TCP on Tokamak Programmes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EFDA meeting on EU contribution to JT60SA Research plan version 3 (ENEA Frascati may 2011 Aula B Brunelli ) 1 of 18 slides Research strategy of JT60SA.
Advertisements

EFDA during FP7 and the PWI TF J.Pamela EFDA Leader PWI Task Force meeting 13 November 2006.
Jerome Pamela PWI meeting, 31 October New Horizons for EFDA PWI meeting, October 2007 Jerome Pamela EFDA Leader.
Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.
FES International Collaboration Program: Vision and Budget Steve Eckstrand International Program Manager Office of Fusion Energy Sciences U.S. Department.
A. Kirk, 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu, China, October 2006 Evolution of the pedestal on MAST and the implications for ELM power loadings.
ASIPP Zhongwei Wang for CFETR Design Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto University.
Ana Garcia Saguar Fusion Agreements Research DG European Commission Renewal of the Mobility Agreement.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
EFDA Fusion Roadmap Status of implementation Francesco Romanelli EFDA Leader.
A Roadmap to the realization of fusion energy Francesco Romanelli European Fusion Development Agreement EFDA Leader and JET Leader 17 May 2013 Acknoledgments:
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
IEA Workshop, San Diego October 2003 Summary of the European SERF-3 Programme David Ward, Ian Cook Culham Science Centre on behalf of GianCarlo Tosato.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / some plasma physics.
The current overall EU policy framework: Europe 2020 strategy, Innovation Union and Energy 2020 Strategy On March 2010, the Commission presented a Communication.
The Burning Plasma Experiment in Magnetic Fusion: What it is and how to do it S. C. Prager University of Wisconsin February, 2004.
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
Broader Approach Activities toward Fusion DEMO Reactors IT/E-2 IAEA 21 st Fusion Energy Conference (Chengdu 17 th October, 2006 ) Shinzaburo Matsuda Japan.
Tokamaks and Spheromaks Kevin Blondino 5 November 2012 “We say that we will put the sun into a box. The idea is pretty. The problem is, we don’t know how.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Report on ITPA-IEA CTP Meetings Dec 13-16, 2010; Cadarache, France Coordination and Implementation of Collaborations in International Tokamak Fusion R&D.
C Gormezano, S Ide ITPA SSO&EP IEA-LT/ ITPA Collaboration 1 Steady State Operation & Energetic Particles Advanced Scenario need the same development path.
Prof. F.Troyon“JET: A major scientific contribution...”25th JET Anniversary 20 May 2004 JET: A major scientific contribution to the conception and design.
Toward a Credible EU Roadmap for Fusion International Workshop on MFE Roadmapping in the ITER Era Princeton University, September 2011 D. Maisonnier.
IAEA 6 Invited Talks 21 Contributed Talks 1 Poster Session: 27 posters Proceedings American Institute of Physics – Conference Series 76 Nominations 26.
Status and Prospects of Nuclear Fusion Using Magnetic Confinement Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany Invited Talk given.
Report on W66 at W69 M. L. Watkins 1 (4) MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, 11 December 2008 Report on Sixth Joint Workshop (W66) “Implementation of the ITPA Coordinated.
25th JET Anniversary 20 May 2004 Prof. D.Palumbo“Setting JET on track” Setting JET on Track Prof. Donato Palumbo Honorary General Director Research EURATOM.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Fusion – in our grasp? IMechE East Midlands branch Tuesday 22 May 2012 Chris.
Spallation Kernfusion. Kernreaktionen: Wichtige Fusionswirkungsquerschnitte.
F Romanelli 1 (19)2 December 2010 Overview of JET experiments and EFDA plans Francesco Romanelli EFDA Leader and JET Leader 2 December 2010.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
ExCo Meetings of IEA Large Tokamak Facilities and Poloidal Divertor IAs GA, San Diego; Jan 2-3, 2008 Dr. Erol Oktay Acting Director ITER and International.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Extrapolation of GDT Results to a DT Fusion Neutron Source for Fusion Materials Testing e Tom Simonen, U. Calif., Berkeley 8 th International Conference.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
1 Subprojects of IFERC K.Lackner (as Chair of IFERC Project Committee) Garching – 14 Apr 2011.
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.
Fusion Fire Powers the Sun Can we make Fusion Fire on earth? National FIRE Collaboration AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT,
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
EIROforumSchool on Instrumentation A. Murari May 2013, CERN. JET: the European Fusion Device Andrea Murari EFDA-JET Close Support Unit EIRO School.
1 Preparation and Positioning of Korea for the ITER Project 2004 KSTAR US-Korea Workshop May 19-20, General Atomics.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under.
Fusion. Examples ● Fusion is the reaction that produces the energy in the sun.
WELCOME 4th IAEA Technical Meeting on Spherical Tori
US Participation in the
KAI ZHANG Nuclear Fusion Power KAI ZHANG Oct
Physics of fusion power
JET Programme in preparation of ITER
ITER & Expectations for Fusion Research in the Next Quarter Century
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
ITERに係わる原子分子過程 Atomic and Molecular Processes in ITER SHIMADA, Michiya ITER International Team Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear.
COntrol, Data Access and Communication System for ITER
Physics of fusion power
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Annual Report on the IA for Co-operation on Tokamak Programmes
Fusion for Energy & ITER Contribution to EU Added Value
IOS-6.3: Control of experimentally simulated burning state
TWG goals, approach and outputs
Request for Extension of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation on Tokamak Programmes Richard A. Pitts ITER Organization.
Annual Report on the IA for Co-operation on Tokamak Programmes
Stellarator Program Update: Status of NCSX & QPS
Presentation transcript:

TCP on Tokamak Programmes Duarte Borba on Behalf of Richard Pitts ITER Organization Chair, Executive Committee February 18, 2016

Outline Aims of the TCP and key achievements A description of TCP participants Current work programme Priorities for future work Governance structure Outreach and communication activities Example of cooperation

Aims of the CTP-TCP and key achievements The objective of this TCP is to enhance the scientific and technological achievements of the Tokamak Programmes by means of co-operative actions for the advancement of the Tokamak concept. The CTP-TCP is one of the largest among the fusion TCPs under the IEA. In 2015, the tokamaks involved in this TCP have continued to provide essential input to the ITER physics basis and to the reinforcement and consolidation of the ITER Research Plan

Description of TCP participants European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), European Union Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Japan United States Department Of Energy (USDOE), United States The Korean Ministry of Education, Science And Technology (MEST), Korea. The Institute For Plasma Research (IPR), India. ITER International Organization ITER China Domestic Agency (CN-DA)

Description of TCP participants Cooperation on large tokamaks started as the "Implementing Agreement on Cooperation among the three large Tokamak facilities (JET, JT-60 and TFTR)" in Feb.19, 1986 Participation of the Government of Korea as a Contracting Party in this Agreement became effective as of 5 February 2010 Participation of the Institute for Plasma Research, India, in this Agreement became effective as of 11 April 2011. Participation of ITER as a Contracting Party in the CTP-IA became effective as of 20 October 2012. Participation of ITER China Domestic Agency (CN-DA) as a Contracting Party in the CTP-IA became effective as of 16 January 2013.

TCP’s current programme of work. Although not the only vehicle for information exchange under the CTP-TCP, the International Tokamak Physics Activity (ITPA) has become a key player in the years since ITPA Coordination has been assumed by the ITER Organization ITPA activities now strongly focused on ITER priorities and coordinated by the IO The 7 ITPA Topical Groups together cover all the priority physics areas Activities are coordinated during the following annual workshops and meetings: International Tokamak Physics Activities (ITPA) Joint Experiments Workshop (JEX) and Meeting of the ITPA Coordinating Committee.

ITPA Joint Experiments for 2016 Summary of ongoing and new Topical Group proposals Topical Group 2015 continue 2016 new total 2016 ITER Priority 1 Divertor & SOL 7 3 10 2 Diagnostics 1 8 Pedestal 6 Energetic particles 5 Integrated Operational Scenarios 9 MHD Stability 11 13 4 Transport & Confinement 12 Total 53 65 16

TCP’s current programme of work 2015 personnel exchanges Wide range of bilateral and multi-lateral collaborations in 2015: EU – US: 6 Exchanges, 90 ppd IO – EU: 4 Exchanges, 11 ppd (participation of ITER personnel on the JET Programme) IO – KO: 2 Exchanges, 9 ppd JA – EU: 2 Exchanges, 1 ppy, 4 ppd JA – US: 4 Exchanges, 32 ppd KO – EU: 2 Exchanges, 51 ppd KO – IO: 1 Exchanges, 5 ppd US – EU: 7 Exchanges, 65 ppd US – KO: 10 Exchanges, 264 ppd Many other exchanges took place under bilateral agreements

Priorities for future work Gaps to Fusion Energy Sustainment of high gain burning plasma Control of burning plasma, long duration, heat exhaust Materials resistant to high heat fluxes and neutron fluence Tritium cycle & T self-sufficiency ~112kg T/year for 500MWe reactor Efficient breeding and extraction

Priorities for future work Support ITER construction and optimise ITER operation ITER 800 m3 ~ 500 MWth DEMO ~ 1000 - 3500 m3 ~ 2000 - 4000 MWth JET, JT60-SA and many tokamaks worldwide

Priorities for future work ITER: the biggest in a long line of Tokamaks ITER builds on nearly 50 years of worldwide tokamak research on more than 150 devices, the largest currently operating, JET, which began operation in 1983 is still operating ASDEX-U, EU DIII-D, US JET, EU ~8 m NSTX, US TCV, EU MAST, EU CMOD, US Superconducting devices operating or planned in Asia/India EAST, China KSTAR, S. Korea SST-1, India JT60-SA, Japan

Priorities for future work Fusion gain and the ITER tokamak Fusion energy gain Break even Q = 1 fa = 17% Q = 5 fa = 50% Q = 10 fa = 67% Q = 20 fa = 80% Q =  fa = 100% Burning plasma regime a-heating fraction The JET and TFTR tokamaks have produced DT fusion powers >10MW for ~1s in the 1990’s (Q ~0.5) In nuclear fusion research, the Lawson criterion, first derived on fusion reactors (initially classified) by John D. Lawson in 1955 and published in 1957,[1] is an important general measure of a system that defines the conditions needed for a fusion reactor to reach ignition, that is, that the heating of the plasma by the products of the fusion reactions is sufficient to maintain the temperature of the plasma against all losses without external power input. As originally formulated the Lawson criterion gives a minimum required value for the product of the plasma (electron) density ne and the "energy confinement time" . Later analysis suggested that a more useful figure of merit is the "triple product" of density, confinement time, and plasma temperature T. The triple product also has a minimum required value, and the name "Lawson criterion" often refers to this inequality. ITER is designed to a scale which should yield Q ≥ 10 at a fusion power of 400 – 500 MW for 300 – 500 s Alternative scenarios also planned at lower Q but longer pulse (up to 1 hour)

ITER under Construction Priorities for future work ITER under Construction ITER Site 2015 ITER Tokamak Complex Manufacturing progress Korea Japan

Governance structure Control of the Programme is vested in the Executive Committee Executive Committee consists of at least one and no more than three members designated by each Contracting Party. Coordination with the ITPA involves mainly the planning and implementation of joint experiments on multiple devices with prescribed parameter ranges and conditions in order to investigate specific high-priority physics issues for the ITER Project and DEMO concepts that would benefit from comparative studies.

Outreach and communication activities Annual Reports to IEA CTP-TPC website: http://ctp.jet.efda.org/lt/

DIII-D: Vertical Control Experiments via Remote Operation of EAST 3rd Shift GA Remote Control Room: Display hardware and software to provide control room experience remotely Real-time audio/video, streaming of data during shot, display of real-time boundary/ signal traces GA Science Collaboration Zone: Dedicated network and cyberspace for between-shot transfer of data to GA DIII-D provides EAST data repository for all U.S. collaborators Data mirror at GA serves all US collaborators General Atomics Remote Control Room supports 3rd shift operation of EAST by US scientists First full 3rd shift remote operation July 22 & 23: Two 3rd shift periods (overnight in China) Triggered vertical displacement events to assess growth rates, controllability Validated EAST models & quantified stability effects of new passive plate/coil geometry By FY 2017, experiments during EAST 3rd shift will enable US scientists to execute full EAST campaign each time EAST runs