Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
Advertisements

Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Assessment in the Biology Department in AY Caroline Solomon Friday December 5.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Nassau Community College THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK G eneral E ducation A ssessment R eview Kumkum Prabhakar, Assistant Professor of Biology.
Fostering Continuous Improvement of Curriculum - Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf Director, Centre for Open Learning Educational Support University of Guelph.
Assessment Report Department of Environmental Science and Biology School of Sciences and Mathematics Chair: Christopher Norment Assessment Coordinator:
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
General Education Assessment Workshop: Spring 2016 Attributes General Education Assessment Committee (GEAC) SUNY Oneonta November 17 & 20, 2015.
General Education Assessment Report Assessment Cycle.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
PDP Presentation Trinity Washington University
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
First-Year Experience Seminars: A Benchmark Study of Targeted Courses for Developmental Education Students.
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Closing the Assessment Loop
Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle
Program Learning Outcomes
SLOs: What Are They? Information in this presentation comes from the Fundamentals of Assessment conference led by Dr. Amy Driscoll and sponsored by.
SLOs and SAOs: What Are They?
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
Assessing Learning Outcomes
COMMUNICATOR Applies effective reading skills to acquire knowledge and broaden perspectives Employs active listening strategies to advance understanding.
Assessment and Accreditation
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Curriculum Coordinator: Debra Backus Date of Presentation: 1/15/15
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Miller Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Program/Department School of ___Health, Sciences, and Criminal Justice_______________ Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Dr. Peggy La.
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Miller Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Industrial Technology Management Program Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Eric Y. Cheng Date.
Curriculum Coordinator: Minhua Wang Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Criminal Justice A.A.S. School of Science, Health and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Economics Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Criminal Justice: Law Enforcement Leadership School of Health, Science and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Lisa Colbert.
BTECH Dental Hygiene School of Science Health and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report
_Accounting_ Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Mechanical Engineering Tech
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Industrial Technology Management Program Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Eric Y. Cheng Date.
Alternative & Renewable Energy Systems (BT) Canino School of Engineering Technology 2017Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Kibria Roman Date of.
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Mechanical Engineering Tech
Curriculum Coordinator: Ron Tavernier Date of Presentation: 1/15/16
Chair: Nadine Jennings Date of Presentation: January 19, 2017
Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/20/17
Program Director: D. Para January 2016
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Curriculum Coordinator: Brandon Baldwin
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/19/18
Curriculum Coordinator: Pamela Quinn Date of Presentation: 1/19/18
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : January 18, 2018
_Accounting_ Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Calendar year 2017 Assessment Report
Curriculum Coordinator: Rosemary Philips
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017 Liberal Arts Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017

Liberal Arts Student Learning Outcomes PLO Defined 1 Demonstrate the ability to critically analyze, evaluate, synthesize and apply arguments from various disciplines. 2 Demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively both through written and oral means. 3 Demonstrate the ability to apply mathematical concepts and models, and to represent mathematical information symbolically, visually, numerically and verbally. 4 Demonstrate an understanding of the different skills, methods, goals, and evaluative tools used in the Social Sciences and Humanities. 5 Demonstrate an understanding of the methods scientists use to explore natural phenomena, including observation, hypothesis development, measurement and data collection, experimentation, evaluation of evidence, and employment of mathematical analysis. 6 Demonstrate an understanding of the history, cultural practices, politics, beliefs, and institutions of other cultures and the interplay of diverse worldviews in the global context.

What Outcomes [ILOs] Were Assessed Defined 1 Communication Skills: Demonstrates the ability to effectively present, organize, and articulate thoughts, ideas, viewpoints, and conclusions both orally and/or in writing 2 Critical Thinking: Demonstrates the ability to interpret, apply, analyze, identify, distinguish and evaluate the assumptions, methodology and/or evidence of concepts, constructs and theory to provide a valid response, conclusion or recommendation. 3 Professional Competence: Demonstrates knowledge and the ability to apply professional, industry and ethical standards through the development of skills and knowledge consistent in professional practice within the respective discipline. 4 Inter/Intrapersonal Skills: Demonstrates an ability to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity; recognize the impact of societal issues within a global context; function effectively as a member or leader of a team; and perform self-reflection of personal growth and achievement.

How Liberal Arts Courses Mapped to ILOs: PLO Courses Defined 1 ANTH 102 ENGL 101 ENGL 221 HIST 103 MATH 111 MATH 121 PSYC 101 SOCI 101 Communication Skills: Demonstrates the ability to effectively present, organize, and articulate thoughts, ideas, viewpoints, and conclusions both orally and/or in writing 2 BIOL 101 Critical Thinking: Demonstrates the ability to interpret, apply, analyze, identify, distinguish and evaluate the assumptions, methodology and/or evidence of concepts, constructs and theory to provide a valid response, conclusion or recommendation. 3 Professional Competence: Demonstrates knowledge and the ability to apply professional, industry and ethical standards through the development of skills and knowledge consistent in professional practice within the respective discipline. 4 Inter/Intrapersonal Skills: Demonstrates an ability to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity; recognize the impact of societal issues within a global context; function effectively as a member or leader of a team; and perform self-reflection of personal growth and achievement.

How was the assessment accomplished? Assessment Tools: Quizzes Mid-Terms and Final Exams Written Assignments Oral Presentations Reflective Journal Writing Portfolio Submission

PLO Assessment Findings

ILO 1: Communication Skills: Demonstrates the ability to effectively present, organize, and articulate thoughts, ideas, viewpoints, and conclusions both orally and/or in writing. Results Measures Not Met % Met Exceeded No Findings All Courses 173 27 30% 34 20% 82 47% 29 17% ANTH 102 5 0% 3 60% 2 40% ENGL 101 55 5% 6 11% 32 58% 14 25% ENGL 221 4 1 HIST 103 75% MATH 111 9 33% 7 26% 8 MATH 121 39 13% 26 67% 8% PSYC 101 30 27% 10 11 37% SOCI 101 44% * PSYC 101 reported the following for “Unspecified”: N – 1 / 3%

ILO 2: Critical Thinking: Demonstrates the ability to interpret, apply, analyze, identify, distinguish and evaluate the assumptions, methodology and/or evidence of concepts, constructs and theory to provide a valid response, conclusion or recommendation. Results Measures Not Met % Met Exceeded No Findings All Courses 176 33 30% 39 22% 73 41% 30 17% ANTH 102 7 0% 4 57% 3 43% BIOL 101 5 100% ENGL 101 40 13% 18% 20 50% 8 20% ENGL 221 2 1 HIST 103 6 33% MATH 111 27 9 26% 7% MATH 121 29 26 67% 8% PSYC 101 38 10 13 34% 3% SOCI 101 12 * PSYC 101 reported the following for “Unspecified”: N – 1 / 3%

ILO 3: Professional Competence: Demonstrates knowledge and the ability to apply professional, industry and ethical standards through the development of skills and knowledge consistent in professional practice within the respective discipline. Results Measures Not Met % Met Exceeded No Findings All Courses 102 16 16% 24 24% 37 36% ANTH 102 8 0% 4 50% BIOL 101 100% ENGL 101 41 10% 20% 20 49% 9 22% ENGL 221 1 HIST 103 10 2 6 60% PSYC 101 38 26% 13 34% 3% * PSYC 101 reported the following for “Unspecified”: N – 1 / 3%

ILO 4: Inter/Intrapersonal Skills: Demonstrates an ability to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity; recognize the impact of societal issues within a global context; function effectively as a member or leader of a team; and perform self-reflection of personal growth and achievement. Results Measures Not Met % Met Exceeded No Findings All Courses 42 8 19% 9 21% 17 40% 7 17% ANTH 102 3 0% 2 67% 1 33% ENGL 101 15 13% 53% 5 ENGL 221 100% PSYC 101 23 35% 30% 6 26% 4% * PSYC 101 reported the following for “Unspecified”: N – 1 / 3%

Summary ILO Total Measures Measures Not Met Met or Exceeded No Findings 1 173 27 or 16% 116 or 67% 29 or 17% 2 176 33 or 19% 112 or 64% 30 or 17% 3 102 16 or 16% 61 or 60% 17 or 16% 4 43 8 or 19% 26 or 60% 7 or 17%

AACU Assessment Findings Liberal Arts

AACU Assessment Results – Communication (Written or Oral) Subject Course Sections Participating Total Sections Outcome HIST 305 Not Taught Fall 2016 24 307 1 No Outcomes Reported ENGL 201 216 2 2 Met 301 1 Exceeded PSYC 340 SOCI 300 Total Sections Selected for Assessment: 7 Total Sections Assessed: 5 % Section Meeting or Exceeding Target: 100%

AACU Assessment Results – Critical Thinking Subject Course Sections Participating Total Sections Outcome HIST 307 1 No Outcomes Reported ENGL 220 1 Exceeded PSYC 275 Assessed for Communication SOCI 300 Total Sections Selected for Assessment: 4 Total Sections Assessed: 1 % Section Meeting or Exceeding Target: 100%

Recommendations, Reflections, and Notes

Recommendations, Reflections, and Notes: AACU Assessment Results – Communication (Written or Oral) ENGL 216: The target goal will be raised to 70% will score 15/20 points. To ensure students reach this goal, the assignment will begin earlier in the semester to give more time, and will include an additional revision ENGL 216: Share the AACU Communication Rubric with students as one of the ways they can self-check their drafts (in addition to the course's peer editing component). Because there were so few students persisting in the class, the findings are not indicative of much.  PSYC 340: Get students to submit slides electronically rather than handouts so that I can enter the findings easier.

Recommendations, Reflections, and Notes: Assessment Results - Program Learning Objectives All four ISLOs Met or Exceeded their Measures at a level of 60% or higher. All four ISLOs had Measures that were Not Met at a level of 19% or lower. Overall, the above are good but a target of 70% of Met or Exceeded Measures ought to remain. Also, it was very difficult to draw any firm conclusions because of the No Findings results at 16-17%.

“Closing the Loop”

Suggested Program Changes Encourage greater collaboration among faculty teaching different sections of the same course to share best practices. Ensure that the Liberal Arts Committee meets and discusses assessment at regular intervals. Encourage closer interaction between our non tenure-track faculty and those on the tenure-track.

Suggested Changes in Teaching Ensure that we meet the need of our advanced students as well as the underprepared in our classes. Encourage students to avail themselves of the tutoring and writing centers. Develop assignments that speak more closely to the course SLOs. Ensure that, in addition to specific curricular content, we emphasize the Liberal Arts significance of our courses.

Suggested Assessment / Taskstream Changes Extract data that notes not the measures “Met” or “Not Met” but the students meeting or not meeting standards. Edit ILO 3 “Professional Competence” – It is difficult to apply this measure to Liberal Arts Disciplines. Perhaps reword it to read “Professional and/or Disciplinary Competence” Collapse “Met” and “Exceeded” into a “Met” category. It was somewhat difficult to pull meaning from the our Assessment findings because of the above.

Budgetary Requests None