Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Mapping of the Interaction Interface of DNA Polymerase β with XRCC1
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Solution Structure of ZASP PDZ Domain
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
NMR Evidence for Forming Highly Populated Helical Conformations in the Partially Folded hNck2 SH3 Domain  Jingxian Liu, Jianxing Song  Biophysical Journal 
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Structure and Signaling Mechanism of Per-ARNT-Sim Domains
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
SH3-SH2 Domain Orientation in Src Kinases
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Dynamic Response of the C2 Domain of Protein Kinase Cα to Ca2+ Binding
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Cooperation between Fixed and Low pH-Inducible Interfaces Controls Lipoprotein Release by the LDL Receptor  Natalia Beglova, Hyesung Jeon, Carl Fisher,
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Yuan Yang, Chang Shu, Pingwei Li, Tatyana I. Igumenova 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 11, Pages (November 1994)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
A Functional Proline Switch in Cytochrome P450cam
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Basis of Mutual Domain Inhibition in a Bacterial Response Regulator
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain Carlos A Amezcua, Shannon M Harper, Jared Rutter, Kevin H Gardner  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 1349-1361 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00857-2

Figure 1 Structural Features of PAS Domains (A) The typical PAS domain fold consists of a five-stranded antiparallel β sheet flanked by several α helices, labeled here with the nomenclature initially proposed for FixL [13]. (B) Sequence alignment of hPASK PAS A with known PAS domain structures, with helical and sheet residues in red and blue, respectively. The alignment was initially generated with the program MultAlin [45] and manually adjusted to match elements of secondary structure between proteins. Aligned proteins and their RCSB accession codes (in parentheses) are as follows: hPASK PAS A (1LL8), PYP (2PHY), BjFixL (1DRM), RmFixL (1D06), HERG (1BYW), and PHY3 (1G28). Structure 2002 10, 1349-1361DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00857-2)

Figure 2 Solution Structure of hPASK PAS A (Left) Bundle of 20 lowest-energy structures for hPASK PAS A, calculated as indicated in the text. (Right) Schematic ribbon diagram of the structure closest to the mean. Structure 2002 10, 1349-1361DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00857-2)

Figure 3 Backbone Dynamics of hPASK PAS A Backbone amide 15N relaxation data is plotted as a function of residue number. Secondary structure elements identified in the solution structure are shown schematically, with the flexible Fα/FG region indicated by dashed lines. (A) 15N R1, R2, and 15N{1H} NOE values, recorded at 14.1 T (1H frequency, 600 MHz). (B) Reduced spectral density function mapping analysis of data presented in (A). Structure 2002 10, 1349-1361DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00857-2)

Figure 4 Identification of a Ligand Binding Pocket within the Core of hPASK PAS A (A) Superposition of 15N/1H HSQC spectra of 800 μM 15N-labeled hPASK PAS A without (black) and with 900 μM compound 1 present (red). (B) Structure-activity relationship information for compound 1, showing that significant changes in affinity result from minor structural modifications. Kd values for compounds 1 and 2 are determined from isothermal titration calorimetry as these compounds exchange between the free and protein-bound states on an intermediate NMR timescale. In contrast, compounds 3–6 exhibit fast exchange on the NMR timescale in their binding to hPASK PAS A, allowing a direct measurement of Kd from the concentration dependence of chemical shifts in a titration. (C) Comparison of binding sites for aromatic compounds within hPASK PAS A (left) and heme within FixL (right) [14, 27]. Amide and methyl groups significantly affected by the addition of saturating quantities of compound 1 are mapped onto hPASK PAS A, by the minimum chemical shift criteria shown in the figure. No information is available for the amide groups of residues highlighted in gray because of solvent exchange broadening. Structure 2002 10, 1349-1361DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00857-2)

Figure 5 Identification of the Kinase Binding Site on the Surface of hPASK PAS A (A) Superimposed 15N/1H HSQC spectra of 200 μM 15N-labeled hPASK PAS A without (black) or with 150 μM unlabeled kinase domain (red). Peaks originating from residues at the PAS/kinase interface show selective intensity reduction upon the addition of kinase because of chemical exchange broadening effects. (B) Location of the kinase binding loop as identified by residues (red sphere) with selectively broadened amide resonances. No information was obtained from residues colored in gray, signals from which are broadened in the absence of kinase, because of rapid solvent exchange at the high pH (pH 7.5) needed to stabilize the kinase domain. Structure 2002 10, 1349-1361DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00857-2)

Figure 6 Structural and Functional Effects of Point Mutations within hPASK PAS A (A) Map of point mutants within the hPASK PAS A domain, categorizing the effects of these on overall folding and kinase inhibitory activity. (B) Effects of the I203F and C228F mutations on the ability of hPASK PAS A to inhibit kinase activity, as assessed both in trans (left, with 400 μM of each PAS domain) and in cis (right). (C) Secondary structure analysis based on 13Cα/13Cβ chemical shifts for two point mutants (I203F and C228F) and wild-type hPASK PAS A. The plotted function is the difference of the secondary shifts of both nuclei [Δδ(13Cα) − Δδ(13Cβ)] and has been treated with a three-residue smoothing window. Red dashed lines at ±1.4 ppm inddicate the amplitudes of significant chemical shift deviations from random cell values [25]. The shaded region indicates the residues most affected by these mutations, which also corresponds to the flexible region identified in Figure 3. (D) Residues perturbed by mutation (I203F and C228F) or ligand binding (compound 1), as identified by changes in backbone amide 15N/1H shifts from unliganded, wild-type hPASK PAS A. Changes were quantitated by [Δδ(1H)2 + 0.1 × Δδ(15N)2]1/2. Residues with significant line broadening upon the addition of compound 1 are identified with pink bars. (E) Altered stability of I203F and C228F point mutants, as assayed by thermal melts monitored by circular dichroism at 222 nm. Melting curves were produced by a five-point running average of experimentally observed ellipticity data. Structure 2002 10, 1349-1361DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00857-2)

Figure 7 Model for Kinase Regulation by Small-Molecule PAS Ligands In the nonliganded state, the hPASK PAS A is capable of inhibiting the activity of its own kinase domain through interactions mediated by the FG loop. The introduction of aromatic groups (purple) within the hydrophobic core of the domain, provided either by the binding of small molecules or via site-directed mutagenesis, leads to conformational changes that propagate to the Fα helix, FG loop, and Hβ strand and relieves the kinase inhibition. Structure 2002 10, 1349-1361DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00857-2)