Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THZ1 Reveals Roles for Cdk7 in Co-transcriptional Capping and Pausing
Advertisements

Structural Basis of Interdomain Communication in the Hsc70 Chaperone
Nicholas O. Bodnar, Tom A. Rapoport  Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
The Unique N Terminus of the UbcH10 E2 Enzyme Controls the Threshold for APC Activation and Enhances Checkpoint Regulation of the APC  Matthew K. Summers,
Ubiquitination Accomplished: E1 and E2 Enzymes Were Not Necessary
Volume 153, Issue 1, Pages (March 2013)
Kenneth Wu, Jordan Kovacev, Zhen-Qiang Pan  Molecular Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
CUL3Δ403–459 forms a functional Cullin‐RING ligase with altered activity and is unable to interact with CRL regulators Purified CUL3WT and CUL3Δ403–459.
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Sichen Shao, Karina von der Malsburg, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Reconstitution of the B
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
Yuan Lin, David S.W. Protter, Michael K. Rosen, Roy Parker 
The TFIIH Subunit Tfb3 Regulates Cullin Neddylation
Transcriptional Fidelity and Proofreading by RNA Polymerase II
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 1999)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Mary E. Matyskiela, David O. Morgan  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
A Dual E3 Mechanism for Rub1 Ligation to Cdc53
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
The APC/C Subunit Mnd2/Apc15 Promotes Cdc20 Autoubiquitination and Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Inactivation  Scott A. Foster, David O. Morgan  Molecular.
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Kunio Nakatsukasa, Gregory Huyer, Susan Michaelis, Jeffrey L. Brodsky 
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Sichen Shao, Ramanujan S. Hegde  Molecular Cell 
Protein Translocation Is Mediated by Oligomers of the SecY Complex with One SecY Copy Forming the Channel  Andrew R. Osborne, Tom A. Rapoport  Cell  Volume.
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
A Ubiquitin Replacement Strategy in Human Cells Reveals Distinct Mechanisms of IKK Activation by TNFα and IL-1β  Ming Xu, Brian Skaug, Wenwen Zeng, Zhijian.
Detecting Folding Intermediates of a Protein as It Passes through the Bacterial Translocation Channel  Hiroshi Kadokura, Jon Beckwith  Cell  Volume 138,
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Evaluation of a Diffusion-Driven Mechanism for Substrate Ubiquitination by the SCF- Cdc34 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex  Matthew D. Petroski, Gary Kleiger,
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Sebastian Rumpf, Stefan Jentsch  Molecular Cell 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Sequential E2s Drive Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly on APC Targets
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Yuki Okuda-Shimizu, Linda M. Hendershot  Molecular Cell 
An SOS Inhibitor that Binds to Free RecA Protein: The PsiB Protein
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Unconventional Mechanism of mRNA Capping by the RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus  Tomoaki Ogino, Amiya K. Banerjee  Molecular.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 75-83 (April 2011) Essential Role for Ubiquitin-Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme Interaction in Ubiquitin Discharge from Cdc34 to Substrate  Anjanabha Saha, Steven Lewis, Gary Kleiger, Brian Kuhlman, Raymond J. Deshaies  Molecular Cell  Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 75-83 (April 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2011 42, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ubiquitin-I44A Cannot Serve as a Donor for Ubiquitin Chain Initiation or Elongation Catalyzed by Cdc34-SCFβ-TrCP Complex (A) 32P-labeled β-catenin peptide (β-cat; 100 nM) was incubated with WT ubiquitin (lanes 1–6) or ubiquitin-I44A (lanes 7–12) in the presence of E1, ATP, 10 μM Cdc34, and 300 nM SCFβ-TrCP. Aliquots were removed at the indicated times and analyzed for substrate ubiquitination (Ubn β-cat) by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. (B) Same as in (A) but using 300 nM neddylated SCFβ-TrCP complex. (C) Same as in (A) but using 32P-labeled monoubiquitinated β-catenin peptide substrate (Ub-β-cat; 1.5 μM) and 300 nM SCFβ-TrCP. Molecular Cell 2011 42, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Discharge Defect of Ubiquitin-I44A Is Intrinsic to the E2∼Ub-I44A Thioester Complex (A) Cdc34 (10 μM) was preincubated with equimolar 32P-labeled WT ubiquitin (lanes 1–6) or ubiquitin-I44A (lanes 7–12) in the presence of 1 μM E1 and ATP for 10 min at 23°C, followed by 5 min incubation with apyrase to terminate charging. Discharge of Cdc34∼Ub was initiated by adding 75 μM ubiquitin-D77 plus 300 nM Cul1-Rbx1 and aliquots were removed at the indicated times and quenched with nonreducing sample buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by autoradiography. Rate of diubiquitin synthesis was estimated per unit Cul1-Rbx1 (mean ± SD). ∗ denotes triubiquitin product. (B) Same as in (A), except no Cul1-Rbx1 was added. Also, 120 μM ubiquitin-D77 was used, and the gel was stained with Coomassie blue to reveal amounts of charged and discharged Cdc34. A Phosphor image of the stained gel was quantified and plotted, from which the rate of Cdc34∼Ub discharge was estimated by fitting to a single exponential decay (right panel). A representative experiment is shown and the values reported (mean ± SD) are an average of three independent experiments. (C) 32P-labeled β-catenin peptide (2 μM) was incubated with WT ubiquitin (lanes 2–5) or ubiquitin-I44A (lanes 6–9) in the presence of E1, ATP, 10 μM UbcH5c, and 200 nM SCFβ-TrCP. Aliquots were removed at the indicated times and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. Molecular Cell 2011 42, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 E133R Mutation in Cdc34 Rescues Thioester Discharge Defect of Ubiquitin-R42E (A) WT Cdc34 (10 μM) (lanes 1–6) or E133R mutant (lanes 7–12) was preincubated with equimolar 32P-labeled R42E Ub in the presence of 1 μM E1 and ATP for 10 min at 23°C, followed by 5 min incubation with apyrase. Discharge of Cdc34∼Ub was initiated by adding 120 μM ubiquitin-D77, and aliquots were removed at the indicated times, quenched, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Coomassie blue staining followed by autoradiography. The image shown is that of the stained gel, and the phosphor image was quantified and plotted. The rate of Cdc34∼Ub discharge was estimated by fitting to a single exponential decay (right panel). Shown is a representative experiment, and the values reported (mean ± SD) are the average of two independent experiments. (B) Same as in (A), but with the addition of 300 nM Cul1-Rbx1 complex and 75 μM ubiquitin-D77 (autorad image shown). ∗ denotes triubiquitin product. (C) 32P-labeled β-catenin peptide (1.5 μM) was ubiquitinated using WT Cdc34 (lanes 1–6) or Cdc34-E133R (lanes 7–12) in the presence of E1, ATP, 30 μM ubiquitin-R42E, and 300 nM SCFβ-TrCP. Aliquots were removed at the indicated times and substrate ubiquitination analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. ∗ denotes contaminating band from the substrate. Molecular Cell 2011 42, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Serine 129 of Cdc34 Is in Close Proximity to Isoleucine 44 of Ubiquitin in a Constrained Cdc34∼Ub Model Rosetta docking model for Cdc34∼Ub thioester was generated by constraining the position of R42 of ubiquitin to be in close proximity to E133 of Cdc34. The thioester bond as well as the key residues for interaction are indicated. The figure was made in PYMOL. Molecular Cell 2011 42, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 S129L Mutation in Cdc34 Suppresses the Defect in Thioester Discharge of Ubiquitin-I44A (A) Cdc34-S129L (10 μM) was preincubated with equimolar 32P-labeled WT ubiquitin (lanes 1–6) or ubiquitin-I44A (lanes 7–12) in the presence of 1 μM E1 and ATP for 10 min at 23°C, followed by 5 min incubation with apyrase. Discharge of Cdc34∼Ub was initiated by adding 120 μM ubiquitin-D77, and aliquots were removed at the indicated times and quenched and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The rate of Cdc34∼Ub discharge was estimated by fitting to a single exponential decay. Shown is a representative experiment and the values reported (mean ± SD) are average of two independent experiments. ∗ denotes triubiquitin product. (B) 32P-labeled β-catenin peptide (100 nM) was incubated with WT Cdc34 (lanes 1–12) or the S129L mutant (lanes 13–24) in the presence of E1, ATP, 300 nM SCFβ-TrCP, and 30 μM WT ubiquitin (lanes 1–6 and 13–18) or ubiquitin-I44A (lanes 7–12 and 19–24). Aliquots were removed at the indicated times, and substrate ubiquitination was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. Molecular Cell 2011 42, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cdc34∼I44A-Ubiquitin Complex Is Defective in Nucleophilic Activation (A) Cdc34 (10 μM) was preincubated with equimolar 32P-labeled WT ubiquitin (lanes 1–6) or ubiquitin-I44A (lanes 7–12) in the presence of 1 μM E1 and ATP for 10 min at 23°C, followed by 5 min incubation with apyrase. Discharge of Cdc34∼Ub was initiated by adding 4 mM hydroxylamine, and aliquots were removed at the indicated times and quenched with nonreducing sample buffer. Rate of Cdc34∼Ub discharge to form Ub-NHOH (which has been verified by mass spectrometry; Saha and Deshaies, 2008) was estimated and reported (mean ± SD). (B) The rate of donor ubiquitin discharge to ubiquitin-D77 acceptor was measured for Cdc34 (6 μM) thioesterified with WT ubiquitin (lanes 1–12) or I44A ubiquitin (lanes 13–24). Discharge rates were measured at pH 7.0 (lanes 1–6 and 13–18) and pH 9.2 (lanes 7–12 and 19–24). Quantification of the gel is shown in Figure S5. ∗For unknown reasons, thioesterified Cdc34 resolved as two bands in this set of experiments. (C) Estimates of reaction rates from Figure 6B. Molecular Cell 2011 42, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions