Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Advertisements

The Humoral Immune Response Is Initiated in Lymph Nodes by B Cells that Acquire Soluble Antigen Directly in the Follicles  Kathryn A. Pape, Drew M. Catron,
Critical Role for Skin-Derived Migratory DCs and Langerhans Cells in TFH and GC Responses after Intradermal Immunization  Clément Levin, Olivia Bonduelle,
Following the Development of a CD4 T Cell Response In Vivo
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
TACI deficiency impairs sustained Blimp-1 expression in B cells decreasing long-lived plasma cells in the bone marrow by Shoichiro Tsuji, Catarina Cortesão,
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
The Role of Dendritic Cells in S
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (November 2017)
B-1a and B-1b Cells Exhibit Distinct Developmental Requirements and Have Unique Functional Roles in Innate and Adaptive Immunity to S. pneumoniae  Karen.
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Regulatory T Cells Control Antigen-Specific Expansion of Tfh Cell Number and Humoral Immune Responses via the Coreceptor CTLA-4  James Badger Wing, Wataru.
Novel Role of the Ras Cascade in Memory B Cell Response
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Fluorescent In Vivo Detection Reveals that IgE+ B Cells Are Restrained by an Intrinsic Cell Fate Predisposition  Zhiyong Yang, Brandon M. Sullivan, Christopher D.C.
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Francis Coffey, Boris Alabyev, Tim Manser  Immunity 
Oral Tolerance Can Be Established via Gap Junction Transfer of Fed Antigens from CX3CR1+ Macrophages to CD103+ Dendritic Cells  Elisa Mazzini, Lucia Massimiliano,
Marginal Zone and B1 B Cells Unite in the Early Response against T-Independent Blood-Borne Particulate Antigens  Flavius Martin, Alyce M Oliver, John.
Louise J. McHeyzer-Williams, Michael G. McHeyzer-Williams  Immunity 
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
CD301b+ Dermal Dendritic Cells Drive T Helper 2 Cell-Mediated Immunity
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
In Vivo Expansion of Regulatory T cells With IL-2/IL-2 mAb Complexes Prevents Anti- factor VIII Immune Responses in Hemophilia A Mice Treated With Factor.
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Susan M. Kaech, Scott Hemby, Ellen Kersh, Rafi Ahmed  Cell 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Toll-Dependent Control Mechanisms of CD4 T Cell Activation
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
The Coinhibitory Receptor CTLA-4 Controls B Cell Responses by Modulating T Follicular Helper, T Follicular Regulatory, and T Regulatory Cells  Peter T.
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Repulsive Guidance Molecule-a Is Involved in Th17-Cell-Induced Neurodegeneration in Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis  Shogo Tanabe, Toshihide Yamashita  Cell.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 3342-3355.e5 (December 2018) Autoreactive, Low-Affinity T Cells Preferentially Drive Differentiation of Short-Lived Memory B Cells at the Expense of Germinal Center Maintenance  Rajiv W. Jain, Kate A. Parham, Yodit Tesfagiorgis, Heather C. Craig, Emiliano Romanchik, Steven M. Kerfoot  Cell Reports  Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 3342-3355.e5 (December 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 25, 3342-3355.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Differential GC Development in the NPOVA and MOG Model Antigen Systems (A) Fluorescent B and CD4+ T cells specific for NPOVA or MOG were isolated and transferred into wild-type, non-fluorescent recipients. Two days post-transfer, mice were immunized with either NPOVA or mMOGtag in CFA in the footpad. Draining popliteal lymph nodes were harvested for histology 5 and 10 days post-immunization, representing the early and mature GCs. (B) Immunofluorescence of lymph nodes from NPOVA- and mMOGtag-immunized mice to visualize RFP+ T cells and GFP+ B cells derived from transferred antigen-specific cells. Sections were also stained for IgD to outline B cell follicles. (C) The density of GFP+ or RFP+ cells in the GC or follicle was quantified. Each data point represents the average value across one histological section for a single mouse, with the bar representing the mean. Datasets were analyzed using Student’s t test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (D) Higher magnification of the regions of interest outlined by the dashed lines in (B) showing CD138 staining for plasma cells. (E) Higher magnification of the regions of interest outlined by the solid white line in (B) were further examined for Ki67, Bcl6, and PD-1 expression. All scale bars in (B), (C), and (D) represent 100 μm. Cell Reports 2018 25, 3342-3355.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Early Collapse of the MOG GC to a Memory Phenotype Fluorescent B and CD4+ T cells specific for NPOVA or MOG were transferred into non-fluorescent C57BL/6 mice that were then immunized with NPOVA or mMOGtag. Draining lymph nodes were harvested for analysis using FACS 5 and 10 days post-immunization. (A) Representative gating of GFP+ cells for plasma cells (PC), GC B cells, and memory/naive B cells (M/N). (B) Quantification from (A) showing size of each cell subset (as defined in A; gating shown above each plot) derived from the transferred GFP+ B cells (top row) or from endogenous GFP− cells (bottom row). Data are expressed as the absolute number of GFP+ cells and as the percentage of all GFP+ cells for plasma cells, or percentage of all GFP+ B cells (CD19+ CD138−) for GC and memory/naive B cells. One representative of two separate experiments is shown. (C) The percentage of all T cells expressing IL-10 or FoxP3 is shown on the left, and the percentage of Bcl6+ PD-1high expressing FoxP3 is shown on the right 10 days post-immunization. (D) The ratio of IgG1-expressing cells to IgM-expressing GC B cells 8 days post-immunization is shown. (E) C57BL/6 mice were immunized with either NPOVA or mMOGtag in CFA. Fourteen days post-immunization, draining popliteal lymph nodes and bone marrow were taken for ELISpot analysis of NP- or MOG-specific IgM or IgG. Blood serum from the same mice was assayed by ELISA for circulating anti-NP or anti-MOG IgM or IgG antibodies. (F and G) IgHMOG B cells were labeled with CTY, then transferred into SMARTA recipient mice along with 2D2 or OTII T cells. Mice were then immunized with either mMOGtag or OVA or were given no immunization. The GC response was assessed by flow cytometry 10 days post-immunization. (F) Data are expressed as the absolute number of GFP+ cells, as the percentage of all GFP+ B cells (CD19+ CD138−) for GC and memory/naive B cells (top), and as the percentage of all GFP+ GC or memory/naive B cell that are MOGtag+ (bottom). (G) Data are expressed as the percentage of GFP+ memory/naive B cells that are CTYlow/neg (left), the MFI CTY of CTYlow/neg memory/naive B cells (top), and the percentage of CTYlow/neg memory/naive B cells that are MOGtag+ (bottom). In all graphs, each data point represents an individual mouse, with the bar representing the mean. Datasets in (B)–(E) were analyzed using Student’s t test, and datasets in (F) and (G) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a t test with Bonferroni correction. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2018 25, 3342-3355.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MOG-Specific T Cells Induce Early GC Collapse to a Memory Phenotype Fluorescent NP-specific B cells and either OVA- or MOG-specific CD4+ T cells were transferred into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipients that were then immunized with either NPOVA or NPMOG. Draining popliteal lymph nodes were harvested for analysis using FACS or, in a separate experiment, histology 5 and 10 days post-immunization. (A) The absolute number of GFP+ cells and the size of the given cell subset are shown as a percentage of all GFP+ cells (plasma cells) or all GFP+ B cells (GC B cells and memory/naive B cells). The 5 and 10 day time points were assessed in separate experiments; data shown are representative of two or three individual experiments. (B) Representative histological sections from NPOVA- or NPMOG-immunized mice to visualize NP-specific GFP+ B cells and either RFP+ OVA-specific or MOG-specific T cells, respectively. Sections were stained for IgD to outline B cell follicles. Scale bars represent 100 μm. (C) The density of GFP+ or RFP+ cells in the GC was quantified from histological images. (D) The ratio of IgG1- to IgM-expressing GC B cells 5 and 10 days post-immunization was determined in a separate FACS experiment. Each data point in (A), (C), and (D) represents an individual mouse, with the bar representing the mean. Datasets were analyzed using Student’s t test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2018 25, 3342-3355.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Increasing T Cell Antigen Affinity Partly Rescues the MOG GC from Early Collapse (A) A schematic of the nfMOGtag antigen showing the insertion of amino acids 13–35 from neurofilament-M (with sequence comparison with the MOG35–55 peptide). (B) In vitro proliferation assay measuring CFSE dilution of labeled OVA-specific T cells cultured for 3 days with NPOVA-loaded splenocytes, or labeled 2D2 T cells cultured with mMOGtag, or nfMOGtag-loaded splenocytes. A representative (of three separate experiments) histogram for each condition is shown. The dashed lines represent unlabeled (left) and fully CFSE-labeled (right) OTII T cells. (C–E) Fluorescent MOG-specific B and T cells were transferred into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipients that were then immunized with mMOGtag or nfMOGtag. Draining popliteal lymph nodes were harvested for analysis using FACS 5 and 10 days post-immunization. The 5 and 10 day time points were assessed in separate experiments; data shown are the combination of two separate experiments. (C) The absolute number of RFP+ T cells is shown 5 days post-immunization. (D) The absolute number of GFP+ cells and the size of the given cell subset at both 5 and 10 days post-immunization are shown as a percentage of all GFP+ cells (plasma cells) or all GFP+ B cells (GC B cells and memory/naive B cells). (E) The ratio of IgG1- to IgM-expressing cells was determined for GC B cells. (F) Fluorescent Ag-specific B and T cells were transferred into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipients that were then immunized with NPOVA, mMOGtag, or nfMOGtag. Mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with BrdU 7 days post-immunization, and draining popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes were harvested for analysis using FACS 12 hr later. The percentage of GFP+ GC B cells that are BrdU+ (left) or CXCR4+ (right) is shown. Each data point represents an individual mouse, with the bar representing the mean. Datasets in (C)–(E) were analyzed using Student’s t test, while datasets in (F) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a t test with Bonferroni correction. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2018 25, 3342-3355.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Tfh Cell Phenotype Is Not Altered by Antigen (A–C) RFP+ antigen-specific T cells were transferred along with non-fluorescent antigen-specific B cells into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipient mice that were then immunized with NPOVA, mMOGtag, or nfMOGtag in CFA. Draining popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes were harvested 10 days later, and Tfh cells (CD4+ CD19− RFP+ CXCR5+ PD-1hi) were FACS-sorted for subsequent analysis of gene expression by digital droplet PCR. One representative of two independent experiments is shown. (A) An example of gating for CXCR5+ PD-1hi Tfh cells is shown. (B) The absolute number of Tfh cells per lymph node is shown (left), along with size of the Tfh population as a percentage of total RFP+ T cells (right). (C) Digital droplet PCR analysis of mRNA levels (copies per cell) for the listed gene. (D) Fluorescent antigen-specific B and T cells were transferred into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipients that were then immunized with NPOVA, mMOGtag, or nfMOGtag. Draining popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes were harvested 8 days post-immunization for analysis using FACS. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for ICOS and PD-1 on RFP+ CXCR5+ PD-1hi Tfh cells (top two panels) and the percentage of Tfh cells (Bcl6+ PD-1hi) that were FoxP3+ (bottom) are shown. Each data point in (B)–(D) represents values from an individual mouse, with the bar representing the mean. Datasets were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a t test with Bonferroni correction. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2018 25, 3342-3355.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Memory B Cells Produced by the MOG GC Response Are Unresponsive to Secondary Challenge (A) Fluorescent antigen-specific B and T cells were transferred into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipients that were then immunized in the left footpad with either NPOVA or mMOGtag in CFA. Thirty-four days post-immunization, mice were immunized in the right footpad with NPOVA, PBS, or mMOGtag in CFA in the right footpad, as shown. (B) The primary response in the left draining popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes and the secondary response in the right lymph nodes were analyzed separately using FACS 5 days post-challenge. The absolute number of GFP+ cells and size of the given antigen-specific subsets as a percentage of the total GFP+ cells (plasma cells) or GFP+ B cells (GC and memory/naive B cells) is shown for the left and right sides separately. (C) Fluorescent MOG-specific B and T cells were transferred into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipients that were then immunized with mMOGtag in CFA in the left footpad. Thirty-two days post-immunization, 5 × 105 naive 2D2 T cells were transferred, and then 34 days post-immunization, mice were immunized in the right footpad with PBS or mMOGtag in CFA, as shown. (D) The primary response in the left draining popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes and the secondary response in the right lymph nodes were analyzed separately using FACS 5 days post-challenge and presented as described in (B). (E) The proportion of GFP+ GC B cells and memory/naïve B cells that bind MOG antigen is shown. (F) Fluorescent antigen-specific B and T cells were transferred into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipients that were then immunized with either NPOVA or mMOGtag in CFA in the left footpad. Seventeen days post-immunization, 5 × 105 naive antigen-specific T cells were transferred, and then 19 days post-immunization, mice were immunized in the right footpad with NPOVA or mMOGtag in CFA, as shown. (G) The primary response in the left draining popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes and the secondary response in the right lymph nodes were analyzed separately using FACS 5 days post-challenge and presented as described in (B). (H) The proportion of GFP+ GC B cells and memory/naive B cells that bind NP or MOG antigen, as appropriate, is shown. Each data point represents an individual mouse, with the bar representing the mean. Datasets in (A) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a t test with Bonferroni correction. Datasets in (D) (E) (G) and (H) were analyzed using Student's t test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2018 25, 3342-3355.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Autoimmune T Cells Do Not Induce Unresponsiveness in MOG-Specific B Cells during the GC Response (A) Fluorescent NP-specific B cells and OVA- or MOG-specific T cells were transferred into non-fluorescent SMARTA recipients that were then immunized in the left footpad with either NPOVA or NPMOG. Thirty-two days post-immunization, naive T cells of the reciprocal specificity were transferred to these recipient mice, as shown, followed 2 days later by immunization with that antigen in the right footpad. (B) The primary response in the left draining popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes and the secondary response in the right lymph nodes were analyzed separately using FACS 5 days post-challenge. The absolute number of GFP+ cells and the size of the given antigen-specific subsets as a percentage of the total GFP+ cells (plasma cells) or GFP+ B cells (GC and memory/naive B cells) are shown for the left and right sides separately. Each data point represents an individual mouse, with the bar representing the mean. Datasets were analyzed using Student’s t test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2018 25, 3342-3355.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.070) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions