Motivation Time Series Analysis Spectra and Results Conclusions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time-Series Analysis of Astronomical Data
Advertisements

Data Analysis Do it yourself!. What to do with your data? Report it to professionals (e.g., AAVSO) –Excellent! A real service to science; dont neglect.
2006 AGU Fall Meeting. 14 Dec. 2006, San Francisco – Poster #G43A-0985 Jim Ray (NOAA/NGS), Tonie van Dam (U. Luxembourg), Zuheir Altamimi (IGN), Xavier.
Jake Griffiths & Jim Ray NOAA/National Geodetic Survey Acknowledgement: Kevin Choi SUBDAILY ALIAS AND DRACONITIC ERRORS IN THE IGS ORBITS Harmonics of.
LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15.
Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab Lecture 17: Covariance and Autocorrelation.
1 Speech Parametrisation Compact encoding of information in speech Accentuates important info –Attempts to eliminate irrelevant information Accentuates.
Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 18/2/15. Continuous processes A continuous process defines a probability distribution over the space of possible signals.
Signals Processing Second Meeting. Fourier's theorem: Analysis Fourier analysis is the process of analyzing periodic non-sinusoidal waveforms in order.
Signals, Fourier Series
The IGS contribution to ITRF2014 Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Zuheir Altamimi, Xavier Collilieux 26th IUGG General Assembly, Prague, 28 June.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
What are the dominant frequencies? Fourier transforms decompose a data sequence into a set of discrete spectral estimates – separate the variance of a.
Goals For This Class Quickly review of the main results from last class Convolution and Cross-correlation Discrete Fourier Analysis: Important Considerations.
1 Methods in Image Analysis – Lecture 3 Fourier U. Pitt Bioengineering 2630 CMU Robotics Institute Spring Term, 2006 George Stetten, M.D., Ph.D.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
DOLPHIN INTEGRATION TAMES-2 workshop 23/05/2004 Corsica1 Behavioural Error Injection, Spectral Analysis and Error Detection for a 4 th order Single-loop.
Chapter 2. Fourier Representation of Signals and Systems
Time Series Spectral Representation Z(t) = {Z 1, Z 2, Z 3, … Z n } Any mathematical function has a representation in terms of sin and cos functions.
1 The Fourier Series for Discrete- Time Signals Suppose that we are given a periodic sequence with period N. The Fourier series representation for x[n]
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
Effect of data gaps: Comparison of different spectral analysis methods Effect of data gaps: Comparison of different spectral analysis methods Catalin Negrea.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
1 LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 2 Supplement (ME EN ) Prof. Rob Stoll Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Fall 2014.
IGS Workshop, June 02, Validation of GNSS Satellite Orbits C. Flohrer, G. Beutler, R. Dach, W. Gurtner, U. Hugentobler 1, S. Schaer, T. Springer.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
Professor A G Constantinides 1 The Fourier Transform & the DFT Fourier transform Take N samples of from 0 to.(N-1)T Can be estimated from these? Estimate.
Digital Image Processing Chapter 4 Image Enhancement in the Frequency Domain Part I.
1 Fourier Series (Spectral) Analysis. 2 Fourier Series Analysis Suitable for modelling seasonality and/or cyclicalness Identifying peaks and troughs.
E. Tanir(1), V. Tornatore(2), K. Teke(3,4) (1) Dept. of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey (2) Dept. of Hydraulics,
CHEE825 Fall 2005J. McLellan1 Spectral Analysis and Input Signal Design.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Wiesław Kosek 1,2, Agnieszka Wnęk 1, Maria Zbylut 1, Waldemar Popiński 3 1) Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying Department, University of Agriculture.
Geocenter motion estimates from the IGS Analysis Center solutions P. Rebischung, X. Collilieux, Z. Altamimi IGN/LAREG & GRGS 1 EGU General Assembly, Vienna,
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposals for Extended Parameterization in SINEX Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
Basic Time Series Analyzing variable star data for the amateur astronomer.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Combination of long time series of tropospheric parameters observed by VLBI R. Heinkelmann, J. Boehm, H. Schuh Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, TU.
ESTIMATION METHODS We know how to calculate confidence intervals for estimates of  and  2 Now, we need procedures to calculate  and  2, themselves.
Periodic signals To search a time series of data for a sinusoidal oscillation of unknown frequency  : “Fold” data on trial period P  Fit a function.
Vertical velocities at tide gauges from a completely reprocessed global GPS network of stations: How well do they work? G. Wöppelmann 1, M-N. Bouin 2,
8/20/2003LSC/ Hannover AFT note1 Computationally efficient search for CW sources Based upon the Arithmetic Fourier Transform (no multiplications!) Exploratory.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
IERS Directing Board Meeting No.39, BIPM Paris, September 23, 2004 IERS2005: Plan “Integrated Earth orientation parameters, Radio sources, and Site coordinates.
FFT corrections for tune measurements
Consistency of Crustal Loading Signals Derived from Models & GPS: Inferences for GPS Positioning Errors Quantify error budget for weekly dNEU GPS positions.
ESTIMATION METHODS We know how to calculate confidence intervals for estimates of  and 2 Now, we need procedures to calculate  and 2 , themselves.
Systematic errors in IGS terrestrial frame products Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi (with contributions from Ralf Schmid, Jim Ray & Wei Chen)
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
Time Series Spectral Representation
How to constrain the origin, orientation and scale
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Sampling and Quantization
Filtering Geophysical Data: Be careful!
Synopsis “The Matrix”: polarisation and pulsar timing
Reference Frame Working Group
Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)
Comments on John Rice’s paper
Example I: F.T. Integration Property
The Timevarying Ionosphere. measured by GPS
ESTIMATION METHODS We know how to calculate confidence intervals for estimates of  and 2 Now, we need procedures to calculate  and 2 , themselves.
 = N  N matrix multiplication N = 3 matrix N = 3 matrix N = 3 matrix
Continuous-Time Fourier Transform
Discrete Fourier Transform
CNES-CLS Dynamical modelling of GPS orbits
Diurnal and Semi-Diurnal Earth Rotation from 37 Years of VLBI Data
Presentation transcript:

THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF THE ANNUAL AND DRACONITIC PERIODS IN GPS STATION POSITION SPECTRA Motivation Time Series Analysis Spectra and Results Conclusions Paul Barrett, USNO/EO 2008 IGS Workshop, Miami Beach, 2008 June 2

MOTIVATION Ray, et al. 2008 Power seen at ~1 cpy and its harmonics (possibly to 8th)‏ Attributed to draconitic (or GPS precession; 1.04 cpy) period Not seen in VLBI or SLR data (except annual period)‏ Results from Fourier Analysis Power at multiple harmonics gives a ramp function with sharp jump at fundamental period Implies non-physical signal

DISCRETE FOURIER TRANSFORM (DFT)‏ Schuster (1905) or Lomb-Scargle (1982) periodogram Appropriate for small datasets with even samples and gaps, or Large (>1000 points) datasets with uneven samples and gaps No off-diagonal terms (i.e. cosine*sine term = 0 )‏ Generalized periodogram - Bretthorst (1988)‏ In “Bayesian Spectrum Analysis and Parameter Estimation” Appropriate for unevenly sampled data with gaps 2x2 matrix - including off-diagonal terms Student t-Distribution Unknown errors Marginalize (or integrate-out) standard deviation

SINGLE FREQUENCY SUMMED SPECTRA ITRF 2005 combination data GPS station position residuals 169 stations >400 weekly measurements Sum of individual station spectra Results – two sets of periods Annual period And 1st & 2nd harmonic For each coordinate Draconitic (1.04 cpy) period At 2nd & 3rd harmonics for each coordinate At 5th harmonic for north coord No other signals >7 cpy

DUAL FREQUENCY SUMMED SPECTRA 4x4 matrix w/off-diagonal terms Identifies two frequencies 3.05 cpy & 3.18 cpy

DUAL FREQUENCY SUMMED SPECTRA Identifies one frequency Peak is along diagonal ~6.24 cpy

SINGLE FREQUENCY GLOBAL SPECTRUM All stations combined Only annual frequency significant

VLBI SPECTRAL ANALYSIS Each station separately, then summed Only annual frequency significant All stations combined No significant frequencies

SLR SPECTRAL ANALYSIS Each station separately, then summed Only annual frequency significant All stations combined Annual frequency significant in North position

CONCLUSIONS Individual GPS station position residual spectra show: Annual periods at 1, 2, & 3 cpy Draconitic periods at ~3.12, ~4.16, & ~6.24 cpy No significant periods >7 cpy Global GPS station residuals show only annual periods Draconitic period is coherent on a per station basis, not between stations Implies incorrect modeling of orbits during eclipse Individual and Global SLR station residuals show annual periods Only Individual VLBI station residuals show an annual period