Marijn T.M. van Jaarsveld, Difan Deng, Erik A.C. Wiemer, Zhike Zi 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scheme 1 Cu(Sal-Gly)(phen) Cu(Sal-Gly)(pheamine) Cu(Sal-Gly)(phepoxy)
Advertisements

Extracellular HSP70 Activates ERK1/2, NF-kB and Pro-Inflammatory Gene Transcription Through Binding with RAGE in A549 Human Lung Cancer Cells Cell Physiol.
TIA-1 Self-Multimerization, Phase Separation, and Recruitment into Stress Granules Are Dynamically Regulated by Zn2+  Joseph B. Rayman, Kevin A. Karl,
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
Synergistic action of dual IGF1/R and MEK inhibition sensitizes childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells to cytotoxic agents and involves downregulation.
Transitory dasatinib-resistant states in KITmut t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia cells correlate with altered KIT expression  Markus D. Herrmann, Jochen.
Phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors protect mouse kidney cells from cyclosporine- induced cell death  E. Sarró, O. Tornavaca, M. Plana, A. Meseguer, E.
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 10, Pages (December 2018)
Marissa V. Powers, Paul A. Clarke, Paul Workman  Cancer Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Marissa V. Powers, Paul A. Clarke, Paul Workman  Cancer Cell 
Volume 120, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Selective HDAC1/HDAC2 Inhibitors Induce Neuroblastoma Differentiation
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Mean-Independent Noise Control of Cell Fates via Intermediate States
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (March 2016)
AT-101, a Pan-Bcl-2 Inhibitor, Leads to Radiosensitization of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer  Luigi Moretti, MD, Bo Li, MD, Kwang Woon Kim, PhD, Heidi Chen,
Inhibition of PI3K-AKT-mTOR Signaling Sensitizes Melanoma Cells to Cisplatin and Temozolomide  Tobias Sinnberg, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Heike Niessner,
Lovastatin Sensitizes Lung Cancer Cells to Ionizing Radiation: Modulation of Molecular Pathways of Radioresistance and Tumor Suppression  Toran Sanli,
Combinatorial Microenvironments Impose a Continuum of Cellular Responses to a Single Pathway-Targeted Anti-cancer Compound  Chun-Han Lin, Tiina Jokela,
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Lea Goentoro, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Nachiket Shembekar, Hongxing Hu, David Eustace, Christoph A. Merten 
Selective Inhibition of p300 HAT Blocks Cell Cycle Progression, Induces Cellular Senescence, and Inhibits the DNA Damage Response in Melanoma Cells  Gai.
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Targeting Mitochondrial DNA with a Platinum-Based Anticancer Agent
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
NF-κB Dynamics Discriminate between TNF Doses in Single Cells
Identification of genotype-selective antitumor agents using synthetic lethal chemical screening in engineered human tumor cells  Sonam Dolma, Stephen.
Targeting Mitochondrial DNA with a Platinum-Based Anticancer Agent
A Genetic Screen Identifies TCF3/E2A and TRIAP1 as Pathway-Specific Regulators of the Cellular Response to p53 Activation  Zdenek Andrysik, Jihye Kim,
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 13, Pages e6 (December 2018)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Xin Xie, Tomas Venit, Nizar Drou, Piergiorgio Percipalle
Mutant and Wild-Type Tumor Suppressor p53 Induces p300 Autoacetylation
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
TIA-1 Self-Multimerization, Phase Separation, and Recruitment into Stress Granules Are Dynamically Regulated by Zn2+  Joseph B. Rayman, Kevin A. Karl,
Gold Nanoparticles for BCR-ABL1 Gene Silencing: Improving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Efficacy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia  Raquel Vinhas, Alexandra R.
Teemu P. Miettinen, Mikael Björklund  Cell Reports 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Mathematical Modeling Highlights the Complex Role of AKT in TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis of Colorectal Carcinoma Cells  Matthew W. Anderson, Joanna J. Moss,
Catalytic Double Cyclization Process for Antitumor Agents against Breast Cancer Cell Lines  Raffaella Mancuso, Ida Ziccarelli, Adele Chimento, Nadia Marino,
Roland Houben, Sonja Ortmann, David Schrama, Marco J
PARP‐1 activity is reduced in NEDP1 KO cells
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Arati Sridharan, Chetan Patel, Jit Muthuswamy 
Identification of Kinases Responsible for p53-Dependent Autophagy
Presentation transcript:

Tissue-Specific Chk1 Activation Determines Apoptosis by Regulating the Balance of p53 and p21  Marijn T.M. van Jaarsveld, Difan Deng, Erik A.C. Wiemer, Zhike Zi  iScience  Volume 12, Pages 27-40 (February 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001 Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

iScience 2019 12, 27-40DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Primary Breast Cells Are More Sensitive to Cisplatin-Induced DNA Lesions Than Primary Lung Cells (A) Overview of adapted MTT assay to measure cell death. Briefly, cells were seeded at 50% density and treated with high doses of cisplatin for 24 or 48 h. Treatment under these conditions results in cell death (e.g., compare the wells treated with 60 μM cisplatin at 24 and 48 h). (B) Breast cells are more sensitive to cisplatin than lung cells. Human primary epithelial cells from six donors were treated with a range of cisplatin concentrations. After 48 h, the cell viability was determined by MTT assay. The concentration at which 50% loss of viability occurred (IC50) was calculated (n = 3–6). A t-test was used to compare IC50 values between breast and lung cells. (C) Treatment with cisplatin results in apoptosis. Nuclear morphology of breast and lung cells was visualized by DAPI stain after 24-h exposure to 80 μM cisplatin (representative experiment, n = 4). (D) Breast cells more frequently display apoptotic morphology (DAPI stain) after 24 h of cisplatin treatment than lung cells (representative experiment, n = 4). A two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test was carried out to compare differences (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001). (E) Breast cells are more sensitive to equal amounts of cisplatin-induced DNA lesions at 48 h. The amount of DNA-bound platinum was determined after 48 h of cisplatin treatment (Figure S1A) and plotted against the cellular viability (MTT assay) at 48 h (representative experiment, n = 3). Regression analysis was used to test if the slope and intercept were different. Error bars represent the SD (n = 3). iScience 2019 12, 27-40DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Proteomic and Functional Analysis Reveals an Increased Chk1 Activity in Lung Cells that Contributes to Cisplatin Resistance (A) Identification of genes involved in differential cisplatin response. Breast and lung cells were treated with a cisplatin dose that caused an equal amount of DNA damage (20 μM and 30 μM, respectively). A protein array (366 unique UniProt IDs covered by both pan-specific and phospho-specific antibodies) was carried out to assess proteomic changes at 6, 12, and 24 h. Gene set enrichment was performed on differentially expressed proteins to identify differentially regulated pathways. After validation of the array results using both antibodies present on the array and antibodies from different manufacturers, inhibitors were used to screen for genes that modified the cisplatin response. For details see Transparent Methods and Figure S2. (B) Overview of BioCarta pathways enriched for differentially expressed genes (DAVID pathway analysis). For details, see Table S2. (C) Overview of the most differentially activated pathways after cisplatin treatment. After array antibody validation (Table S2), activity of differentially regulated pathways was determined using quantitative western blot (Figure S3). The colors indicate whether protein activity (e.g., highest phosphorylation levels) is the highest in lung (red) or breast (blue) cells. (D) Inhibition of Chk1 activity differentially affects cisplatin sensitivity. Cells were treated for 1 h with the Chk1 inhibitor PF477736 (1 μM) or an equivalent amount of DMSO, after which cisplatin was added. Viability was determined after 48 h. Error bars represent the SD (n = 7). A two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test was carried out to test if differences were significant (**p < 0.01). iScience 2019 12, 27-40DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cisplatin Treatment Results in Different DNA Damage Signaling Dynamics in Breast and Lung Cells (A) Relative change of Chk1, Chk2, p53, and p21 dynamics after cisplatin treatment in breast and lung cells. Protein levels were analyzed using quantitative western blot and normalized by the number cells loaded in each sample. For every blot the highest expression value was set to 1, after which the average value was calculated for five to eight blots. Depicted is the average value normalized to the maximum value per graph. Error bars represent the SEM. Two-way ANOVAs were used to test if a protein was differentially expressed in breast versus lung cells. See also Figure S6. (B) Comparison of model simulations to the experimental data of DNA damage signaling dynamics. To compare with the corresponding experimental data, the model simulation data were scaled as relative values (normalized to the maximal values in breast and lung cells) and depicted as blue lines. Data from individual blots are depicted as “+.” The average values are shown as red circles. Note that some data points with the same values appear overlapped in this scatterplot. iScience 2019 12, 27-40DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Inhibitor Studies Reveal Different Roles for Chk1 and Chk2 in Breast and Lung Cells (A and B) Model predictions for the inhibition of Chk1 and Chk2 in breast (A) and lung cells (B). (C and D) Inhibition of Chk1 and Chk2 alter p53 and p21 dynamics. Primary breast (C) and lung cells (D) were pretreated for 1 h with inhibitors against Chk1 (PF477736; 1 μM) and Chk2 (Inhibitor II, 10 μM) or an equivalent amount of DMSO, followed by cisplatin treatment. Depicted is the average relative expression (n = 3–7) for each condition normalized to the maximum value. Error bars represent the SEM. Two-way ANOVAs were used to test if a protein was differentially expressed between treatments. See also Figures S10 and S11. iScience 2019 12, 27-40DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Breast Cells Are More Resistant to Doxorubicin Than Lung Cells (A) Cell viability response to equal intracellular amounts of doxorubicin. After 48 h of doxorubicin treatment, intracellular doxorubicin fluorescence was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (Figure S12). The intracellular doxorubicin levels (arbitrary units) were plotted against the cellular viability (as determined by MTT assay) (n = 3). Error bars represent the SD. Regression analysis was used to test if the slope and intercept were different. (B) Relative change of Chk1, Chk2, p53, and p21 dynamics after doxorubicin treatment in breast and lung cells. Depicted is the average relative expression per treatment (n = 4–6) normalized to the maximum value per graph. Error bars represent the SEM. Two-way ANOVAs were used to test if a protein was differentially expressed in breast versus lung cells. See also Figure S13. (C) Comparison of model simulations to the experimental data in response to doxorubicin treatment. To compare with the corresponding experimental data, the model simulation data were scaled as relative values (normalized to the maximal values in breast and lung cells) and depicted as blue lines. Data from individual blots are depicted as “+.” The average values are shown as red circles. Note that some data points with the same values appear overlapped in this scatterplot. iScience 2019 12, 27-40DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Mathematical Modeling Shows that the Balance of p53 and p21 Levels Determines Cell Viability after DNA Damage (A–D) Model simulations for the dynamics of cell viability, apoptosis rate, p53, p21, and threshold for apoptosis in response to cisplatin (A and B) or doxorubicin (C and D) in breast and lung cells. iScience 2019 12, 27-40DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A Friction Model of Cell Apoptosis Response to DNA Damage Signaling (A) A simple scheme for Chk1, Chk2, p53, and p21 protein interactions. (B) A cartoon of the “friction model.” A cyan-to-orange gradient indicates the balance between survival (cyan region) and apoptosis (orange region). Cellular outcome to DNA damage is determined by the balance of the driving force (caused by p53) and the friction force (induced by p21). To move cells to the apoptotic state, the driving force should be larger than the friction force. The size of arrows depicts the relative strength of the driving and friction forces in breast and lung cells in response to cisplatin or doxorubicin treatment. p-Chk1 and p-Chk2 contribute to p53 phosphorylation, and both p-p53 and Chk2 can induce p21 transcription. However, whether p21 expression increases also depends on the nature of the stress. iScience 2019 12, 27-40DOI: (10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.001) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions