (GIBCO–BRL). Molecular Cell 2001 7, 97-104DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00158-7)

Figure 3 ySWI/SNF Changes DNA Topology in Small Domains Nucleosomal arrays were reconstituted on a 3.1 kb plasmid (pCL115) that contains a single 5S rDNA nucleosome-positioning sequence. Reconstitutions were performed with either the circular plasmid or with the linear plasmid precut with ScaI. Remodeling reactions contained ySWI/SNF (2 nM), nucleosomal substrate (1 nM), and HincII (500 U/ml), for which there is a unique site within the 5S rDNA sequence. The fraction of uncut array was quantified with time as described in the legend to Figure 1. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 97-104DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00158-7)