Existing BSAP follow up

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental data collection and information systems in the Baltic Sea Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre of SYKE EEA/EIONET Workshop Maritime.
Advertisements

Aim To develop and test a management system for implementing an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Contributes to Defra project area MF10 ‘Impact of fishing.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
Overview of existing marine assessments in Europe (North East Atlantic, Baltic Sea, Mediterranean and Black Seas) Frédéric Brochier UNESCO/IOC Consultant.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
EU Public Health Programme Strand 1: Improve information system Establish Working Parties: 1.Lifestyle and other health determinants 2.Morbidity.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
Quality assurance activities at EUROSTAT CCSA Conference Helsinki, 6-7 May 2010 Martina Hahn, Eurostat.
Progress report of Working Group activities 1 David Pennington, EC (JRC) - WG1 Co-chair Food SCP RT Plenary meeting – 20 th November 2013.
AdriaMed Expert Consultation Interactions between capture fisheries and aquaculture Rome, Italy November st Coordination Committee (2000)
Getting Involved in the Research Data Alliance Stefanie Kethers
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Photo: Terhi Ryttäri HELCOM Red List of Species and Biotopes Progress of the project HELCOM RED LIST Fishes 28 February-1 March 2012 Project Coordinator.
Reporting on Programme of Measures (Art. 13)
Start and break slide Kick-Off-Meeting April 1 st – 3 rd 2009 Large Conference Hall of Hotel Riga Riga/ Latvia host: Baltic Sea Region Programme
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan – progress on the eve of the 2013 Ministerial Meeting Monika Stankiewicz HELCOM Executive Secretary Baltic Marine Environment.
Ecosystem approach to fisheries (western Channel and Celtic Sea) Simon Jennings, Cefas, UK.
Baltic 21 Project Proposal for INTERREG strategic project on bioenergy.
Part-financed by the European Union From application to implementation – the procedures Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar for 1st application.
BUDGET 4Distribution of budget per phases of the project; 4Itemization of budget; 4Division of budget per source of contribution; 4Division of budget between:
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.
How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.
Theme 3 – Physical loss and damage to the seafloor
“The EUNIS habitat classification, governance and future developments”
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Guidance report: Methodology for the assessment of ecological coherence of MPA’s Henk Wolters 30 October 2014.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Follow up of the Saint Malo seminar conclusions in the Batic Sea
WORKSHOP 17th Sept 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Lead Country approach to indicator development
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Conclusions: Parallel session 2, Group 2
Progress in the implementation of D11
Project MORE We are revising the strategy
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
MSFD Com Dec 2010/ 477/ EU review Recommendations for D2
Unit 4 Fisheries Planning
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
Preliminary methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on Programme of Measures (Article 16) WG DIKE Sarine Barsoumian (12/10/2015, Brussels)
Jannica Haldin HELCOM Professional Secretary
Information on projects
Preparatory Workshop of the Pilot Boreal Natura 2000 Seminar
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
Common Understanding Way forward
HOLAS II: project to develop a 2nd Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea Ulla Li Zweifel, Professional Secretary.
Progress of intersessional work
HELCOM WORK Submitted by the Contracting Parties in HELCOM that are also EU member states Name Surname.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Operational Guidance for the implementation of the CRF
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment scales and aggregation
Water Director's Meeting December 2013, Vilnius DG Environment
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Project intervention logic
Tony Zamparutti, Milieu Ltd
Presentation transcript:

Existing BSAP follow up Baltic Sea Action Plan Index of Actions Overview of implementation of the BSAP Name Surname

Current follow-up of BSAP Current overview of implementation (2013): a coherent list of actions from the BSAP and the 2010 HELCOM Ministerial Declaration. Issues: some actions lack clear targets and deadlines some actions lack agreed follow-up reporting not clear how the overall description of progress is concluded the overall progress is difficult to overview (long document) Secretariat IG PoM, 21 August 2014

Proposed steps for developing the follow-up system 1) Scrutinize the existing list of actions and separate broad statements from concrete actions that can be followed up 2) Categorize the list into: different types of actions (e.g. measures to reduce pressures, spatial measures, actions to influence international regulations, development of guidelines, improve knowledge etc.) level of implementation (national, regional) Secretariat IG PoM, 21 August 2014

Proposed steps for developing the follow-up system 3) Develop a reporting system that is based on agreed indicators, follow-up questions and aggregation rules. Two systems are proposed: a) Implementation of actions - simple indicator-based follow-up, short-term goal b) Measured/anticipated results of implemented actions – detailed follow-up, longer-term goal Secretariat IG PoM, 21 August 2014

Proposed steps for developing the follow-up system 4) Develop the presentation of results A simple overview of implementation of actions (e.g. traffic light table) A susbstantive presention of measured results of the implemented actions (e.g. fact sheets) Example from WWF report on implementaiton of BSAP Name Surname

Assessment of accomplishment Simple cases: Action: Carrying out an assessment (e.g. Red list assessment) Regional: Yes/No Action: Ratification of a protocol National: Yes/No Regional: Accomplished - all countries have implemented the action Partly accomplished - some countries have implemented the action Not accomplished - no country has implemented the action Name Surname

Assessment of accomplishment Examples: Name Surname

Proposed categories of actions a. Measures [directly aimed at reducing pressures or improving the state of the environment] Reduction of pressures Spatial protection Restoration/Reintroductions of habitats and species HELCOM Recommendations that require implementation through measures Joint actions with the aim of influencing international regulations b. Management coordination [aimed at establishing joint HELCOM principles for coordinated management of the marine environment] HELCOM Recommendations not included under Measures Plans, guidelines and manuals Assessment tools Classification systems, reporting systems Follow-up/assessments of agreed actions and plans Name Surname

Proposed categories of actions c. Monitoring and assessment [the implementation of] Monitoring and surveillance Assessments d. Data and information Data Databases e. Knowledge Promotion of research Reviews and evaluations Development of supporting information [e.g. modelling] Name Surname

Time table Follow-up implementation of actions; Proposal developed by the Secretariat, including when necessary new indicators, by end of 2014. GEAR, IG PoM and timely HELCOM WG meetings to be consulted during the development phase, Endorsement of the revised follow-up system by appropriate HELCOM WGs and HoD, possibly through intersessional communication, during 1st Q 2015, Contracting Parties to update implementation of BSAP actions using the simple indicator-based follow-up system during 2nd Q 2015, (based on update 2013 reporting) Endorsement of results during 3rd Q 2015. Name Surname

Time table Detailed follow-up of measures taken and results of implemented actions; initiate the development of such system as soon as agreed, relevant HELCOM WGs to identify actions that are relevant to follow-up from point of “results” of measures, Secretariat/HELCOM WGs to develop templates for reporting sheets. Step-wise process; to cover as many action areas as possible by 2016/2017[?]. Name Surname

Secretariat IG PoM, 21 August 2014