Backtesting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Value-at-Risk: A Risk Estimating Tool for Management
Advertisements

Overview of AS 30 Financial Inst. & Derivatives. Flow of presentation Overview of AS 30 Derivatives Financial Instruments Hedge Accounting Key Challenges.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Hedging in terms of Future and options in Stock Market
Enterprise Risk Management
British Bankers’ Association CRD 3 and beyond How are you left? Simon Hills British Bankers Association.
1 AFDC MAFC Training Program Shanghai 8-12 December 2008 Value at Risk Christine Brown Associate Professor Department of Finance The University of Melbourne.
The VaR Measure Chapter 8
Market-Risk Measurement
CHAPTER 8 Testing VaR Results to Ensure Proper Risk Measurement.
CHAPTER 9 Calculating Capital for Market Risk. INTRODUCTION VaR gives a solid foundation for assessing the amount of capital that should be held by a.
“Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons,”
IOPS Toolkit for Risk-based Supervision
ASX Clear - Risk Framework
FRM Zvi Wiener Following P. Jorion, Financial Risk Manager Handbook Financial Risk Management.
Value at Risk: Market Risk Models Han Zhang Director, Head of Market Risk Analytics Corporate Market and Institutional Risk August 23, 2013 University.
May 22, 2003Risk management in KELER1 Risk management in KELER Budapest May 22, 2003 Kristóf Matuszka risk analyst.
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Review Group th September 2008.
Ludovic Aigrot Chair, MiFID Task Force, Federation of European Securities Exchanges Bürgenstock, 6 September How.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
Topic 5. Measuring Credit Risk (Loan portfolio)
Strengthening the resilience of the banking sector1 Proposed changes to Counterparty Credit Risk in Basel Accord Presentation to PRMIA/ISDA seminar London,
Basel Committee Recommendations. Framework Amendment to Capital Accord to incorporate market risk –1996 Application of Basel II to trading activities.
Measurement of Market Risk. Market Risk Directional risk Relative value risk Price risk Liquidity risk Type of measurements –scenario analysis –statistical.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Modification proposal 0073 ‘Revision to the Notice Period regarding the implementation of changes to Transportation charges’ Transmission Workstream, 2.
Developing an Investment Governance Framework
Caps and Swaps. Floating rate securities Coupon payments are reset periodically according to some reference rate. reference rate + index spread e.g.1-month.
John Batty DEFRA UK Bratislava November Legal Background For any given surface water body, applying the MAC-EQS means that the measured concentration.
Session 5: Review of the Scientific Method and The ATS Development Process 1.
Ukraine (nr 46514): Expert Mission on Supervision of Investment Funds` Activities - TAIEX Bartłomiej Kurzeja Risk management process. Techniques, tools.
Contact us: Call: Mail: Visit:
March-14 Central Bank of Egypt 1 Strategic Asset Allocation.
Treasury Market Risk Management. Treasury Management Treasury management is a broader concept than liquidity management Management of cash flows in terms.
Backtest Results Ryan Simmen March, 2017.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Impairment of assets
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Types of risk Market risk
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
MiFID II/R Systematic Internalisers for bond markets Updated November 2016 Author: Andy Hill.
Scenario Analysis and Stress Testing
Auditing & Investigations II
Market-Risk Measurement
Proposed Credit Policy For Virtual Bidding
Chapter 2 Mechanics of Futures Markets
ISO New England System R&D Needs
Energy Risk Management Credit Rating Perspective
MiFID II/R Systematic Internalisers for bond markets July 2015
Types of risk Market risk
Financial Risk Management
Scenario Analysis and Stress Testing
Module 8: Futures, Forwards, and Swaps
17 Futures Markets and Risk Management Bodie, Kane, and Marcus
Value at Risk Chapter 9.
Investor protection and MIFID
VaR Introduction I: Parametric VaR Tom Mills FinPricing
Doc A6465/17/02, /02a and /02b Ag.no "Annex 2" supplement to Eurostat Annual Report, October 2016 Working Group on Articles A64 and A65 of the Staff.
2009 AT&T Pension Asset Liability Study and Risk Budget L
Repo with the CCP (Risk Management System)
Counterparty Credit Risk in Derivatives
Establish the Price: Rating
Chapter 2 Futures Markets and Central Counterparties
Repricing Swaps & OIS Discounting
Margin Collateral Framework
What to look at in fire engineering analysis
Margining.
Anti-Procyclicality Framework
Operational Risk Management
Liquidity.
Asset & Liability Management
Presentation transcript:

Backtesting

Backtesting Introduction A CCP shall assess its margin coverage by performing an ex-post comparison of observed outcomes with expected outcomes derived from the use of margin models. Such back testing analysis shall be performed each day in order to evaluate whether there are any testing exceptions to margin coverage. Coverage shall be evaluated on current positions for financial instruments, clearing members and take into account possible effects from portfolio margining and, where appropriate, interoperable CCPs.” ESMA Article 49 paragraph 1 LME Clear executes a number of back tests using different parameters and assumptions. Where applicable this is performed via factor backtesting and on Clearing Member accounts using portfolio back testing. LME Clear will also use the methodology on back testing the performance of collateral haircuts. LME Clear uses the BASEL traffic light approach (BASEL II coverage test) and Kupiec-POF test to analyse the results of backtesting.

Backtesting Governance overview Backtesting is performed on a daily basis. Any breaches are analysed and reported to the Clearing Risk Committee on a monthly basis. At the point at which the number of breaches in a historical look-back period exceeds pre-determined thresholds then this will be immediately escalated to the Clearing Risk Committee with a full explanation and where appropriate the proposed actions. A quarterly report is provided to the Board Risk Committee. The results of backtesting will be made available to Clearing Members on a regular basis.

Backtesting BASEL Traffic Light and Kupiec – POF tests - Generic The coverage test has been derived from BASEL II practices to estimate the maximum number of breaches allowed per time window. LME Clear chose a traffic light approach that is derived from the Basel II regulation Annex 10a (page 315) which defines three zones; Green, Yellow and Red. The Basel Traffic Light approach uses a yellow zone beginning at the confidence interval at 95% of not achieving the stated margin methodology. The red zone begins at the point such that the probability exceeds 99.99%. Instead of calculating the start of the red zone as defined by the Basel approach, LME Clear utilises the more conservative Kupiec-POF test at a 99% confidence interval to provide a more statistically robust measure. LME Clear calculates the maximum number of breaches allowed per time window derived from the rules above.

Backtesting Factor Margin Backtesting LME Clear performs the backtesting of all SPAN margin parameters using one and two day non- overlapping returns over a rolling period of 500 data points. This is carried out by comparing price returns over a one day and two day period against the margin parameter set by LME Clear. Margin parameters are compared to a forward absolute return, mirroring what would happen in the event of a Member default where LME Clear Initial Margin would need to cover the price moves on the subsequent days. This tests the appropriateness of the rates set by LME Clear and ensures those rates cover both one and two day returns sufficiently.

Backtesting Factor Margin Backtesting – March 2019 results The table below summarises the results. All scanning range, volatility shifts, inter-currency shifts and inter-commodity spread credits are in the green threshold The inter-prompt spread charges for aluminum HG (AH) and cobalt (CO) are showing a number of breaches within the yellow threshold for some tier combinations. Zinc (ZS) is showing a number of breaches within the red threshold. For Aluminium HG (AH) a review has taken place with no further action required at this stage but additional ongoing monitoring has been implemented. For Cobalt (CO) a review has taken place but no actions proposed due to materiality - total CO inter-prompt spread charge is only $14k (less than 0.01% of IM). Zinc has been the scope of a specific review presented to the Clearing Risk Committee and resultant actions implemented, including increasing the confidence interval from 99% to 99.3% which historically would reduce down the number of breaches to be in the green threshold. There were no additional breaches during the 4th quarter 2018 and 1st quarter 2019 All other inter-prompt results are within the green threshold

Backtesting Portfolio Margin Backtesting The LME Clear risk appetite states that LME Clear’s margining model seeks to ensure that at each position account level a minimum 99.5% of observed losses will be less than the initial margin held. LME Clear will perform daily portfolio backtesting on all Members, for each position account. LME Clear will look to pass portfolio backtesting at a confidence interval of 99.5% on both one day and two day clean P&L. All portfolio backtesting will use 500 data points on each account to analyse backtesting results. For any new Member accounts, LME Clear will analyse and report on any breaches. However a minimum number of data points are required for the account level portfolio backtesting to be statistically relevant. LME Clear deems 250 data points to be sufficient.

Backtesting Portfolio Margin Backtesting assumptions While analysing the backtesting results, the known SPAN margin algorithm limitations will be taken into account. Where breaches at an account level are caused by a known limitation, which are managed outside of the Initial Margin calculation, these will be documented. This may require no action to be taken or new model proposed, even if the number of breaches falls into the Red threshold. While the backtesting data will use a significant and realistic spread of real portfolios covering a substantial range of instruments and strategies, LME Clear will identify specific hypothetical strategies to prove the effectiveness of the algorithm and backtest these in conjunction with real portfolios. For the purpose of further validating the model LME Clear has included fixed representative portfolios within the analysis. This allows LME Clear to perform some relevant statistical analysis. Portfolio Backtesting – April 2019 results The maximum number of breaches on a single member portfolio is four and there are currently no breaches on any hypothetical or representative portfolios. Therefore all results are in the green threshold.

Backtesting Collateral Backtesting Member collateral back testing follows the same reporting and governance process as cleared positions. Back testing performed in 2 areas; Risk Factor; Securities – zero coupon curves with volatility converted to prices, Gold – spot prices, FX – spot rates, LME Warrants – cash price Member Portfolio – Position account level, clean portfolio Results measured on same Basel II combined with Kupiec-POF basis as margin collateral against a 99.5% confidence level Results capture 1,000 data points of 1 day historical movements, 500 data points of non-overlapping 2 day historical movements.

Backtesting Factor Margin Collateral Backtesting – Feb 2019 results The table summarises the results of Margin Collateral Risk Factor Backtesting breaches per test and by time series. Feb 2019 Results No new risk factor breach arose during the month. No hypothetical portfolio breaches arose during the month. No new actual portfolio breaches arose during the month. All acceptable margin collateral is currently classified as GREEN per the BINOMIAL /KUPIEC back testing thresholds.