Susan Burke, University of Arizona

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.
Advertisements

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
Summary of Results and Projected Precision Rediscovering the Top Quark Marc-André Pleier, Universität Bonn Top Quark Pair Production and Decay According.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Dimuon Channel ( Z  μμ ) L uminosity ~180 pb -1 (recorded) 2 isolated muons with both having matching central tracks |η μ | 15 GeV 65.0 < M μ 1 μ 2
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
The Discovery of the Top Quark By Ben Smith. Introduction  By 1977, the discovery of the bottom quark suggested the presence of its isospin partner,
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Herbstschule fuer Hochenergiephysik, Maria Laach, September 2007.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
06/30/05 Mathieu Agelou – LowX’05 1 Sensitivity to PDFs at the Tevatron. Mathieu Agelou CEA – Saclay Low x workshop, Sinaia, Romania.
Puu Oo Cone, Hawaii Gordon Watts University of Washington For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Moriond QCD March 24, 2003Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D01 b-production cross-section at the TeVatron Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D0 for the CDF and D0 collaborations.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Measuring the t-tbar Cross-Section in the Dilepton Channel at CDF* J. Incandela for C. Mills Jan. 17, 2008 DOE Site Visit UC Santa Barbara * PhD Thesis.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
American Physical Society Meeting St. Louis, MO April th, 2008 Measuring the top mass at DØ using the Ideogram Method Amnon Harel
Top quark pair cross-section D0 (1 fb -1 results) Viatcheslav Sharyy for D0 collaborations CEA-Saclay / IRFU/ SPP ● Introduction ● Dilepton.
The Hunt For Single Top Production
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
B Tagging Efficiency and Mistag Rate Measurement in ATLAS
Deep Inelastic Scattering 2006
Trang Hoang Florida State University - Dzero
W boson helicity measurement
Top Quark Production at the Large Hadron Collider
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron and the standard model fits
Tim Scanlon Imperial College, London on behalf of the DØ Collaboration
Top quark production cross section Top quark mass measurement
The Hunt For Single Top Production
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
The Top Quark Search Joey Foley.
Presentation transcript:

Susan Burke, University of Arizona Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Outline Experiment Top Quark Dilepton Selection Lepton+Track Selection Conclusions & Updates Susan Burke, University of Arizona for the DØ Collaboration October 31, 2006

Fermilab Tevatron Currently the world’s only source for top quarks! pp collider at √s =1.96TeV Upgraded from Run I (1.8TeV): 36 bunches (396 ns spacing) Improved Linac Main injector (150 GeV proton storage ring) Antiproton “recycler” (began June 2004) Peak luminosity >10x higher than Run I Currently the world’s only source for top quarks! Integrated Luminosity Run I: ∫ Ldt~ 125 pb-1 Run II so far  1 fb-1 Run II expected: 4 - 8 fb-1 This analysis: 360-370 pb-1 corresponding to April 2002-August 2004 Run II Integrated Luminosity

DØ Detector DØ detector is comprised of: Central Tracking Detectors Silicon Microstrip Tracker Allows b-tagging of jets! Scintillating Fiber Tracker Surrounded by 2T solenoid magnet Liquid Argon Calorimeter Uranium/Copper/stainless steel absorber plates Surrounded by liquid Argon Muon Spectrometer 3 Layers of wire chambers 3 Layers of scintillation counters 1.8T toroid magnet outside innermost layer

Object Identification Muons Tracks in central tracking detectors Hits in muon spectrometer Electrons Tracks in central tracking detectors Energy clusters in electromagnetic calorimeter Primary Vertex Reconstructed from at least 3 quality tracks MET Reconstructed from vector addition of calorimeter ET, corrected for muon and track PT Jets Energy clusters in calorimeter

Top quark decays to W + b quark (~100%) in Standard Model Final decay states determined by W decay mode: · 2 b-quark jets · up to 2 leptons + neutrino pairs · up to 4 additional jets All hadronic ~ 44 % Lepton + Jets ~ 46% Dilepton ~ 10% ee+e+ ~ 6%, including e’s and ’s originating from ’s (W  decay) Branching Ratios (%):

tt → ll Signature t 2 high-PT (transverse momentum) leptons jet 1 n b W+ W- l+ n lepton 1 neutrino 1 jet 1 jet 2 l-  2 high-PT (transverse momentum) leptons Isolated from each other and the jets 2 high-PT jets Significant missing transverse energy (MET) from neutrinos n neutrino 2 lepton 2 Few background processes share this signature!

Type of Backgrounds Physics Backgrounds Instrumental Backgrounds With intrinsic MET Z/γ*→ tt → ll, WW/WZ → ll Small backgrounds Estimated from Monte Carlo (MC) Instrumental Backgrounds Z/γ*→ ee () No intrinsic MET, fake MET due to calorimeter energy resolution and noise Estimated from data (MC, normalized to data) Dominant background in ee & uu Instrumental leptons : multijet production & W + jets ee: at least one fake electron, relatively small background  : at least one muon fakes isolation from jets, relatively small background e: at least one fake electron or one fake isolated muon, dominant background Estimated from data for all 3 channels Hi

Event Selection µµ ee eµ Leptons Jets Background rejection cuts: ≥2 isolated, opposite charged leptons from primary vertex Trigger PT › 15 GeV Jets ≥2 jets, PT › 20 GeV Orthogonality vetoes Background rejection cuts: (μleading,MET) MET ee MET > 35 GeV (tightened at low Mee) Remove events with 80  Mee  100 Cut on event shape variable µµ MET > 35 GeV (tightened at high & low values of (μleading, MET)) 2 > 2 ( 2 is an event variable which tests consistency with Z hypothesis) eµ HT > 122 GeV (HT = pTlepton1 + pTjet1 + pTjet2 )

Signal & Background Estimates Estimated yields in all channels after full selection: Yields scaled to integrated luminosity used for each channel. Expected signal yields assume tt cross section of 7 pb. The errors on yields represent statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature.

Kinematic Distributions After full selection All channels combined Signal estimated with tt Monte Carlo

Cross Section Measurement Data from April 2002-August 2004 Channel # observed events: Nobs Background: Nbckg Signal Efficiency Branching Ratio L (pb-1) ee 5 1.0 0.082 0.01584 384 eμ 21 4.5 0.139 0.03155 368 μμ 2 1.3 0.064 0.01571 363 Cross section = (Nobs - Nbckg ) / (Signal Efficiency x Branching Ratio x Integrated Luminosity) Note: The instrumental background yield in the eµ channel is actually extracted from fitting an electron likelihood distribution, rather than by the simple counting method defined above.

Cross Section Measurement The combined top production cross section in the dielectron, dimuon, and electron muon final states: Our result is consistent with the Standard Model prediction! Primary sources of systematic error are jet energy scale calibration and lepton reconstruction.

Lepton + Track Analysis Dilepton Channels Benefit from few backgrounds Suffer from low branching ratio (~6%) Suffer from low signal efficiency largest hit in signal efficiency is from requiring 2 fully reconstructed leptons! Signal Efficiency Lepton + Track Selection 1 isolated lepton, PT >15 GeV Electron or Muon 1 isolated track, PT > 15 GeV ≥1 jet, PT > 20 GeV MET : For e +track >15-20 GeV For + track > 25-35 GeV (Tighter cuts are for events in Z mass window) Veto on eµ events to ensure channel orthogonality for combination Still a lot of background in sample! ee 8.2% eμ 13.9% μμ 6.4%

b-Tagging Backgrounds (Z + jets): most jets are from light quarks or gluons Signal: 2 high PT jets are from b-quark Require at least one jet to be b-tagged! b quark hadronizes into B-meson which travels a few mm before decaying Secondary vertex algorithm uses tracks with high impact parameter significance Decay length significance of secondary vertex Lxy /Lxy 7 Any jet with reconstructed secondary vertex is b-tagged! b-Tagging

Signal & Background Estimation Signal Estimation tt Monte Carlo Jet b-tagging efficiency estimated using semi-leptonic b decays in data Probability to tag a light quark jet (mistag rate) is measured in multijet events in data Background Estimation Physics Backgrounds: Z/γ*→ tt, WW→ ll Estimated with MC b-tagging efficiency from Z/γ*→ ee () , W+ jets Instrumental Backgrounds Z/γ*→ ee () Estimated from MC, normalized to data b-tagging efficiency from Z/γ*→ ee () data with low MET Instrumental leptons : multijet production & W + jets Fake electrons, fake isolated tracks, or fake isolated muons Estimated in Data Tagging probability for multijet (W+jets) is estimated in data sample with isolated lepton and low (high) MET

Results Estimated yields in both channels after full selection: Yields scaled to integrated luminosity used for each channel. Expected signal yields assume tt cross section of 7 pb. The errors on yields represent statistical uncertainties unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Cross Section Measurement Primary sources of systematic error:  jet energy scale calibration  Z background  track and lepton reconstruction  tagging rate for signal Nobs = # of observed events NBkg = estimated background yield = efficiency L = luminosity

Cross Section Measurement The combined top production cross section using the lepton + track and electron muon final states: Our result is consistent with the Standard Model prediction!

Conclusion and Updates We have measured the top pair production cross section in dilepton and lepton + track events using ~370pb-1 The combined result for dielectron, dimuon, and electron muon final states, using a total of 28 events, is: The combined result for e+track, + track, and electron muon final states, using a total of 44 events, is: We are working on a combination with all five selections, which accounts for correlations between the channels Combination includes new selection criteria for the  channel! Results are still statistically limited! All channels are currently being analyzed with a higher data set: ~1fb-1

Kinematic Distributions After full selection e + track and  + track channels combined ≥ 2 jets = 1 jet 2 jets 2 jets