Electron Optics & Bunch Compression

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Physics | ELBE | SRF Photo Injector for Electron- Laser Interaction LA 3 NET conference: Laser applications at accelerators, Mallorca,
Advertisements

1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
W.S. Graves1 Seeding for Fully Coherent Beams William S. Graves MIT-Bates Presented at MIT x-ray laser user program review July 1, 2003.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
Collective Effects in the Driver of the Wisconsin Free-Electron Laser (WiFEL) Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team Synchrotron Radiation Center.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
SFLASH  SASE interference setup & optics rough estimation 1d estimation 3d estimation summary.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
External Seeding Approaches for Next Generation Free Electron Lasers
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
W.S. Graves 2002 Berlin CSR workshop 1 Microbunching and CSR experiments at BNL’s Source Development Lab William S. Graves ICFA CSR Workshop Berlin, Jan.,
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
Twin bunches at FACET-II Zhen Zhang, Zhirong Huang, Ago Marinelli … FACET-II accelerator physics workshop Oct. 12, 2015.
Beam Optics of the TTF2 Nina Golubeva DESY. Beam optics from the BC2 up to the undulators General introduction to linear optics: – constraints for different.
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
X-band Based FEL proposal
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Eduard Prat / Sven Reiche :: Paul Scherrer Institute
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Short pulse, low charge LCLS operation
A compact, soft X-ray FEL at KVI
Challenges in Simulating EEHG
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Gu Qiang For the project team
Paul Scherrer Institut
Linac optimisation for the New Light Source
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
Free Electron Lasers (FEL’s)
Re-circulating Linac Option
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL?
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Simulation Calculations
Challenges in Simulating EEHG
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
Brief Introduction to (VUV/)Soft X-ray FELs
Selected simulations for XFEL photo injector
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Enhanced Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission
Presentation transcript:

Electron Optics & Bunch Compression BESSY FEL: Electron Optics & Bunch Compression Michael Abo-Bakr Outlook: BESSY FEL: introduction Machine layout Bunch Compression & Linac Optics Tolerance Studies

BESSY FEL characteristics/goals: Soft-X-ray multi user facility 4th generation high brightness snchrotron radiation source: Ephot,max = 1 keV (lmin = 1.24 nm) CW operated 2.3 GeV linac multi stage HGHG: short pulses with highly reproducable wavelength, shape and intensity

BESSY FEL characteristics/goals: Photon energy range: 25 eV to 1 keV (51 nm >  > 1.2 nm) Time structure: < 20 fs Peak power: 5 GW Pulse energy: 100 J Pulse sequence: 1 kHz macro-pulse (25 kHz SB) Brightness: 1031 Ph./(sec mm2 mrad2 0.1%BW) No. FEL-line 3 No beamlines per FEL-line 3 (5) free selectable photon beam polarization fully coherent photon beams

High Gain Harmonic Generation (HGHG)* Principle lu p I lu p I lu p I lu High power fs-laser (Ti:Sa-variable frequency) intense high brilliant e- beam Modulator: External seed at wo overlaps electron beam, modulating beam energy. Dispersive Section: Energy modulation is causing a spatial bunching in chicane magnets. Radiator: Electron beam radiates coherently at h.wo in long radiator, tuned in resonance to harmonic h = 3 ..5. *Developed and demonstrated by L.-H. Yu et al. DUVFEL

High Gain Harmonic Generation (HGHG) Principle radiator output  seeding radiation for the next stage  Cascaded HGHG scheme fs UV-Laser (230-460) nm 1st Stage 2nd Stage Mod. Dis. Radiator Seed Laser Mod. Radiator Dis. Delay BESSY Soft X-ray “low energy” FEL-line Delay Final Amplifier Electron beam quality degrades due to seeding and FEL amplification  “Fresh bunch” technique Seed pulse Electron bunch

BESSY FEL: Electron Beam Requirements HGHG & ‘Fresh bunch’ technique: most challenging requirements from high-energy FEL line (4 stages) Bunch Charge 2.5 nC Electron energy 2.3 GeV Peak current 1.8 kA Transverse emittance* ~ 1.5 p mm mrad Energy spread** 1.0 x 10-4 * sliced, normalized ** sliced, relative

FEL Performance from Start-to-End Simulations External Seed: variable Ti:Sa 460 – 230 nm, 500 MW, Profile: Gauss, 17 fs (FWHM)

General Machine Layout BC1 219 MeV L1 + Booster (L0) RF Photoinjector L2 20 eV – 1 keV L3 L4 FEL2 FEL3 EXT2 2300 MeV 3rd harmonic cavity BC2 753 MeV EXT1 1020 MeV FEL1 Arc nc pulsed photo-injector (PITZ design), later sc CW gun 18 TESLA type modules with 8 cavities each = 144 cavities, average accelerating field: 16 MV/m, 3rd harmonic cavity required 3 undulator section (FEL lines): 20/45/50 m

Electron optics gun simulations using ASTRA : PITZ type gun, optimized for 1 kHz operation (40 Mv/m peak field, 3 MW peak power, 75 kW verage power) linac optics and buch conpression using ELEGANT: two bunch compressors 180 degree arc extraction sections for low and middle energy FEL line, dogleg long. collimator dispersive sections in undulator section

Bunch Compression: two stage compression First compression stage: moderate compression (arc) energy: compromise between decreasing momentum chirp and space charge forces versus increasing R56 of compressor (reduced chirp) at higher energies Arc: must be passed with sufficiently long bunch length/ low peak current to avoid CSR effects energy: compromise between decreased sensitivity againcst CSR effects and space gained versus increasing R56 of second compressor at higher energies tuned to roughly isochronous behaviour – natural R56 acts decompressing, chromaticity needs to be controlled Second bunch compressor: energy: low to decrease R56 -> directly placed at the arc’s end general: weak & short bending magnets to reduce strength of CSR fields small hor. betafunctions in compressor dipoles (H-funktion)

Bunch Compression Two stage compression: start with long 60 A peak current pulse from injector chirp generated with “LINAC 1” (first two modules): f = -13.3 degree, harmonic cavity slightly off crest BC1: R56 = -10.5 cm increasing peak current 60 A -> 200 A “Linac 2” still off crest by f = -5.0 degree arc slighlty compressing: R56 = -1.9 cm 200 A -> 240 A BC2: R56 = -9.3 cm increasing peak current 240 A -> 1.8 kA downstream dispersive sections: no significant changes in bunchlength

Bunch Compressor 1 Type Energy R56 T566 Dipole length Dipole bending radius Dipole bending angle Quadrupole length Quadrupole strength 6 dipole chicane 219 MeV -10.5 cm 16.4 cm 0.4 m 1.80/2.25/4.50 m 222/178/89 mrad 0.2 m < 3.0 m-2

Bunch Compressor 2 Type Energy R56 T566 Dipole length Dipole bending radius Dipole bending angle Quadrupole length Quadrupole strength 8 dipole chicane 753 MeV -9.3 cm 14.0 cm 0.4 m 4.36/8.50/13.89 m 92/47/29 mrad 0.2 m < 5.0 m-2

Bunch Compressor 2: charge variation Sliced hor. Emittance through BC2 for 7.5 nC (black), 2.5 nC (red) and 0.1 nC (blue)

180 degree arc Type 4 x 45° TBA Energy 753 MeV R56 -1.87 cm T566 Dipole length Dipole bending radius Dipole bending angle Total arc length Arc diameter 4 x 45° TBA 753 MeV -1.87 cm 110 cm 0.5/1.0 m 2.55 m 196/392 mrad 48.4 m 28.8 m

180 degree arc: charge variation Sliced hor. Emittance through arc (1/2) for 2.5 and 7.5 nC (smoothing on)

180 degree arc: charge variation Charge & elegant parameter variation for arc (1/2) varied parameters: Npart Nkicks smoothing

Full Linac: Twiss Parameters (black = hor. beta, red = vert. beta, blue = hor. disp)

Linac Start-to End simulations: current distribution & long Linac Start-to End simulations: current distribution & long. phase space

Linac Start-to End simulations: hor. emittance & energy spread

CSR microbunch instability ???: smoothing on/off csr fields depends on dl/ds -> stat. fluctuations can cause artificial dens. modulation with (red, sg_hw=16, bins = 1000, 100k) and without (black) smoothing of charge density

CSR microbunch instability ???: smoothing on/off with (left, sg_hw=16, bins = 1000, 100k) and without (right) smoothing of charge density

CSR microbunch instability ???: smoothing on/off momentum distribution with (left, sg_hw=16, bins = 1000, 100k) and without (right) smoothing of charge density colors: histogram with 200 (red) and 2000 (black) bins, normalized

CSR microbunch instability ??? Long. Phase Space without smoothing: dependency of the number of tracked particles (black: 100k = ref, red 500k, blue 2500k)

CSR microbunch instability ??? momentum distribution: Npart dependency with no smoothing for 500k (left) and 2500k (right)

CSR microbunch instability: cure with laser heater ? Laser Heater for (sliced) energy spread increase: does not fully solve the problem (Npart) 1.5 MW 60 MW Laser power: 300 kW

CSR microbunch instability: cure with laser heater ? momentum distribution: with Laser heater (1500 kW)

Tolerance studies Most sensitive parameters: energy spread (FEL’s in general) energy + arrival time (HGHG & seeding) Single error injector simulations: long. phase space at booster module end for: ± 2.5 ps timing jitter (blue), ±1 MV/m gun amplitude (red) and ±5° gun phase errors (green), reference curve (black). variations of final long. phase space (high energy beamline) due to energy (top) and timing (bottom) jitters from injector.

Tolerance studies tolerance budget Injector end (booster mod. end) Linac end (begin of high energy FEL undulator section)