Stream Crossing Replacement Policy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Culvert Inventory and Assessment Protocol 2015 Field Season.
Advertisements

Culvert Inventory and Assessment Protocol 2012 Field Season.
1 CTC 261 Hydraulics Culvert Design. 2 Objectives  Know the factors associated with culvert design  Know what a skewed culvert is.
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Design of Open Channels and Culverts CE453 Lecture 26
Design of Culverts. Culvert Design - Basics Top of culvert not used as pavement surface (unlike bridge), usually less than 7 m.
Road Decommissioning Monitoring For every 10 miles of road decommissioned, one ¼ mile monitoring segment is established and monitored. Segments are monitored.
Drainage Channel Restoration Construction Project Wood Co. Engineer’s Office Great Lakes Protection Fund A.D. Ward, D. Mecklenburg, R. McCall, D.J. Mears.
Design of Open Channels and Culverts
Vineyard Planting in Sonoma County Nick Frey Sonoma County Winegrape Commission.
Channel Repair of Montezuma Creek in Coronado National Memorial following Fire and Flood Damage Stephanie Yard, P.E. & Allen Haden, Aquatic Ecologist Natural.
Examples for Mitigation Category 1 and 2 Streams.
1 Quality Assurance Boards Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance,
Stream Crossings: Effects on Streams at Fort Riley Military Installation Gilbert Malinga 1, James Steichen 1, Stacy Hutchinson 1,Phillip Woodford 2, Tim.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
Discussion Topics Construction Contract Administration Lessons Learned Other Construction Issues Questions? / Comments (Anytime)
1 Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish.
Connecticut Department of Transportation: Office of Environmental Planning (OEP) Statewide Drainage Maintenance Activities State owned Rail Facilities.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Bridge Engineering Section Bridge Rehabilitation.
 Do you have an Interest in Math and Science?  Do you have good problem solving skills?  Do you approach problems in an analytical manner?  Can.
Modern Urbanized Stream Water Quality Improvement Technologies Creating a Net Zero Water Quality Impact Solution in the Natural Environment.
Federal Force Account Utilizing Sponsor Resources Georgia Airports Association – Spring Workshop March 13, 2014 Presented By Katie Eleam Aviation Project.
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
Peabody Coal Lower Basin Pipeline Engineering Appraisal Study Bureau of Reclamation September 18, 2002.
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project June 2006.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above If you are reading this, then you are successfully seeing the webinar video. Use.
Basic Hydraulics: Culverts – I
CON 2001 CVE 4070 Construction Methods/Engineering Changes & Extra Work Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
Managing Road Maintenance Efficiently and Economically (Doing it Right the First Time) 2015 SDATAT Annual Road Conference Mr. Ken Skorseth SDLTAP Special.
1 Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If you are reading this, then you are successfully.
1 PS&E Plans, Specifications and Estimate. 2 Contract Letting Plans-Show what is being built Plans-Show what is being built Specifications-Show how project.
Design and Implementation of Large Wood Structures at Twelvemile Creek Prince of Wales Island Tongass National Forest The Nature Conservancy TEAMS Enterprise.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Temecula Valley Recycled Water Pipeline Joe Mouawad Sr. Director of Engineering September 2, 2015.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
permitting.
Riprap Installation Construction Inspection for Field Office Activities Will use Riprap Gradation and Riprap Subgrade Problems from Class Problem Section.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If.
Limited Service Agreements
Rating Grade Separations
Bridges Reach analysis Fundamental tool for design
There are 2 Types of Bridge Inspectors – Class B and Class A.
Annual Summary Details
EFFECTIVE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS FOR IN-CHANNEL PROJECTS
Fluvial Criteria in the FAHP
Site Grading Site Grading Civil Engineering and Architecture
Admin Manual Changes 4/13/2017 Starts at 9am
District-Wide Well Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Repair
Limited Service Agreements
The North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative Changes for 2016
Costs and Economics of Construction
a design technique for achieving fish passage
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP’S)
Construction Management & Inspection
Road-Stream Interface:
Bridges.
Worksite Assessment Overview 1/31/2017 Starts at 9am
Dirt, Gravel, and Low-Volume Roads
Hydraulics Updates to the IndianaDesign Manual
Dirt and Gravel Road/Low Volume Road Program
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Reporting, and Spending
Longitudinal Profile Survey for Successful Culvert Replacement
The North Atlantic Aquatic Connectivity Collaborative Changes for 2016
In-Stream Structures & Grade Control
Shaver Creek Permitting
Dirt and Gravel Road/Low Volume Road Program
Presentation transcript:

Stream Crossing Replacement Policy Stream Crossing Bootcamp This Section – Bank Management In this section we will focus on the management of road banks. Stream Crossing Replacement Policy

Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Stream Crossing Replacement Policy – Section 7.1 of the Administrative Manual

Policy for replacing culverts and bridges. Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Policy for replacing culverts and bridges. Applies to both D&G and LVR projects. Goal of the policy Limits replacements to areas where structure is causing problem with stream. Existing structures must be undersized and causing stream instabilities in relation to the bankfull width of the stream New structures must be sized to properly accommodate stream flow, bed load, and aquatic organisms (bankfull width)

Undersized Structures cause stream instability Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Undersized Structures cause stream instability Gravel deposition upstream (constant “cleaning”) “Firehose effect” erosion downstream Often barriers to aquatic life -Trout Unlimited

Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings BANKFULL WIDTH Bankfull Width: Width of channel at bankfull flow: typically when water begins to access floodplain and characterized by a 1-2 year event.

Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Existing Stream crossing structures with an opening of more than 13 ft2 ( equivalent to 48” diameter round pipe) In order to be eligible for replacement, EXISTING structures must: 1. Have a structure to bankfull width ratio of 75% or less. 2. Show signs of streambank erosion. 3. Show signs of streambed erosion/aggradation.  

Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Existing Stream crossing structures with an opening of more than 13 ft2 ( equivalent to 48” diameter round pipe) In order to be eligible for replacement, EXISTING structures must: 1. Have a structure to bankfull width ratio of 75 % or less. 2. Show signs of streambank erosion. 3. Show signs of streambed erosion/aggradation.  The NEW REPLACEMENT structure must (all four): 1. Have a structure width at least equal to bankfull width (100% ratio). 2. Be properly aligned with the channel. 3. Consider additional floodplain connectivity when possible. 4. Be designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of aquatic organisms through the structure.

Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Existing Stream crossing structures with an opening equal to or less than 13 ft2 ( equivalent to 48” diameter round pipe) In order to be eligible for replacement, EXISTING structures must: 1. Have a structure to bankfull width ratio of 75% or less. 2. Show signs of streambank erosion. 3. Show signs of streambed erosion/aggradation. The NEW REPLACEMENT structure must (all four): 1. Have a structure width at least equal to bankfull width (100% ratio). 2. Be properly aligned with the channel. 3. Consider additional floodplain connectivity when possible. 4. Be designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of aquatic organisms through the structure.

PENDING ADMIN MANAL APPROVAL Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings PENDING ADMIN MANAL APPROVAL When does the Stream Crossing Policy Apply? Applies to situations where streams, including intermittent channels, with identified bed and banks are flowing into the road or uphill ditch. Contact the Commission for questionable circumstances. In order for exemptions on “questionable stream” channels, Districts must obtain written approval from the Commission prior to contracting the project. Use of Round Pipes Round pipes over 36” in diameter are not permitted for use in DGLVR funded stream crossings. Oval or squash pipes are acceptable.

Crossings that are not eligible for replacement Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Crossings that are not eligible for replacement Program funds can NOT be used to replace the structure. This includes any materials, equipment, labor, engineering / consulting, etc. Maintenance is not an eligible expense. Including lining of existing crossings, bridge deck repair, etc. Can do work on road and stream around existing structure. Divert ditches from directly impacting the stream Drainage and base improvements on the road around the structure Streambank Stabilization Headwalls or endwalls on existing structure

Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Multiple pipes Existing stream crossings consisting of multiple pipes are eligible for replacement regardless of their relationship to the bankfull measurement (multiple pipes only, not multi-cell bridges). Installation of multiple pipe structures is NOT permitted with Program funds. Must be replaced with a single opening structure of at least bankfull width.

Details in manual, and recorded Webinar. Chap 7. Add. Policies 7.1 Stream Crossings Details in manual, and recorded Webinar. Photo documentation Recommended! Site Info Site Evaluation: width considerations Site Evaluation: erosion considerations Appendix K in manual Eligibility Determination

All necessary permits must be obtained before work can begin. Chap 8. Permits 8 Permits All necessary permits must be obtained before work can begin.

Stream Crossing Bootcamp This Section – Bank Management In this section we will focus on the management of road banks. The District Process

The Initial Site Assessment The Grant Application The Contract The District Process The Initial Site Assessment The Grant Application The Contract Municipal Bidding

The Initial Site Assessment The District Process The Initial Site Assessment When the District first meets the applicant and their Stream Crossing… Is it eligible for Replacement?

The Initial Site Assessment The District Process The Initial Site Assessment Stream Crossing Evaluation Form

The Initial Site Assessment The District Process The Initial Site Assessment

The Initial Site Assessment The District Process The Initial Site Assessment Consider the Required Opening Size of the Structure if Replaced by the Program… Does the applicant want to proceed? 20 foot Federal inspection requirement. Permits are required. Engineering will be required to some degree.

Stream Crossing Bootcamp This Section – Bank Management In this section we will focus on the management of road banks. The Application

A Stream Crossing Application Requires… The District Process The Application A Stream Crossing Application Requires… A Bankfull Width Structure Cost Estimate Structure Bedding Material Costs Stream Grade Control Costs Head/End Wall & Wing Wall Measurements & Cost Estimate

Determining Structure Costs The District Process The Application Determining Structure Costs Quotes should include Delivery ?Assembly? Traffic Loading Get Multiple Estimates. Use the Highest Estimate for the Grant Application.

The District Process The Application Bedding Material Assume you will not recycle material from the excavation. Don’t over think this! Length x Width x Depth of Structure Cubic Feet / 27= Cubic Yards Cubic Yards x 1.5 = Tons Don’t Subtract for the Structure Opening Don’t Forget to Figure Pipe Bedding Depth Consider Road Cover

Material for Stream Grade Control The District Process The Application Material for Stream Grade Control Must have it! Rip Rap Logs Baffles? Inside the Pipe and at the Inlet and Outlet.

Bypass Pumping Stream Flow Erosion Control The District Process The Application Head/End Walls & Wings Bypass Pumping Stream Flow Erosion Control Stream Bed Material in the Pipe

The District Process The Application

What about Equipment… “Old Materials Standard” Actual Rental Costs The District Process The Application What about Equipment… “Old Materials Standard” Actual Rental Costs

The District Process The Application

Labor… Could be Contractor Township Crews The District Process The Application Labor… Could be Contractor Township Crews

The District Process The Application App slide

Engineering and Design The District Process The Application Engineering and Design During the Application Phase you can budget up to 10% of grant requested funds towards engineering. This budget amount can go in the Labor Column. CAUTION: If the Contract Amount changes the Grant Budget for Engineering Expenses may change too.

The District Process The Application App slide

The District Process The Application QUESTIONS?