CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2012.
Advertisements

CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE Chap Authentication2 AUTHENTICATION A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS –NEEDED BEFORE DOCUMENTS.
EVIDENCE Trial Procedures. What is the point of Evidence? Evidence is the way in which the Crown and the defence try to reconstruct the chain of events.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2011.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
+ Rules & Types of Evidence. + Rules of Evidence During a trial, either the Crown or the defence may object to questions asked by the opposing attorney.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2008.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 Prof. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 1 2 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN AND CAN’T (MOSTLY)
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE Chap Authentication2 AUTHENTICATION A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS –NEEDED BEFORE.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2011.
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE Prof. JANICKE Chap Best Ev. Rule2 APPLIES ONLY TO: WRITINGS PHOTOGRAPHS RECORDINGS.
The Presentation of Evidence Evidence presented by both the Crown and the defence must be presented in the form of witness testimony and exhibits. All.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
Put on your head phones! Court Proceedings for a Criminal Case Fill in your notes sheets as you follow along.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 Prof. JANICKE 2016.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
The Criminal Trial Process
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2010.
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2016.
Introduction to Cross Examination, Impeachment, and Hearsay
WHAT IS EVIDENCE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES DOCUMENTS
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2012.
Safeguards for criminal trials
CHAP RESUMED: THE RULE EXCLUDING HEARSAY – WHAT IS HEARSAY EVIDENCE?
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
AGENDA Brief Lecture on Chapters courtroom evidence and jury selections and juries Film, 12 angry men Written exercise
Warm Up Who is the most important person in a courtroom? Why?
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2016.
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
OBJECTIONS.
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
Witnesses’ Roles in a Case
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2016.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE 2010.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE 2008.
Evidence.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 2: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2011.
WHO’S WHO IN THE COURT ROOM?
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2015.
The “Adversarial System”
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE 2010.
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED
CHAPTER 4, PARTS D-H RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW “UNAVAILABLE” Prof. Janicke 2019.
CHAP. 4, part A: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2019.
Business Law Final Exam
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
Presentation transcript:

CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2010

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay IN GENERAL: WITNESSES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY TO OUT-OF-COURT UTTERANCES OF THEMSELVES OF OTHERS DOCUMENTS CONTAIN STATEMENTS AND AREN’T ALLOWED IN EVIDENCE THEY ARE WRITTEN OUT OF COURT 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay EXAMPLES IN GENERAL: WITNESS CAN’T SAY WHAT HE TOLD THE POLICE LETTERS ARE INADMISSIBLE POLICE REPORTS ARE INADMISSIBLE 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay RATIONALE: WE WANT WITNESSES TO TELL US FIRST-HAND ON THE STAND WHAT THEY SAW AND DID CROSS-EXAMINATION IS AN ADVERSARY’S RIGHT 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay E.G.: CHEMIST FROM THE POLICE LAB TESTIFIES TO THE BLOOD TYPE; THE WRITTEN REPORT IS NOT ADMITTED HOMEOWNER TESTIFIES THERE WAS AN INTRUDER; NOT WHAT SHE TOLD THE POLICE; NOT HER WITNESS STATEMENT TO THE POLICE BORROWER TESTIFIES LOAN PAYMENTS WERE MADE ON TIME; HER LETTER TO BANK SAYING SO IS NOT ADMITTED 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

THE MAIN EXCEPTION TO WHAT IS HEARSAY: STATEMENTS OF OPPOSING PARTY CAN BE INTRODUCED BY THE OPPONENT, VIA ANY WITNESS WHO KNOWS WHAT WAS SAID CORPORATE DOCUMENTS (LETTERS; MEMOS) ARE ADMISSIBLE BY THE OTHER SIDE 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay WHAT JONES SAID 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH HIGH UP BENCH (JUDGE) JONES JURY CLERK AND REPORTER PODIUM COUNSEL FOR SMITH COUNSEL FOR JONES RAILING SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH HIGH UP BENCH (JUDGE) BYSTANDER JURY CLERK AND REPORTER PODIUM COUNSEL FOR SMITH COUNSEL FOR JONES RAILING SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH HIGH UP BENCH (JUDGE) SMITH JURY CLERK AND REPORTER PODIUM COUNSEL FOR SMITH COUNSEL FOR JONES RAILING SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH HIGH UP BENCH (JUDGE) SMITH JURY CLERK AND REPORTER PODIUM COUNSEL FOR SMITH COUNSEL FOR JONES RAILING SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH HIGH UP BENCH (JUDGE) BYSTANDER JURY CLERK AND REPORTER PODIUM COUNSEL FOR SMITH COUNSEL FOR JONES RAILING SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH HIGH UP BENCH (JUDGE) JONES JURY CLERK AND REPORTER PODIUM COUNSEL FOR SMITH COUNSEL FOR JONES RAILING SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay THE BASICS A PARTY CAN ALWAYS TESTIFY TO WHAT HAPPENED A PARTY’S WITNESSES CAN ALWAYS TESTIFY WHAT THE OTHER PARTY SAID PARTY X’S LAWYER CANNOT ASK ANY WITNESS WHAT X SAID WROTE DOWN REPORTED BY PHONE TOLD OTHERS ORALLY 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay NOTE THAT CONFESSIONS ARE STATEMENTS BY “THE OPPOSING PARTY” (DEFENDANT); HENCE NOT HEARSAY WHEN OFFERED BY THE PROSECUTION PROS. CAN ASK A BYSTANDER WHAT D. SAID PROS. CAN ASK A POLICEMAN WHAT D. SAID (IF HE HEARD IT) IF D. TESTIFIES AT TRIAL, PROS. CAN ASK D. WHAT D. SAID 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay

Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay A VICTIM IS NOT A PARTY IN A CRIMINAL CASE HENCE, VICTIM’S OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS TO POLICE OR NEIGHBORS ARE USUALLY NOT ALLOWED TO BE INTRODUCED AT TRIAL BY EITHER SIDE VICTIM CAN OF COURSE TESTIFY TO WHAT HAPPENED, IF ASKED 2010 Chap. 3 -- Intro to Hearsay