Data Sharing in Clinical Trials

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OVERVIEW OF FACULTY OF 1000’S SERVICES
Advertisements

Academic Publishing is Evolving… Helping the world efficiently publish its knowledge Pete Binfield Co-Founder and Publisher PeerJ CRIStin Meeting, Norway.
Registration of Clinical Trials and Resources for Clinical Trial Registration.
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (URM) 1978: editors of general medical journals meet in Vancouver BC1978: editors of general medical journals meet.
Jamanetwork.com © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. The JAMA Network Expands! A Story of Innovation A Presentation for London Info.
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
H E L S I N G I N K A U P P A K O R K E A K O U L U H E L S I N K I S C H O O L O F E C O N O M I C S Orientaatiopäivät 1 Writing Scientific.
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health Module 1: Clinical Trials and Requirements for Registration and Results Reporting.
Scientific Data as Research Infrastructure: The Biomedical Sciences Strategies for Economic Sustainability of Publicly Funded Data Repositories Board on.
Open Access Resources: An Introduction to Public Library of Science and BioMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Rick Peterson Duke University.
Acknowledgements and Conflicts of interest Dr Gurpreet Kaur Associate Professor Dept of Pharmacology Government Medical College Amritsar.
Engaging with best editorial and publication practice Shreeya Nanda Deputy Editor.
Intensive Course in Research Writing: Session 1 (27 June 2011)
Jim Neaton PubH 8403 Presentation. Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors; a Book.
Guide for AWS Reviewers Lois A. Killewich, MD PhD AWS AJS Editorial Board.
Introduction to the Medical Literature Robert D. Hadley, PhD, PA-C PAS 851 June 23, 2003.
Rene Descartes: “I think; therefore I am.”. 3.3: Data Ethics Statistics Chap 3: Designing Experiments.
Jim Neaton PubH 8400 December 12, Perspective of an Editor: How it Works Controlled Clinical Trials (now Clinical Trials) –25 Associate Editors;
How to choose a journal Kim E. Barrett, Ph.D. Dean of Graduate Studies and Professor of Medicine University of California, San Diego Chair, APS Publications.
DATABASES. Learning outcomes for today By the end of this session you will be able to: ◦ Use boolean operators ◦ Understand the structure of information.
About Symbiosis Online Publishing
Tim Friede Department of Medical Statistics
1st Steering Committee Meeting activities from WP3 –
NRF Open Access Statement
Our Digital Showcase Scholars’ Mine Annual Report from July 2015 – June 2016 Providing global access to the digital, scholarly and cultural resources.
CMNS 110: Term paper research
Disclosure UK Talking about Transparency.
Choosing Your Letter Writers: Making networking work for you
A strategic conversation with Tim Jewell and Thom Deardorff
Ian Bruno, Suzanna Ward The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
Scientific Publishing
Manuscript Submission and Review: Perspective of an Editor and Author
How to Critically Appraise Literature
Scott Strayer, MD, MPH Assistant Professor
Dr. Frederic Surre City University of London; IEEE Standards Education
Introducing a New Undergraduate Research Journal
DIA GCP/QA SIAC All Member Meeting
Scenarios: “I kinda think I’m interested in cancer research…”
Oncology Update June 3rd, 2000
Recording and Reporting Clinical Trial Results
Open Access, Research Funders, Research Data, and the REF
How to Apply for and Receive Industry Funding for Investigator Sponsored Research Chuck Simonton MD, FACC, FSCAI Chief Medical Officer Abbott Vascular.
New Issue Released by Journal of Palliative Medicine & Care - Volume 4 - Issue 3 – 2017
Research Journals and “Other” Kinds of Articles: Good Uses of Space?
Evidence-Based Medicine
Clinical Study Results Publication
What Are Clinical Trials?
1st Steering Committee Meeting activities from WP3 –
Disclosure UK Talking about Transparency.
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
STROBE Statement revision
Writing up your results
Dealing with reviewer comments
A model for the transition from subscription to Fair Open Access
Systematic reviews, meta analyses, and cost effectiveness studies
Scientific Publishing in the Digital Age
Julia Saiz Shimosato, PhD
Evaluating sources.
Masoud Solaymani-Dodaran Iran University of Medical Sciences
Report of the Editor July 1997 to December 2005
Researching Physics Web-based Research.
Altmetrics: The Practical Implications Michael Taylor Head of Metrics Development Digital
Judy MIELKE, PhD. Taylor & Francis
Writing scientific papers and publishing your research
Updated NIH Public Access Policy
Data + Research Elements What Publishers Can Do (and Are Doing) to Facilitate Data Integration and Attribution David Parsons – Lawrence, KS, 13th February.
MANUSCRIPT WRITING TIPS, TRICKS, & INFORMATION Madison Hedrick, MA
Joyce Backus Associate Director, Library Operations
Journal editor perspectives
By Ken Hyland Journal of English for Academic Purposes (2010)
Presentation transcript:

Data Sharing in Clinical Trials Defining what we know Honoring those at risk Sustaining the field Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D. Editor-in-Chief, New England Journal of Medicine Distinguished Parker B. Francis Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

Clinical Question Participants Randomization Data Analysis Clean Data Data Analysis

Trialists Patients Clean Data Data Scientists ANY JOURNAL OTHER JOURNAL ANY JOURNAL Data Scientists Trialists Clean Data

Trialist Concerns Major Trial Questions Time Investment Rewards Patient Concerns Privacy Want Data to be Widely but Responsibly Used Trialists Concerns Major questions addressed by the trial Time invested versus time for data use Little reward for future trialists Patient Concerns Privacy Their data not widely shared Their data not used responsibly Data Scientists Concerns Transparency Publicly supported data not public New ideas not sought Data Scientists Concerns Transparency Data Not Public New Ideas

June 8, 2017

Public Data Sharing Statement July 1 2018 Clinical Trialists Data Warehouse

Examples of Public Data Sharing Statements Anyone All Immediately Any purpose Public Authorized From article Pre-specified Meta-analysis Designated warehouse No one No data Never Not applicable No access Open access Controlled access No access

Public Data Use Statement Warehouse Clinical Trialists Data Analyst

DATA WAREHOUSE FRONT OFFICE Open to the public

FRONT OFFICE DATA WAREHOUSE National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Illness (NDCT) DATA WAREHOUSE SOAR - Duke Clinical Research Institute YODA – Yale ACCESS – CVS Project Data Sphere- Project Data Sphere, LLC (PDS), an independent, not-for-profit initiative of the CEO Roundtable on Cancer's Life Sciences Consortium (LSC), operates the Project Data Sphere platform, a free digital library-laboratory that provides one place where the research community can broadly share, integrate and analyze historical, patient-level data from academic and industry phase III cancer clinical trials. FRONT OFFICE

ANZCTR

The data sharing statements are generally a single page; this is the top part of one example. Article information appears at the top of the page. ICMJE journals are handling in various ways (e.g., BMJ has tiers of articles with different data sharing requirements for each and has a list of standard statements for authors to choose from, and they can be customized). Approaches may be evolving as we all learn what works best.

Submitted These data represent all submitted articles with data sharing statements through the end of 2018. Yes = 588 No = 399 Not a clinical trial = 1263 Paper originally submitted before July 1 = 12 No response = 62 Through 2/15/19

Published since July 1, 2018

Response at Acceptance As of January 10, 2019 Will share data? Response at Acceptance Response after Proof Change No 26 15 -11 Yes 23 35 +12 Not a clinical trial 4 Submitted before 7/1/18 8 7 -1 This table shows a comparison between authors’ data sharing statements at acceptance and their statements after they’ve seen them and reconsidered at the proof stage. Jeff can probably tell us about any next steps being considered by the ICMJE.