Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages (August 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Growth and Morphology of Escherichia coli: Experiments and Stochastic Model  Pradeep Kumar, Albert Libchaber  Biophysical.
Advertisements

Volume 112, Issue 10, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Arikta Biswas, Amal Alex, Bidisha Sinha  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Characterizing Cell Adhesion by Using Micropipette Aspiration
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Force-Clamp Analysis Techniques Give Highest Rank to Stretched Exponential Unfolding Kinetics in Ubiquitin  Herbert Lannon, Eric Vanden-Eijnden, J. Brujic 
Bipedal Locomotion in Crawling Cells
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
M. Maraldi, C. Valero, K. Garikipati  Biophysical Journal 
SAXS versus FRET: A Matter of Heterogeneity?
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet Movement
Shijie He, Chenglin Liu, Xiaojun Li, Shaopeng Ma, Bo Huo, Baohua Ji 
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (August 2017)
Dynamics of the Serine Chemoreceptor in the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane: A High- Speed Single-Molecule Tracking Study  Dongmyung Oh, Yang Yu, Hochan.
Metastatic State of Cancer Cells May Be Indicated by Adhesion Strength
Susanne Karsch, Deqing Kong, Jörg Großhans, Andreas Janshoff 
MunJu Kim, Katarzyna A. Rejniak  Biophysical Journal 
Nanopore Sequencing: Forcing Improved Resolution
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Tianhui Maria Ma, J. Scott VanEpps, Michael J. Solomon 
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Jai A. Pathak, Rumi R. Sologuren, Rojaramani Narwal 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
Raft Formation in Lipid Bilayers Coupled to Curvature
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Aida Ebrahimi, Laszlo N. Csonka, Muhammad A. Alam  Biophysical Journal 
Cholesterol Depletion Mimics the Effect of Cytoskeletal Destabilization on Membrane Dynamics of the Serotonin1A Receptor: A zFCS Study  Sourav Ganguly,
Traction Forces of Neutrophils Migrating on Compliant Substrates
Cell Traction Forces Direct Fibronectin Matrix Assembly
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
V. Vetri, G. Ossato, V. Militello, M.A. Digman, M. Leone, E. Gratton 
Stefan Nehls, Andreas Janshoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
K. Venkatesan Iyer, S. Pulford, A. Mogilner, G.V. Shivashankar 
Will J. Eldridge, Zachary A. Steelman, Brianna Loomis, Adam Wax 
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Hung-Yu Chang, Xuejin Li, George Em Karniadakis  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetics of Surface-Driven Self-Assembly and Fatigue-Induced Disassembly of a Virus- Based Nanocoating  Alejandro Valbuena, Mauricio G. Mateu  Biophysical.
Interbeat Interval Modulation in the Sinoatrial Node as a Result of Membrane Current Stochasticity—A Theoretical and Numerical Study  Hila Dvir, Sharon.
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Physical Modeling of Dynamic Coupling between Chromosomal Loci
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Leukocyte Rolling on P-Selectin: A Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Effect of Cytoplasmic Viscosity  Damir B. Khismatullin, George A. Truskey 
Blocking of Single α-Hemolysin Pore by Rhodamine Derivatives
Cell Growth and Size Homeostasis in Silico
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 108, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Quantification of Fluorophore Copy Number from Intrinsic Fluctuations during Fluorescence Photobleaching  Chitra R. Nayak, Andrew D. Rutenberg  Biophysical.
Hydrodynamic Determinants of Cell Necrosis and Molecular Delivery Produced by Pulsed Laser Microbeam Irradiation of Adherent Cells  Jonathan L. Compton,
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Inherent Force-Dependent Properties of β-Cardiac Myosin Contribute to the Force- Velocity Relationship of Cardiac Muscle  Michael J. Greenberg, Henry Shuman,
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Ai Kia Yip, Pei Huang, Keng-Hwee Chiam  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Dmitry A. Fedosov, Bruce Caswell, George Em Karniadakis 
Border Forces and Friction Control Epithelial Closure Dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages 671-678 (August 2017) Temporal Variation in Single-Cell Power-Law Rheology Spans the Ensemble Variation of Cell Population  PingGen Cai, Ryosuke Takahashi, Kaori Kuribayashi-Shigetomi, Agus Subagyo, Kazuhisa Sueoka, John M. Maloney, Krystyn J. Van Vliet, Takaharu Okajima  Biophysical Journal  Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages 671-678 (August 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.025 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematics of the AFM force modulation of G∗ of a single cell fluctuating in time (a) and the time-lapse measurement of single cells placed in square-shaped regions without cell-cell contact (b). The force modulation was examined at the center of the square region with a time interval of 80 s. The untreated cells were measured at the center of the square regions, and the same single cells were measured at the same locations after cytoD treatment. (c) Given here is an overlay of the phase contrast image of NIH3T3 cells cultured on the micropatterned substrate and the fluorescence image of the cell nuclei. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 671-678DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.025) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Time course of G′ (a) and G″ (b) of NIH3T3 cells cultured in the square regions at different frequencies during the untreated condition (0–80 min) and the cytoD-treated condition (100–180 min) in which the cell was incubated for a period of 80–100 min after addition of cytoD at 80 min. The measurement frequency corresponds to 180, 150, 100, 50, 25, 10, 5, and 3 Hz from the upper to lower data plots. (c) Given here is the time course of G″/G′ at a frequency of 10 Hz. (d) Given here is the autocorrelation function of log G′, clog G′(t) (n = 8), at f = 180 Hz for the untreated cells. The solid line represents the fitted result from the stretched exponential function, Eq. 8. The relaxation time τ (e) and stretching exponent β (f) of clog G∗(t) for untreated cells is given as a function of frequency. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 671-678DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.025) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Temporal distributions of G′ (left) and G″ (right) moduli of a single NIH3T3 cell measured at the cell center under untreated (blue) and cytoD-treated (red) conditions at different frequencies: (a) 3, (b) 50, and (c) 180 Hz. The solid lines represent the fitted results of untreated and treated cells using a log-normal distribution function. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 671-678DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.025) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Frequency dependencies of G∗¯(G′¯ (a) and G″¯ (b)) of untreated (blue) and cytoD-treated (red) cells. Solid lines in (a) and (b) represent the fitted results from Eq. 4. The point where the curves of G′¯ intersect is defined as G′¯=g¯0 at f=Φ¯0. Given here are frequency dependencies of σlog G′ (c) and σlog G″ (d) of untreated (blue) and treated (red) cells. Solid lines in (c) represent the fitted results from Eq. 6. The point where the curves of σlog G′ intersect is defined as (Φ¯0, σlogg0). Solid lines in (d) represent the fitted results from Eq. S19 in Cai et al. (25). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 671-678DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.025) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Temporal distribution of log G0 (a), α (b), and log μ (c) of untreated (blue) and cytoD-treated (red) cells measured at the center location of the square region. The solid lines represent the fitted results of untreated and treated cells using a log-normal distribution function (a and c) and a normal distribution function (b). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 671-678DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.025) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 (a) Plots of σ˜logG′T, which represents σlogG′T−σlogg0T as a function of log f in untreated (blue) and cytoD-treated (red) conditions. The inset shows σ˜logG′T versus logG′¯. Solid lines represent the fitted results from Eq. 6 in (a) and Eq. 7 in the inset. (b) Given here is a comparison of inherent frequency-dependent variations σ˜logG′ for temporal (blue) and ensemble (green) experiments. The inset shows both σ˜logG′ values as a function of logG′¯. Solid lines represent the fitted results from Eq. 6 in (a) and Eq. 7 in the inset. The number of these experimental data was n = 8 cells for the temporal variation and n = 6 dishes for the ensemble variation. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 671-678DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.025) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions