Warm Up A 2011 paper asked a random sample of students from Stanford University to consider the following statement: “The meeting next Wednesday has been.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Four girls soccer teams took a random sample of players regarding the number of goals scored per game. The results are below. Use a significance level.
Advertisements

Copyright ©2006 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. More About Categorical Variables Chapter 15.
Statistics Testing the Difference Between Proportions Statistics Mrs. Spitz Spring 2009.
 Check the Random, Large Sample Size and Independent conditions before performing a chi-square test  Use a chi-square test for homogeneity to determine.
Chi Square Test of Homogeneity. Are the different types of M&M’s distributed the same across the different colors? PlainPeanutPeanut Butter Crispy Brown7447.
COMPARING TWO PROPORTIONS Chapter 22 Part 1. Subscripts Use subscripts when comparing two groups.
Lecture notes 13: ANOVA (a.k.a. Analysis of Variance)
Analysis of Count Data Chapter 8
Warm Up Check your understanding p. 687 CONDITIONS:
Analysis of Count Data Goodness of fit
Warm Up Check your understanding on p You do NOT need to calculate ALL the expected values by hand but you need to do at least 2. You do NOT need.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Introduction The two-sample z procedures of Chapter 10 allow us to compare the proportions of successes in two populations or for two treatments. What.
8-1 of 23.
Hypothesis Testing II: The Two-sample Case
Measuring Evidence with p-values
Chapter 12 Tests with Qualitative Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Warm Up A 2011 paper asked a random sample of students from Stanford University to consider the following statement: “The meeting next Wednesday has been.
Warm Up Define the null and alternate hypotheses for the following scenarios: 1) The DMV reports that 80% of all new drivers pass the road test on their.
Warm Up A 2005 study took a random sample of scientists in the natural sciences and a separate random sample of scientists in the social sciences. Each.
Chapter 5 Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 11 Goodness-of-Fit and Contingency Tables
Two-sided p-values (1.4) and Theory-based approaches (1.5)
Elementary Statistics
Confidence Interval Construction
AP Statistics Multiple Choice Investigation
The Analysis of Categorical Data and Chi-Square Procedures
HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR Variance and standard deviation
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
AP Stats Check In Where we’ve been… Chapter 7…Chapter 8…
Chapter 11: Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Introducing Hypothesis Tests
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Contingency Tables: Independence and Homogeneity
Overview and Chi-Square
Section 12.2 Two-Proportion z tests
Inference for Relationships
HOT SEAT.
The Randomized Complete Block Design
P-VALUE.
The Analysis of Categorical Data and Goodness of Fit Tests
WARM - UP The following represents snowfall amounts for 8 random winters in Detroit. 78” 130” 140” 120” 108” 120” 156” 101” 1. Fill in all four.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Elementary Statistics: Picturing The World
Chi2 (A.K.A X2).
CHAPTER 11 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
The Analysis of Categorical Data and Goodness of Fit Tests
A special type of t-inference
Chapter 13: Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Inference for Tables Chi-Square Tests Ch. 11.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
The Analysis of Categorical Data and Goodness of Fit Tests
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Section 11-1 Review and Preview
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Inference for Two Way Tables
The Analysis of Categorical Data and Goodness of Fit Tests
A weight loss program claims that program participants have a mean weight loss of at least 10 pounds after one month. You work for a medical association.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Warm Up A 2005 study took a random sample of scientists in the natural sciences and a separate random sample of scientists in the social sciences. Each.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Working with Two Populations
Warm Up A 2003 paper investigated the tendency of people to rationalize their poor performance. Subjects were initially given a test asking them to guess.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Warm Up A 2009 study investigated whether people can tell the difference between pate, processed meats and gourmet dog food. Researchers used a food processor.
Warm Up A survey of 200 randomly selected California lottery ticket buyers asked them their age. The ages of the lottery players are listed below. Also.
Chi Square Test of Homogeneity
Presentation transcript:

Warm Up A 2011 paper asked a random sample of students from Stanford University to consider the following statement: “The meeting next Wednesday has been moved forward two days.” The statement is ambiguous, the meeting could now be on either Monday or Friday. The students’ guesses as to which day the meeting is are below. Monday Friday 11 33 Is this convincing evidence the proportion that would guess Monday or Friday is not the same?

Two Way Tables Summary of head injuries among college students 0 1 2 or more Total Soccer Players 45 25 21 91 Non-Soccer Athletes 68 15 13 96 Non-Athletes 45 5 3 53 Total 158 45 37 240 Is this convincing evidence the proportions of individuals with head injuries are different among soccer players, non-soccer athletes and non-athletes?

Practice - Two Way Tables A 2005 study involved 290 people who had lost at least 10% of their body weight in a medical weight-loss program. They were randomly assigned to a follow-up group that either met monthly in person, met monthly online or received a monthly newsletter. After 18 months the amount of weight regained was measured. Regain < 5 lbs Regain > 5 lbs In-person 54 47 Online 44 53 Letter 25 67 Make a two-way table of observed and expected values for the hypothesis that the proportion who gained more than 5 lbs is the same for all methods of follow-up.

Practice – Chi Square Test for Homogeneity A 2005 study involved 290 people who had lost at least 10% of their body weight in a medical weight-loss program. They were randomly assigned to a follow-up group that either met monthly in person, met monthly online or received a monthly newsletter. After 18 months the amount of weight regained was measured. Regain < 5 lbs Regain > 5 lbs In-person 54 47 Online 44 53 Letter 25 67 Is this statistically significant data that the proportion of people gaining 5 pounds or more is different among the 3 follow-up programs?

Practice A 2005 study took a random sample of overweight preschool students and a separate random sample of non-overweight preschool students. For each sample it was determined how many sweet drinks they consumed per day. The data is below. 0 1 2 3 or more Overweight 22 73 56 102 Not 93 207 168 339 Is there evidence of a difference in the proportion of overweight preschool kids consuming 0, 1, 2, or 3+ sweet drinks versus kids who are not?