Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ho-Geun Yoon, Doug W. Chan, Albert B. Reynolds, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
RNF168 Promotes Noncanonical K27 Ubiquitination to Signal DNA Damage
Damage-Induced Ubiquitylation of Human RNA Polymerase II by the Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4, but Not Cockayne Syndrome Proteins or BRCA1  Roy Anindya, Ozan.
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
SMRT Derepression by the IκB Kinase α
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
C-Jun Downregulation by HDAC3-Dependent Transcriptional Repression Promotes Osmotic Stress-Induced Cell Apoptosis  Yan Xia, Ji Wang, Ta-Jen Liu, W.K.
Spatial and Temporal Recruitment of Androgen Receptor and Its Coactivators Involves Chromosomal Looping and Polymerase Tracking  Qianben Wang, Jason S.
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages (October 2012)
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Fan Yang, Huafeng Zhang, Yide Mei, Mian Wu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Sang-Hyun Song, Chunhui Hou, Ann Dean  Molecular Cell 
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Formation of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Presentation transcript:

Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 69-80 (January 2008) Histone H2A Monoubiquitination Represses Transcription by Inhibiting RNA Polymerase II Transcriptional Elongation  Wenlai Zhou, Ping Zhu, Jianxun Wang, Gabriel Pascual, Kenneth A. Ohgi, Jean Lozach, Christopher K. Glass, Michael G. Rosenfeld  Molecular Cell  Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 69-80 (January 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 2A-HUB Functions as a Transcriptional Repressor (A) Schematic representation of the domain organization of 2A-HUB protein. (B) 2A-HUB cofractions with N-CoR. The fractions (34–42) were analyzed by western blot analysis to detect N-CoR and 2A-HUB. (C) Endogenous coimmunoprecipitation of 2A-HUB with N-CoR and HDACs. Nuclear extracts of C2C12 cells were immunoprecipitated using control IgG, anti-N-CoR, anti-SMRT, or anti-2A-HUB antibodies, and coimmunoprecipitated proteins were detected by western blot analysis using indicated antibodies. (D) 2A-HUBmut interacts with N-CoR and HDAC1. Cell lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-2A-HUBmut were incubated with IgG or anti-HDAC1 or anti-N-CoR antibody, and immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by anti-Flag antibodies. Five percent of the input was loaded. (E) Reporter assays using a Gal4-dependent luciferase reporter in HEK293T cells. Cells were first transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs against HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and N-CoR and then transfected with 3XUAS-TK-luciferase reporter in combination with vector expressing Gal4, Gal4-2A-HUB. (F) Reporter assays using a Gal4-dependent luciferase reporter in HEK293T cells. Cells were transfected with 3XUAS-TK/luciferase reporter in combination with vector expressing Gal4 or Gal4-2A-HUB or Gal4-2A-HUBmut and then treated with DMSO or TSA. (G) Endogenous 2A-HUB coimmunoprecipitated with HA-UbcH5b in vivo. Cell lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with a HA-UbcH5a, HA-UbcH5b, or HA-UbcH5c expression plasmid were incubated with anti-2A-HUB antibody, and immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by anti-HA antibodies. Five percent of the input was loaded. (H) Reporter assays using a Gal4-dependent luciferase reporter in HEK293T cells. Cells were first transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs against UbcH5b or N-CoR as indicated and then transfected with 3XUAS-TK-luciferase reporter in combination with vector expressing Gal4, Gal4-2A-HUB. In (E), (F), and (H), the activity observed from Gal4 was arbitrarily set as 10. Data represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 69-80DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 2A-HUB Monoubiquitinates Histone H2A In Vitro (A) In vitro ubiquitination assay for 2A-HUB. In vitro ubiquitination reactions were performed in the presence of recombinant E1, recombinant E2 (UbcH5b), recombinant His-ubiquitin, and in vitro-translated 35S-labeled 2A-HUB or 2A-HUBRmut. Reaction products were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to western blot analysis with anti-His antibodies to visualize ubiquitin conjugates. (B) Western blot analysis of 2A-HUB, N-CoR, HDAC1, and HDAC3 protein levels after knockdown of 2A-HUB. Equal loading was confirmed using anti-β-tubulin antibodies. (C) Endogenous 2A-HUB coimmunoprecipitated with Flag-H2A or Flag-H2B in vivo. Soluble chromatin extracted from HEK293T cells transfected with a Flag-H2A or Flag-H2B expression plasmid was incubated with anti-2A-HUB antibody, and immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by anti-Flag antibodies. Five percent of the input was loaded. (D) Endogenous 2A-HUB associates with endogenous H2A and H2B in vivo. Soluble chromatin extracts from either HEK293T transfected with control siRNA or 2A-HUB siRNA was incubated with IgG or anti-2A-HUB antibody, and immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by anti-H2A or anti-H2B antibodies. Five percent of the input was loaded. (E) In vitro ubiquitination assay for H2A or H2B. In vitro ubiquitination reactions were performed in the presence of recombinant E1, recombinant E2(UbcH5b), recombinant His-ubiquitin, histone H2A or H2B, and purified recombinant GST-fused WT 2A-HUB or recombinant GST-fused 2A-HUBRmut as indicated. Reaction products were probed with antibodies against His to visualize ubiquitin conjugates. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 69-80DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 2A-HUB Monoubiquitinates Histone H2A In Vivo (A) Western blot analysis endogenous uH2A and H2A. Soluble chromatin extracts from HEK293T transfected with Flag-2A-HUB or Flag-2A-HUBRmut were probed with anti-Flag, anti-uH2A, anti-Histone H2A, and anti-β-tubulin antibodies. (B) In vivo ubiquitination of histone H2A by 2A-HUB. HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated combinations of expression plasmids. The top panel shows the whole-cell lysates (WCL) were probed with anti-Flag antibodies. The lower panel shows Ni-NTA agarose precipitates of the lysates of transfected cells, which were probed with anti-Flag antibodies. (C) In vivo ubiquitination assays using WT Flag-H2A- or Flag-H2A(K119R)-expressing plasmid. HEK293T was transfected with the indicated combinations of expression plasmids. The Ni-NTA agarose precipitates of the lysates of transfected cells were probed with anti-Flag antibodies. (D) In vivo ubiquitination of histone H2B by 2A-HUB. The experiment was carried out as described in Figure 3B. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 69-80DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 2A-HUB and N-CoR Regulate a Subset of Chemokine Gene Expression (A) Real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed to document efficiency of 2A-HUB 1# siRNA, N-CoR siRNAs to diminish endogenous 2A-HUB and N-CoR. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of several endogenous 2A-HUB/N-CoR target genes upon 2A-HUB 1# siRNA or N-CoR siRNA transfection. In (A) and (B), values (normalized to corresponding values of internal control gene Hprt) are the average of three replicates ± SEM. (C and D) Reporter assays using a RANTES-200-Luc reporter (C) and IP-10-Luc reporter (D) in RAW264.7 cells. Cells were transfected with the reporters, siRNA, or different expression plasmids as indicated. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with DMSO or LPS for 12 hr. (E) RT-qPCR analysis of RANTES gene expression upon control siRNA or 2A-HUB 1# siRNA transfection. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were treated with LPS for 8 hr. Values (normalized to corresponding values of internal control gene Hprt) are the average of three replicates ± SEM. (F) Migration of RAW 264.7 cells was increased in response to the supernatant from LPS-treated 2A-HUB knockdown macrophages (see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Values are means ± SEM from three independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05 (versus control, Student's t test). (G and H) Reporter assays using a 3xAP-1-Luc reporter (G) and 3xNF-κB-Luc reporter (H) in RAW264.7 cells. Cells were transfected with the reporters, control siRNA, and 2A-HUB siRNA as indicated. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with TPA or TNF-α for 12 hr. In (C), (D), (G), and (H), values are the relative values to normalized activity from basal, reporter-only transfected cells (bar 1, set as 1) and are expressed as the average of three independent experiments ± SEM. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 69-80DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Recruitment of 2A-HUB and uH2A on the Target Gene Promoters (A) ChIP analyses were performed after cells were stimulated with LPS for 30 min. Soluble chromatin was immunoprecipitated by the antibodies indicated, and the bound DNA was analyzed by quantitative PCR using a primer pair flanking the regulatory sequence of the promoter of KC, MIP2, RANTES, or IP-10. ChIP was performed as described in the Experimental Procedures. (B) Two-step ChIP assays were performed, showing that 2A-HUB is not recruited to the N-coR+ KC promoter. (C) Two-step ChIP assays were performed, showing that 2A-HUB is recruited to the N-coR+ RANTES promoter. (D) ChIP analyses of the occupancy of 2A-HUB on the RANTES promoter after depletion of N-CoR by siRNA in RAW 264.7 cells. Values (ratios of ChIP to corresponding inputs) in (A)–(D) are means ± SEM of at least two independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 69-80DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 H2A Ubiquitination by 2A-HUB Prevents FACT Recruitment (A) Coimmunoprecipitation of Spt16 and H2A/H2B. (Top panel) Immunoprecipitation of endogenous Spt16. (Middle panel) Coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous Spt16 with unmodified Flag-H2A, but not Flag-uH2A, in HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-H2A. (Bottom panel) Coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous Spt16 with both unmodified Flag-H2B and Flag-uH2B in HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-H2B. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of endogenous RANTES gene expression upon LPS treatment after depletion Spt16 by siRNA. Values (normalized to corresponding values of internal control gene Hprt) are the average of three replicates ± SEM. (C) ChIP in RAW246.7 cells treated with LPS (time courses as indicated) using a panel of antibodies as shown. PCR primers amplifying the promoter region and a downstream region corresponding to exon 3 of the RANTES gene were used. (D) ChIP was performed in RAW264.7 cells first treated with control or 2A-HUB siRNA and then induced by LPS for 30 min. A panel of antibodies was used as shown. Values (ratios of ChIP to corresponding inputs) in (C) and (D) are the mean ± SEM of at least two independent experiments. (E) In the model, H2A monoubiquitination mediated by 2A-HUB inhibits the early step of RNA Pol II transcriptional elongation by blocking the recruitment of FACT and maintains genes in a repressed status. Upon gene activation by LPS, removing ubiquitin from H2A by 2A-DUB increases FACT recruitment and facilitates RNAPII transcriptional elongation. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 69-80DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions