Application of the Ecosystem Services Approach: Dordogne River and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation of the WFD: when ecosystem services come into play, Brussels, 29& Utilizing the ESA for WFD implementation: opportunities and challenges.
Advertisements

Application of the Ecosystem Services Approach: Dordogne River and Hydromorphological GoodStatus Hydromorphological Good Status ESAWADI project case study.
Add your Logo in the slide master menu Module IMPLICATIONS WP8- SERVICES WP9-SOCIOECON WP10-VALUATION.
CO 2 Valuing Virginia’s ECOSYSTEM Services
1 “TRANSBOUNDARY WATER COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA” Dr. Saghit Ibatullin, Chairman Executive Committee of International Fund for saving the Aral Sea.
The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A.
Perceived Climate Change Impacts and Exposure Units ASTRA Conference May 2006 Klaipeda Jürgen Kropp & Klaus Eisenack Potsdam Institute for Climate.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Black Sea Basin Directorate – presentation of the scope, responsibilities and project interests Mrs. TANYA.
Date/event: EEA EIONET Freshwater Workshop 27-28th Sept 2010, Copenhagen Author: Dr Manuel Lago (Ecologic Institute, Berlin) ETC/Water 2010 Overview of.
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.
Group Work IWRM Integrated River Basin Management.
INTRODUCTION TO INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Module 1 Session 1.3: What is Integrated Water Resources Management?
Date/event: Water accounts and economics workshop, 7-8/10/2010, Copenhagen Author: Dr Manuel Lago (Ecologic Institute, Berlin) ETC/Water 2010 Overview.
Dr. Joerg Hartmann WWF Dams Initiative Leader Energy in a Water Constrained World.
Water.europa.eu 3) a. Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Water Directors’ meeting Budapest, 26 & 27 May 2011 Nicolas ROUYER European Commission.
Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.
Framework for Water Management – challenges at national/local and trans-boundary scale Water Framework Directive implementation Gordana Kozhuharova, REC,
The case of the Cork oak ecosystem, TUNISIA
RUPES Workshop, Cagayan de Oro , September 2012
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Identification on Significant Pressures - Surface Water Bodies
STATUS OF LAKE VICTORIA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT II
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Challenges in a Changing World
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
Climate change impacts on the Loire river basin
Local Government Climate Change Support Program 2016
Environmental Services Training Group
CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional Authority
Plateforme ECOBAG Inter-regional Platform «Water and sustainable development» of Adour-Garonne River Basin ECOBAG Connecting science and stakeholders in.
National Environment Policy Presentation
Concepts in Water Resources Management
Beate Werner European Environment Agency
The EU WATER POLICY.
Key Conclusions of Workshop Session 4: taking stock of developments – research and other work.
A. Pistocchi, A. Aloe, S. Bizzi, F. Bouraoui, P. Burek, A. de Roo, B
Could the ecosystem services framework play a role in the FD implementation? Michael Munk Sørensen (COWI) 17 October 2013 WG Flood's Meeting.
Development of a joint water and agriculture agenda
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Update on RBMP&FRMP adoption and reporting Assessment of RBMP&FRMP
River Basin Management Plans
Future EU rural development policy and the Water Framework Directive
Hydropower and the WFD: constraint or opportunity?
Objectives, Scope and Structure of Country Reports
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Marie-Perrine Miossec
5b - Expert Group on Agriculture & Water/River Basin Network on agriculture Paving the way for WFD in cross compliance: discussion on practical implementation.
Costs and Benefits associated with the implementation of the Water Framework Directive, with a special focus on agriculture Summary & recommendations.
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
Fitness Check of EU Freshwater Policy
European Commission activities
Challenges in a Changing World
Water Science-Policy Interface (CIS-SPI) Progress report
CIS WG D meeting 7 April 2011 DG ENV, Brussels
Jacques Delsalle, DG Environment, Unit D.1
The Blueprint and Council Conclusions:
Aquaculture: part of the problem or part of the solution?
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Point 6 - CAP reform elements for discussion
Peter Kristensen European Environment Agency
River basin management plans in Europe
Andrea Tilche Unit Head of the Water Key Action
Optimization for Sustainable Water Resources
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
MAES and Accounting support to BD 2020 evaluation
Floodplains: important ecosystems and mitigators of flood risks
Presentation transcript:

Application of the Ecosystem Services Approach: Dordogne River and Hydromorphological Good Status ESAWADI project case study FP6 IWRM-Net2 Based on the work of: Elise Catalon, Philippe Blancher, Catherine Vignon (Asconit Consultants) Bruno Maresca, Anne Dujin, Xavier Mordret (CREDOC)

Case study background: ESAWADI objectives To analyze and test the potential utility of ecosystem services approach for the implementation of WFD : To contribute to economic analysis required for by the WFD To illustrate some concepts and relatively abstract objectives of the WFD among the stakeholders and public, and help the decision-making process To generate recommendations for the RBMP mid-term evaluation in 2012, in view of the WFD second round Two other case-studies : Ems River (Germany), estuary of Mondego River (Portugal)

The Dordogne Valley ? Overall basin : 24 500 km² - Dordogne River : 475 km In red, the study-area = the most dynamic part of Dordogne Valley Hydro-electricity Photo credits : EPIDOR Tourism Crop Irrigation

Why is hydromorphology important? Major transformations over the 20th century due to: Construction of hydro-electric dams in the up-stream part  sudden variations of water levels and temperature in relation to dam operations, no more morphogenic floods, no more formation of oxbow lakes… Mineral extraction in the flood plain till 1981  heavy physical deformation, bank erosion, channel incision… Flood protection works  constraints on river capacity to shift its course, physical deformation Both river dynamics and a river’s capacity to shift its course are pointed out in WFD implementation as good status requirements

Some issues related to hydromorphological situation? Bank erosion Floods and floods prevention Water authorities faced with the complexity of morphological processes and difficulties to convey hydromorphological issues to stakeholders Oxbow lakes restoration

Case study objectives Assumption: the ecosystem services approach can be applied to assess the benefits of water management measures which could improve the hydromorphological status and thereby convince stakeholders of the relevance of these measures. To achieve these goals, the case study aims to: provide a good description of the relations between ecological functions, based on a good hydromorphological status, and services important to stakeholders provide physical data/indicators which can give a fair indication of the importance of the service. Indicators approved both by scientists and stakeholders, since we can not expect a strong scientific legitimacy. Economic valuation is not required.

Main stakeholders Involved in the case-study framing and implementation: EPIDOR (Regional Public Watershed Board), Adour-Garonne Water Agency, ONEMA Regional office Institutional stakeholders involved through a written questionnaire and a workshop (planned for Feb. 2012): Local authorities, farmer representatives, leisure activities representatives… Riparian population involved through a written questionnaire (done) and a public meeting (planned for Feb. 2012 and organized by EPIDOR)

ES approach implemented Completed steps : In-depth analysis of the local context, water bodies status, local uses and practices, issues at stake… Broad identification of ecosystem services present in this area Development of an analysis framework based on relations between river functional compartments, ecosystems and services Questionnaire on the understanding and relations riparians have with the hydromorphological issues Ongoing steps: Analysis of the 120 questionnaires completed Identification of the ecosystem services which will be prioritized and quantified, of the relevant scale/area and choice of the indicators which will be tested (different indicators for the same service)

Identification and characterization of Dordogne river compartments functions Elise Catalon

Identification and characterization of Dordogne river ecosystems functions

Identification of ecosystem services relevant to this theme Provisioning services: Professional fishing Water supply for domestic use Water supply for agricultural uses Cattle watering place Regulation services: Auto-purification of water Biodiversity and ecosystems preservation Prevention of bank erosion Prevention of floods Drought impact mitigation Regulation of local climate Societal services: Landscape (aesthetic value, support for artistic inspiration) Biodiversity, social and heritage value Leisure fishing and hunting Tourism and fresh-water activities (bathing, boats…)

Some indicators to be tested Regulation services: Auto-purification of water: data’s on pollution reduction due to a riffle before a place important for freshwater activities, savings on treatment Provisioning services: Professional fishing: annual turnover Societal services: Leisure fishing and hunting: number of fish permits, data’s on number of users Tourism and fresh-water activities (bathing, boats…): data’s on number of users, number of clubs, number of spots, turnover

ES approach to be implemented Planned steps : Full description, localization (GIS treatment) and quantification of the services, assessment of some measures (Oct. 2011 to Jan. 2012) Try to assess the increase in ecosystem services related to a loss of hydroelectricity production implied by measures good for the geomorphological status Discussion of the results with stakeholders (Feb. 2012) Modifications to take into account stakeholder feed-back (March-April 2012). Synthesis of the full process (May 2012).

Key lessons from presentation Since the project is ongoing, these key lessons below are provisional: Policy: Very high interest and expectations from EPIDOR and Water Agency, dissatisfied with traditional economic evaluations and who need to convince stakeholders of the measures required to improve the hydromorphological status Scientific: Development of the method itself very interesting to go deeper in the scientific issues and raise questions related to the link between good ecological status and ecosystem functioning Operational: too early to draw lessons

For further information visit www.esawadi.eu THANK YOU For further information visit www.esawadi.eu Philippe BLANCHER Asconit Consultants philippe.blancher@asconit.com