The DTT project – Il progetto DTT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Plasma-Wall Interaction Task Force meeting November 2006 Lubljana, Slovenia "Interaction of a liquid Gallium jet with ISTTOK's edge plasmas: first.
Advertisements

ITER Organization, Cadarache, France
Report from US ITER Fusion Power Associates December 15, 2011 Ned Sauthoff Project Manager.
PPPL ST-FNSF Engineering Design Details Tom Brown TOFE Conference November 10, 2014.
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
ASIPP Zhongwei Wang for CFETR Design Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto University.
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
EPICS Collaboration Meeting – Aix-en-Provence June 2010 Page 1 ITER welcomes EPICS WD Klotz ITER int. Organiztion That’s me.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Initial Assessment of Maintenance Scheme for 2- Field Period Configuration A. R. Raffray X. Wang University of California, San.
Physics of fusion power
The main function of the divertor is minimizing the helium and impurity content in the plasma as well as exhausting part of the plasma thermal power. The.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
Y. ASAOKA, R. HIWATARI and K
1 Lecture #24 Fusion ENGR 303I. 2 Outline Fusion →Definition →Atoms usually used Previous attempts at fusion Current attempts at fusion →International.
Nuclear Fusion Energy Rishi Gohil ChE 379: Energy Technology and Policy Dr. Thomas Edgar Fall 2007.
Indian Fusion Test Reactor
School of Energy Engineering and Physics. Professor Reza Amrollahi Biyouki Dean.
India’s Strategy for Fusion Energy R. Srinivasan Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar – , India.
Nuclear Fusion: Using the energy of the stars on Earth.
1 The Broader Approach Projects P. Barabaschi F4E Garching – 14 Apr 2011.
Construction of Wendelstein 7-X Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik
ASIPP EAST Overview Of The EAST In Vessel Components Upgraded Presented by Damao Yao.
Nuclear Fusion Katharine Harrison. Why Are We Interested? There are great challenges that are associated with fusion, but there are also very large possible.
Kaname Ikeda, October Status of the ITER Project Status of the ITER Project Kaname Ikeda ITER Nominee Director-General October 2006.
ARIES AT Project Meeting - Princeton, NJ 18 Sept 00 1 ARIES-AT Toroidal Field (TF) and Poloidal Field (PF) Coils Tom Brown, Fred Dahlgren, Phil Heitzenroeder.
Exploring Magnetically Confined Burning Plasmas in the Laboratory AAAS Annual Meeting Ned Sauthoff February 18, 2005 “Yearn to burn” “Burn to learn” Marshall.
Overview of the KSTAR commissioning M. Kwon 3 June, 2008.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 16th TOFE Madison, Sept , EUROPEAN TECHNOLOGICAL EFFORT IN PREPARATION OF ITER CONSTRUCTION ROBERTO.
Divertor Design Considerations for CFETR
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
Fusion Fire Powers the Sun Can we make Fusion Fire on earth? National FIRE Collaboration AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT,
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
KIT Objectives in Fusion by 2020 Workshop on the European Fusion Roadmap for FP8 and beyond April 13 – 14, 2011; IPP Garching.
Charles C. Baker Virtual Laboratory for Technology presented at the U.S. ITER Forum University of Maryland, College Park May 8, 2003 US ITER Technology.
1 mm 1.5 mm 2 mm 0.5 mm 1.5 mm ABSTRACT Within the framework of fusion technology research and development, a neutron source has long been considered a.
Charles C. Baker Deputy US ITER Planning Officer presented at the Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC November, 2003.
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
1 PFC requirements  Basic requirements  Carbon based  Provisions for adding (interface design included in research prep budget)  NBI armor  Trim coil.
The mass of the nuclei produced is less than the mass of the original two nuclei The mass deficit is changed into energy We can calculate the energy released.
The International Workshop on Thin Films. Padova 9-12 Oct of slides Present Status of the World- wide Fusion Programme and possible applications.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
ITER Liquid Helium Plants Status and Test Protocol ICEC June 29th, 2015 / Grenoble / FranceY. FABRE.
Status of Upgrading Project of Tokamak T-15 E. Azizov 1), P. Khvostenko 1), I. Anashkin 1), V. Belyakov 2), E. Bondarchuk 2), O. Filatov 2), V. Krylov.
MAIN COMPONENTS  INTODUCTION  PRINCIPLE  CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS  PROCESS  ADVANTAGES  DISADVANTAGES  CONCLUSION.
MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT FUSION Zack Draper | Physics 485 November 23, 2015.
1 Young-Ju Lee Vacuum & Cryogenic Engineering Team National Fusion Research Institute Young-Ju Lee Vacuum & Cryogenic Engineering Team National Fusion.
Fusion. Examples ● Fusion is the reaction that produces the energy in the sun.
US Participation in the
Instrumentation for status monitoring of SST-1 superconducting magnets
MANUFACTURING OF MAGNETS FOR SST-1 TOKAMAK
Nuclear Fusion Katharine Harrison.
KAI ZHANG Nuclear Fusion Power KAI ZHANG Oct
Construction and Status of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus at SNU
Design and Fabrication of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus (VEST)
X.R. Wang, M. S. Tillack, S. Malang, F. Najmabadi and the ARIES Team
The Frascati Neutron Generator
Preparation of activation experiments for ITER material characterization and data validation in the Deuterium–Tritium JET campaign T. Vasilopoulou &
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
The Gas Dynamic Trap (GDT) Neutron Source
CONT Meeting, 21 January
Fusion for Energy & ITER Contribution to EU Added Value
Qingjin XU Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP),
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
IFMIF/DONES Project: opportunities for the industry
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
1 NEMO Group, Dipartimento Energia, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
Presentation transcript:

The DTT project – Il progetto DTT Raffaele Albanese* and the DTT executive board (R. Albanese, F. Crisanti, P. Martin, A. Pizzuto) on behalf of the DTT team * Consorzio CREATE / Univ. Napoli Federico II ILO Industrial Opportunities Days, Napoli, 6 June 2019

OUTLINE Introduction Why DTT? What is DTT? DTT layout DTT components DTT management

Introduction: Fusion vs fission E = m c2 Advantages of fusion: Abundance of fuel Small amount of fuel needed for reactor conditions No pollution No greenhouse effect No direct nuclear waste No risk of severe accidents

Introduction: Fusion on Earth Ignition condition: n•T•τ ≥ 5×1021 m-3 s KeV In the 90s the JET Tokamak achieved: n•T•τ = 0.9×1021 m-3 s KeV Q= Pfus/Pin=(16MW/25MW)=0.6 Gravitational confinement Inertial confinement At the very high (100 million °C) temperatures needed for fusion the gas is fully ionized and is a very good conductor: plasma (4th state of the matter). Magnetic confinement

Why DTT? DTT aims JET: In the 90’s the JET tokamak achieved 16 MW of nuclear fusion power from D-T reactions, with 25 MW of input power, i.e., with a fusion gain Q>0.6.   ITER: To improve Q, the current strategy aims to increase magnetic field, plasma current and machine dimensions. This is the mission of ITER, an international tokamak conceived in the 80’s under construction at Cadarache, France. The first plasma is expected in 2025. In the next decades ITER should produce Pfus=500 MW from Pin=50 MW with Q10. DTT: The DTT is a facility conceived to develop and test controllable power exhaust solutions in an integrated environment and DEMO relevant conditions. DEMO: According to the EU Fusion Roadmap, DEMO is expected to be the first fusion plant to provide electricity to the grid in the second half of this century.

Why DTT? Fusion Roadmap

Why DTT? EU Fusion Roadmap & DTT added value The European fusion community identified eight important missions on the path towards fusion electricity: 1) Plasma regime of operation 2) Heat-exhaust system 3) Neutron resistant materials …. divertor plates www.euro-fusion.org/fileadmin/user_upload/EUROfusion/Documents/2018_TopLevel_Roadmap.pdf DTT is a new device, where the modern technologies can be adopted and further developed; the presently operating tokamaks were designed about 40 years ago By 2025 most of the plasma experiments built in the ‘80 will likely shut down and the experimental plasma physics activities are carried out on a few machines DTT construction will keep industry linked to fusion field DTT would be the ideal training device to grow the new ITER & DEMO generations

Why DTT? EU Fusion Roadmap & DTT added value Plasma facing components to cope with very large power fluxes 10-20 MWm-2 achieved Innovative materials (Liquid Metal PFCs) Remove plasma energy before it reaches PFCs  radiation Geometry + plasma physics Strike point sweeping (courtesy of JET)

What is DTT? An Italian fully superconducting tokamak project DTT = Divertor Tokamak Test facility is: An Italian fully superconducting tokamak project Under final design To be built in ENEA Frascati Research Centre Within the European roadmap to the realization of fusion energy To study the power exhaust problem in: an integrated environment DEMO relevant conditions

What is DTT? History “Green book” “Blue book” 30th SOFT 2015 2017 2018 2019 Jul 15 DTT Project Proposal (“Blue Book”) Jul 17 European workshop on DTT roles and objectives -> Eurofusion PEX-AHG Dec 17 Call for interest open to all Italian Regions to host DTT Apr–Sep 18 Appeal to the supreme court by some regions against the results of the call Apr–Aug 18 Cost revision committee on the “Blue Book” design Jul 18 First Design review meeting to address the recommendations from the Eurofusion PEX-AHG Oct 18 DTT management organization set-up Apr 19 DTT Interim Design Report (“Green Book”) https://www.dtt-project.enea.it/downloads/DTT_IDR_2019_WEB.pdf

What is DTT? Parameters + technology   DTT ITER DEMO R (m) 2.14 6.2 9.1 a (m) 0.65 2 2.93 A 3.3 3.1 Ip (MA) 5.5 15 19.6 B (T) 6 5.3 5.7 Heating Ptot (MW) 45 120 460 Psep /R (MW/m) 14 17 Pulse length (s) 95 400 7600 Flexibility and DEMO relevant technologies

DTT layout: Site & torus hall 9 sites were proposed from all over Italy “Casale Monferrato” (TO) “Ferrania” (SV) “La Spezia” (SP) “Porto Marghera” (VE) “CR ENEA Brasimone” (BO) “Cittadella Della Ricerca” (BR) “CR ENEA Frascati” (RM) “Capitolo San Matteo” (SA) “Manoppello” (PE) “CR ENEA Frascati” (RM)

DTT layout: DTT machine at a glance Item TF CS PF VV Cryostat NBI Total Mass [ton] 270 45 126 153 302 80 ~ 1000 ~11 m

DTT layout: Neutronics Neutron yield is significant for a DD device (1.5x1017 n/s from DD and 1.5x1015 n/s DT) Radiation & loads to be taken into account for the design of DTT components Neutron induced radioactivity calls for remote handling Tokamak building walls at least 220 cm to comply with limits for professional workers (300 Sv/yr) outside the building and for public (10 Sv/yr) at about 40 m distance from the building

DTT components: Magnet system 18 Toroidal Field coils Nb3Sn Cable-In-Conduit Conductors 5 Double-Pancakes (3 regular + 2 side) 6 Central Solenoid module coils Nb3Sn Cable-In-Conduit Conductors 6 independent modules 6 Poloidal Field coils 4 NbTi Cable-In-Conduit Conductors 2 Nb3Sn Cable-In-Conduit Conductors 6 independent modules Design based on proven and reliable technologies

DTT components: Vacuum vessel Shell Thickness (inboard) 15 mm Shell Thickness (outboard) Ports Thickness 25 mm Ribs thickness 10 mm Volume VV 75 m3 Material AISI 316-L(N) Weight of main vessel body 36900 kg Operating Temperature of the VV (max) 60 °C Baking temperature of the VV (max) 110 °C ~ 2.2 m ~ 4 m

DTT components: In-vessel components Design requirements compatibility: liquid lithium divertor (closed cycle) remote handling system In-vessel magnetic diagnostics In-vessel control coils DEMO Materials electromagnetic loads FW inboard module: 2 modules per VV sector for RH limitations EUROfusion decision on the first divertor planned in 2023  flexibility needed to incorporate it inside the DTT vessel FW outboard: plane modules plus a top part per VV sector for RH limitations and loads

DTT components: Flexibility required

DTT components: Constraints

DTT components: Heating system   DTT ITER DEMO Psep /R (MW/m) 15 14 17

DTT components: Power supply system The power supply system has to feed 6 superconducting modules of the central solenoid, 6 poloidal field superconducting coils, 18 toroidal field superconducting coils designed for a current up to 45 kA, the in-vessel coils for plasma fast control and vertical stabilization, the ELM/RWM coils, the negative neutral beam injectors, the electron and ion cyclotron additional heating systems, and, finally, the auxiliary systems and services.

DTT components: Cryostat Major diameter at equatorial section ~11.2m Maximum height including basement ~11 m Structural Material SA-240 304LN Operational pressure (Vacuum) 10-3 Pa Design temperature of cryostat wall 293 K Thickness of the Cryostat walls 30 mm Thickness of the external ribs 25 mm Estimated Mass of CV main cylinder ~66 tons Estimated Mass of CV top lid ~16 tons Estimated Mass of CV basement ~220 tons Top Lid Main Cylinder Basement

DTT management: Organizational chart

DTT management: Investments

DTT management: Main procurements and services 1.Superconducting Magnets: Strands: Nb3Sn and NbTi * Cables Magnets (coils+casings) Externalstructure 2. Vessel/In-Vessel: Vacuum Chamber First Wall Divertor 3. Power Supplies: CS, PF, TF & protection systems Additional heating Auxiliaries Distribution systems 4. Heating system: Ion Cyclotron Electron Cyclotron Neutral Beam Injector 5. Cryocooler 6. Control & data acquisition 7. Remote maintenance 8. Buildings 9. Assembly * Call for nomination + prequalification + call for tender phases concluded: evaluation ongoing

DTT management: Type of companies, services, contracts Most procurements will be oriented to the SMEs In a few cases the bidders should have high financial capacity Services are expected to be required mainly during the assembly and operation phases Due to the tight schedule, call for tender specs will be based on well assessed design and proven technology Framework contracts and open procurements are deemed too risky for a timely construction within budget Procurements will be typically based on Call for Nomination, Pre-qualification, Call for Tender or Negotiated Procedure limited to pre-qualified candidates

DTT management: Timeline Design completion Tender phase Manufacturing

DTT management: Next steps Apr 2018: Frascati selected as DTT site July 2018: 1st Design Review Meeting of major components End 2018: Launched first call for tender procedure (for SC strands) End 2018: Recruitment of ENEA personnel started Mar 2019: 2nd Design Review Meeting Apr 2019 : DTT Interim Design Report Fall 2019 : Establishment of DTT Consortium, Award of SC strand contract, TF coil tender, Loan activated by EIB after licensing 2022-2023: Decision on divertor configuration (PEX) 2022-2025: Assembly and commissioning End 2025: First experimental plasma: 3T, 2 MA 2025  : Operations

DTT management: Further information For further information: www.dtt-project.enea.it fsn@enea.it