Action item 2 Japan EVS-GTR IWG#17.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Progress Report on TF5 test items. 2 1.Status update on TF5 2.Summary 3. Next step activity Content.
Advertisements

REPORT TO GRPE 71 ST SESSION EVE IWG 1 Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG) Informal document GRPE st GRPE, 8-12 June 2015, agenda.
Head Restraint GTR Status to AC th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item II
EVS-GTR TF5 Update Progress TF5 task force – thermal propagation 2015/6/4.
Progress report of TFG 7 “Fire resistance test” Mar 18, 2015 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute (KATRI)
Korean Research Results “Fire resistance test” June 2, 2015 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute (KATRI)
Republic of Korea Ministry of Construction and Transportation Republic of KOREA Overall Status of Recent UN/ECE/WP29 Sessions
Related Illustration on thermal propagation Prof. Xiao Chengwei (TF5 team leader) 2015/06/03.
for Thermal Propagation
Page June 2015 OICA position on venting EVSTF-04-11e.
TF5 – Status report on thermal propagation EVS-GTR 9 th IWG meeting Changchun, China 2015/9/17.
Progress report of TFG 7 “Fire resistance test” Mar 19, 2015 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute (KATRI)
1 Discussion paper on Current Status on TF5 test items Xiao Chengwei.
OICA views on “Thermal Propagation” 1 9 December 2015 OICA EVSTF-06-04e.
Progress report of TFG 7 “Fire resistance test” (rev.1) Nov 19, 2014 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute.
EVS-GTR TF5 Update Progress
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 14/09/
1 GRPE Informal Working Group on Heavy Duty Hybrids UNITED NATIONS Report to GRPE 65 Geneva, 17 January 2013 Informal document No. GRPE (65th GRPE,
Proposal of the Informal Working Group on Head Restraints GTR Phase 2 JAPAN Informal document No. GRSP (43rd GRSP, May 2008, agenda item.
Progress report of TFG 7 “Fire resistance test” Mar. 3rd, 2016 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute.
Task Force 1: Protection against Water February 29th , 2016.
Review of EVS 9 th Meeting 1> TF8 catch an agreement on the definition of heavy duty electric vehicles as below: heavy vehicles cover the vehicles belong.
TF#4 – Mechanical Integrity Approved Japanese proposal for addition of vehicle mechanical protection structure into mechanical integrity requirement. EVS-11-17e.
Task Force 8: Heavy Duty Vehicles
TC22 SC37 WG3 Liaison Report for EVS-GTR Thermal Propagation Work Item
Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation Phase 1
JRC comments and questions in advance EVS Canada EVS GTR IWG Session #14 Ottawa, September 2017.
Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation
Co-Sponsors: China, Japan, EU and US 59th Session GRSP May 9-13, 2016
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)
Informal document GRPE-73-21
OICA WP29 Informal Group on IWVTA
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)
WLTP-14-15e Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-14-15e) 14th WLTP IWG 26 April 2016.
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Japan research of thermal propagation test
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
GTR EVS ‘Thermal propagation testing’ JRC Work Plan
TC22 SC37 WG3 Liaison Report for EVS-GTR Thermal Propagation Work Item
JRC comments and questions in advance EVS CATARC EVS GTR IWG Session #14 Ottawa, September 2017.
Conditions and procedures of Japan research
TF4 report (Tokyo, 2016/03/03) 1. Mechanical integrity test
Scientific Inquiry Standard B – 1.7.
Imperialism Case Studies – Assignment #2
Proposal for future maintenance of Mutual Resolution 2
Japan research of thermal propagation test
OICA Feedback on Proposed Test Procedure
Informal document GRPE-78-15
Introduction to Revision of GTR 7
Lithium Ion Battery Safety
WLTP Informal Working Group
1. Summary # items RESULTS status remarks EV_1 HEV system power
Chapter 11 Quality Control.
EVS-06-10e Progress Report on TF5 Nov. 3rd, 2014.
Japan’s response to Action item 2 EVS-GTR IWG#17.
= x 2 = = 20 4 x 5 = = 16 4 x 4 = = 18 6 x 3 = = 12 2 x 6 = 12.
JRC comments and questions in advance EVS Korea EVS GTR IWG Session #14 Ottawa, September 2017.
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
(Task 43 of the IWG Task List)
OICA Message on FE Workshop FE Workshop, 79th GRPE, Geneva 22 May 2019
Informal document GRPE-79-20
Discussion at 21 September 2016 IWG meeting
TF9 Meeting: Warning Light Indicator
Global Technical Regulation on Electric Vehicle Safety
Report to 178th WP.29 session from the 35th IWG on DETA meeting
OICA Comments to GRE/2017/17 and GRE/2017/22
TF5: Cell/module/system test
TF1 Meeting content Open issues of EVS 10th meeting
Supplemental material on TF5 Japan comments
Presentation transcript:

Action item 2 Japan EVS-GTR IWG#17

Key messages To answer action item2, “(A) Is thermal propagation due to an internal short single cell thermal runaway a problem in the field?” and “(B) Simulation of a single cell thermal runaway” are important in order to continue research. Simulate “Internal short circuit caused by cell manufacturing failure” in this test. If there are other causes which may lead to thermal propagation, necessary to set new test which simulates these, not include these in thermal propagation test. Need to investigate the method which can simulate “Internal short circuit caused by cell manufacturing failure”. Action Items Responsibility Due 2  All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research. ALL China, EC, Japan, US, Canada, Korea, OICA 12/01/18

Action item2 in IWG#16 (A) and (B) are preconditions of this test. Need to decide first. Questions Note (A) Is thermal propagation due to an internal short single cell thermal runaway a problem in the field? Preconditions of this test. Necessary to decide first. (B) Simulation of a single cell thermal runaway (C) Elimination of Detection and Intervention Technologies Depends on (B). Need to decide (B) first. (D) Ignition of vented gases and other risks No conflict (E) Evaluation Criteria Important but no conflict (F) Repeatability and Reproducibility Depends on test method. Test method will be decided based on (B). (G) Manipulation of test-device (H) Specifics of initiation methods and environmental conditions (I) Re-testing and re-homologation Same as other tests (J) Documentation requirements