NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0517r0 May 2013 Submission Slide 1 Authors: Combining Process in Virtual CS Mechanism for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Issues related to OCW management Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax
WUR Wakeup Channel Access
Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
Virtual CS during UL MU Date: Authors: March 2017
Trigger Frame Format for az
Discussions on Partial BSS Color
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
TG ax Consideration of Spatial Reuse
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Regarding UL MU protection
BSS Color in NDP Ranging
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
Reverse Direction in ac
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Regarding HE fragmentation
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
CW value after UL MU procedure
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Comment resolution on CID 20175
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set
Regarding HE fragmentation
SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO link access
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
CW value after UL MU procedure
OBSS_PD simplification
TXOP Truncation Enhancement
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
BSS Load Information Element for 11ax
BSS Color in NDP Ranging
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
EHT Power saving considering multi-link
Presentation transcript:

NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation November 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/1423r0 November 2016 NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation Date: 2016-11-07 Authors: Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS Geonjung Ko, WILUS

November 2016 Introduction The UL MU operation and the CS mechanism during the UL MU operation cause the situation which has not existed in the conventional WLAN. The proper NAV update rule is required considering the UL MU operation. Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS

Recap: UL MU Operation [1] November 2016 Recap: UL MU Operation [1] “The UL MU operation allows an AP to solicit simultaneous immediate response frames from one or more non-AP STAs.” UL MU CS mechanism Although an HE STA is solicited by a Trigger frame by an AP, the HE STA may not respond to the Trigger frame. “If the CS Required subfield in a Trigger frame is set to 1, the STA shall consider the status of the CCA and the virtual carrier sense (NAV) before UL MU transmission in response to the Trigger frame.” Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS

Recap: NAV Update Rule [1] November 2016 Recap: NAV Update Rule [1] The current intra-BSS NAV update rule “A STA shall update the intra-BSS NAV with the duration information indicated by the received frame in a PSDU if and only if all the following conditions are met The frame is identified as intra-BSS The indicated duration information is greater than the STA’s current intra- BSS NAV value The STA is not solicited an immediate response by the PPDU carrying the frame” Thus, if a STA is solicited an immediate response, the STA does not update the NAV. Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS

Problem Unwanted transmission by the STA which has not updated its NAV November 2016 Problem Unwanted transmission by the STA which has not updated its NAV Since STA3 is solicited by a Trigger frame, STA3 does not update its NAV. The CCA indicates busy and STA3 does not respond to the Trigger frame. STA3 may give an interference to the intra-BSS. Soliciting immediate responses from STA1, STA2, and STA3 Trigger Frame AP STA1 HE trigger-based PPDU HE SU PPDU transmitted by STA3 STA2 HE trigger-based PPDU STA3 STA3 CS: Busy Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS

November 2016 Proposal In case that a STA is solicited an immediate response, but the STA is not able to respond, the STA shall update its NAV. Soliciting immediate responses from STA1, STA2, and STA3 Trigger Frame AP STA1 HE trigger-based PPDU STA2 HE trigger-based PPDU STA3 NAV STA3 CS: Busy Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS

November 2016 Conclusion The current NAV update rule needs a modification following the UL MU CS mechanism. If a STA is not able to respond to the frame soliciting an immediate response from the STA, then the STA shall update its NAV. Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS

References [1] Draft P802.11ax D0.5 November 2016 Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS

November 2016 Straw Poll Do you agree to make the change below and include it to the next revision of the TG draft? (Clause 25.2.2 in page 118 of D0.5) A STA shall update the intra-BSS NAV with the duration information indicated by the received frame in a PSDU if and only if all the following conditions are met:(#164) —  The frame is identified as intra-BSS according to the rule described in 25.2.1 (Intra-BSS and inter-BSS frame detection)(#164)(#1466) —  The indicated duration information is greater than the STA's current intra-BSS NAV value(#164) —  Either Tthe STA is not solicited an immediate response by the PPDU carrying the frame.(#2905) or the STA is solicited an immediate response by the PPDU carrying the frame but the STA is not able to respond to the frame. Y N A Geonjung Ko et al., WILUS