Low versus atmospheric oxygen tension for embryo culture in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Carolina O. Nastri, Ph.D., Beatrice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lisa Marii Cookingham, M. D. , Rachel P. Goossen, B. A. , Amy E. T
Advertisements

The effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer  William M. Buckett, M.D.  Fertility and Sterility 
Outdoor air pollution and human infertility: a systematic review
Grace Younes, M.D., Togas Tulandi, M.D., M.H.C.M. 
Krinos M. Trokoudes, M. D. , Constantinos Pavlides, M. Sc
Elias M. Dahdouh, M. D. , M. Sc. , Jacques Balayla, M. D
Demián Glujovsky, M.D., M.Sc., Cynthia Farquhar, M.D., M.P.H. 
Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Hye Jin Chang, M.D., Ph.D.,
Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled.
Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and a meta-analysis  Konstantinos A. Toulis, M.D.,
Supplementation with progestogens in the first trimester of pregnancy to prevent miscarriage in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic.
Endometrial scratch injury before intrauterine insemination: is it time to re-evaluate its value? Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through.
Effectiveness and feasibility of hysteroscopic sterilization techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Claire F. la Chapelle, M.D., Sebastiaan.
Bjørn Bay, M. D. , Erik Lykke Mortensen, M. Sc
Does the use of calcium ionophore during artificial oocyte activation demonstrate an effect on pregnancy rate? A meta-analysis  Sughashini Murugesu, M.B.B.Chir.,
Endometrin as luteal phase support in assisted reproduction
Thyroid antibodies and gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
Composition of single-step media used for human embryo culture
Effect of a very-low-calorie diet on in vitro fertilization outcomes
Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials  Ana Cobo, Ph.D., César Diaz, M.D. 
Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies: summary of a Cochrane review  Stephan Bontekoe, M.D., Neil Johnson,
Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day.
The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
Cem Atabekoglu, M. D. , Murat Sonmezer, M. D. , Sinan Özkavukcu, M. D
Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study  Nicole Hope, M.B., B.S., Hon., Luk.
Gilad Karavani, M. D. , Assaf Ben-Meir, M. D. , Yoel Shufaro, M. D
Konstantinos Pantos, M. D. , Evangelos Makrakis, M. D
Aviad Cohen, M.D., Benny Almog, M.D., Togas Tulandi, M.D., M.H.C.M. 
Reproductive outcomes of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with high levels of DNA fragmentation in semen:
Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement in vitro fertilization  Ginny Mounce,
Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis 
Martin D. Keltz, M. D. , Josh C. Skorupski, M. D. , Katrina Bradley, M
Transvaginal versus transabdominal ultrasound guidance for embryo transfer in donor oocyte recipients: a randomized clinical trial  Daniel Bodri, M.D.,
Cervical mucus removal before embryo transfer in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Andrea Busnelli, M.D., Chiara Dallagiovanna,
Cabergoline for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials  Valeria M.S.
Effects of acupuncture on pregnancy rates in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Cui Hong Zheng, M.D., Ph.D.,
Lisa Marii Cookingham, M. D. , Rachel P. Goossen, B. A. , Amy E. T
Hysteroscopic local anesthetic intrauterine cornual block in office endometrial ablation: a randomized controlled trial  Vinod Kumar, Ph.D., Konstantinos.
Role of coculture in human in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis
Influence of acupuncture stimulation on pregnancy rates for women undergoing embryo transfer  Caroline Smith, Ph.D., Meaghan Coyle, B.Hlth.Sc. (Acup.),
A meta-analysis of the route of administration of luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone 
Randomized controlled trial comparing embryo culture in two incubator systems: G185 K-System versus EmbryoScope  Julie Barberet, Pharm.D., Jérémy Chammas,
Reduced oxygen tension improves embryo quality but not clinical pregnancy rates: a randomized clinical study into ovum donation cycles  Maria J. de los.
Use of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with cryptozoospermia: a meta-analysis  Nikita Abhyankar, M.B.ChB.,
The effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro.
Antimüllerian hormone as predictor of implantation and clinical pregnancy after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Reshef Tal,
Impact of oocyte donation on perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies
Rosheen Grady, B. H. Sc. , Nika Alavi, M. D. , Rachel Vale, B. Sc
Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained.
Melatonin supplementation during controlled ovarian stimulation for women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pia Saldeen, M. D. , Ph. D. , Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, M. D
Efficacy and safety of human chorionic gonadotropin for follicular phase stimulation in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
Kirstine Kirkegaard, M. D. , Johnny Juhl Hindkjaer, M. Sc
Aaron K. Styer, M. D. , Diane L. Wright, Ph. D. , H. C. L. D. , Anne M
Cameron Gilbert, M. Sc. , Maria Valois, M. D. , FRCPC, Ph. D
Association of maternal and fetal MTHFR A1298C polymorphism with the risk of pregnancy loss: a study of an Indian population and a meta-analysis  Rohini.
Impact of subclinical hypothyroidism in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss  Lia A. Bernardi, M.D., Ronald N. Cohen, M.D., Mary D. Stephenson, M.D.,
Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive.
A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer  William M. Buckett, M.D.  Fertility and Sterility 
David H. Barad, M.D., M.S., Norbert Gleicher, M.D. 
Krinos M. Trokoudes, M. D. , Constantinos Pavlides, M. Sc
Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement in vitro fertilization  Ginny Mounce,
The use of recombinant luteinizing hormone in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques with advanced reproductive age: a systematic review.
Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving
Oocyte retrieval timing based on spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge during natural cycle in vitro fertilization treatment  Daniel Bodri, M.D., M.Sc.,
Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles  John L. Frattarelli,
Presentation transcript:

Low versus atmospheric oxygen tension for embryo culture in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Carolina O. Nastri, Ph.D., Beatrice N. Nóbrega, M.D., Danielle M. Teixeira, M.D., Jowanka Amorim, M.Sc., Lívia M.M. Diniz, M.D., Marina W.P. Barbosa, M.D., Vanessa S.I. Giorgi, M.Sc., Vicky N. Pileggi, M.Sc., Wellington P. Martins, Ph.D.  Fertility and Sterility  Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 95-104.e17 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037 Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Study flow chart for the three parts of the review: RCTs for the first and second part and observational studies for the third part of the review. Obs = observational studies; RCT = randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 1 Forest plot for live birth/ongoing pregnancy per randomized woman for the review of clinical outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 during all embryo culture.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 2 Forest plot for clinical pregnancy per randomized woman for the review of clinical outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 during all embryo culture.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 3 Forest plot for miscarriage per clinical pregnancy for the review of clinical outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 during all embryo culture.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 4 Forest plot for live birth/ongoing pregnancy per randomized woman for the review of clinical outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 after Day 2.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 5 Forest plot for clinical pregnancy per randomized woman for the review of clinical outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 after Day 2.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 6 Forest plot for miscarriage per clinical pregnancy for the review of clinical outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 after Day 2.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 7 Forest plot for fertilization per oocyte randomized for the review of laboratory outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 during all embryo culture.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 8 Forest plot for cleavage per oocyte randomized for the review of laboratory outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 during all embryo culture.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 9 Forest plot for top cleavage embryos per oocyte randomized for the review of laboratory outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 during all embryo culture.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 10 Forest plot for blastocyst per oocyte randomized for the review of laboratory outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 before Day 3 followed by low O2 in both groups.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 11 Forest plot for top blastocyst per oocyte randomized for the review of laboratory outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 before Day 3 followed by low O2 in both groups.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 12 Forest plot for cleavage embryos per oocyte randomized for the review of laboratory outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 only after Day 2.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 13 Forest plot for blastocyst per oocyte randomized for the review of laboratory outcomes. Comparison of “LowO2 versus AtmO2 only after Day 2.” A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 14 Funnel plot analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of LowO2 embryo culture on (A) live birth/ongoing pregnancy and (B) clinical pregnancy showing asymmetry. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 15 Cumulative meta-analyses of studies evaluating the effect of LowO2 embryo culture on (A) live birth/ongoing pregnancy and (B) clinical pregnancy showing a trend toward a decrease in the observed effect over time. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 16 Forest plot for live birth/ongoing pregnancy per randomized woman considering only the studies using the same incubator in both groups and comparing LowO2 and AtmO2 during all embryo culture. A/B = selection bias (sequence generation and allocation concealment); C = performance bias; D = detection bias; E = attrition bias; F = reporting bias; G = other bias. Fertility and Sterility 2016 106, 95-104.e17DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.037) Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions